Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the legal protection for victims of money laundering against the rejection of resistance to the execution of mortgage rights. The analysis was conducted against the background of the verdict of the Cibinong District Court Number 582/Pid.B/2019/PN.Cbi which ruled that one of the results of the money laundering crime in the form of SHGB No. 5993 was returned to the victim but the object of dispute was in the process of execution of a mortgage. This type of research is normative legal research. Normative research is legal research conducted by examining library materials or secondary data. The data in this research is secondary data obtained through literature study and supported by primary data obtained by interviewing sources. The data obtained in this study were analyzed using qualitative methods and then presented descriptively. The results of this study show that the creditor holding the Mortgage Rights has a separatist right guaranteed by the Mortgage Rights Act must take precedence over other creditors. Legal protection for victims of money laundering crimes against the rejection of resistance to the execution of mortgage rights is that they can file a new civil lawsuit to the district court to sue the object of the dispute by adding a new defendant so that it is not Nebis In Idem. In addition, it can be attempted in good faith to mediate between the defendant and the victim for the loss incurred. Victims of money laundering crimes can file extraordinary legal remedies, namely by reviewing the decision of the third party resistance (derden verzet). Seeking good faith towards the victim through mediation related to material damages.
Keywords
Article Details
Copyright (c) 2025 Guntar Mahendro, Destri Budi Nugraheni
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
Ali Geno Berutu, “Tindak Pidana Kejahatan Pencucian Uang (Money Laundering) dalam Pandangan KUHP dan Hukum Islam Pidana”, Tawazun: Jurnal of Sharia Economic Law, Vol.2, No. 1, (2019), 2, https://journal.iainkudus.ac.id
Andi Marlina, Imron Rizki A, Safri Salam, “Penegakan Hukum terhadap Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang oleh Jasa Umrah Abu Tours”, Delictum: Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Hukum Pidana Islam, IAIN Pare, Mei (2023), 3, https://ejurnal.iainpare.ac.id/index.php/delictum/index
Iman Rahmat Gulo, Sunarmi, Mahmud Mulyadi, “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Korban Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang dengan Predicat Crime Tindak Pidana Penipuan yang Hartanya Dirampas Untuk Negara (Studi Putusan MahkamaH Agung No. 3096K/Pid.Sus/2019)”, Jurnal Rectum Vol.5, No.3, (2023), 3, http://dx.doi.org/10.46930/jurnalrectum.v5i3.3496
Laila M.Rasyid S.H.,M.Hum dan Herinawati,S.H.,M.Hum, Modul Pengantar Hukum Acara Perdata, Unimal Press, Lhoksumawe, 2015;
Mishael Joshua, R.Rahaditya, “Quo Vadis Perampasan Aset dalam Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Sebagai Pemenuhan Keadilan Terhadap Korban”, Unes Law Review Vol.6, No.4, Juni, (2024), 3, https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i4
Muhammad Septian dan Armansyah, “Kekuatan Eksekutorial Hak Tanggungan yang Dirampas Negara terkait Korupsi berdasarkan Undang-Undang Hak Tanggungan (Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2701K/PDT/2017)”, Jurnal Kemahasiswaan dan Kenotariatan, Vol.2, No. 1, Desember 2022, https://journal.univpancasila.ac.id
R.Soeroso, 1994, Praktik Hukum Acara Perdata, Tata Cara, Proses Persidangan, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta;
Salim H.S, Perkembangan Hukum Jaminan Di Indonesia, Jakarta, PT Raja Grafindo Persada, 2004,
Sudikno Mertokusumo, Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia, Liberty, 2009, Yogyakarta;
Susanto, “Penafsiran Asas Manfaat Tentang Asset Recovery Korban Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang (Kajian Putusan Nomor 195K/PDT/2018), Jurnal Yudisial, Vol.13 No.1, April (2020), 4, Jurnal.komisiyudisial.go.id
Tania Irwan,”Implementasi Upaya Pemulihan Aset Korban Tindak Pidana Penipuan dan Pencucian Uang dalam Kasus First Travel”, Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan.Vol 5, No. 4, November 2021; https://ejournal.mandalanursa.org/index.php/JISIP/article/view/2223
Yonatha Sebastian Laowo, “Kajian Hukum Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang (Money Laundering)” Jurnal Panah Keadilan, Universitas Nias Raya, Vol. 1, No.1, Februari (2022), 86, https://jurnal.uniraya.ac.id/index.php/PanahKeadilan
Zefanius Fransico, Urgensi Kepastian Hukum Hak Preferent dalam Hak Tanggungan dan Hak Parate Eksekusi Bank Sebagai Kreditur terhadap Aset Debitur yang dirampas Negara, Tesis, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, 2019
References
Ali Geno Berutu, “Tindak Pidana Kejahatan Pencucian Uang (Money Laundering) dalam Pandangan KUHP dan Hukum Islam Pidana”, Tawazun: Jurnal of Sharia Economic Law, Vol.2, No. 1, (2019), 2, https://journal.iainkudus.ac.id
Andi Marlina, Imron Rizki A, Safri Salam, “Penegakan Hukum terhadap Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang oleh Jasa Umrah Abu Tours”, Delictum: Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Hukum Pidana Islam, IAIN Pare, Mei (2023), 3, https://ejurnal.iainpare.ac.id/index.php/delictum/index
Iman Rahmat Gulo, Sunarmi, Mahmud Mulyadi, “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Korban Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang dengan Predicat Crime Tindak Pidana Penipuan yang Hartanya Dirampas Untuk Negara (Studi Putusan MahkamaH Agung No. 3096K/Pid.Sus/2019)”, Jurnal Rectum Vol.5, No.3, (2023), 3, http://dx.doi.org/10.46930/jurnalrectum.v5i3.3496
Laila M.Rasyid S.H.,M.Hum dan Herinawati,S.H.,M.Hum, Modul Pengantar Hukum Acara Perdata, Unimal Press, Lhoksumawe, 2015;
Mishael Joshua, R.Rahaditya, “Quo Vadis Perampasan Aset dalam Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Sebagai Pemenuhan Keadilan Terhadap Korban”, Unes Law Review Vol.6, No.4, Juni, (2024), 3, https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i4
Muhammad Septian dan Armansyah, “Kekuatan Eksekutorial Hak Tanggungan yang Dirampas Negara terkait Korupsi berdasarkan Undang-Undang Hak Tanggungan (Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2701K/PDT/2017)”, Jurnal Kemahasiswaan dan Kenotariatan, Vol.2, No. 1, Desember 2022, https://journal.univpancasila.ac.id
R.Soeroso, 1994, Praktik Hukum Acara Perdata, Tata Cara, Proses Persidangan, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta;
Salim H.S, Perkembangan Hukum Jaminan Di Indonesia, Jakarta, PT Raja Grafindo Persada, 2004,
Sudikno Mertokusumo, Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia, Liberty, 2009, Yogyakarta;
Susanto, “Penafsiran Asas Manfaat Tentang Asset Recovery Korban Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang (Kajian Putusan Nomor 195K/PDT/2018), Jurnal Yudisial, Vol.13 No.1, April (2020), 4, Jurnal.komisiyudisial.go.id
Tania Irwan,”Implementasi Upaya Pemulihan Aset Korban Tindak Pidana Penipuan dan Pencucian Uang dalam Kasus First Travel”, Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan.Vol 5, No. 4, November 2021; https://ejournal.mandalanursa.org/index.php/JISIP/article/view/2223
Yonatha Sebastian Laowo, “Kajian Hukum Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang (Money Laundering)” Jurnal Panah Keadilan, Universitas Nias Raya, Vol. 1, No.1, Februari (2022), 86, https://jurnal.uniraya.ac.id/index.php/PanahKeadilan
Zefanius Fransico, Urgensi Kepastian Hukum Hak Preferent dalam Hak Tanggungan dan Hak Parate Eksekusi Bank Sebagai Kreditur terhadap Aset Debitur yang dirampas Negara, Tesis, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, 2019