Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 531 Download : 1183

Main Article Content

Abstract

The development of technology nowadays seems to reach all aspects of life, includes the realm of art, especially digital illustration. However, these developments were not followed by regulatory developments so that there was a legal vacuum in them. This study is intended to analyze the legal vacuum of limiting an act that can be categorized as piracy and legal protection for the creator of the piracy of digital illustrations which are  tokenized in the form of NFT using doctrinal research methods. Based on the results of the study, it is concluded that the Standard of Copyright Ability and substantial similarity can be used as criteria for piracy of digital illustrations. There are still vacancies in the regulations regarding the limitations of piracy of a work and the provisions governing NFT. The copyright protection system for digital illustrations in the current regulations consists of preventive and repressive protection. Due to this legal vacuum, it is hoped that regulation about NFT and fine art can be added, and awareness of all parties can be made to avoid infringement of other people's copyrights.

Keywords

Digital Illustration Copyright NFT

Article Details

License

The works in this journal are openly licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0).

This license grants readers the freedom to:

  • Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format

  • Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially under the following conditions:

  1. Attribution
    Readers must give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and JIPRO, provide a link to the CC BY-SA 4.0 license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/), and indicate if changes were made. Such credit must not imply endorsement by the licensor.

  2. ShareAlike
    If readers remix, transform, or build upon the material, they must distribute their contributions under the same CC BY-SA 4.0 license.

  3. No Additional Restrictions
    Readers may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from exercising the rights granted by the license.

How to Cite
Amukti, Enggal Triya, Erna Susanti, and Lily Triyana. 2023. “PERLINDUNGAN HAK CIPTA SENIMAN ATAS PEMBAJAKAN ILUSTRASI DIGITAL DALAM BENTUK NON-FUNGIBLE TOKEN”. JIPRO: Journal of Intellectual Property, December, 100-114. https://doi.org/10.20885/jipro.vol6.iss2.art4.
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. HS, H. Salim & Nurbani, Erlies Septiana. (2017). Penerapan Teori Hukum pada Penelitian Tesis dan Disertasi. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
  2. Kinter, Earl W. Kinter & Lahr, Jack. (1983). An Intellectual Property Law Primer. New York: Clark Boardman.
  3. Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. (2011). Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Grup.
  4. Muhdar, Muhammad. (2017). Pedoman Penyusunan Skripsi Program Studi Ilmu Hukum Jenjang Strata Satu (S-1). Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mulawarman: Samarinda.
  5. Penyalai, Fitriayu. (2020). Domain Publik di Indonesia. Jakarta: Goethe-Institut.
  6. Purwaningsih, Endang, Muslikh, & Chikmawati, Nurul Fajri. (2019). Hak Kekayaan Intelektual dan Investasi Kajian HKI dalam Dunia Investasi termasuk pada UMKM. Malang: Setara Press.
  7. Soelistyo, Henry. (2011). Hak Cipta Tanpa Hak Moral. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.
  8. Sugiharto, Alexander, Musan, Muhammad Yusuf & Falahuddin, Muhammad James. (2022). NFT & Metaverse: Blockchain, Dunia Virtual & Regulasi, Jakarta: Perkumpulan Kajian Hukum Terdesentralisasi INDONESIAN LEGAL STUDY FOR CRYPTO ASSET AND BLOCKCHAIN.
  9. Prancis. (1971). Berne Convention for The Protection of Literary and Artistic Works. Paris Act. Indonesia. (2014).
  10. Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 Tentang Hak Cipta. Lembaran RI No. 226, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Nomor 5599. Sekretariat Negara. Jakarta.
  11. Indonesia. (2019). Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 71 Tahun 2019. Lembaran RI No. 185, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Nomor 6400. Sekretariat Negara. Jakarta.
  12. Maroko. (1995). Trade Related Aspect of Intellectual Property Rights. Marrakesh Agreement Estabilishing the World Trade Organization.
  13. Altaftazani, Deden Herdiana, Hana Sakura Putu Arga, Jajang Bayu Kelana, dan Siti Ruqoyyah. (2020). Jurnal Ilmiah P2M STKIP Siliwangi. Analisis Pembelajaran Daring Membuat Seni Kolase Menggunakan Model Project Based Learning Pada Masa Pandemi Covid 19. Vol.7, No. 2, hlm. 185-191.
  14. Craig, Carys J. (2020). Forthcoming Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal. Transforming “Total Concept & Feel”: Dialogic Creativity and Copyrights’s Substantial Similarity Doctrine. Vol. 38, No. 3, hlm. 603-654.
  15. Kusno, Habi. (2016). Fiat Justisia. Perlindungan Hukum Hak Cipta Terhadap Pencipta Lagu yang Diunduh Melalui Internet. Vol. 10,No. 3, hlm. 489-502.
  16. Lee, Moon Hee. (2017). Northwestern University Law Review. Seeing’s Insight: Toward A Visual Substantial Similarity Test For Copyright Infringement of Pictorial, Graphic, and Sculptural Works. Vol. 111, No. 3, hlm. 833- 878.
  17. Lengkong, Marcello Raja, Dientje Rumimpunu, dan Sarah D. L. Roeroe. (2021). Lex Privatum. Perlindungan Hak Cipta Terhadap Pengubahan Aransemen Musik Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 Tentang Hak Cipta. hlm. 194-203.
  18. Margono, Suyud. (2012). Jurnal Rechtvinding. Prinsip Deklaratif Pendaftaran Hak Cipta: Kontradiksi Kaedah Pendaftaran Ciptaan dengan Asas Kepemilikan Publikasi Pertama Kali, Jurnal Rechtsvinding. Vol. 1, No. 2, hlm. 237-255.
  19. Muslih, M. (2013). Legalitas. Negara Hukum Indonesia dalam Perspektif Teori Hukum Gustav Radbruch. Vol. 4, No. 1, hlm. 130-152.
  20. Noor, Usman. (2021). Pustakaloka: Jurnal Kajian Informasi dan Perpustaan. NFT (Non-Fungible Token): Masa Depan Arsip Digital? Atau Hanya Sekedar Bubble?. Vol. 13, No. 2, hlm. 223- 234.
  21. Nurahmansyah, Karuniawan. (2019). Jurnal Rechtens. Pertimbangan Kewajiban Prinsip Deklaratif pada Hak Cipta Fotografi Jurnalistik Melalui Media Internet. Vol. 8, No. 1.
  22. Oktaviani, Monika dkk. (2019). Diponegoro Law Journal. Problem Yuridis Pelanggaran Hak Cipta dalam Bentuk Tindak Pidana Pembajakan dalam Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 Tentang Hak Cipta. Vol. 8, No. 2, hlm. 2186-2197.
  23. Paramisuari, Anak Agung Sinta dan Agung Putri M.E. Purwani. (2018). Journal Ilmu Hukum. Perlindungan Hukum Ekspresi Budaya Tradisional. Vol. 7, No. 1, hlm. 1-16.
  24. Rahmatunisa dan Erna Febriani. (2019). Jurnal Komunikologi. Strategi, Public Relation dalam Membangun Personal Branding Seniman Visual (Studi Deskriptif Kualitatif Strategi Public Relations dalam Membangun Personal Branding Muklay Sebagai Seniman Visual). Vol. 16, No. 2, hlm. 104-111.
  25. Restuningsih, Jati, Kholis Roisah, dan Adya Paramitha Prabandari. (2021). Notarius. Perlindungan Hukum Ilustrasi Digital Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 Tentang Hak Cipta. Vol. 14, No. 2, hlm. 957-971.
  26. Rizal, Fitra. (2020). Al-Manhaj: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam. Nalar Kritis Pelanggaran Hak Cipta dalam Islam. Vol. 2, No. 1, hlm. 1-23.
  27. S, Hendri. (2017). Jurnal Hukum Doktinal. Implementasi Hak Cipta dalam Hubungannya dengan Tujuan Hukum. Vol. 2, No. 2, hlm. 553-571.
  28. Saputra, I Gede Hendra Irawan dan I Dewa Putu Surya. Jurnal Pacta Sunt Servanda. Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Masyarakat Pengguna Sistem Pembayaran Bitcoin di Indonesia Ditinjau dari Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen. Vol. 2, No. 1. hlm. 9- 15.
  29. Simatupang Taufik H., Trisapto Wahyudi Agung Nugroho, Imam Lukito dan Antonio Rajoli Ginting. (2021). Advances in Social Sciences, Education and Humanis Research. Study on the Application of the Concept Substantial Similarity for the Protection of Architectural Works Towards Renewal of the Copyright Law in Indonesia. Vol. 592, hlm. 142-146.
  30. Sulistianingsinh, Dewi dan Apriliana Khomsa Kinanti. (2022). Krtha Bhayangkara. Hak Karya Cipta Non-Fungible Token (NFT) dalam Sudut Pandang Hukum Hak Kekayaan Intelektual. Vol. 16, No. 1, hlm. 198-206.
  31. Umboh, Karel Yossi dan Roy V. Karamoy. (2021). Lex Privatum. Tinjauan Yuridis dalam Mempublikasi Foto yang Mengandung Hak Cipta Tanpa Izin Ditinjau dari Undang- Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta, Vol. 9, No. 3, hlm. 65-75.
  32. Yulianto. (2016), Brikolase. Kajian Bentuk Seni Lukis Loro Blonyo Karya Koeboe Sarawan. Vol. 8. No. 2, hlm. 112-132.
  33. BRL Working Paper Series. (2021). The Non-Fungible Token (NFT) Market and Its Relationship with Bitcoin and Ethereum. Hamburg: Blockchain Research Lab.
  34. Center for Digital Society. (2021). Memahami Non-Fungible Tokens (NFT) di Industri CryptoArt. Yogjakarta: Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Politik Universitas Gadjah Mada.
  35. PricewaterhouseCooper Limited. (2021). Non-Fungible Token (NFTs): Legal, tax and accounting considerations you need to know. Hong Kong.
  36. World Intellectual Property Organization. (2004). WIPO Intellectual Property Handbook: Policy, Law, and Use.
  37. Notif Indonesia. (2021). Bagaimana Peluang NFT di Indonesia. Tersedia:https://notif.id/2021/ 28481/news/ekonomi/finansial /bagaimana-peluang-nft-di- indonesia/,[29 Desember 2021].
  38. The Finary Report. (2021). Potensi dan Masalah NFT. [Online]. Tersedia:https://www.thefinery report.com/articles/2021/4/9/ potensi-dan-masalah-nft [1 Februari 2022].