Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 84 Download : 35

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Purpose – This study maps global research on the integration of Sharia principles, sustainability, and energy business models using bibliometric and systematic review approaches. It identifies publication trends, thematic structures, and scholarly contributions, showing how maqasid al-Sharia values, particularly justice, well-being, and ecological responsibility, can guide ethical and sustainable energy transitions.
Methodology – This study combines bibliometric analysis using Biblioshiny and VOSviewer with a PRISMA-based systematic review. The dataset covered 112 Scopus-indexed publications published between 2013 and 2025, with an annual growth rate of 32.77%. The analysis examined publication trends, citation patterns, author collaboration, thematic mapping, and keyword co-occurrence.
Findings – Bibliometric evidence shows that research on Sharia-driven sustainable energy business models accelerated after 2018 and peaked in 2024. Keyword co-occurrence analysis identified seven clusters: ESG governance and CSR, green innovation, climate change and green finance, renewable energy and emission reduction, financial inclusion, ethical technology, and Islamic fintech, digital finance, and energy governance. Thematic mapping positions sustainable development, environmental management, and the circular economy as basic themes, while financial technology and banking signal emerging directions.
Implications – This study supports Islamic ESG performance reporting, ethical technology, green innovation, and inclusive finance. For policymakers, it recommends regulating green sukuk, institutionalizing energy waqf, and designing incentives for renewable energy, emission reduction, and maqasid-based sustainable SDG transition pathways.
Originality – This study offers an integrative bibliometric and systematic synthesis of sustainable energy business models based on Islamic ethical values.

Keywords

Sharia principles Sustainable business models Renewable energy Bibliometric Analysis Systematic review

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Windiani Windiani, Dhofirotun Nadifah, Muhammad Saiful Hakim, Muhammad Alfarizi

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

How to Cite
Windiani, W., Nadifah, D., Hakim, M. S. ., & Alfarizi , M. . (2026). Sharia-driven sustainable business models in the energy sector: A bibliometric and systematic review. Asian Journal of Islamic Management (AJIM), 8(1), 136–157. https://doi.org/10.20885/AJIM.vol8.iss1.art8
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Abakah, E. J. A., Tiwari, A. K., Ghosh, S., & Doğan, B. (2023). Dynamic effect of Bitcoin, fintech and artificial intelligence stocks on eco-friendly assets, Islamic stocks and conventional financial markets: Another look using quantile-based approaches. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 192, 122566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122566 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122566
  2. Abdullah, N. A. I. N., Hamid, N. A., & Haron, R. (2024). Issues and challenges of sustainable finance: An experience from the Islamic banking industry. In Islamic Finance and Sustainable Development: A Global Framework for Achieving Sustainable Impact Finance (pp. 187–194). Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003468653-21 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003468653-21
  3. Ahmad, S., Wong, K. Y., & Rajoo, S. (2019). Sustainability indicators for manufacturing sectors: A literature survey and maturity analysis from the triple-bottom line perspective. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 30(2), 312–334. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-03-2018-0091 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-03-2018-0091
  4. Alam, A., Tri Ratnasari, R., Latifathul Jannah, I., & El Ashfahany, A. (2023). Development and evaluation of Islamic green financing: A systematic review of green sukuk. Environmental Economics, 14(1), 61–72. https://doi.org/10.21511/ee.14(1).2023.06 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21511/ee.14(1).2023.06
  5. Aldhaheri, W. (2025). Islamic green finance: Sharia-compliant pathways towards sustainable development goals (SDGs). Open Journal of Applied Sciences, 15(05), 1294–1309. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojapps.2025.155090 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ojapps.2025.155090
  6. AlNuaimi, B. K., Singh, S. K., & Harney, B. (2021). Unpacking the role of innovation capability: Exploring the impact of leadership style on green procurement via a natural resource-based perspective. Journal of Business Research, 134, 78–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.05.026 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.05.026
  7. Alonso-Martinez, D., De Marchi, V., & Di Maria, E. (2021). The sustainability performances of sustainable business models. Journal of Cleaner Production, 323, 129145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129145 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129145
  8. Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
  9. Asif, M. (2022). Sustainable energy transition in the 21st century. In Handbook of Energy and Environmental Security (pp. 27–38). Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-824084-7.00023-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-824084-7.00023-0
  10. Awais, M., Öztürk, A. O., Bhatti, O. K., & Ellahi, N. (2024). The Islamic economic system: Cultural context in a global economy. Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003484349 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003484349
  11. Ayaz, G., & Zahid, M. (2024). Trends, shifts and future prospects of sustainable finance research: A bibliometric analysis. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 15(5), 1094–1117. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-06-2022-0340 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-06-2022-0340
  12. Azad, S., Tulasi Devi, S. L., & Mishra, A. K. (2024). Investing in our planet: Examining retail investors’ preference for green bond investment. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(6), 5151–5173. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3743 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3743
  13. Aziz, J. A., & Suryanto, T. (2024). Is an Islamic economic system possible without the prohibition of interest (Riba): A critical appraisal of a Shari’ah compliant economic system as envisioned by Sjafruddin Prawiranegara (1911-1989) in Indonesia. Manchester Journal of Transnational Islamic Law and Practice, 20(4), 39–52.
  14. Bankel, A., & Mignon, I. (2022). Solar business models from a firm perspective: An empirical study of the Swedish market. Energy Policy, 166, 113013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113013
  15. Batool, A., Shabbir, R., Abrar, M., & Bilal, A. R. (2023). Do fear and perceived knowledge of Covid-19 drive sustainable consumption behaviour in Muslims? The mediating role of religiosity. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 14(7), 1645–1668. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-08-2021-0258 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-08-2021-0258
  16. Berrich, O., Mafakheri, F., & Dabbou, H. (2024). Renewable energy transition and the Paris Agreement: How governance quality makes a difference? Energies, 17(17), 4238. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17174238 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en17174238
  17. Bhuyan, A., Sanguri, K., & Sharma, H. (2021). Improving the keyword co-occurrence analysis: An integrated semantic similarity approach. In 2021 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM) (pp. 482–487). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEM50564.2021.9673030 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEM50564.2021.9673030
  18. Bibri, S. E., Huang, J., Omar, O., & Kenawy, I. (2025). Synergistic integration of digital twins and zero energy buildings for climate change mitigation in sustainable smart cities: A systematic review and novel framework. Energy and Buildings, 333, 115484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2025.115484 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2025.115484
  19. Bidmon, C. M., & Knab, S. F. (2018). The three roles of business models in societal transitions: New linkages between business model and transition research. Journal of Cleaner Production, 178, 903–916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.198 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.198
  20. Calandra, D., Wang, T., Cane, M., & Alfiero, S. (2023). Management of hydrogen mobility challenges: A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 410, 137305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137305 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137305
  21. Chapra, M. U. (2008). The Islamic vision of development in the light of Maqāṣid al-Sharīʿah. The International Institute of Islamic Thought.
  22. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
  23. Dragović, A., Zrnić, N., Dragović, B., & Dulebenets, M. A. (2024). A comprehensive review of maritime bibliometric studies (2014–2024). Ocean Engineering, 311, 118917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.118917 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.118917
  24. Dwivedi, R., Nerur, S., & Balijepally, V. (2023). Exploring artificial intelligence and big data scholarship in information systems: A citation, bibliographic coupling, and co-word analysis. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 3(2), 100185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2023.100185 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2023.100185
  25. Effendi, P. L., Wirjodirdjo, B., & Rosdaniah, S. I. (2024). A strategic framework for sustainable business model of renewable energy services. Revista de Gestao Social e Ambiental, 18(9), e05397. https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v18n9-037 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v18n9-037
  26. El Khoury, R., Nasrallah, N., & Alareeni, B. (2023). ESG and financial performance of banks in the MENAT region: Concavity–convexity patterns. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 13(1), 406–430. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2021.1929807 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2021.1929807
  27. Endri, E., Tahya Hania, B., & Ma’ruf, A. (2022). Corporate green sukuk issuance for sustainable financing in Indonesia. Environmental Economics, 13(1), 38–49. https://doi.org/10.21511/ee.13(1).2022.04 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21511/ee.13(1).2022.04
  28. Faizi, F., Kusuma, A. S., & Widodo, P. (2024). Islamic green finance: Mapping the climate funding landscape in Indonesia. International Journal of Ethics and Systems, 40(4), 711–733. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOES-08-2023-0189 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOES-08-2023-0189
  29. Fodol, M. Z., & Aslan, H. (2025). Mapping the evolution of Islamic finance for sustainability: A bibliometric analysis. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-08-2024-0926 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-08-2024-0926
  30. Fuso Nerini, F., Tomei, J., To, L. S., Bisaga, I., Parikh, P., Black, M., Borrion, A., Spataru, C., Castán Broto, V., Anandarajah, G., Milligan, B., & Mulugetta, Y. (2017). Mapping synergies and trade-offs between energy and the sustainable development goals. Nature Energy, 3(1), 10–15. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-017-0036-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-017-0036-5
  31. Ghorbani, B. D. (2024). Bibliometrix: Science mapping analysis with R Biblioshiny based on Web of Science in applied linguistics. In A Scientometrics Research Perspective in Applied Linguistics (pp. 197–234). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-51726-6_8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-51726-6_8
  32. Harahap, B., Risfandy, T., & Futri, I. N. (2023). Islamic law, Islamic finance, and sustainable development goals: A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 15(8), 6626. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086626 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086626
  33. Hartanto, A., Nachrowi, N. D., Samputra, P. L., & Huda, N. (2024). A bibliometric analysis of Islamic banking sustainability: A study based on Scopus scientific database. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 15(9), 2245–2285. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-04-2023-0123 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-04-2023-0123
  34. Issa, S. O., Alabi, A. T., & Ubandawaki, A. T. (2025). Climate change governance, Sharia governance quality, and financed emission mitigation: Evidence from Islamic banks in Southeast and West Asia. Borsa Istanbul Review, 25(4), 722–732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2025.03.011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2025.03.011
  35. Izadikhah, M., & Saen, R. F. (2016). A new preference voting method for sustainable location planning using geographic information system and data envelopment analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 137, 1347–1367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.021
  36. Jamali, D., & Karam, C. (2018). Corporate social responsibility in developing countries as an emerging field of study. International Journal of Management Reviews, 20(1), 32–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12112 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12112
  37. Kemeç, A., & Altınay, A. T. (2023). Sustainable energy research trend: A bibliometric analysis using VOSviewer, RStudio Bibliometrix, and CiteSpace software tools. Sustainability, 15(4), 3618. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043618 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043618
  38. Khan, S. (2022). Barriers of big data analytics for smart cities development: A context of emerging economies. International Journal of Management Science and Engineering Management, 17(2), 123–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/17509653.2021.1997662 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17509653.2021.1997662
  39. Khan, S. A. R., Jian, C., Zhang, Y., Golpîra, H., Kumar, A., & Sharif, A. (2019). Environmental, social and economic growth indicators spur logistics performance: From the perspective of South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 214, 1011–1023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.322 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.322
  40. Khan, S., Kaushik, M. K., Kumar, R., & Khan, W. (2023). Investigating the barriers of blockchain technology integrated food supply chain: A BWM approach. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 30(3), 713–735. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-08-2021-0489 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-08-2021-0489
  41. Kismawadi, E. R., Irfan, M., Haron, R., & Masitah, M. (2024). Bridging finance and sustainability: Islamic financial institutions’ contributions to the transition to sustainable energy. In Issues of Sustainability in AI and New-Age Thematic Investing (pp. 138–161). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-3282-5.ch009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-3282-5.ch009
  42. Kulevicz, R. A., Porfirio, G. E. D. O., De Oliveira, O. S., Zavala Zavala, A. A., Silva, B. A. D., & Constantino, M. (2020). Influence of sustainability reports on social and environmental issues: Bibliometric analysis and the word cloud approach. Environmental Reviews, 28(4), 380–386. https://doi.org/10.1139/er-2019-0075 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/er-2019-0075
  43. Kuzey, C., Uyar, A., Ellili, N. O. D., & Karaman, A. S. (2024). Corporate social responsibility performance and social reputation via corporate social responsibility awarding: Is there a threshold effect? Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 24(5), 993–1020. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-03-2023-0128 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-03-2023-0128
  44. Mohd Zain, F. A., Muhamad, S. F., Abdullah, H., Sheikh Ahmad Tajuddin, S. A. F., & Wan Abdullah, W. A. (2024). Integrating environmental, social and governance (ESG) principles with maqasid al-Sharia: A blueprint for sustainable Takaful operations. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 17(3), 461–484. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-11-2023-0422
  45. Morshed, A. (2026). Sustainable energy revolution: Green finance as the key to the Arab Gulf States’ future. International Journal of Energy Sector Management, 20(2), 556–577. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJESM-10-2024-0007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJESM-10-2024-0007
  46. Muhammad, H. A., Asim, M., Imran, M., Khan, Z. A., Wilberforce, T., & Baik, Y.-J. (2022). Renewable energy systems. In Handbook of Energy Transition (pp. 63–94). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003315353-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003315353-6
  47. Mukherjee, D., Lim, W. M., Kumar, S., & Donthu, N. (2022). Guidelines for advancing theory and practice through bibliometric research. Journal of Business Research, 148, 101–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.04.042 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.04.042
  48. Muñoz-Leiva, F., Viedma-del-Jesús, M. I., Sánchez-Fernández, J., & López-Herrera, A. G. (2012). An application of co-word analysis and bibliometric maps for detecting the most highlighting themes in the consumer behaviour research from a longitudinal perspective. Quality & Quantity, 46(4), 1077–1095. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-011-9565-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-011-9565-3
  49. Oseni, A. A., Bamiro, N. B., Ashafa, S. A., & Olohunlana, S. D. (2025). Sustainable halal financing framework for blue and green economy. In Green and Blue Economy Frameworks for Halal Industry Sustainability (pp. 253–273). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-1729-6_14 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-1729-6_14
  50. Prayogo, S. M. S., Raditya, A., & Sarea, A. (2024). A bibliometric analysis of green sukuk literature. Review of Islamic Social Finance and Entrepreneurship, 3(2), 184–198. https://doi.org/10.20885/RISFE.vol3.iss2.art6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20885/RISFE.vol3.iss2.art6
  51. Proka, A., Beers, P. J., & Loorbach, D. (2018). Transformative business models for sustainability transitions. In CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance (pp. 19–39). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73503-0_2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73503-0_2
  52. Qureshi, M. A., Khaskheli, A., Qureshi, J. A., Raza, S. A., & Khan, K. A. (2023). Factors influencing green purchase behavior among millennials: The moderating role of religious values. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 14(6), 1417–1437. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-06-2020-0174 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-06-2020-0174
  53. Rahim, R., Rathore, H. S., Rabbani, M. R., & Alam, M. N. (2024). Maqasid al-Sharia and green finance: A theoretical framework on Islamic finance with sustainable development goals for a greener future. In International Conference on Sustainable Islamic Business and Finance (SIBF) (pp. 255–261). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/SIBF63788.2024.10883847 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/SIBF63788.2024.10883847
  54. Ren, X., Li, Y., Yan, C., Wen, F., & Lu, Z. (2022). The interrelationship between the carbon market and the green bonds market: Evidence from wavelet quantile-on-quantile method. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 179, 121611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121611 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121611
  55. Salman, M., Long, X., Dauda, L., & Mensah, C. N. (2019). The impact of institutional quality on economic growth and carbon emissions: Evidence from Indonesia, South Korea and Thailand. Journal of Cleaner Production, 241, 118331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118331 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118331
  56. Sedighi, M. (2015). Using of co-word analysis method in mapping of the structure of scientific fields (case study: The field of Informetrics). Journal of Information Processing and Management, 31(1), 40–59. https://doi.org/10.35050/JIPM010.2015.040
  57. Shaikh, A. K., Ahmad, N., Khan, I., & Ali, S. (2021). E-participation within e-government: A bibliometric-based systematic literature review. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 17(4), 15–39. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEGR.2021100102 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEGR.2021100102
  58. Sharma, G. S., Chintalapati, N., & Verma, P. (2024). A bibliometric analysis of social media use for personal learning outcomes using Biblioshiny & VOSviewer. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-024-02599-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-024-02599-y
  59. Shinde, S. S., Khandare, N. B., Kale, G. M., & Nalbalwar, S. L. (2025). Transforming industries with green business models: Strategic management approaches to sustainable energy and technology. In 2025 International Conference in Advances in Power, Signal, and Information Technology (APSIT) (pp. 1–6). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/APSIT63993.2025.11086153 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/APSIT63993.2025.11086153
  60. Singh, K., & Vashishtha, S. (2023). Relationship trend of energy consumption and economic growth studies: A global examination based on bibliometric and visualization analysis. International Journal of Energy Sector Management, 17(2), 310–332. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJESM-06-2021-0022 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJESM-06-2021-0022
  61. Sivanandan, P., & Ahmad, R. (2025). Ethical investment in Islamic finance: The role of ESG toward sustainable growth. In Islamic Finance and Corporate Governance: Synergies for Sustainable Growth (pp. 43–56). Emerald Group Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83662-346-520251006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83662-346-520251006
  62. Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
  63. Socol, A., & Iuga, I. C. (2025). Does democracy matter in banking performance? Exploring the linkage between democracy, economic freedom and banking performance in the European Union member states. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 30(1), 86–116. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.2911 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.2911
  64. Suki, N. M., Sharif, A., Afshan, S., & Suki, N. M. (2020). Revisiting the environmental Kuznets curve in Malaysia: The role of globalization in sustainable environment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 264, 121669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121669 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121669
  65. Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
  66. Vanegas Cantarero, M. M. (2020). Of renewable energy, energy democracy, and sustainable development: A roadmap to accelerate energy transition in developing countries. Energy Research & Social Science, 70, 101716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101716 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101716
  67. Vetrova, M., Solovey, T., Arenkov, I., & Ivanova, D. (2024). Value-based vs pragmatic approach to the sustainable development of energy sector companies in the context of Industry 5.0. In A. Appolloni, V. Kumar, A. Appolloni, E. Kuzmin, & V. Akberdina (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation (Vol. 70, pp. 104–120). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-66801-2_8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-66801-2_8
  68. Zafar, M. B., & Sulaiman, A. A. (2020). Measuring corporate social responsibility in Islamic banking: What matters? International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 13(3), 357–388. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-05-2019-0227 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-05-2019-0227
  69. Zainal, F. A., Muhamad, S. F., Abdullah, H., Sheikh Ahmad Tajuddin, S. A. F., & Wan Abdullah, W. A. (2024). Integrating environmental, social and governance (ESG) principles with maqasid Al-Sharia: A blueprint for sustainable Takaful operations. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 17(3), 461–484. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-11-2023-0422 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-11-2023-0422
  70. Zhou, G., Liu, L., & Luo, S. (2022). Sustainable development, ESG performance and company market value: Mediating effect of financial performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(7), 3371–3387. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3089 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3089
  71. Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629