Article Sidebar

Submitted
June 30, 2025
Accepted
July 25, 2025
Published
July 30, 2025
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 172 Download : 224

Main Article Content

Abstract

Climate change caused by greenhouse gas emissions has led countries like Indonesia and New Zealand to develop carbon trading systems as mechanisms to reduce emissions. This study aims to analyze the differences in the structure and oversight of carbon market regulation between Indonesia and New Zealand, as well as to assess the effectiveness of their implementation. The research uses normative legal methods, combining comparative and statutory approaches. The findings indicate that Indonesia officially launched its carbon exchange in 2023, regulated by the Financial Services Authority (OJK) and implemented through a market-based mechanism. In contrast, New Zealand has operated its Emissions Trading Scheme (NZ ETS) since 2008 using a closed-bid auction system with robust compliance monitoring by the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA). The study compares three key aspects: legal regulation, trading mechanisms, and supervision systems. The results reveal that New Zealand has more advanced obligations for sectors, price setting, and risk-based auditing, while Indonesia faces challenges in regulatory clarity and market participation. The study recommends strengthening Indonesia’s legal framework and reporting mechanisms to enhance the carbon market’s effectiveness and contribute meaningfully to emission reduction targets.

Keywords

Carbon Exchange Emissions Trading Climate Change

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Muhammad Adriansyah, Adelia Kusuma Wardhani

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

How to Cite
Adriansyah, M., & Wardhani, A. K. (2025). Carbon Exchange Trading and Monitoring Scheme In Indonesia and New Zealand. Journal of Private and Commercial Law, 2(1), 26–51. https://doi.org/10.20885/JPCOL.vol2.iss1.art2
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Atmasasmita, R. 1989. “Asas-asas Perbandingan Hukum Pidana”. Jakarta: Yayasan Lembaga Bantuan Hukum Indonesia. 

  2. Baskara Wahyu, A.P. 2023. “Kerangka Hukum Bursa Karbon di Indonesia: Perkembangan Terkini dan Tantangn Ke depan”. Jurnal: Mimbar Hukum Universitas Gajah Mada.

  3. Benjamin Rontard dan Harnandez. 2022. “Konstruksi Politik Penetapan Harga Karbon: Pengalaman dari Skema Perdagangan Emisi Selandia Baru”. Environmental Development 43.

  4. Catera, K. 2022. “Pengakuan Hak Karbon Hutan di Indonesia: Pendekatan Konsitusional.” Jurnal Lentera Hukum, Vol 9, Edisi 1.

  5. Irama, A.B. 2020. “Perdagangan karbon di Indonesia: kajian kelembagaan dan keuangan negara”. Info Artha Vol 4 No 1. Tanggerang Selatan: Direktorat Sistem Manajemen Investasi Ditjen Perbendaharaan, Kementrian Keuangan, Politeknik Keuangan Negara STAN. 

  6. Ivan Diaz-Rainey, “Carbon Pricing and System Linking: Lessons from The New Zealand Emissions Trading Scheme”, Energy Economics, Vol. 73, 2018.

  7. Leining, C, Kerr Suzi, Bronwyn. 2020. “Skema Perdagangan Emisi Selandia Baru: tinjauan kritis dan prospek masa depan untuk tiga inovasi desain”. Climate Policy. No 2. 

  8. Leonarda, T dkk. 2023. “Pengaruh Peraturan Pajak Ramah Lingkungan Terhadap Energi Baru Terbarukan Pendanaan Energi di Indonesia.” Bestuur Jurnal of Administrasi Law. Vol 11. No 2. 

  9. Margareth, T. R. 2022. “Perdagangan Karbon: Memahami Konsep dan Implementasinya”. Standar: Better Standard Better Living. Vol 1 No 3. 

  10. Mertokusumo, A. dan Pitlo. 1993. “Bab tentang Penemuan Hukum.” Yogyakarta: Citra Aditya Bhakti. 

  11. Miaomiao Tao, et all, “Enhancing New Zealand’s emissions trading scheme A comprehensive sector-level assessment for a stronger regulatory framework”, Journal or Environtmental Management, Vol. 352, 2024.

  12. Biro Komunikasi Kementrian Koordinator Bidang Kemaritiman dan Investasi RI. 2023. “Pemerintah Indonesia Tegaskan Komitmen Mewujudkan Nol Emisi Karbon di Tahun 2060”. https://maritim.go.id/. Accesed 11 Juli 2024. 

  13. International Carbon Action Partnership (ICAP). 2023. “New Zealand Emissions Trading Scheme”. Accesed 11 Juli 2024. 

  14. Kamalina, A. R. 2024. “Kementerian Keuangan Ungkap Penyebab Bursa Karbon Sepi Peminat, Sempat Nol Transaksi dalam Sebulan.” https://ekonomi.bisnis.com. Accesed 11 Juli 2024. 

  15. Santosa, A. Kepala departemen Literasi, Inklusi Keuangan dan Komunikasi. 2023. “Siaran Pers: Presiden Resmikan Bursa Karbon Indonesia”. https://ojk.go.id/id/. Accesed 11 Juli 2024. 

  16. Wuryasti, F. 2023. “Ini Empat Skema Perdagangan Karbon yang Disiapkan BEI”. https://maritim.go.id/. Accesed 13 Juli 2024.