Main Article Content

Abstract

Chicken is one of source of animal protein which consumed by many people. Although the animal protein is needed as a source of nutrition, the product becomes a danger when contain of formalin. This study aims to determine the level of use of formaldehyde in chicken meat in Yogyakarta traditional markets and the factors associated with the incident. The samples used were 56 chickens, obtained from 11 traditional markets in Yogyakarta were chosen randomly. Each sample was tested using two reagent is phenylhydrazine and Quantofiq. Interpretation of test phenylhydrazine that is colored bluegreen solution and eventually turned into a red-orange color if the sample is positive, and yellow if it is negative. At Quantofiq test the color will be formed at the end of the detection paper, then color matched to the color table to determine levels of formaldehyde in the samples tested. The results showed that 6 (10,7%) positive samples contain of formaldehyde and analysis of Chi-Square showed that p_value = 0.045. So sales location were association with used of formaldehyde in chicken meat.

Keywords

chicken formaldehyde traditional market

Article Details

Author Biographies

Roza Azizah Primatika, Kesmavet, Fakultas Kedokteran Hewan UGM


Heru Susetya, Fakultas Kedokteran Hewan UGM

Bagian Kesmavet Fakultas Kedokteran Hewan UGM

Arselia Kartika Sari, Fakultas Kedokteran Hewan UGM

Mahasiswa Fakultas Kedokteran Hewan UGM
How to Cite
Primatika, R. A., Susetya, H., & Sari, A. K. (2015). Monitoring Penggunaan Formalin Pada Daging Ayam (Observation The Use Of Formalin In Chicken). EKSAKTA: Journal of Sciences and Data Analysis, 15(1-2), 55–60. https://doi.org/10.20885/eksakta.vol15.iss1-2.art6

References

  1. Arifin, Z., 2007, Stabilitas Formalin dalam Daging Ayam selama Penyimpanan Seminar Nasional Teknologi Peternakan danVeteriner.
  2. Aswad, M., Fatmawaty, A., Nursamsiar, dan Rahmawanti, 2011, Validasi Metode Spektrofotometri Sinar Tampak untuk Analisis Formalin dalam Tahu. SekolahTinggi Ilmu Farmasi (STIFA) Makassar 15 (1): 26-29.
  3. Bahri, S., Sani, Y., dan Indraningsih, 2006, Beberapa Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Keamanan Pangan Asal Ternak di Indonesia, Balai Penelitian Veteriner Bogor, Vol. 16 No. 1 Th 2006.
  4. Fessenden, R.J., dan Fessenden, J.S, 2007, Kimia Organik. Erlangga : Jakarta.
  5. Fraizer, W.C., danWesthoff, D.C., 1981, Food Microbiology.3rd Edition. Tata McGraw Hill Publishing Co., Ltd. New Delhi.
  6. Hastuti. S, 2010, Analisis Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif Formaldehid pada Ikan Asin di Madura, Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Trunojoyo 4 (2): 132-137.
  7. Martin S.W., Meek A.H., Willeberg P, 1987, Veterinary epidemiology, principles and methods. Ames: Iowa State University Press; p. 343.
  8. Oettingen, W.F, 1954, Poisoning A Guide to Clinical Diagnosis and Treatment, Paul B. Hoeberr, INC. Medical Book Departement of Harper and Brothers.
  9. Rahman, A., dan Sumantri, 2007, Analisis Makanan, Gadjah Mada University Press : Yogyakarta.
  10. Sanjaya, A.W., Sudarwanto, M., Soejoedono, R.R., Purnawarman, T., Lukman, D.W., dan Latif, H., 2007, Higiene Pangan Bagian Kesehatan Masyarakat Veteriner. Fakultas Kedokteran Hewan IPB. Bogor.