Article Sidebar

A comparative socio-legal and maqasid analysis of waṣiyyah wājibah in Islamic inheritance law in Indonesia and Malaysia
Submitted
April 8, 2026
Accepted
May 21, 2026
Published
May 23, 2026
Download
PDF Review Reports Originality Report
Statistic
Read Counter : 16 Download : 0

Main Article Content

Abstract

Introduction
Islamic inheritance law is widely recognized for its doctrinal clarity, yet contemporary social transformations have exposed gaps between classical rules and modern family realities. The concept of waṣiyyah wājibah (compulsory bequest) has emerged as a legal mechanism to address the exclusion of socially dependent individuals such as adopted children, orphaned grandchildren, and interfaith relatives. Despite its growing importance, comparative and integrative studies examining its application across different legal systems remain limited.
Objectives
This study aims to analyze the concept and implementation of waṣiyyah wājibah in Indonesia and Malaysia through a comparative framework. It seeks to identify the legal, institutional, and socio-cultural factors shaping its application, and to evaluate its legitimacy and function using sociological and maqāṣid al-sharīʿah perspectives.
Method
The research adopts a qualitative, doctrinal–comparative approach based on the analysis of legal texts, statutory regulations, judicial decisions, and scholarly literature. It integrates normative legal analysis with socio-legal interpretation and purposive reasoning to examine how waṣiyyah wājibah operates within different institutional contexts.
Results
The findings reveal that waṣiyyah wājibah functions as a flexible instrument of legal adaptation in both countries, though with distinct characteristics. Indonesia demonstrates a more expansive and jurisprudence-driven model, where courts extend the scope of compulsory bequests to address diverse social realities. Malaysia, by contrast, exhibits a more structured and decentralized approach, shaped by state enactments and procedural frameworks. In both systems, waṣiyyah wājibah remains bounded by doctrinal constraints and justified through principles of justice, welfare, and the objectives of Islamic law.
Implications
The study highlights the role of waṣiyyah wājibah in enhancing family welfare, reducing inheritance disputes, and promoting socially responsive legal outcomes. It also underscores the importance of institutional design and judicial reasoning in shaping the effectiveness of Islamic legal reform.
Originality/Novelty
This study offers an integrated comparative analysis that combines doctrinal, socio-legal, and maqāṣid-based perspectives. It contributes to the literature by demonstrating how Islamic inheritance law can adapt to contemporary challenges while maintaining its normative foundations.

Keywords

Islamic inheritance law legal pluralism maqāṣid al-sharīʿah Malaysia socio-legal analysis waṣiyyah wājibah Indonesia

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Neneng Desi Susanti, Arisman Arisman, Kasnan Kasnan, Ros Amira Mohd Ruslan

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
How to Cite
Susanti, N. D. ., Arisman, A., Kasnan, K., & Mohd Ruslan, R. A. . (2026). A comparative socio-legal and maqasid analysis of waṣiyyah wājibah in Islamic inheritance law in Indonesia and Malaysia. Journal of Islamic Economics Lariba, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.20885/jielariba.vol12.iss2.art10
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Abari, M. S., Nikdoosti, M., & Fesharaki, M. J. (2021). Comparison of “will” concept in education and jurisprudence and possible challenges in the educational system of iran and england. Iranian Journal of Comparative Education, 4(2), 1209–1226. https://doi.org/10.22034/ijce.2021.245541.1207

  2. Abbas, S., Mukhlas, O. S., Neonbeni, R. V., Saebani, B. A., Judijanto, L., Saepullah, U., & Sistyawan, D. J. (2025). The application of kafā’ah and weton in the socio-legal development of marriage law in east java. Nurani: Jurnal Kajian Syari’ah Dan Masyarakat, 25(2), 493–513. https://doi.org/10.19109/nurani.v25i2.28041

  3. ‘Abdel-Hay, M. (2018). Mental disability in Islamic jurisprudence from a moral perspective. Bulletin of The Faculty of Languages & Translation, 15(2), 379–411. https://doi.org/10.21608/bflt.2018.58412

  4. Abdul Rahman, A. H., & Hassan, R. (2020). Islamic estate planning in Malaysia: The dilemma (Perancangan harta Islam di Malaysia: Satu dilema). Journal of Islam in Asia (E-ISSN 2289-8077), 17(2), 238–268. https://doi.org/10.31436/jia.v17i2.963

  5. Abdul Rahman, N. A. (2019). Muslim personal laws and the accommodation of minorities: The need to better balance individual rights and group autonomy in Singapore. German Law Journal, 20(7), 1079–1095. https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2019.71

  6. Abdullah, M. (2020). Reflection of maqāṣid al-sharī’ah in the classical fiqh al-awqāf. Islamic Economic Studies, 27(2), 79–90. https://doi.org/10.1108/IES-06-2019-0011

  7. Adjie, H. (2021). Distinguishing: Appointment, recognition of children and ratification of children based on Law Number 23 of 2006 concerning Population Administration. International Journal of Science and Society, 3(2), 313–320. https://doi.org/10.54783/ijsoc.v3i2.343

  8. Ahmad, S. (2016). The Singapore fatwa and irsyad on nzar-nuzriah. ICR Journal, 7(3), 368–378. https://doi.org/10.52282/icr.v7i3.249

  9. Ahmed, H. (2025). Islamic normative legal theory: Framework and applications. Journal of Law and Religion, 40(1), 28–58. https://doi.org/10.1017/jlr.2025.10056

  10. Alfida, L., & Azhari, A. F. (2024). Analogy and harmony: An analysis of the rights and obligations of adopted children in the distribution of inheritance from the perspective of Islam and Christianity. Istinbath, 23(2), 275–291. https://doi.org/10.20414/ijhi.v23i2.771

  11. Alma’amun, S., Kamarudin, M. K., Wan Mohd Nasir, W. N., Nor Muhamad, N. H., & Ahmad, R. (2022). Legislative provisions for waṣiyyah wājibah in Malaysia and Indonesia: To what extent do they differ in practice? ISRA International Journal of Islamic Finance, 14(2), 157–174. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIF-01-2021-0013

  12. Alpat, B. (2023). The concept of lineage, types of lineage and a general evaluation of the establishment of lineage. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 6(12), 7535–7544. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v6-i12-42

  13. Anwar, W. A., Wahyu, A. R. M., Mukhlas, O. S., & Khosyiah, S. (2024). Modifying assessment for the advancement of family law theories and practices. Jurnal Al-Dustur, 7(1), 96–119. https://doi.org/10.30863/aldustur.v7i1.5989

  14. Atallah, F. A. (2026). Digital mediation and fatwa authority in contemporary Islam: A critical Islamic legal and media-theoretical framework. Religions, 17(3), 350. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel17030350

  15. Azwar, Z., Armi, Mhd. I., Zulfan, Z., Jelani, A. B. B., & Nasri, A. L. (2024). Child filiation and its implications on maintenance and inheritance rights: A comparative study of regulations and judicial practices in Indonesia, Malaysia, and Turkey. Journal of Islamic Law, 5(1), 62–85. https://doi.org/10.24260/jil.v5i1.2326

  16. Bastani, S., & Waldenström, D. (2021). Perceptions of inherited wealth and the support for inheritance taxation. Economica, 88(350), 532–569. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecca.12359

  17. Crouch, D. J. M., & Bodmer, W. F. (2020). Polygenic inheritance, GWAS, polygenic risk scores, and the search for functional variants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(32), 18924–18933. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2005634117

  18. Daud, Z. F. M., & Azahari, R. (2022). The wajibah will: Alternative wealth transition for individuals who are prevented from attaining their inheritance available to purchase. International Journal of Ethics and Systems, 38(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOES-09-2018-0133

  19. Dupret, B., Belkadi, A., Lindbekk, M., & Yakin, A. U. (2023). Paternal filiation in Muslim-majority environments: A comparative look at the interpretive practice of positive Islamic law in Indonesia, Egypt, and Morocco. Journal of Law, Religion and State, 10(2–3), 167–217. https://doi.org/10.1163/22124810-20230002

  20. Dwairi, O. N. (2022). Marital abuse: Its impact on wife’s right to her dowry in Islamic family law. Dirasat: Shari’a and Law Sciences, 49(1), 154–164. https://doi.org/10.35516/law.v49i1.824

  21. Farah, A. Q., & Hattab, R. M. (2020). The application of sharīʿah finance rules in international commercial arbitration. Utrecht Law Review, 16(1), 117–139. https://doi.org/10.36633/ulr.592

  22. Fatah, A. A., & Yunatskyi, M. (2024). Inheritance relations in Ukraine: Practical aspect. Public Administration and Law Review, 1(17), 56–65. https://doi.org/10.36690/2674-5216-2024-1-56

  23. Fatima, H. (2024). A critical appraisal of obligatory bequest as prevalent in Muslim countries. Islamic Studies, 63(2), 213–240. https://doi.org/10.52541/isiri.v63i2.3071

  24. Ghozali, M., Firdaus, M. I., Saleh, M. A. M., & Musa, Z. M. (2024). Kajian perbandingan hak warisan anak angkat di Indonesia dan Malaysia: A comparative study of the inheritance rights of adopted children in Indonesia and Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Syariah and Law, 12(3), 726–738. https://doi.org/10.33102/mjsl.vol12no3.1164

  25. Güney, N. (2024). Maqāsid al-Sharī‘a in Islamic finance: A critical analysis of modern discourses. Religions, 15(1), 114. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15010114

  26. Hakim, M. L. (2023). Ismail Mundu on Islamic law of inheritance: A content analysis of Majmū‘ al-Mīrāth fī Ḥukm al-Farā’iḍ. Al-Jami’ah: Journal of Islamic Studies, 61(1), 59–79. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajis.2023.611.59-79

  27. Hakim, M. L., & Nasution, K. (2022). Accommodating Non-Muslim rights: Legal arguments and legal principles in the Islamic jurisprudence of the Indonesian Supreme Court in the Post-New Order Era. Oxford Journal of Law and Religion, 11(2–3), 288–313. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojlr/rwad004

  28. Halim, A. H., Mohd Noor, N. A., & Mohd Salim, W. N. (2020). The execution of Muslim’s will (wasiyyah) in Malaysia: A way to evade Islamic inheritance (faraid) (Pelaksanaan wasiat di Malaysia: satu cara pembahagian harta pusaka (faraid)). Journal of Islam in Asia, 17(3), 184–197. https://doi.org/10.31436/jia.v17i3.992

  29. Harefa, S. (2025). The fundamental principles of Islamic law in the digital era: An ushul fiqh and Maqashid Sharia approach. Journal of Islamic Law on Digital Economy and Business, 1(1), 84–99. https://doi.org/10.20885/JILDEB.vol1.iss1.art6

  30. Hassan, S. A., Malik, F. A., Hanapi, M. S., Khairuldin, W. M. K. F. W., & Embong, A. H. (2026). Integrating Islamic reasoning into contemporary economic development and planning. Planning Malaysia, 24(3), 211–227. https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v24i42.2040

  31. Hidayati, T., & Hidayatullah, M. S. (2021). Investigating the construction of ijma in the study of Islamic law through sociological and historical approach. Media Syari’ah : Wahana Kajian Hukum Islam Dan Pranata Sosial, 23(2), 127–150. https://doi.org/10.22373/jms.v23i2.10924

  32. Ismail, I., Busyro, B., Nofiardi, N., Wadi, F., & Alwana, H. A. (2022). Legislative provisions for waṣiyyah wājibah in Malaysia and Indonesia: To what extent do they differ in practice? Al-Risalah: Forum Kajian  Hukum Dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan, 22(2), 165–178. https://doi.org/10.30631/alrisalah.v22i2.1243

  33. Jany, J. (2020). Legal traditions in Asia: History, concepts and laws. Springer. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-030-43728-2

  34. Kamis, N. S., & Abd. Wahab, N. (2022). Analysing the loopholes on estate administration of cryptocurrency in Malaysia: Shariah and law perspectives. International Journal of Islamic Business, 7(2), 65–77. https://doi.org/10.32890/ijib2022.7.2.5

  35. Kasdi, A., & Anwar, K. (2019). Inheritance distribution of adopted children in the perspective of customary law and Islamic law compilation: Case study of the application of inheritance law in Kudus. Al-Ahkam, 29(2), 141–158. https://doi.org/10.21580/ahkam.2019.29.2.4203

  36. Khamis, M. R., Zahari, R. H., Hasnon, S. N. A., & Hashim, M. J. M. (2024). Factors influencing the increase of unclaimed property among Muslims in Klang Valley. Information Management and Business Review, 16(3(I)S), 537–550. https://doi.org/10.22610/imbr.v16i3(I)S.4081

  37. Kutaraya, M. K., Hamidah, S., & Chanifah, N. (2024). The distribution of obligatory bequest to Non-Muslim biological children from the perspective of Islamic inheritance law in Indonesia. Ascarya: Journal of Islamic Science, Culture, and Social Studies, 4(1), 78–88. https://doi.org/10.53754/iscs.v4i1.668

  38. Luntajo, M. M., & Hasan, F. (2025). Inheritance across faiths in Muslim Minahasa families: Legal pluralism and cultural adaptation in Manado, Indonesia. Journal of Islamic Economics Lariba, 11(1), 617–644. https://doi.org/10.20885/jielariba.vol11.iss1.art24

  39. Makka, M. M., Albatati, R. A., Hasan, F., & Alting, S. P. (2021). The conversion of the adopted children’s clan in the Village of Tumbak from the Islamic law point of view. Kawanua International Journal of Multicultural Studies, 2(1), 10–17. https://doi.org/10.30984/kijms.v2i1.16

  40. Marpaung, W., & Adly, M. A. (2022). Discourse of wasiat wajibah in review of istinbath Islamic law. TAQNIN: Jurnal Syariah Dan Hukum, 4(1), 11–21. https://doi.org/10.30821/taqnin.v4i1.11985

  41. Mohamad, M. I. B. K., Hamdan, M. N., & Yusof, A. N. M. (2025). Third-party refusal of medical treatment – A critical analysis of case report from Islamic ethical perspectives. BMC Medical Ethics, 26(1), 48. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-025-01209-1

  42. Mubarak, A., Nazmi, N., Abduh, M. R., Listiana, N., Azkia, N., & Ashidiqi, I. U. (2026). Marital property regimes in Islamic law: A comparative madhhab analysis and its integration into modern Islamic economic governance. SYARIAH: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pemikiran, 26(1), 27–48. https://jurnal.uin-antasari.ac.id/index.php/syariah/article/view/20553

  43. Muntazar, A. & Syafruddin. (2025). Problems of inheritance distribution for transgender in the perspective of ushul fiqh and human rights. Human Rights Review, 26(4), 279–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12142-026-00753-6

  44. Nugroho, F., Hartiwiningsih, H., & Handayani, I. G. A. K. R. (2025). Rethinking subsidiary in corruption cases: Indonesian experiences. Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System, 5(2), 686–713. https://doi.org/10.53955/jhcls.v5i2.714

  45. Olowu, D. (2010). Children’s rights, international human rights and the promise of Islamic legal theory. Law, Democracy & Development, 12(2), 62–85. https://doi.org/10.4314/ldd.v12i2.52894

  46. Pedersen, J., & Bøyum, S. (2020). Inheritance and the family. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 37(2), 299–313. https://doi.org/10.1111/japp.12389

  47. Rafay, A., Sadiq, R., & Ajmal, M. (2017). Uniform framework for sukuk al-ijarah – a proposed model for all madhahib. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 8(4), 420–454. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-09-2015-0042

  48. Rasyid, A., Lubis, R. F., & Saleh, I. (2024). Contestation of customary law and Islamic law in inheritance distribution: A sociology of Islamic law perspective. Al-Ahkam, 34(2), 419–448. https://doi.org/10.21580/ahkam.2024.34.2.20843

  49. Regev-Messalem, S. (2020). How the law “keeps the money in the family”: Lessons at the intersection of elder care and inheritance disputes in Israel. Law & Social Inquiry, 45(1), 81–110. https://doi.org/10.1017/lsi.2019.47

  50. Reskiani, A., Tenrilawa, D. F., Aminuddin, A., & Subha, R. (2022). Konstruksi pemikiran pembaharuan hukum kewarisan Islam di Indonesia (Studi yurisprudensi Mahkamah Agung) [Construction of thoughts on reforming Islamic inheritance law in Indonesia (Jurisprudence study of the Supreme Court)]. JURIS (Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah), 21(1), 39–51. https://doi.org/10.31958/juris.v21i1.5564

  51. Retnowulandari, W. (2023). Maslahah wasiat wajibah for adopted children with different religions and stepchildren. In Z. B. Pambuko, C. B. Edhita Praja, L. Muliawanti, V. S. Dewi, M. Setiyo, F. Yuliastuti, & A. Setiawan (Eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd Borobudur International Symposium on Humanities and Social Science 2021 (BIS-HSS 2021) (Vol. 667, pp. 759–763). Atlantis Press SARL. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-494069-49-7_127

  52. Rohman, B., Wahib, M., Juniati, W., Yusof, N. B., & Abdulghani, N. A. (2026). Hybrid legalities in Muslim minority societies. Justicia Islamica, 23(2), 381–416. https://doi.org/10.21154/justicia.v23i2.12108

  53. Rokhim, A., Fuad, S., & Sahin, C. (2025). Qawāʿid al-tafsīr as an epistemological model for valid Qur’anic interpretation: A comparative analysis of Marāḥ Labīd and al-Miṣbāḥ. Jurnal Lektur Keagamaan, 23(2), 696–732. https://doi.org/10.31291/jlka.v23i2.1488

  54. Rosadi, A., & Ropiah, S. (2020). Reconstruction of different religion inheritance through wajibah testament. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 8(2), 327–350. https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v8i2.466

  55. Rozikin, M. R. (2026). al-farāʾiḍ is half of knowledge: A critical Hadith analysis and its juridical implications in Islamic inheritance discourse. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 13(1), 2598289. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2025.2598289

  56. Roziqi, A., Ramadhan, M. R. S., Prayogi, A., & Falah, F. (2025). Institutional ijtihād and socio-legal adaptation: The formulation of waṣiyah wājibah in Indonesia’s compilation of Islamic law. Asy-Syir’ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari’ah Dan Hukum, 59(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajish.v59i1.1517

  57. Septiana, D., Mujtahidin, S., & Taufik, Z. (2023). Comparison of children’s inheritance laws outside marriage in Indonesia with several other countries. Ex Aequo Et Bono Journal Of Law, 1(2), 76–83. https://doi.org/10.61511/eaebjol.v1i2.2024.340

  58. Shith, M. S. S. P. M., Adilii, M. A. M., Putera, N. S. F. M. S., & Abdul Rahim, M. (2022). Al-wisayyah in the Islamic estate planning: The Malaysian perspective. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 7(11), e001948. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v7i11.1948

  59. Subagyono, B. S. A., Fahamsyah, E., Sururi, H., & Amaliyah. (2025). Contemporary Islamic economic law on legal protection for bankrupt guarantors: Comparative insights from common law and Asian jurisdictions. MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review, 4(2), 1449–1470. https://doi.org/10.32332/milrev.v4i2.11897

  60. Sujono, I. (2025). Application of John Stuart Mill’s formal equality theory to distribution of inheritance for adopted children: A comparative study of Burgerlijk Wetboek and Compilation of Islamic Law. Journal of Modern Islamic Studies and Civilization, 3(3), 401–418. https://doi.org/10.59653/jmisc.v3i03.2006

  61. Timmermans, S., & Prickett, P. J. (2022). Who counts as family? How standards stratify lives. American Sociological Review, 87(3), 504–528. https://doi.org/10.1177/00031224221092303

  62. Timur, F. G. C., Umam, K., & Aulia, M. R. N. (2024). Contemporary warfare and political jurisprudence (fiqh siyasah): An analysis of asymmetric warfare in military-political doctrine (siyasah harbiyyah). Hikmatuna : Journal for Integrative Islamic Studies, 10(1), 104–120. https://doi.org/10.28918/hikmatuna.v10i1.7059

  63. Tremayne, S. (2022). Anonymous gamete donation in Iran: Lineage revisited. The Muslim World, 112(3), 340–352. https://doi.org/10.1111/muwo.12439

  64. Wimra, Z., Huda, Y., Bunaiya, M., & Hakimi, A. R. (2023). The living fiqh: Anatomy, philosophical formulation, and scope of study. JURIS (Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah), 22(1), 185–198. https://doi.org/10.31958/juris.v22i1.9491

  65. Yusuf, A. A. (2017). Controversy of Islamic law on the distribution of inheritance to the heirs of different religion. HUNAFA: Jurnal Studia Islamika, 14(2), 377–403. https://doi.org/10.24239/jsi.v14i2.490.377-403

  66. Yusuf, N., Willya, E., Mash’ud, I., Kamma, H., & Imamuddin, I. (2025). Reception of islamic legal rituals among indigenous indonesian communities with comparative findings from wetu telu and masade. Jurnal Ilmiah Al-Syir’ah, 23(2), 170. https://doi.org/10.30984/jis.v23i2.3478

  67. Zaini, A., Ridho, M. Z., Muttaqin, E. Z., & Yussof, H. B. (2025). Adaptation of Islamic law in the Dutch Colonial Era: Fiqh al-aqalliyyāt, Maqasid al-Shariah, and its legacy for modern Indonesian Islamic legal institutions. Jurnal Ilmiah Al-Syir’ah, 23(2), 265–278. https://doi.org/10.30984/jis.v23i2.2758

Green banking policy and implementation in Islamic banking: Evidence from Bank Syariah Indonesia Surabaya through a Maqāṣid al-Sharīʿah perspective

Khalishah Mulyani, Neneng Desi Susanti, Nurhayati Nurhayati
Abstract View : 66
Download :0
10.20885/jielariba.vol12.iss2.art3
PDF Review Reports Originality Report

The influence of parental education and household financial behavior on halal food consumption in Tanjung Pinang City, Indonesia

Sella Kurnia Sari, Firdaus Firdaus, Selly Kudrati Ningsih, Ferri Yonantha
Abstract View : 95
Download :61
10.20885/jielariba.vol12.iss1.art14
PDF Review Reports Originality Report

Strengthening SEHATI self-declare halal certification in South Kalimantan: Roles, constraints, and field practices of Halal Product Process Companions

Zulpa Makiah, Supian Sauri, Lutpi Sahal
Abstract View : 540
Download :269
10.20885/jielariba.vol12.iss1.art8
PDF Review Reports Originality Report

The dynamics of mosque fund management in Old Order Indonesia

Rizqi Anfanni Fahmi, Amelia Fauzia, Abdur Razzaq
Abstract View : 287
Download :425
10.20885/jielariba.vol12.iss1.art4
PDF Review Reports Originality Report

Female migrant workers, family welfare, and Islamic economic philosophy: A gender-based empirical study in Indonesia

Ibnul Jauzi Abdul Ceasar, Yusdani Yusdani, Amir Mu’allim
Abstract View : 475
Download :241
10.20885/jielariba.vol11.iss2.art20
PDF Review Reports Originality Report