Article Sidebar

Submitted
April 25, 2026
Accepted
July 15, 2026
Published
July 15, 2026
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 5 Download : 0

Main Article Content

Abstract

Indonesia has progressively strengthened the legal framework for intellectual property-based financing through Government Regulation Number 24 of 2022 and Minister of Creative Economy/Head of Creative Economy Agency Regulation Number 6 of 2025 on Intellectual Property Valuators. These regulations provide a more structured framework for valuing intellectual property used as fiduciary collateral. This study examines the implications of the regulation of intellectual property valuators for legal certainty in satisfying the objective validity requirements of fiduciary guarantee agreements. Using normative legal research with statutory and conceptual approaches, the study analyzes the relationship between the legal determinability of intellectual property, the reliability of its economic valuation, and creditor protection. The findings demonstrate that the current framework has strengthened legal certainty by regulating valuation approaches, professional qualifications, registration procedures, professional obligations, and supervisory mechanisms. Nevertheless, substantive gaps remain concerning the governance of valuation panels, the evidentiary weight of valuation reports, professional liability, periodic revaluation, the recognition of collateral values under banking regulations, and enforcement mechanisms. This study argues that uncertainty or fluctuation in the economic value of intellectual property does not automatically render the collateral object indeterminate or the fiduciary guarantee agreement null and void. Further regulatory harmonization, accountable valuation procedures, integrated registration and valuation data, and effective market infrastructure are therefore required to strengthen creditor protection and the implementation of intellectual property based financing.

Keywords

Fiduciary Guarantee Intellectual Property Legal Certainty

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Istiqomah Istiqomah

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

How to Cite
Istiqomah, I. (2026). Implications of Intellectual Property Valuer Regulation on Legal Certainty in The Fulfillment of Fiduciary Guarantee Agreements. Journal of Private and Commercial Law, 3(1), 41–66. https://doi.org/10.20885/JPCOL.vol3.iss1.art3
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Admin, Admin. “Kumpulan Yurisprudensi Kebatalan Perjanjian.” Law Firm Dr. Iur Liona N. Supriatna., S.H., M.Hum. – Andri Marpaung, S.H. & Partners, 2020. https://www.lawyersclubs.com/kumpulan-yurisprudensi-kebatalan-perjanjian.

  2. ———. “MAPPI Gelar Public Hearing SPI Kekayaan Intelektual.” Media Penilai, 2023. https://mediapenilai.mappi.or.id/index.php/2023/12/09/mappi-gelar-public-hearing-spi-kekayaan-intelektual/.

  3. ———. “Valuation Standards.” IPBA Connect, n.d. https://profwurzer.com/diplex/docs/ip-valuation/valuation-standards/.

  4. Ali, Muhammad Dzulfikar Syaiful. “Penentuan Nilai Limit Valuasi Hak Cipta Dalam Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia.” Law, Development and Justice Review 8, no. 5 (August 2025). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14710/ldjr.8.2025.177-194.

  5. Aprilia, Nita. “Analisis Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 2022 Tentang Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Sebagai Jaminan Utang Dalam Perspektif Hukum Ekonomi Syariah.” AT-TASHARRUF: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Ekonomi Syariah 2, no. 2 (2024).

  6. Assegaf Hamzah & Partners. “New Regulation Empowers IP Valuation for Business Financing.” Indonesia Client Update, October 22, 2025. https://www.ahp.id/clientalert/AHPClientUpdate-22October2025.pdf.

  7. Dewi, Putri Maha, Rustan Susilowardani, and dkk. Hukum Bisnis Kontemporer. Serang: Sada Pustaka, 2025.

  8. Ertananda, Annisa, Yetniwati Yetniwati, and Dwi Suryahartati. “Hak Cipta Sebagai Objek Jaminan Fidusia Dalam Perjanjian Kredit Perbankan Di Indonesia.” Recital Review 7, no. 1 (2025): 140–56. https://doi.org/10.22437/rr.v7i1.44458.

  9. Fahmi Ihsan Margolang, and Fenny Fenny. “The Legal Fremwork and Practice of Using Intellectual Property Right as Fiduciary Collateral in Indonesia : Challengs and Solution.” Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan Dan Sosial Humaniora 2, no. 4 (2025): 185–97. https://doi.org/10.62383/aliansi.v2i4.1078.

  10. Febriani, Komang Ari, and I Made Sarjana. “Analisis Yuridis Kekayaan Intelektual yang Dibebankan Sebagai Jaminan Fidusia Dari Perspektif Ekonomi Kreatif.” Ethics and Law Journal: Business and Notary 2, no. 4 (2024). https://doi.org/10.61292/eljbn.234.

  11. ———. “Analisis Yuridis Kekayaan Intelektual yang Dibebankan Sebagai Jaminan Fidusia Dari Perspektif Ekonomi Kreatif.” Ethics and Law j.: -bus. and n.a. 2, no. 4 (October 2024). https://doi.org/10.61292/eljbn.234.

  12. Firdaus, Muhammad Bintang. “Dialektika Keadilan, Kepastian, Kemanfaatan Hukum Dalam Perspektif Gustav Radbruch Pada Hukum Indonesia.” Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Kebijakan Publik | E-ISSN : 3031-8882 3, no. 1 (2025): 357–67. https://doi.org/10.62379/qy4b6z80.

  13. Hariyani, Iswi, Cita Yustisia Serfiyani, and R Serfianto D Purnomo. Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Sebagai Jaminan Kredit. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Andi, 2018.

  14. Idea, Admin. “Sosialisasi PP No 24 Tahun 2022 Tentang Ekonomi Kreatif.” IDEA : Media E-Commerce Indonesia, 2022. https://idea.or.id/artikel/sosialisasi-pp-no-24-tahun-2022-tentang-ekonomi-kreatif?lang=id.

  15. Ismayani, Ismayani. “Rekonstruksi Regulasi Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia Akibat Debitur Wanprestasi Berbasis Nilai Keadilan.” Universitas Islam Sultan Agung, 2023. https://repository.unissula.ac.id/31131/1 Program Doktor Ilmu Hukum_10302100099_fullpdf.pdf.

  16. Jasmindhia, Rania. “Pembebanan Jaminan Fidusia Atas Hak Kekayaan Intelektual.” JIHHP 4, no. 5 (July 2024): 1419–27. https://doi.org/10.38035/jihhp.v4i5.2285.

  17. Kementerian Ekonomi Kreatif/Badan Ekonomi Kreatif Republik Indonesia. “Peraturan Menteri Ekonomi Kreatif/Kepala Badan Ekonomi Kreatif Nomor 6 Tahun 2025 tentang Penilai Kekayaan Intelektual.” Berita Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2025 Nomor 723. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/329471/permenekraf-no-6-tahun-2025.

  18. Khatimah, Husnul. “Peluang Monetasi Kekayaan Intelektual Melalui Pembiayaan Berbasis Jaminan.” Interdisciplinary Explorations in Research Journal 3, no. 2 (2025): 369–83. https://doi.org/10.62976/ierj.v3i2.1126.

  19. Kusuma, Arif Budi, and Suherman Suherman. “Legal Certainty of Intellectual Property That Becomes an Object of Debt Collateral in Bank Financial Institutions According to Government Regulation Number 24 of 2022.” International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice 2, no. 2 (2025): 166–73. https://doi.org/10.62951/ijlcj.v2i2.618.

  20. Laksana, Andri Winjaya. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Kreditur Konkuren Dalam Kepailitan Berbasis Nilai Keadilan.” Universitas Islam Sultan Agung, 2025. https://repository.unissula.ac.id/42409/.

  21. Legal, Klik. “Perkembangan Dan Implementasi Pengaturan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Di Indonesia Dalam Kedudukannya Sebagai Jaminan.” Kliklegal.Com, 2023. https://kliklegal.com/perkembangan-dan-implementasi-pengaturan-hak-kekayaan-intelektual-di-indonesia-dalam-kedudukannya-sebagai-jaminan/.

  22. Lestari, Yunita Estu. “Pengakuan Hki Sebagai Objek Hak Tanggungan: Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Perluasan Jaminan Kebendaan Dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia.” Jurnal Multilingual 5, no. 1 (2025). https://ejournal.penerbitjurnal.com/index.php/multilingual/article/view/1289.

  23. Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. “Putusan Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019.” January 6, 2020. https://www.mkri.id/public/content/persidangan/putusan/putusan_mkri_6694.pdf.

  24. ———. “Putusan Nomor 2/PUU-XIX/2021.” August 31, 2021. https://www.mkri.id/public/content/persidangan/putusan/putusan_mkri_8060.pdf.

  25. Mardiana, Herda, Muhamad Amirulloh, and Pupung Faisal. “Hak paten sebagai objek jaminan fidusia berdasarkan peraturan perundang-undangan mengenai jaminan fidusia dan paten.” J. Cakrawala Huk. 11, no. 2 (August 2020): 177–86. https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v11i2.4094.

  26. Mufarokhah, Lailatul, and Made Aditya Pramana Putra. “Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Akta Perjanjian Yang Dinyatakan Batal Demi Hukum (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 287/Pdt.g/2024/Pn Gin).” JMA 3, no. 10 (2025). https://doi.org/10.62281/dsgka723.

  27. Mustafida, Latifa. “Penerapan Doktrin Misbruik Van Omstandigheiden Terhadap Pembatalan Akta Notaris Berdasarkan Putusan Pengadilan (Study Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Yogyakarta).” Universitas Islam Indonesia, 2017. https://dspace.uii.ac.id/handle/123456789/9127.

  28. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Republik Indonesia. “Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Republik Indonesia Nomor 19 Tahun 2025 tentang Kemudahan Akses Pembiayaan kepada Usaha Mikro, Kecil, dan Menengah.” Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2025 Nomor 27/OJK, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 157/OJK. https://ojk.go.id/id/regulasi/Documents/Pages/POJK-19-Tahun-2025-Kemudahan-Akses-Pembiayaan-Kepada-UMKM/POJK%2019%20Tahun%202025%20Kemudahan%20Akses%20Pembiayaan%20Kepada%20Usaha%20Mikro%2C%20Kecil%2C%20dan%20Menengah.pdf.

  29. ———. “Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Republik Indonesia Nomor 40/POJK.03/2019 tentang Penilaian Kualitas Aset Bank Umum.” 2019. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/128448/peraturan-ojk-no-40pojk032019-tahun-2019.

  30. Puspitasari, Firda, and Diah Puspita Citra Mandiri Ningtyas. “Keabsahan Perjanjian Fidusia Terkait Pembatalan Sepihak Atas.” RLJ 1, no. 2 (2025). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.36355/.v1i2.

  31. Putra, Revan Ananda. “Peran Penilai Publik Dalam Menentukan Nilai Ekonomi Hak Cipta Atas Musik Sebagai Objek Jaminan Fidusia Berdasarkan PP NO. 24 Tahun 2022.” Universitas Gadjah Mada, 2025. https://etd.repository.ugm.ac.id/penelitian/detail/253511.

  32. Ramadhan, Ksatria Dwi Putra. “Peluang Penerapan Hak Cipta Sebagai Jaminan Fidusia Dalam Sistem Hukum Jaminan Indonesia.” Universitas Islam Indonesia, 2025. https://dspace.uii.ac.id/handle/123456789/60180.

  33. Republik Indonesia. “Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 2022 tentang Peraturan Pelaksanaan Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2019 tentang Ekonomi Kreatif.” Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2022 Nomor 151, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 6802. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/216815/pp-no-24-tahun-2022.

  34. ———. “Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2016 tentang Paten.” Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2016 Nomor 176, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 5922. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/37536/uu-no-13-tahun-2016.

  35. ———. “Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2019 tentang Ekonomi Kreatif.” Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2019 Nomor 212, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 6414. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/details/123686/uu-no-24-tahun-2019.

  36. ———. “Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta.” Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2014 Nomor 266, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 5599. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/details/38690/uu-no-28-tahun-2014.

  37. ———. “Undang-Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 tentang Jaminan Fidusia.” Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1999 Nomor 168, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 3889. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/45374/uu-no-42-tahun-1999.

  38. ———. “Undang-Undang Nomor 65 Tahun 2024 tentang Perubahan Ketiga atas Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2016 tentang Paten.” Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2024 Nomor 251, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 7002. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/306515/uu-no-65-tahun-2024.

  39. Rizkiawan, Teguh. “Kekayaan Intelektual Sebagai Objek Jaminan Kredit Perbankan: Prospek Dan Kendala.” Lex Renaissance 7, no. 4 (2022): 883–94. https://doi.org/10.20885/JLR.vol7.iss4.art13.

  40. Rochadiningsih, Yetti, Torang Nasution, Henri Pardamean, and Muhamad Amin. “Analisis Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 2022 Dalam Mewujudkan Skema Pembiayaan Berbasis Kekayaan Intelektual.” JMIH 8, no. 2 (August 2023): 1. https://doi.org/10.36722/jmih.v8i2.2304.

  41. S, Hendri, and Rusniati. “Analisis Yuridis Aspek Hukum Benda Tidak Bergerak Sebagai Objek Jaminan Fidusia.” Disiplin : Majalah Civitas Akademika Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum sumpah Pemuda 27, no. 3 (2021): 198–207. https://doi.org/10.46839/disiplin.v27i3.54.

  42. Simbolon, Fransiska Agustina, Tan Kamello, Burhan Sidabariba, and Syarifah Lisa Andriati. “Hak Preferen Kreditor Melaksanakan Lelang Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia.” Gorontalo Law Review 8, no. 1 (2025). https://jurnal.unigo.ac.id/index.php/golrev/article/view/3849.

  43. Students of the Master of Law Study Program Faculty of Law University of Jember, Riana Karimah Umami, Moh Ali Prakoso Bhim, and Lecturer of the Master of Law Study Program Faculty of Law University of Jember. “Qualification of Copyrights as Objects on Fiduciary Warranty Objects.” IJSSERS 02, no. 12 (December 2022). https://doi.org/10.55677/ijssers/V02I12Y2022-12.

  44. Syaifuddin, Didid Muhammad. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Masyarakat Atas Kepastian Hukum Akta Otentik Notaris Terhadap Akta Yang Tidak Dibacakan Dan Diterangkan Kepada Para Pihak.” Universitas Islam Sultan Agung, 2022.

  45. Wahyu Mahendra, Zaenal Arifin, Muhammad Junaidi, and Soegianto Soegianto. “Implementasi Nilai Pasar Dan Nilai Likuidasi Sebagai Nilai Limit Dalam Lelang Hak Tanggungan.” JULR 8, no. 3 (2025): 2861–77. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v8i3.12877.

  46. Waluja, Hana Djaja. “Kepastian Hukum Terhadap Penilai Publik Sebagai Penentu Nilai Hak Cipta Dalam Jaminan Kredit Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum Statuta 1, no. 1 (2021): 19–36. https://doi.org/10.35586/jhs.v1i1.5702.

  47. Wilianita, Ani, Yuniar Rahmatiar, and Muhamad Abas. “Akibat Hukum Jaminan Fidusia Yang Tidak Didaftarkan Secara Elektronik (Online) Dihubungkan Dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 Tentang Jaminan Fidusia.” JIHHP 4, no. 6 (n.d.).

  48. Wulandari, Sekar, Fokky Fuad, and Suartini Suartini. “Valuasi Aset Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Dalam Jaminan Fidusia.” jbh 13, no. 2 (December 2024): 543–54. https://doi.org/10.37893/jbh.v13i2.972.

  49. Wullur, Aerlangga Marfellino Rafael, Edwin Tinangon, and Anastasia E Gerungan. “Implementasi Unsur-Unsur Pasal 1320 Kuhperdata Dalam Perjanjian Persatuan Dana Duka Jiko Lembang Mahakerret Barat.” Lex Crimen 13, no. 5 (2025).

  50. Zainuddin, Muhammad, and Aisyah Dinda Karina. “Penggunaan Metode Yuridis Normatif Dalam Membuktikan Kebenaran Pada Penelitian Hukum.” Smart Law Journal 2, no. 2 (2023). https://e-journal.unkaha.ac.id/index.php/slj/article/view/26.