Bilah Samping Artikel

Telah diserahkan
August 9, 2023
Diterima
July 8, 2025
Diterbitkan
July 9, 2025
Unduh
PDF (English)
Statistik
Baca Penghitung : 512 Unduh : 260

Isi Artikel Utama

Abstrak

Corruption and money laundering are classified as extraordinary crimes due to their significant impact on state finances and their potential to destabilize the national economy. These crimes not only result in the direct loss of public funds but also undermine trust in state institutions, obstruct development programs, and damage Indonesia's international reputation. Given the magnitude of these threats, there is an urgent need for effective legal mechanisms to recover stolen assets swiftly and efficiently. This study explores the urgency of ratifying the Asset Confiscation Bill as a critical step in enhancing Indonesia’s legal framework for combating corruption and money laundering. Currently, Indonesia’s asset recovery mechanisms are limited by procedural constraints embedded in existing laws on corruption and money laundering. These laws generally require a court decision with permanent legal force before any assets can be confiscated. Such a requirement often hampers swift action and allows perpetrators to conceal or transfer illicit assets during lengthy legal processes. This study, which uses a normative legal research method, relies on an analysis of laws, legal doctrines, relevant literature, and legal dictionaries to assess the shortcomings of current asset confiscation regulations. The findings suggest that the Asset Confiscation Bill holds great potential to fill these legal gaps. If enacted, the bill could provide a legal basis for the non-conviction-based confiscation of assets, enabling law enforcement to act more decisively in reclaiming assets suspected to be linked to corruption or money laundering. Such a reform would significantly bolster Indonesia’s efforts to combat economic crimes and protect national financial integrity.

Kata Kunci

Asset Confiscation Bill Corruption Money Laundering

Rincian Artikel

Lisensi

Hak Cipta (c) 2025 Khilmatin Maulidah, Ratna Kumala Sari, Aldisa Melissa, Agnes Fitryantica

Creative Commons License

Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

Cara Mengutip
Maulidah, K., Sari, R. K., Melissa, A., & Fitryantica, A. (2025). The Urgency of Enacting the Asset Confiscation Bill for the Eradication of Corruption and Money Laundering in Indonesia. Prophetic Law Review, 7(1), 95–116. https://doi.org/10.20885/PLR.vol7.iss1.art5
Unduh Sitasi
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Referensi

  1. Adam, Widyarti. “Pentingnya Pengesahan Rancangan Undang-Undang Perampasan Aset Oleh Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Republik Indonesia.” Akademik: Jurnal Mahasiswa Humanis 5, no. 1 (2025): 151–61. https://doi.org/10.37481/jmh.v5i1.1139.

  2. Alwi Rahman Kusnandar. ‘’’Klasemen Liga Korupsi Indonesia’ Ramai, Berikut Urutannya!” umj.ac.id, January 28, 2025. https://umj.ac.id/just_info/klasemen-liga-korupsi-indonesia-ramai-berikut-urutannya/.

  3. D., M. Dani Fariz Amrullah, Dora Mustika, and Ari Priyanto. “Review of Islamic Law Regarding on Confiscation of Assets Resulting from Criminal Acts of Corruption.” Pranata Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 20, no. 1 (31 January 2025): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.36448/pranatahukum.v20i1.378.

  4. D. A., Ady Thea. “Barang Sitaan Hasil Pidana Harus Dikelola Unit Manajemen Aset.” hukumonline.com, 21 June 2023. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/barang-sitaan-hasil-pidana-harus-dikelola-unit-manajemen-aset-lt649316310cde1/.

  5. ———. “RUU Perampasan Aset Tindak Pidana Instrumen Pemberantasan Korupsi dan Kejahatan Ekonomi.” hukumonline.com, 10 April 2023. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/ruu-perampasan-aset-tindak-pidana-instrumen-pemberantasan-korupsi-dan-kejahatan-ekonomi-lt64337ed81a442/.

  6. Darmayasa, Putu. ‘Mekanisme Perampasan Aset Dalam Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Di Indonesia’. pahamhukum.id, 21 October 2024. https://pahamhukum.id/konten/artikel/mekanisme-perampasan-aset--dalam-peraturan-perundangundangan-di-indonesia/50.

  7. Decision of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia No.  90/PUU‑XII/2015 (n.d.).

  8. Faridzi, Mohammad Al, and Gunawan Nachrawi. ‘Kualifikasi Kejahatan Luar Biasa Terhadap Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 301 K/Pid.Sus/2021)’. Jurnal Kewarganegaraan 6, no. 2 (December 2022): 3014–19. https://doi.org/10.31316/jk.v6i2.3244.

  9. Fitriyani, Desi, and Muthi’ah Maizaroh. ‘Possibility of Implementing In-Rem Asset Forfeiture as an Asset Recovery Effort in Indonesia’. AML/CFT Journal: The Journal of Anti Money Laundering and Countering the Financing of Terrorism 1, no. 2 (14 June 2023): 205–19. https://doi.org/10.59593/amlcft.2023.v1i2.62.

  10. Haridhi, Zilmi. ‘RUU Perampasan Aset: Revolusi Penegakan Hukum Melalui Pemulihan Aset Yang Disalahgunakan’. antikorupsi.org, 12 October 2023. https://antikorupsi.org/id/ruu-perampasan-aset-revolusi-penegakan-hukum-melalui-pemulihan-aset-yang-disalahgunakan.

  11. Heriyanto, Dodik Setiawan Nur. ‘Diplomation as One of the Alternatives to Returning Corruption Assets Abroad’. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues 24, no. 1 (2021): 1–5.

  12. Hudjolly, Rabith Madah Khulaili Harsya, Fatima Suatrat, Kalijunjung Hasibuan, and Deny Susanto. ‘Establishment of the Asset Confiscation Law to Minimize Corruption in Indonesia’. As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga 6, no. 2 (7 May 2024): 1724–30. https://doi.org/10.47467/as.v6i2.6569.

  13. Irfan, Nurul and Masyrofah. Fiqh Jinayah. 1st ed. Jakarta: Amzah, 2013. https://repository.uinjkt.ac.id/dspace/bitstream/123456789/51021/1/FIQIH%20JINAYAH.pdf.

  14. Khalila, Aviva. ‘Rejuvenasi KPK: Urgensi Pemberlakuan Rancangan Undang-Undang Perampasan Aset Dengan Pendekatan in Rem Dan Tinjauan Pendekatan Serupa Pada Regulasi Unexplained Wealth Di Australia’. https://lk2fhui.law.ui.ac.id/, 2023. https://lk2fhui.law.ui.ac.id/portfolio/rejuvenasi-kpk-urgensi-pemberlakuan-rancangan-undang-undang-perampasan-aset-dengan-pendekatan-in-rem-dan-tinjauan-pendekatan-serupa-pada-regulasi-unexplained-wealth-di-australia/.

  15. Khasan, Moh., and Ja’far Baehaqi. Perampasan Aset Terpidana Korupsi Dalam Kajian Hukum Pidana Dan Fiqh Jinayah. 1st ed. Semarang: Alinea Media Dipantara, 2021. https://eprints.walisongo.ac.id/id/eprint/19623/1/1a-Buku%20Perampasan%20aset%20terpidana%20korupsi_pressed.pdf.

  16. Lamijan, and Mohamad Tohari. ‘Dampak Korupsi Terhadap Pembangunan Ekonomi Dan Pembangunan Politik’. J-PeHI: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Indonesia 3, no. 2 (29 December 2022): 40–59. https://doi.org/10.61689/jpehi.v3i02.381.

  17. Law No. 7 of 2006 on the Ratification of the United Nations Convention Against Corruption, 2003 (n.d.).

  18. Law No. 8 of 2010 on the Prevention and Eradication of the Criminal Act of Money Laundering (n.d.).

  19. Law No. 20 of 2001 on Eradication of Criminal Act of Corruption (n.d.).

  20. Law No. 31 of 1999 on Eradication of Criminal Act of Corruption (n.d.).

  21. Meiryani, Sani Muhamad Isa, and Johan Muliadi Kerta. ‘Money Laundering in Corruption Cases in Indonesia’. Journal of Money Laundering Control 27, no. 1 (2 January 2024): 127–38. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMLC-05-2022-0069.

  22. Misran. ‘Kriteria Jarimah Takzir’. Jurnal Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Perundang-Undangan Dan Pranata Sosial 2, no. 1 (13 February 2018): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.22373/justisia.v2i1.2648.

  23. Mohas, Muhyi Mohas, Belardo Prasetya Mega Jaya, Mohamad Fasyehhudin, and Arizon Mega Jaya. ‘The Indonesia Government’s Strategy in Arrest and Confiscation of Criminal Corruption (Corruptor) Assets Abroad’. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum 21, no. 3 (28 March 2022): 432. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2021.21.3.2882.

  24. Mubarak, Mahdavika Arsy, and Ayu Izza Elvany. ‘Confiscation of Assets Laundered through Cryptocurrency Transactions in Indonesia: A Regulatory Framework’. Contemporary Issues in Criminal Law 1, no. 1 (30 June 2024): 37–62. https://doi.org/10.20885/CICL.vol1.iss1.art3.

  25. Presidential Letter No. R22/Pres/05/2023 (n.d.).

  26. Pusat Pelaporan dan Analisis Transaksi Keuangan. ‘Kolaborasi Perpustakaan PPATK Dan ICW Bahas Pentingnya RUU Perampasan Aset’. ppatk.go.id/news, 21 November 2024. https://www.ppatk.go.id/news/read/1417/kolaborasi-perpustakaan-ppatk-dan-icw-bahas-pentingnya-ruu-perampasan-aset.html.

  27. ———. ‘Laporan Kinerja Tahun 2018: Pusat Pelaporan Dan Analisis Transaksi Keuangan’. Jakarta Pusat: Pusat Pelaporan dan Analisis Transaksi Keuangan (PPATK), February 2019. https://www.ppatk.go.id/backend/assets/images/publikasi/1557368838_.pdf.

  28. Pusat Perencanaan Pembangunan Hukum Nasional, Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia R.I. ‘Laporan Akhir Naskah Akademik Rancangan Undang‑Undang Tentang Perampasan Aset Tindak Pidana’. Jakarta: Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, October 2012. https://bphn.go.id/data/documents/na_ruu_tentang_perampasan_aset.pdf.

  29. Putra, Irwan Sapta. ‘Tindak Pidana Korupsi Ditinjau Dari HAM Di Indonesia’. Jurnal Res Justitia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 2, no. 1 (January 2022): 87–105. https://doi.org/10.46306/rj.v2i1.27.

  30. Ramadhan, Ilham, Mia Puspita Sari, Nedi Aprizal, Tyo Qhoirun Nisa, and Dimas Dwi Arso. ‘Studi Analisis Terhadap Urgensi Dan Implementasi Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 2010 Tentang Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang’. Mandub : Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum Dan Humaniora 2, no. 3 (19 July 2024): 376–89. https://doi.org/10.59059/mandub.v2i3.1502.

  31. Ramli, Asmarani, Dodik Setiawan Nur Heriyanto, Fezer Tamas, and Dian Latifiani. ‘The Importance of Non-Conviction Based (NCB) Regulations for Asset Confiscation in Illegal Investment’. Journal of Law and Legal Reform 5, no. 1 (31 January 2024): 1–26. https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.vol5i1.2089.

  32. riaupos.jawapos.com. ‘Dugaan Korupsi Pertamina Rugikan Negara Capai Rp1 Kuadriliun, Inilah 9 Pemain Di Klasemen Skandal Korupsi Terbesar Indonesia’, 1 March 2025. https://riaupos.jawapos.com/nasional/2255706194/dugaan-korupsi-pertamina-rugikan-negara-capai-rp1-kuadriliun-inilah-9-pemain-di-klasemen-skandal-korupsi-terbesar-indonesia.

  33. Rinaldi, Deby, Watni Marpaung, and Arifuddin Muda Harahap. ‘Criminal Punishment in the Concept of Non-Conviction Based on Asset Forfeiture (Analysis of Islamic Criminal Law)’. Jurnal Akta 12, no. 1 (7 February 2025): 60–71. https://doi.org/10.30659/akta.v12i1.43728.

  34. Salamor, Anna Maria. ‘Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Asset Recovery Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia’. Matakao: Corruption Law Review 1, no. 2 (16 November 2023): 116–22. https://doi.org/10.47268/matakao.v1i2.11309.

  35. Sjahdeini, Sutan Remy. Seluk Beluk Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Dan Pembiayaan Terorisme. 1st ed. Jakarta: Pustaka Utama Grafiti, 2007.

  36. Sofian, Ahmad, Bambang Pratama, and Hanifah Azizah. ‘Mechanism for Asset Forfeiture in the Money Loundering Criminal Law and Asset Forfeiture Bill (Law Comparison with the United States)’. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development 11, no. 12 (5 December 2023): 1–33. https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v11i12.1712.

  37. Suryani, Dewi Ervina. ‘Penerapan Undang-Undang No 8 Tahun 2010 Tentang Pencegahan Dan Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang (TPPU) Terhadap Penegakan Hukum Pidana Pencucian Uang (Money Laundering) Terhadap Tindak Pidana Kehutanan (Illegal Logging)’. Jurnal Hukum Kaidah: Media Komunikasi Dan Informasi Hukum Dan Masyarakat 19, no. 3 (3 August 2020): 499–508. https://doi.org/10.30743/jhk.v19i3.2827.

  38. Tantimin. ‘Penyitaan Hasil Korupsi Melalui Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture Sebagai Upaya Pengembalian Kerugian Negara’. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia 5, no. 1 (31 January 2023): 85–102. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v5i1.85-102.

  39. Transparency International Indonesia. ‘Indeks Persepsi Korupsi 2024: “Korupsi, Demokrasi, Dan Krisis Lingkungan”’. ti.or.id, 11 February 2025. https://ti.or.id/indeks-persepsi-korupsi-2024-korupsi-demokrasi-dan-krisis-lingkungan/.

  40. United Nations Convention Against Corruption, 2003 (n.d.).

  41. Warjiyati, Sri. ‘Urgensi RUU Perampasan Aset: Strategi Baru Dalam Pemberantasan Korupsi Menuju Sistem Hukum Yang Lebih Adil’. Https://Uinsa.Ac.Id/Blog (blog), 10 June 2024. https://uinsa.ac.id/blog/urgensi-ruu-perampasan-aset-strategi-baru-dalam-pemberantasan-korupsi-menuju-sistem-hukum-yang-lebih-adil.

  42. www.alinea.id. ‘Korupsi “Menggila”, Apa Kabar RUU Perampasan Aset?’, 20 March 2025. https://www.alinea.id/peristiwa/korupsi-menggila-apa-kabar-ruu-perampasan-aset-b2nk29RsH.

  43. Yoserwan, and Fausto Soares Dias. ‘Implementing the Anti-Money Laundering Law: Optimizing Asset Recovery in Corruption Cases in Indonesia’. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan 13, no. 2 (31 July 2024): 227. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.13.2.2024.227-250.