Article Sidebar

An Application of Spatial Dispersion Industrialization Model Towards Income Distribution, Employment Opportunity, and Economy
Submitted
December 20, 2022
Accepted
December 30, 2022
Published
December 31, 2022
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 295 Download : 107

Main Article Content

Abstract

Industrialization is expected to bring positive impacts for the indigenous people in the form of the emergence of social change. The occurred social change is expected to present sufficient room availability, especially on social income, employment opportunity, and economy. Industrialization consequences lead to spatial dispersion problems, which the policymakers do not expect. The impacts are the emergence of the new social class structure change, the high urbanization flow, life necessity fulfillment competition, and the emerging social gap. This study is expected to discover and develop a spatial dispersion model to focus on the three cities in the industrialization process in terms of income, economy, and employment opportunities. To see the compatibility among the three spatial dispersion indicators (income distribution, employment opportunity, and economy) compared to industrialization, the researchers applied Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) approach to test the hypotheses and analyze the empirical data retrieved through the covariance matrices. The research findings showed the correlation among the three variables by analyzing the retrieved CR values and the probabilities. It can be concluded that income distribution, employment opportunities, and the economy significantly influenced industrialization in Bunder Village, Pademawu Sub-district, Pamekasan Regency. Future research should cover other variables or areas to broaden the insight into how these variables impact industrialization.

Keywords

Economy Employment Opportunity Industrialization Income Distribution Spatial Dispersion

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Afifah, Tin et al. 2018. “Subnational Regional Inequality in Access to Improved Drinking Water and Sanitation in Indonesia: Results from the 2015 Indonesian National Socioeconomic Survey (SUSENAS).” Global Health Action 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2018.1496972.

  2. Ashley, C., and S. Maxwell. 2001. “Rethinking Rural Development.” Development Policy Review 19(4): 395–425.

  3. Botonaki, Anna, Dimitrios Natos, and Konstadinos Mattas. 2009. “Exploring Convenience Food Consumption through a Structural Equation Model.” Journal of Food Products Marketing 15(1): 64–79.

  4. Campolina Diniz, Clélio, and Danilo Jorge Vieira. 2016. “Brazil: Accelerated Metropolization and Urban Crisis.” Area Development and Policy 1(2): 155–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23792949.2016.1202085.

  5. Chung, Jin Hyuk, Taewan Kim, Hojong Baik, and Yun Sook Choi. 2009. “A Structural Equation Model of Activity Participation and Travel Behavior Using Longitudinal Data.” Transportation Planning and Technology 32(2): 163–85.

  6. Danta, Darrick R. 1987. “Hungarian Urbanization and Socialist Ideology.” Urban Geography 8(5): 391–404.

  7. Ding, Chengri, and Xingshuo Zhao. 2011. “Assessment of Urban Spatial-Growth Patterns in China during Rapid Urbanization.” Chinese Economy 44(1): 46–71.

  8. Dwyer, Janet, Neil Ward, Philip Lowe, and David Baldock. 2007. “European Rural Development under the Common Agricultural Policy’s ‘Second Pillar’: Institutional Conservatism and Innovation.” Regional Studies 41(7): 873–88.

  9. Edbiz. (2019). Islamic Finance Country Index - IFCI 2019. In Global Islamic Finance Report 2019 (pp. 1–2). DDCAP Group.

  10. Evans, Stephen, Paulo J. Partidário, and Joanna Lambert. 2007. “Industrialization as a Key Element of Sustainable Product-Service Solutions.” International Journal of Production Research.

  11. Gundlach, Erich. 2005. “Solow vs. Solow: Notes on Identification and Interpretation in the Empirics of Growth and Development.” Review of World Economics.

  12. Hollifield, C. Ann, Joseph F. Donnermeyer, Gwen Wolford, and Robert Agunga. 2009. “Leading Community Innovation: Organizing Successful Rural Telecommunications Self-Development Projects.” Community Development 38(2): 52–67.

  13. Jung, Seung Eun et al. 2017. “Does Depressive Affect Mediate the Relationship between Self-Care Capacity and Nutritional Status Among Rural Older Adults? : A Structural Equation Modeling Approach.” Journal of Nutrition in Gerontology and Geriatrics 36(1): 63–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21551197.2017.1281785.

  14. Khorev, B. S. 1974. “The Problems of Small Cities and the Policy of Stimulating Small-City Growth.” Soviet Geography 15(5): 263–73.

  15. Marsh, Herbert W. et al. 2019. “Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling (ESEM), and Set-ESEM: Optimal Balance Between Goodness of Fit and Parsimony.” Multivariate Behavioral Research 0(0): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2019.1602503.

  16. Pandya, G. H. 2003. “Assessment of Traffic Noise and Its Impact on the Community.” International Journal of Environmental Studies 60(6): 595–602.

  17. Prananta, A. W., Rahmawati, A. D., Budiyanti, S., Holisah, J., & Kusumah, W. (2022). Tourism Industrialization Model and the EFfects on the Income, Employment Opportunity, and Economy In Sumenep City, Beach 9, Gili District. Vol.4 No 2, Hlm 285.

  18. Samuelson, Paul A. 1989. “Robert Solow: An Affectionate Portrait.” Journal of Economic Perspectives.

  19. Smith.J.H. 1962. “Industrial-Sociology-1962.Pdf.” Londosn Scholl Of Economic 193: 930.

  20. Smith, Philip T., Frank McKenna, Claire Pattison, and Andrea Waylen. 2001. “Structural Equation Modelling of Human Judgement.” Thinking and Reasoning 7(1): 51–68.

  21. Treiman, Donald J. 1970. “Industrialization and Social Stratification.” Sociological Inquiry.