Main Article Content
Abstract
This article examines the Guidance and Supervision of Notary Former Convicts by the Notary Supervisory Council based on UUJN and Permenkumham. The problem that is formulated is how to develop and supervise ex-convict Notaries by the Notary Supervisory Council in DIY, and what are the obstacles to fostering and supervising ex-convict Notaries by the Notary Supervisory Council in DIY. This type of research is normative which is supported by information from resource persons with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. Legal materials were analyzed descriptively qualitatively. The results of this study conclude that the Guidance and Supervision carried out by the Notary Supervisory Council is guided by the UUJN and the RI Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights No. 15 of 2020 while the Guidance and Supervision carried out by the Notary Supervisory Council to former Notary Convict members is an annual examination that has been regulated in the Notary Position Law. In the Picking Test of the Notary protocol, there has been no special attention or agenda in the regular monitoring of Notary Ex-Convicts and the obstacles that occur in the guidance and supervision, due to the Notary Supervisory Council which does not yet have special rules in carrying out its duties, thus triggering several subjective factors in viewing and assess the effectiveness of the guidance and supervision of the Notaries involved
Key Word: Supervisory Board of Notaries, Notaries, Prisoners
Abstrak
Artikel ini meneliti tentang Pembinaan dan Pengawasan Notaris Mantan Narapidana Oleh Majelis Pengawas Notaris berdasarkan UUJN dan Permenkumham. Masalah yang dirumuskan adalah bagaimana Pembinaan dan Pengawasan terhadap Notaris mantan narapidana oleh Majelis Pengawas Notaris di DIY, dan apa yang menjadi kendala pembinaan dan pengawasan notaris mantan narapidana oleh Majelis Pengawas Notaris di DIY. Jenis penelitian ini adalah Normatif yang didukung dari keterangan Narasumber dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual. Bahan hukum dianalisis secara deskriptif kualitatif. Hasil penelitian tersebut menyimpulkan bahwa Pembinaan dan Pengawasan yang dilakukan Majelis Pengawas Notaris berpedoman UUJN dan Permenkumham RI No.15 Tahun 2020 sedangkan Pembinaan dan Pengawasan yang dilakukan oleh Majelis Pengawas Notaris kepada anggota Notaris Mantan Narapidana adalah pemeriksaan tahunan yang sudah diatur dalam Undang Undang Jabatan Notaris. Dalam Uji Petik protokol Notaris belum ada perhatian atau agenda khusus dalam monitoring secara berkala terhadap Notaris Mantan Narapidana dan Kendala yang terjadi dalam pembinaan dan pengawasan, disebabkan oleh Majelis Pengawas Notaris yang belum memiliki aturan khusus dalam menjalankan tugasnya sehingga memicu beberapa faktor yang bersifat subyektif dalam melihat dan menilai keefektifan pembinaan dan pengawasan terhadap Notaris yang terlibat
Kata Kunci: Majelis Pengawas Notaris, Notaris, Narapidana
Keywords
Article Details
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
- Buku
- Adjie, Habib, Hukum Notaris Indonesia Tafsir Tematik Terhadap Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris, Refika Aditam , Surabaya, 2007.
- Hamzah, Andi, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana, Rineka Cipta, Jakarta, 1994.
- Sjaifurrachman, Habib adjie, Aspek Pertanggungjawaban Notaris Dalam Pembuatan Akta, Cetakan I, Mandar Maju, Bandung, 2011.
- Jurnal
- Wibisono, Dwikky Bagus dan Umar Ma’ruf, “Peranan Majelis Pengawas Daerah (MPD) Terhadap Pengawasan Pelaksanaan Jabatan Notaris Di Kabupaten Tegal”, Jurnal Ilmiah Prodi Magister Kenotariatan, Vol 5 nomor 1 Tahun 2018
- Peraturan Perundang-undangan
- Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris
- Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris
References
Buku
Adjie, Habib, Hukum Notaris Indonesia Tafsir Tematik Terhadap Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris, Refika Aditam , Surabaya, 2007.
Hamzah, Andi, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana, Rineka Cipta, Jakarta, 1994.
Sjaifurrachman, Habib adjie, Aspek Pertanggungjawaban Notaris Dalam Pembuatan Akta, Cetakan I, Mandar Maju, Bandung, 2011.
Jurnal
Wibisono, Dwikky Bagus dan Umar Ma’ruf, “Peranan Majelis Pengawas Daerah (MPD) Terhadap Pengawasan Pelaksanaan Jabatan Notaris Di Kabupaten Tegal”, Jurnal Ilmiah Prodi Magister Kenotariatan, Vol 5 nomor 1 Tahun 2018
Peraturan Perundang-undangan
Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris
Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris