Isi Artikel Utama

Abstrak

The actions of Notary and PPAT officials must comply with the provisions of Article 38 of the UUJN-P, not only regarding the certainty of the date but also the numbering. However, in case No. 530/Pdt.G/2016/PN. Dps. states that the actions are contrary to Article 15 paragraph 1 of Law No. 2 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law No. 30 of 2004 concerning the Position of Notary. This research includes normative legal research. Data collection or processing techniques that support and are related to this research are document studies. The approach used in legal research that will be carried out is a statutory approach. Analysis of legal materials using qualitative descriptive methods, all collected data is analyzed qualitatively with an inductive nature. The legal consequences of a notarial deed that does not comply with the provisions of Article 38 UUJN are that the deed has evidentiary value as a private deed and if any of the parties does not recognize the deed, it makes the deed null and void because it does not comply with Article 1320. The Notary's responsibility is not fulfilled for a notarial deed made not based on Article 38 UUJN, the Notary is responsible for carrying out obligations, fulfilling the agreement in the peace, completing the deed process with the applicable procedures and legal regulations based on UUJN by immediately giving a number and date to the deed of sale and purchase agreement and the deed of power of attorney to sell.

Kata Kunci

Legal Consequences Notarial Deed Article 38 UUJN

Rincian Artikel

Cara Mengutip
Anhar, H. I. (2025). Akibat Hukum Akta Notaris Yang Tidak Memenuhi Pasal 38 Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 Tentang Jabatan Notaris. Officium Notarium, 4(2), 316–339. https://doi.org/10.20885/JON.vol4.iss2.art8

Referensi

  1. Adil, Ustad, Mengenal Notaris Syariah, PT. Citra Adita Bakti, Bandung, 2011.

  2. Adjie, Habib, Penerapan Pasal 38 UUJN-P dalam Pelaksanaan Tugas Jabatan Notaris, Bintang Pustaka Madani, Yogyakarta, 2021.

  3. Ali, Achmad, Menguak Tabir Hukum, Kencana, Jakarta: 2008.

  4. Anshori, Abdul Ghofur, Lembaga Kenotariatan Indonesia, Perspektif Hukum dan Etika, UII Press, Yogyakarta, 2012.

  5. Arief, Saifuddin, Notariat Syariah Dalam Praktik, Darunnajah Publishing, Jakarta, 2011.

  6. Arliman, Laurensius, Notaris dan Penegakan Hukum oleh Hakim, CV Budi Utama, Yogyakarta, 2015.

  7. HS, Salim, Teknik Pembuatan Akta Satu (Konsep Teoritis, Kewenangan Notaris, Bentuk dan Minuta Akta), Rajawali Press, Jakarta, 2015.

  8. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata

  9. Mas, Marwan, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia, 2003.

  10. Mertokusumo, Sudikno, Mengenal Hukum Suatu Pengantar, Liberty, Yogyakarta, 2003.

  11. Muhammad, Abdulkadir, Etika Profesi Hukum, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 2001.

  12. Simorangkir, O.P. Etika Jabatan, Aksara Persada Indonesia, Jakarta, 1998.

  13. Sjaifurrachman, Aspek Pertanggungjawaban Notaris dalam Pembuatan Akta, CV. Mandar Maju, Bandung, 2011.

  14. Soedjono Dirdjosisworo, 2010, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum , Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Tinggi

  15. Soerodjo, Irawan, Kepastian Hukum Hak Atas Tanah di Indonesia, Arkola, Surabaya, 2003.

  16. Soeroso, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2011.

  17. Subekti, Hukum Pembuktian, PT. Pradnya Paramitha, Jakarta, 2005. 

  18. Sugiartu, Agus dan Lina Sinarta, Panduan Pintar Cara Membuat Aneka Surat Perjanjian, Prestasi Pustaka Publisher, Jakarta, 2012. 

  19. Tobing, G.H.S. Lumban, Peraturan Jabatan Notaris, Erlangga, Jakarta, 1996. 

  20. Triwulan, Titik dan Shinta Febrian, Perlindungan Hukum bagi Pasien, Prestasi Pustaka, Jakarta, 2010. 

  21. Ufuk Robert Wibowo, “Apa Wujud Tanggung Jawab Notaris Akibat Akta Otentik Terdegradasi Menjadi Akta di Bawah Tangan”, Humani, Vol. 10 No. 1, 2020.

  22. Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris