Article Sidebar

Download
PDF Research Instrument Data Output
Statistic
Read Counter : 1667 Download : 1193

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of organizational commitment and cost management knowledge on the relationship between budget participation and managerial performance. The data used in this study collected by distributed questionnaires to 700 managers work in manufacturing companies in Indonesia. The sample used in this study consists of 98 managers who involve in budgetary participation. Data were analyzed by using the Structural Equation Model (SEM) based Partial Least Square (PLS) with WarpPLS 6.0 software. The result of this study represent that budgetary participation has a positive effect on managerial performance and cost management knowledge moderate the relationship between budgetary participation and managerial performance, while organizational commitment has no effect on the relationship between budgetary participation and managerial performance.

Keywords

Budget participation Organizational commitment Cost management knowledge Managerial performance

Article Details

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Author Biographies

Laras Dwi Novlina, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, Indonesia

Accounting Department

Mirna Indriani, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, Indonesia

Accounting Department

Indayani indayani, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, Indonesia

Accounting Department

References

  1. Agbejule, A., & Saarikoski, L. (2006). The effect of cost management knowledge on the relationship between budgetary participation and managerial performance. The British Accounting Review, 38, 427–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2006.06.003
  2. Arifuddin, Azis, F., & Kusumawati, A. (2017). Participation and goal clarity budget to performance apparatus with commitment and cultural organization as a moderating variable. World Journal of Social Sciences, 7(2), 24–37.
  3. Blumberg, M., & Pringle, C. D. (1982). The missing opportunity in organizational research: some implications for a theory of work performance. The Academy of Management Review, 7(4), 560–569.
  4. Brink, A. G., Coats, J. C., & Rankin, F. W. (2018). Who’s the boss ? The economic and behavioral implications of various characterizations of the superior in participative budgeting research. Journal of Accounting Literature, 41, 89–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acclit.2018.03.004
  5. Brownell, P. (1982). A field study examination of budgetary participation and locus of control. The Accounting Review, 57(4), 766–777.
  6. Cheng, K., Chen, T., & Shih, N. (2014). The influence of budgetary participation by r & d managers on product innovation performances : the effect of trust , job satisfaction and information asymmetry. Asia Pacific Management Review, 19(2), 133–150. https://doi.org/10.6126/APMR.2014.19.2.02
  7. Chong, V. K., & Strauss, R. (2017). Participative budgeting : the effects of budget emphasis , information asymmetry and procedural justice on slack – additional evidence. Asia-Pacific Management Accounting Journal, 12(1).
  8. Colquitt, J. A., Lepine, J. A., & Wesson, M. J. (2017). Organizational behaviour: improving performance and commitment in workplace. fifth edition. New York: Mcgraw-Hill Education.
  9. Derfuss, K. (2015). Reconsidering the participative budgeting–performance relation: a meta-analysis regarding the impact of level of analysis, sample selection, measurement, and industry influences. The British Accounting Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2015.07.001
  10. Ernis, F., Sularso, R. A., & Wardayati, S. M. (2017). Pengaruh partisipasi anggaran terhadap kinerja manajerial melalui komitmen organisasi dan motivasi. Jurnal Bisnis Dan Manajemen, 11(2), 139–154.
  11. Farahmita, A. (2016). Job satisfaction, cost management knowledge, budgetary participation, and their impact on performance. International Research Journal of Business Studies, 9(1), 15–29.
  12. Ghozali, I., & Latan, H. (2014). Partial least squares: konsep, metode dan aplikasi menggunakan program WarpPLS 4.0 (Edition 2). Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro.
  13. Gunawan, A. C., & Santioso, L. (2015). Pengaruh partisipasi anggaran terhadap kinerja motivasi sebagai variabel moderating ( studi empiris pada perusahaan manufaktur di Jakarta dan Tangerang ). Jurnal Akuntansi, XIX(1), 144–159.
  14. Hariyanti, W., Purnamasari, P., & O, M. L. (2015). Pluriform motivation as antecedent and its relationships to budgeting participation and managerial performance (empirical study on manufacturing companies listed on Indonesian Stock Exchange). Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 211, 836–843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.110
  15. Hasan, H., Bz, F. S., & Indriani, M. (2018). The role of budgetary control on managerial performance in fertilizer companies in indonesia. Journal of Accounting Research, Organization, and Economics, 1(2), 138–148.
  16. Indriani, M., & Nadirsyah. (2015). Interaction effect of budgetary participation and management accounting system on managerial performance: evidence from indonesia. Global Journal of Business Research, 9(1), 1–13.
  17. Irfan, M., Santoso, B., & Effendi, L. (2016). Pengaruh partisipasi anggaran terhadap senjangan anggaran dengan asimetri informasi, penekanan anggaran dan komitmen organisasional sebagai variabel pemoderasi. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Investasi, 17(2), 158–175. https://doi.org/10.18196/jai.2016.0052.158-175
  18. Jermias, J., & Yigit, F. (2013). Budgetary participation in turkey: the effects of information asymmetry, goal commitment, and role ambiguity on job satisfaction and performance. Journal of International Accounting Research, 12(1), 29–54. https://doi.org/10.2308/jiar-50385
  19. Karakoc, E. Y., & Ozer, G. (2016). The budget-related antecedents of job performance. International Journal of Research in Business & Social SCience, 5(3), 38–53. https://doi.org/10.9761/jasss
  20. Kenis, I. (1979). Effect of budgetary goal characteristics on managerial attitudes and performance. The Accounting Review, 54(4), 707–721.
  21. Lau, C. M., Scully, G., & Lee, A. (2018). The effects of organizational politics on employee motivations to participate in target setting and employee budgetary participation. Journal of Business Research, 90, 247–259.
  22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.05.002
  23. Mahoney, T. A., Jerdee, T. H., & Carroll, S. J. (1965). The job(s) of management. Industrial Relationships, 97–110.
  24. Maiga, A. S., Nilsson, A., & Jacobs, F. A. (2014). Assessing the impact of budgetary participation on budgetary outcomes : the role of information technology for enhanced communication and activity-based costing. Jounal of Management Control. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00187-014-0191-9
  25. Medhayanti, N. P., & Suardana, K. A. (2015). Pengaruh partisipasi anggaran terhadap kinerja manajerial dengan self efficacy, desentralisasi, dan budaya organisasi sebagai variabel pemoderasi. E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana, 1, 155–170.
  26. Mercurio, Z. A. (2015). Affective commitment as a core essence of organizational commitment : an integrative literature review. Human Resource Development Review, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484315603612
  27. Milani, K. (1975). The relationship of participation in budget-setting to industrial supervisor performance and attitudes: a field study. The Accounting Review, 50(2), 274–284.
  28. Mowday, R. T., Steers, R. M., & Porter, L. W. (1979). The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 14, 224–247.
  29. Murwaningsari, E. (2008). The role of organizational commitment and procedural justice in moderating the relationship between budgetary participation and managerial performance. Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business, 10(2), 185–210.
  30. Nafarin, M. (2017). Penganggaran perusahaan. Edisi 3. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
  31. Negara, I. G. J., & Gayatri. (2017). Pengaruh partisipasi anggaran, self-efficacy, sistem pengukuran kinerja, dan sistem reward pada kinerja mnajerial. E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana, 20, 2479–2508.
  32. Noor, I. H., & Othman, R. (2012). Budgetary participation: how it affects performance and commitment. Accountancy Business and the Public Interest, 53–73.
  33. Nuraini, A. L., & Rosyati. (2012). Pengaruh partisipasi anggaran dan informasi akuntansi terhadap kinerja manajerial: komitmen organisasi, gaya kepemimpinan, ketidakpastian tugas, ketidakpastian lingkungan, dan strategi bisnis sebagai variabel moderasi. Proceeding of Conference in Business, Accounting, and Management, 1(1), 99–120.
  34. Oluwalope, A. A., & Sunday, O. (2017). Impact of budgetary participation and organizational commitment on managerial performance in Nigeria. Accounting and Finance Research, 6(3), 48–55. https://doi.org/10.5430/afr.v6n3p48
  35. Patterson, M. G., West, M. A., Lawthom, R., & Nickell, S. (1997). Impact of people management practices on business performance. Issues in People Management, (Institute of Work Psychology, University of Sheffield. Institute of Personnel and Development, London, UK).
  36. Porter, L. W., Steers, R. M., & Mowday, R. T. (1974). Organizational commitment , job satisfaction , and turnover among psychiatric technicians. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59(5), 603–609.
  37. Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2015) Organizational behaviour. 16th Edition. Edinburgh Gate: Pearson Education Limited.
  38. Rokhman, M. T. N. (2017). Improving managerial performance through participation role of budget preparation : a theoretical and empirical overview. Journal of Economics and Finance, 8(1), 39–43. https://doi.org/10.9790/5933-0801013943
  39. Rudhianto, H. (2010). Pengaruh komitmen organisasi dan gaya kepemimpinan terhadap hubungan antara partisipasi anggaran dan kinerja (studi empiris di Universitas Sebelas Maret). Tesis Program Pasca Sarjana Studi Akuntansi Universitas Sebelas Maret.
  40. Santos, A. C. dos, Lavarda, C. E. F., & Marcello, I. E. (2014). The relationship between cost management knowledge and budgetary participation with managers ’ performance. Review of Business Management, 16(50), 124–142. https://doi.org/10.7819/rbgn.v16i50.1236
  41. Saraswati, G. P., & Aisyah, M. N. (2015). Pengaruh partisipasi penyusunan anggaran terhadap kinerja manajerial dengan job relevant information sebagai variabel moderating (studi pada dinas pemerintah kota Yogyakarta). Jurnal Nominal, IV.
  42. Savitri, E., Ritonga, K., & Ayuni, R. (2015). Pengaruh partisipasi anggaran terhadap kinerja manajerial dengan kepuasan kerja dan pengetahuan manajemen biaya sebagai variabel moderating. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 12(2), 166–181.
  43. Selvina, M., & Yuliansyah, Y. (2015). Relationships between budgetary participation and organizational commitment : mediated by reinforcement contingency evidence from the service sector industries. International Research Journal of Business Studies, 8(2), 69–80.
  44. Shields, J. F., & Shields, M. D. (1998). Antecedents of participative budgeting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 23(1), 49–76.
  45. Shields, M. D., & Young, S. M. (1994). Managing innovation costs : a study of cost conscious behavior by r & d professionals. Journal of Management Accounting Research.
  46. Sumarno, J. (2005). Pengaruh komitmen organisasi dan gaya kepemimpinan terhadap hubungan antara partisipasi anggaran dan kinerja manajerial (studi empiris pada kantor cabang perbankan indonesia di Jakarta). Jurnal Bisnis Strategi, 14(2).
  47. Wombacher, J. C., & Felfe, J. (2017). Dual commitment in the organization: effects of the interplay of team and organizational commitment on employee citizenship behaviour, efficacy beliefs, and turnover intentions. Journal of Vocational Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2017.05.004
  48. Wong-On-Wing, B., Guo, L., & Lui, G. (2010). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation and participation in budgeting : antecedents and consequences. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 22(2), 133–153. https://doi.org/10.2308/bria.2010.22.2.133
  49. Yogantara, K. K., & Wirakusuma, M. G. (2013). Pengaruh komitmen organisasi dan gaya kepemimpinan pada hubungan antara partisipasi anggaran dan kinerja manajerial BPR. E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana, 2, 261–280.
  50. Yuliansyah, Y., & Khan, A. A. (2017). A revisit of the participative budgeting and employees’ self-efficacy interrelationship – empirical evidence from Indonesia's public sector. International Review of Public Administration, 4659, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/12294659.2017.1325584
  51. Zainuddin, S., & Zainal, D. (2012). The impact of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation on job performance in a participative budget setting : a research note. Journal of Accounting Perspectives, 5, 48–58.