Article Sidebar

Submitted
April 11, 2025
Accepted
December 9, 2025
Published
December 31, 2025
Download
Statistic
Read Counter : 26

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study documents fact-checkers' priority of political agenda in Indian and Pakistani government-run fact-checking. Government fact-checkers in both countries debunked the issues critical of the government and set the political discourse in the two South Asian countries. This research also shows that Indian and Pakistani fact-checkers' interest areas are confined to issues related to politics, entertainment, sports, health, religion, economics, and international affairs.

Keywords

fact-checking south asia pakistan india journalism

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Ahmed Shatil Alam, Umer Bilal, Mohammad Zahid Hossain

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
How to Cite
Alam, A. S., Bilal, U. ., & Zahid Hossain, M. (2025). Arbiters of Truth: Government Fact-checking in the South Asia . Asian Journal of Media and Communication, 9(1). Retrieved from https://journal.uii.ac.id/AJMC/article/view/39761
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
  2. Braun, V. (2009). Selling the “perfect” vulva. Cosmetic surgery: A feminist primer, 133-149.
  3. Amazeen, M. A. (2015). Revisiting the epistemology of fact-checking. Critical Review, 27(1), 1-22.
  4. Cronk, B. C. (2016). How to use IBM SPSS statistics: A step-by-step guide to analysis and interpretation. Routledge.
  5. Dragomir, M. (2018). Control the money, control the media: How government uses funding to keep media in line. Journalism, 19(8), 1131-1148.
  6. Fact Checker MoIB [@FactCheckerMoIB]. (n.d.). Tweets [Twitter profile]. Twitter. Retrieved February 13, 2022, from https://twitter.com/FactCheckerMoIB
  7. Freedom House. (2022, February 23a). Pakistan: Freedom in the world 2022 country report. Retrieved February 14, 2023, from https://freedomhouse.org/country/pakistan/freedom-world/2022
  8. Freedom House. (2022, February 23b). Bangladesh: Freedom in the world 2022 country report. Retrieved February 14, 2023, from https://freedomhouse.org/country/bangladesh/freedom-world/2022
  9. Freedom House. (2022, February 23c). India: Freedom in the world 2022 country report. Retrieved February 14, 2023, from https://freedomhouse.org/country/india/freedom-world/2022
  10. Funke, D. (2018, May 30). How to fact-check politics in countries with no press freedom. Poynter. Retrieved from https://www.poynter.org/fact-checking/2018/how-to-fact-check-politics-in-countries-with-no-press-freedom/
  11. Graves L (2016) Deciding What’s True: The Rise of Political Fact-Checking in American Journalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
  12. Graves, L. (2017). Anatomy of a fact check: Objective practice and the contested epistemology of fact checking. Communication, Culture & Critique, 10(3), 518-537.
  13. Graves, L. (2018). Boundaries not drawn: Mapping the institutional roots of the global fact-checking movement. Journalism Studies, 19(5), 613-631.
  14. Haque, M. M., Yousuf, M., Arman, Z., Main Uddin Rony, M., Alam, A. S., Hasan, K. M, Islam, K. & Hassan, N. (2018). Fact-checking Initiatives in Bangladesh, India, and Nepal: A Study of User Engagement and Challenges. arXiv e-prints, arXiv-1811.
  15. Jahangir, R. (2021, November 28). Pro-government ‘fact checkers’ are vilifying Pakistani journalists. Coda Story. Retrieved May 10, 2023, from https://www.codastory.com/authoritarian-tech/pakistan-harassment-journalists/
  16. Kieran, M (2000). The Regulatory and Ethical Framework for Investigative Journalism. Hugo de Burgh (Ed.), Investigative Journalism. Context and Practice.
  17. Locke, J. (1988). Two Treaties of Government. Cambridge University Press.
  18. McQuail, D. (1992). Media Performance, Mass Communication, and The Public Interest. London: Sage Publication.
  19. Mena, P. (2019). Principles and boundaries of fact-checking: Journalists’ perceptions. Journalism Practice, 13(6), 657-672.
  20. Nieminen, S., & Rapeli, L. (2019). Fighting Misperceptions and Doubting Journalists’ Objectivity: A Review of Fact-checking Literature. Political Studies Review, 17(3), 296-309. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478929918786852
  21. Nyhan B, Porter E, Reifler J, et al. (2020) Taking fact-checks literally but not seriously? The effects of journalistic fact-checking on factual beliefs and candidate favorability. Political Behavior 42(3): 939–960.
  22. PIB Fact Check [@PIBFactCheck]. (n.d.). Tweets [Twitter profile]. Twitter. Retrieved February 13, 2022, from https://twitter.com/PIBFactCheck
  23. Schuldt, L. (2021). Official truths in a war on fake news: Governmental fact-checking in Malaysia, Singapore, and Thailand. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 40(2), 340-371.
  24. Smalley, S. (2022, July 7). Fact checker detained in India for allegedly inflaming religious strife. Poynter. Retrieved February 14, 2023, from https://www.poynter.org/fact-checking/2022/fact-checker-mohammed-zubair-arrested-india-religion/
  25. Stromback, J. (2005). In Search of a Standard: four Models of Democracy and Their Normative Implications for Journalism. Journalism Studies, Volume 6.
  26. Thomas-Meyer, M., Mytton, O., & Adams, J. (2017). Public responses to proposals for a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages: a thematic analysis of online reader comments posted on major UK news websites. PloS one, 12(11), e0186750.
  27. Unit, E. I. (2023). Democracy index 2022
  28. Uscinski, J. E. (2015). The epistemology of fact checking (is still naìve): Rejoinder to Amazeen. Critical Review, 27(2), 243-252.
  29. Uscinski, J. E., & Butler, R. W. (2013). The epistemology of fact checking. Critical Review, 25(2), 162-180.
  30. Vinhas, O., & Bastos, M. (2024). When Fact-Checking Is Not WEIRD: Negotiating Consensus Outside Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, and Democratic Countries. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 0(0).https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612231221801
  31. Walker, C., & Orttung, R. W. (2014). Breaking the news: The role of state-run media. Journal of Democracy, 25(1), 71-85.
  32. Young, D. G., Jamieson, K. H., Poulsen, S., & Goldring, A. (2018). Fact-checking effectiveness as a function of format and tone: Evaluating FactCheck. org and FlackCheck. org. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 95(1), 49-75.
  33. Zaller, J.(2003). A New Standard of News Quality: Burglar Alarms for the monitorial citizen. Political Communication 20(2).
  34. Zeng, J., Burgess, J., & Bruns, A. (2019). Is citizen journalism better than professional journalism for fact-checking rumours in China? How Weibo users verified information following the 2015 Tianjin blasts. Global media and China, 4(1), 13-35.