Article Sidebar

Cover JIELariba Volume 8, Issue 1, January-June 2022
Submitted
July 18, 2022
Accepted
September 8, 2022
Published
September 24, 2022
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 377 Download : 339

Main Article Content

Abstract

This paper aims to analyze the efficiency value and compare the efficiency ratio between sharia insurance and conventional insurance companies, both life insurance and general insurance in Indonesia, for 2018-2020. The research applies the Stochastic Frontier Analysis (SFA) method, which uses total capital and expenses as input variables, and total income as output variables. The efficiency values of Islamic and conventional insurance companies' results were compared using an independent sample t-test statistical test. The population of this research is all Islamic and conventional insurance companies listed on the website of the Financial Services Authority (OJK). The sample used is 19 sharia insurance companies (15 life insurance companies and four general insurance companies). The sample of conventional insurance is 23 companies (22 life insurance companies and one general insurance company). The results showed that the efficiency value of Islamic insurance companies (0.6549) was 0.0697 lower than conventional insurance (0.7246). It can be concluded that the efficiency of conventional insurance is better than Islamic insurance. Islamic insurance management capabilities are lower than conventional insurance companies’ management capabilities.

Keywords

Efficiency Stochastic Frontier Analysis Islamic insurance conventional insurance comparison

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Nur Kholis, Yunita Nur Afifah

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
How to Cite
Kholis, N. ., & Afifah, Y. N. . (2022). Measuring Financial Efficiency of Insurance Companies in Indonesia Using Stochastic Frontier Analysis Approach: A Comparison Between Islamic and Conventional Insurances. Journal of Islamic Economics Lariba, 8(1), 196–212. https://doi.org/10.20885/jielariba.vol8.iss1.art12
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Akhtar, M. H. (2018). Performance analysis of Takaful and conventional insurance companies in Saudi Arabia. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 25(2), 677–695. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-01-2017-0018
  2. Al-Amri, K. (2015). Takaful insurance efficiency in the GCC countries. Humanomics, 31(3), 344-353. https://doi.org/10.1108/H-05-2014-0039.
  3. Almulhim, T. (2019). Analysis of Takaful vs. Conventional insurance firms’ efficiency: Two-stage DEA of Saudi Arabia’s insurance market. Cogent Business & Management, 6(1), 1633807. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2019.1633807
  4. Antonio, M. S., Ali, M. M., & Akbar, N. (2013). A comparative analysis of the efficiency of takaful and conventional insurance in Malaysia. International Journal of Excellence in Islamic Banking and Finance, 182(881), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.12816/0001416
  5. Bisnis.com. (2021). Kontribusi Bruto Asuransi Syariah Tumbuh 41,32 Persen di Kuartal III/2021. https://finansial.bisnis.com/read/20211222/231/1480485/kontribusi-bruto-asuransi-syariah-tumbuh-4132-persen-di-kuartal-iii2021
  6. Coelli, T. J., Rao, D. S. P., O’Donnell, C. J., & Battese, G. E. (2005). An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis second edition. New York (US): Springer Science+ Business Media.
  7. Grmanová, E., & Ivanová, E. (2018). Efficiency of banks in Slovakia: Measuring by DEA models. Journal of International Studies, 11(1), 257-272. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2018/11-1/20
  8. Jaloudi, M.M. (2019). The efficiency of Jordan insurance companies and its determinants using DEA, slacks, and logit models. Journal of Asian Business and Economic Studies, 26(1). 153-166. https://doi.org/10.1108/JABES-10-2018-0072
  9. Jurickova, E., Pilik, M., & Kwarteng, M. A. (2019). Efficiency measurement of National Innovation Systems of the European Union countries: DEA Model Application. Journal of International Studies, 12(4), 286-299. doi:10.14254/2071–8330.2019/12-4/19
  10. Lanfranchi, D., & Grassi, L. (2021). Translating technological innovation into efficiency: the case of US public P&C insurance companies. Eurasian Business Review, 11(4), 565-585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40821-021-00189-7
  11. Lee, H. S., Cheng, F. F., Har, W. M., Nassir, A. M., & Ab Razak, N. H. (2019). Efficiency, firm-specific and corporate governance factors of the Takaful insurance. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 12(3), 368-387. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-06-2018-0187.
  12. Naushad, M., Faridi, M. R., & Faisal, S. (2020). Measuring the managerial efficiency of insurance companies in Saudi Arabia: A data envelopment analysis approach. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(6), 297-304. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no6.297
  13. OJK (2019). Hasil Survei Literasi dan Inklusi Keuangan Nasional Meningkat. Jakarta: www.sikapiuangmu.ojk.go.id.
  14. OJK, O. J. (2020). Statistik Bulanan IKNB Syariah April 2020. Jakarta: www.ojk.go.id.
  15. OJK (2022). Statistik Bulanan IKNB Syariah April 2022. Jakarta: www.ojk.go.id
  16. Purwanti, A. (2016). Analisis Perbandingan Efisiensi pada Industri Asuransi Umum Syariah dan Konvensional di Indonesia dengan Pendekatan Two-Stage Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) (Doctoral dissertation, Fakultas Ekonomika dan Bisnis).
  17. Radwan, M., Calandra, D., & Koumbarakis, P. (2020). Takaful industry and Blockchain: challenges and opportunities for costs’ reduction in Islamic insurance companies. European Journal of Islamic Finance, Special Issue. https://doi.org/10.13135/2421-2172/4926
  18. Rusydiana, A. S., & Nugroho, T. (2017). Measuring efficiency of life insurance instution in Indonesia: Data envelopment analysis approach. Global Review of Islamic Economics and Business, 5(1), 012-024. https://doi.org/10.14421/grieb.2017.051-02
  19. Santoso, S. (2014). Statistik Multivariat Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: PT Elex Media Komputindo.
  20. Shieh, H. S., Hu, J. L., & Ang, Y. Z. (2020). Efficiency of life insurance companies: an empirical study in Mainland China and Taiwan. SAGE Open, 10(1), 2158244020902060. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020902060
  21. Sugiyono (2005), Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: CV. Alfabeta
  22. Sunarsih, & Fitriyani. (2018, Januari ). Analisis Efisiensi Asuransi Syariah di Indonesia tahun 2014-2016 dengan Metode Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). Jurnal Ekonomi dan Keuangan Islam, 4, 9-21. https://doi.org/10.20885/jeki.vol4.iss1.art2
  23. Tuffahati, H., Mardian, S., & Suprapto, E. (2016). Pengukuran efisiensi asuransi syariah dengan Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan Islam, 4(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.35836/jakis.v4i1.27
  24. Ulansari, D. R., & Septiarini, D. F. (2020). A comparative study of the efficiency of conventional and Sharia insurance in Indonesia. Jurnal Keuangan dan Perbankan, 24(2), 202-213. https://doi.org/10.26905/jkdp.v24i2.3165
  25. Wanke, P., Tsionas, M. G., Chen, Z., & Antunes, J. J. M. (2020). Dynamic network DEA and SFA models for accounting and financial indicators with an analysis of super-efficiency in stochastic frontiers: An efficiency comparison in OECD banking. International Review of Economics & Finance, 69, 456-468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2020.06.002