Article Sidebar

Cover JIELariba Volume 7, Issue 1, January-June 2021
Submitted
March 20, 2021
Accepted
April 28, 2021
Published
December 8, 2021
Download
PDF RATING SUKUK DAN RASIO KEUANGAN BANK UMUM SYARIAH
Statistic
Read Counter : 194 Download : 209

Main Article Content

Abstract

The risk of default if the rating shows a decreasing result over several years of maturity measurement that can apply in banking institutions requires banking institutions to maintain or even increase the rating of sukuk issued. The purpose of this study is to discuss the effect of profitability ratios, liquidity ratios, leverage, and productivity ratios on the rankings of sukuk in Islamic banking institutions issuing sukuk. By using purposive sampling from 14 Islamic banks, 6 Islamic banking institutions were obtained as research samples in the 2015-2019 period, which were analyzed using multiple linear regression showing that only the productivity variable had a significant and positive influence on the rankings of sukuk in Islamic banking institutions, although with positive coefficient, profitability does not have a significant effect on the sukuk rating. Meanwhile, the liquidity and leverage variables did not have a significant effect and formed a negative relationship pattern on the sukuk rating in the Indonesian Islamic banking institutions issuing the sukuk. This concludes that only the productivity ratio can increase the rating of sukuk issued by banking institutions, while other ratios such as profitability do not have a significant effect and the financial ratios of liquidity and leverage will decrease the rating of the sukuk. So, this research suggests that in maximizing the rating of sukuk, the proxies for banking productivity should be increased.

Article Details

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Afiani, D. (2013). Pengaruh likuiditas, produktifitas, profitabilitas, dan leverage terhadap peringkat sukuk (Studi empiris pada bank umum syariah dan unit usaha syariah periode 2008-2010) [Effect of liquidity, productivity, profitability, and leverage on sukuk ratings (Empirical study on Islamic commercial banks and sharia business units for the period 2008-2010)]. Accounting Analysis Journal, 2(1), 110-115. https://doi.org/10.15294/aaj.v2i1.1151
  2. Al Haraqi, M. S., & Ningsih, E. S. (2017). Pengaruh return on asset, secure dan maturity terhadap rating sukuk [The effect of return on assets, secure and maturity on the sukuk rating]. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Ekonomi Akuntansi, 2(4), 116–124. http://jim.unsyiah.ac.id/EKA/article/view/5245
  3. Arundina, T., Kartiwi, M., & Omar, M. A. (2016). Artificial intelligence for Islamic sukuk rating predictions. In C.L. Dunis, P.W. Middleton, A. Karathanasopolous, & K.A. Theofilatos (Eds.), Artificial intelligence in financial markets (211-241). Palgrave Macmillan.
  4. Astuti, R. P. (2017). Pengaruh likuiditas, produktivitas, profitabilitas, terhadap peringkat sukuk [Effect of liquidity, productivity, profitability, on sukuk ratings]. Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen Dan Akuntansi Terapan (JIMAT), 8(1), 80–94. http://jurnal.stietotalwin.ac.id/index.php/jimat/article/view/134
  5. Borhan, N. A., & Ahmad, N. (2018). Identifying the determinants of Malaysian corporate sukuk rating. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 11(3), 432–448. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-02-2017-0045
  6. Cahyati, A., & Nurnasrina, N. (2019). Peringkat sukuk berdasarkan return on asset dan debt to equity ratio [Sukuk rating based on return on assets and debt to equity ratio]. SERAMBI: Jurnal Ekonomi Manajemen dan Bisnis Islam, 1(3), 101–110. https://doi.org/10.36407/serambi.v1i3.132
  7. Darmawan, A., Al Fayed, Y. F., Bagis, F., & Pratama, B. C. (2020). Pengaruh profitabilitas, likuiditas, leverage, umur obligasi dan ukuran perusahaan terhadap peringkat obligasi pada sektor keuangan yang terdapat di BEI tahun 2015-2018 [The effect of profitability, liquidity, leverage, bond age and company size on bond ratings in the financial sector listed on the IDX in 2015-2018]. DERIVATIF: Jurnal Manajemen, 14(1), 99–114. https://doi.org/10.24127/jm.v14i1.443
  8. Elhaj, M. A. A., Muhamed, N. A., & Ramli, N. M. (2015). The influence of corporate governance, financial ratios, and sukuk structure on sukuk rating. Procedia Economics and Finance, 31, 62–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01132-6
  9. Elhaj, M. A., Muhamed, N. A., & Ramli, N. M. (2018). The effects of board attributes on sukuk rating. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 11(2), 312–330. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-03-2017-0057
  10. Fitriani, P. R., Andriyanto, I., & Ridwan, M. (2020). Pengaruh rasio keuangan dan pertumbuhan perusahaan terhadap peringkat obligasi Syariah [The effect of financial ratios and company growth on Islamic bond ratings]. AKTSAR: Jurnal Akuntansi Syariah, 3(1), 103–118. https://doi.org/10.21043/aktsar.v3i1.7629
  11. Hadinata, S. (2020). Determinan peringkat sukuk: Ditinjau dari aspek akuntansi dan non-akuntansi [Determinants of sukuk ratings: in terms of accounting and non-accounting aspects]. Wahana Riset Akuntansi, 8(2), 95–107. https://doi.org/10.24036/wra.v8i2.109370
  12. Hamida, L. (2017). Pengaruh likuiditas dan leverage terhadap yield sukuk dengan peringkat sukuk sebagai variabel intervening (Studi pada perusahaan non keuangan di Bursa Efek Indonesia) [The effect of liquidity and leverage on sukuk yields with sukuk ratings as an intervening variable (Study on non-financial companies on the Indonesia Stock Exchange)]. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis, 18(1), 71–86. https://doi.org/10.30659/ekobis.18.1.71-86
  13. Juardi, & Sueno, N. (2019). Pengaruh produktivitas, firm size dan maturity terhadap peringkat sukuk pada perusahaan non keuangan di Indonesia [Effect of productivity, firm size and maturity on sukuk ratings of non-financial companies in Indonesia]. Akrual: Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 1(2), 1–18. https://uia.e-journal.id/Akrual/article/view/1018
  14. Kurniawan, A. T., & Suwarti, T. (2017). Pengaruh profitabilitas, leverage, likuditas dan produktifitas terhadap peringkat obligasi [Effect of profitability, leverage, liquidity and productivity on bond ratings]. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Multi Disiplin Ilmu & Call for Papers Unisbank Ke-3, 3(3), 435–443. https://www.unisbank.ac.id/ojs/index.php/sendi_u/article/view/5070
  15. Lustig, Y. (2014). The investment assets handbook: A definitive practical guide to asset classes. Harriman House Limited.
  16. Malia, L., & Andayani. (2015). Pengaruh rasio keuangan terhadap peringkat sukuk [Effect of financial ratios on sukuk ratings]. Jurnal Ilmu & Riset Akuntansi, 4(11), 1–15. http://jurnalmahasiswa.stiesia.ac.id/index.php/jira/article/view/3229
  17. Melinda, D., & Wardani, M. K. (2018). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi peringkat sukuk pada perushaan penerbit sukuk di Bursa Efek Indonesia [Factors that affect the sukuk rating of the sukuk issuing companies on the Indonesia Stock Exchange]. Kompartemen: Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi, 17(2), 69–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.30595/kompartemen.v16i2.4742
  18. Melis, K. (2014). Analisis faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi rating sukuk [Analysis of the factors that affect the sukuk rating]. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa FEB Universitas Brawijaya, 3(1), 1–21. https://jimfeb.ub.ac.id/index.php/jimfeb/article/view/1682
  19. Muhammad, R., & Biyantoro, C. T. S. (2019). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi peringkat sukuk (Studi empiris perusahaan yang diperingkat Fitch Rating) [Factors affecting sukuk ratings (Empirical study of companies rated by Fitch Rating)]. Al-Masraf: Jurnal Lembaga Keuangan dan Perbankan, 4(2), 187–200. https://doi.org/10.15548/al-masraf.v4i2.267
  20. Murhardi, W. R. (2013). Analisis laporan keuangan, proyeksi dan valuasi saham [Financial statement analysis, projections and stock valuation]. Salemba Empat.
  21. Nurfa’izah, Kaukab, M. E., & Efendi, B. (2020). Penilaian instrumen keuangan syariah: Anteseden peratingan sukuk [Assessment of Islamic financial instruments: Sukuk rating antecedents]. Manarul Qur’an:Jurnal Ilmiah Studi Islam, 20(1), 20–34. https://doi.org/10.32699/mq.v20i1.1612
  22. Pebruary, S. (2016). Pengaruh rasio profitabilitas, rasio likuiditas, rasio leverage dan pendapatan bunga terhadap rating sukuk korporasi periode 2010-2013 [The effect of profitability ratios, liquidity ratios, leverage ratios and interest income on corporate sukuk ratings for the 2010-2013 period]. Dinamika Ekonomi & Bisnis, 13(1), 95–112. https://doi.org/10.34001/jdeb.v13i1.397
  23. Pranoto, G. E., Anggraini, R., & Takidah, E. (2017). Pengaruh profitabilitas, ukuran perusahaan, produktivitas, dan reputasi auditor terhadap peringkat sukuk [Effect of profitability, firm size, productivity, and auditor reputation on sukuk ratings]. Jurnal Wahana Akuntansi, 12(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.21009/wahana.012/1.2
  24. Qizam, I., & Fong, M. (2019). Developing financial disclosure quality in sukuk and bond market: Evidence from Indonesia, Malaysia, and Australia. Borsa Istanbul Review, 19(3), 228–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2019.05.002
  25. Rofi, A. T. (2020). Pengaruh total assets dan total assets turnover terhadap rating sukuk dengan return on assets sebagai variabel intervening studi pada sukuk korporasi di Indonesia tahun 2016-2018 [The effect of total assets and total assets turnover on the sukuk rating with return on assets as an intervening variable for the study of corporate sukuk in Indonesia in 2016-2018]. Islamic Economics Journal, 6(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.21111/iej.v6i1.4451
  26. Rukmana, A. D., & Laila, N. (2020). Pengaruh ukuran perusahaan, likuiditas, leverage, profitabilitas, corporate governance, dan jenis sukuk terhadap rating sukuk korporasi di Indonesia [The effect of company size, liquidity, leverage, profitability, corporate governance, and types of sukuk on corporate sukuk ratings in Indonesia]. Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah Teori dan Terapan, 7(9), 1786–1803. https://doi.org/10.20473/vol7iss20209pp1786-1803
  27. Tensia, K. O., Yaya, R., & Supriyono, E. (2015). Variabel – variabel yang dapat memengaruhi peringkat obligasi (Studi kasus perusahaan non keuangan dan non jasa yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia) [Variables that can affect bond ratings (Case studies of non-financial and non-service companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange)]. JBTI: Jurnal Bisnis Teori dan Implementasi, 6(2), 184–206. https://journal.umy.ac.id/index.php/bti/article/view/2525
  28. Widowati, D., Nugrahanti, Y., & Kristanto, A. B. (2013). Analisis faktor keuangan dan non keuangan yang berpengaruh pada prediksi peringkat obligasi di Indonesia (Studi pada perusahaan non keuangan yang terdaftar di BEI dan di daftar peringkat PT Pefindo 2009-2011) [Analysis of financial and non-financial factors that influence the prediction of bond ratings in Indonesia (Study on non-financial companies listed on the IDX and on the PT Pefindo ranking list 2009-2011)]. Jurnal Manajemen, 13(1), 35–54. https://doi.org/10.28932/jmm.v13i1.141
  29. Winanti, E., Nurlaela, S., & Titisari, K. H. (2017). Pengaruh rasiolikuiditas, rasio produktivitas, rasio profitabilitas, dan rasio solvabilitas terhadap peringkat sukuk [The effect of liquidity ratios, productivity ratios, profitability ratios, and solvency ratios on sukuk ratings]. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Pajak, 18(01), 130–139. https://doi.org/10.29040/jap.v18i01.90