Main Article Content

Abstract

An interesting issue is how the Song Parody and Copyright in Settings in Indonesia. and the next issue is the Copyright Protection of the Inner Song Creator Use of Video Parody on YouTube. This study uses the approach: statute approach, and conceptual approach. Techniques for tracing legal materials using techniques document study (library research), and analysis of the study using qualitative analysis. Results research shows that Copyright Protection Against Songwriters In The use of parody videos on YouTube is based on UUHC, both creators and actors the show can file legal remedies by way of termination and in a civil manner. On termination, the Creator and Performer of the Original Song will report to the minister for parody songs on YouTube that violate copyright so that they cannot be accessed by the public based on article 55 UUHC with. Civilly both the Creator and Performer the original song can file a claim for compensation to the Commercial Court based on article 99 UUHC which must be preceded by peace efforts. Criminally only songwriters only original persons can file criminal charges based on article 113 paragraph 2 UUHC, Meanwhile, performers cannot file criminal charges based on UUHC, except for Article 315 of the Criminal Code if you think it's a parody of a song uploaded on YouTube This caused him to be defamed.

Keywords

Copyright Song Video Parody YouTube

Article Details

Author Biography

Chaileisya Miranda, Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia

Magister Hukum

How to Cite
Miranda, Chaileisya. 2021. “Perlindungan Hak Cipta Terhadap Pencipta Lagu Dalam Penggunaan Video Parody Di Youtube”. JIPRO: Journal of Intellectual Property 4 (1):47-56. https://doi.org/10.20885/jipro.vol4.iss1.art4.

References

  1. H. C. Black, Black Law’s Dictionary, Definition Of The Terms And Phares Of American And English Jurisprudence, Ancient And Modern, (Ed. 6), United States Of America: West Publishing Co., 1990.
  2. Indonesia, Undang-Undang Tentang Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik, Undang- Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008, Ln Nomor 58 Tahun 2008, Tln Nomor 4843.
  3. Indonesia, Undang-Undang Hak Cipta , UU No. 28 Tahun 2014, LN No. 266 Tahun 2014, TLN No. 5599.
  4. Juli Wilson Marshall, Et.Al, The Satire/Parody Distinction In Copyright And Trademark Law Can Satire Ever Be A Fair Use, https://Apps.Americanbar.Org/Litigation/Committees/Intellectual/Roundtables/0506_Ou tline.Pdf, Diakses Pada 12 Desember 2020.
  5. Marry Marsella, “Google Beri Tips Cara Jadi Terkenal Di Youtube”, Cnn Indonesia, (21 Oktober 2015), http://Www.Cnnindonesia.Com/Teknologi/20151021135103-185-86343/GoogleBeri-Tips-Cara-Jadi-Terkenal-Di-Youtube/, diakses 11 Desember 2020.
  6. Rahmadi Usman, Hukum Hak Atas Kekayaan Intelektual (Perlindungan Dan Dimensi Hukumnya Di Indonesia), Bandung; PT Alumni, 2003 Rahmi Jened, Hak Cipta (Copyright’s Law), Bandung: Pt Citra Aditya Bakti, 2014.
  7. Setiawan. “Kekuatan New Media Dalam Membentuk Budaya Populer di Indonesia ( Studi Tentang Menjadi Artis Dadakan Dalam Mengunggah Video Musik Di Youtube)”. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, Universitas Mulawarman Samarinda, 2013.
  8. T. Hozumi, Buku Panduan Hak Cipta Asia Versi Indonesia [Asian Copyright Handbook], Diterjemahkan Oleh Masri Maris, Jakarta : Ikapi, 2006.
  9. WIPO Memahami Hak Kekayaan Industri, Diterjemahkan Oleh Direktorat Jendral Hak Kekayaan Intelektual, Jakarta : Kementrian Hukum Dan Hak Asasi Manusia.
  10. Youtube, About, https://www.youtube.com/yt/about/, diakses 11 Desember 2020 Youtube, Term Of Service, https://www.youtube.com/t/terms, diakses 11 Desember 2020.
  11. Zainuddin Ali, Metode Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2016.