Article Sidebar

Submitted
October 23, 2025
Accepted
December 28, 2025
Published
December 31, 2025
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 65 Download : 4

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study examines how visual bias is articulated in local digital journalism by analysing Radar Cirebon’s Instagram coverage during the 2024 mayoral election in Cirebon, Indonesia. Employing a qualitative content analysis, eighty-two Instagram posts published during the official campaign period were examined using Denis McQuail’s framework of media performance, focusing on presentational features such as personalization, dramatization, stereotyping, juxtaposition, and accuracy. The findings reveal a consistent pattern of visual and textual alignment that favoured the media owner–affiliated candidate, expressed through evaluative captions, aesthetic personalization, and emotionally charged imagery. Rather than manifesting through explicit misinformation, bias operated at the level of representation and interpretation, shaped by both ownership structures and the platform logic of Instagram. Situated within debates on platformization and the political economy of media, the study highlights the particular vulnerability of local journalism in Indonesia, where close proximity between media ownership and political actors can blur editorial boundaries in digital contexts. By repositioning McQuail’s media performance framework within platform-based journalism, this research contributes to visual communication scholarship and underscores the need for stronger ethical safeguards to protect editorial independence in local digital media ecosystems.

Keywords

digital journalism Instagram local journalism media ownership visual bias platformization

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Akhmad Muzadi Muzadi

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
How to Cite
Muzadi, A. . (2025). Visual Bias in Indonesian Platform-Based Journalism: Media Ownership and Instagram Coverage in Radar Cirebon. Asian Journal of Media and Communication, 9(2), 137–152. https://doi.org/10.20885/asjmc.vol9.iss2.art4
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Aalberg, T., Strömbäck, J., & De Vreese, C. H. (2012). The framing of politics as strategy and game: A review of concepts, operationalizations and key findings. Journalism, 13(2), 162–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884911427799
  2. Al-Rawi, A., Al-Musalli, A., & Fakida, A. (2021). News values on Instagram: A comparative study of international news. Journalism and Media, 2(2), 305–320. https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia2020018
  3. Aspinall, E., & Berenschot, W. (2019). Democracy for Sale: Elections, Clientelism, and the State in Indonesia. Cornell University Press.
  4. Baker, C. E. (2007). Media Concentration and Democracy: Why Ownership Matters. Cambridge University Press.
  5. Bucher, T. (2018). If... then: Algorithmic Power and Politics. Oxford University Press.
  6. Carlson, M. (2015). Introduction: The many boundaries of journalism. In M. Carlson & S. C. Lewis (eds.), Boundaries of Journalism: Professionalism, Practices and Participation. Routledge.
  7. Coleman, S. (1999). The new media and democratic politics. New Media & Society, 1(1), 67–74. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444899001001011
  8. Cotter, K. (2023). “Shadowbanning is not a thing”: Black box gaslighting and the power to independently know and credibly critique algorithms. Information Communication and Society, 26(6), 1226–1243. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.1994624
  9. Deuze, M. (2008). The changing context of news work: Liquid journalism and monitorial citizenship. International Journal of Communication, 2(1), 848–865.
  10. Durán, C., & Urzúa, P. (1978). On the ideological role of Mercurio in Chilean society. LARU Studies, 2(3), 45–64.
  11. Enli, G. (2017). Twitter as arena for the authentic outsider: Exploring the social media campaigns of Trump and Clinton in the 2016 US presidential election. European Journal of Communication, 32(1), 50–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323116682802
  12. Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
  13. Entman, R. M. (2007). Framing bias: Media in the distribution of power. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 163–173. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00336.x
  14. Esser, F., & Strömbäck, J. (2014). Mediatization of politics: Towards a theoretical framework. In F. Esser & J. Strömbäck (eds.), Mediatization of Politics: Understanding the Transformation of Western Democracies (pp. 3–28). Palgrave Macmillan.
  15. Ferreira, C. H. G., Murai, F., Silva, A. P. C., Almeida, J. M., Trevisan, M., Vassio, L., Mellia, M., & Drago, I. (2021). On the dynamics of political discussions on Instagram: A network perspective. Online Social Networks and Media, 25, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.osnem.2021.100155
  16. Freedman, D. (2014). The Contradictions of Media Power. Bloomsbury Publishing.
  17. Grabe, M. E., & Bucy, E. P. (2009). Image Bite Politics: News and the Visual Framing of Elections. Oxford University Press.
  18. Guo, M., & Sun, F. S. (2023). Local television news on Instagram: Exploring the effects of news values and post features on audience engagement. International Journal on Media Management, 25(1–2), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/14241277.2023.2204528
  19. Hanitzsch, T., Van Dalen, A., & Steindl, N. (2018). Caught in the nexus: A comparative and longitudinal analysis of public trust in the press. International Journal of Press/Politics, 23(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161217740695
  20. Herman, E. S., & Chomsky, N. (1988). Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media. Pantheon Books.
  21. Hermida, A. (2010). Twittering the news: The emergence of ambient journalism. Journalism Practice, 4(3), 297–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512781003640703
  22. Jenkins, H. (2008). Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. New York University Press.
  23. Kreiss, D. (2016). Prototype Politics: Technology-intensive Campaigning and the Data of Democracy. Oxford University Press.
  24. Krippendorff, K. (2019). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology (fourth edition). Sage Publications.
  25. Larsson, A. O. (2023). The rise of Instagram as a tool for political communication: A longitudinal study of European political parties and their followers. New Media & Society, 25(10), 2744–2762. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211034158
  26. Lim, M. (2011). Democratization & corporatization of media in Indonesia. https://merlyna.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/lim_at_crossroads_2011.pdf
  27. McChesney, R. D. (2004). The Problem of the Media: US Communication Politics in the Twenty-first Century. New York University Press.
  28. McQuail, D. (1992). Media Performance: Mass Communication and the Public Interest. Sage Publications.
  29. Nieborg, D. B., & Poell, T. (2018). The platformization of cultural production: Theorizing the contingent cultural commodity. New Media and Society, 20(11), 4275–4292. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818769694
  30. Nielsen, R. K., Newman, N., Fletcher, R., & Kalogeropoulos, A. (2023). Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2020. Retrived from: digitalnewsreport.org/2023
  31. Nugroho, Y., Putri, D. A., & Laksmi, S. (2012). Mapping the landscape of the media industry in contemporary Indonesia. https://cipg.or.id/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/MEDIA-2-Media-Industry-2012.pdf
  32. Olausson, U. (2018). The celebrified journalist: Journalistic self-promotion and branding in celebrity constructions on Twitter. Journalism Studies, 19(16), 2379–2399. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2017.1349548
  33. Parmelee, J. H., & Roman, N. (2020). Insta-echoes: Selective exposure and selective avoidance on Instagram. Telematics and Informatics, 52, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101432
  34. Perreault, G. P., & Hanusch, F. (2024). Normalizing Instagram. Digital Journalism, 12(4), 413–430. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2022.2152069
  35. Pickard, V. (2020). Restructuring democratic infrastructures: A policy approach to the journalism crisis. Digital Journalism, 8(6), 704–719. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2020.1733433
  36. Saks, J., & Hopkins, A. (2024). US regional newspapers and Instagram: A content analysis. Electronic News, 18(1), 49–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/19312431231177392
  37. Saldaña, J. (2013). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. Sage Publications.
  38. Shehata, A., & Strömbäck, J. (2021). Learning political news from social media: Network media logic and current affairs news learning in a high-choice media environment. Communication Research, 48(1), 125–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650217749354
  39. Shoemaker, P. J., & Reese, S. D. (2014). Mediating the Message in the 21st Century: A Media Sociology Perspective. Routledge.
  40. Tapsell, R. (2017). Media Power in Indonesia: Oligarchs, Citizens and the Digital Revolution. Rowman & Littlefield International.
  41. Tapsell, R. (2015). Indonesia’s media oligarchy and the ‘Jokowi phenomenon’. Indonesia, 99, 29–50. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5728/indonesia.99.0029
  42. Trevisan, M., Vassio, L., Drago, I., Mellia, M., Murai, F., Figueiredo, F., Da Silva, A. P. C., & Almeida, J. M. (2019). Towards understanding political interactions on Instagram. HT 2019 - Proceedings of the 30th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media, 247–251. https://doi.org/10.1145/3342220.3343657
  43. Van Dijck, J., Poell, T., & De Waal, M. (2018). The Platform Society: Public Values in a Connective World. Oxford University Press.
  44. Watson, J., van der Linden, S., Watson, M., & Stillwell, D. (2024). Negative online news articles are shared more to social media. Scientific Reports, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-71263-z