Article Sidebar

Submitted
October 26, 2024
Accepted
July 8, 2025
Published
July 9, 2025
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 364 Download : 253

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study critically examines the capacity of single mothers to enforce child support obligations against former husbands following divorce proceedings in Malang Regency, Indonesia. The research adopts a qualitative fieldwork approach, employing purposive (non-probability) sampling to select participants. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with divorced women who have legal custody of their children, specifically those whose children were minors at the time the divorce decree was issued. According to Article 41 of Law No. 1 of 1974 on Marriage and Article 156 of the Compilation of Islamic Law, the financial responsibility for the maintenance and welfare of children rests with the father until the child reaches the age of 21, marries, or becomes economically independent. However, the reality encountered by many single mothers deviates sharply from this legal expectation. Many ex-husbands fail to comply with child support obligations, leaving mothers to bear the full financial and emotional burden of child-rearing. Interviews revealed several contributing factors to this negligence, including the ex-husband’s lack of personal responsibility, economic incapacity, unknown whereabouts, and interference from third parties such as new spouses or family members. Although Indonesian law provides mechanisms for legal enforcement of child support, the findings indicate that very few single mothers pursue formal legal action. This reluctance is attributed to strained interpersonal relationships, concerns over the child’s psychological well-being, the complexity and cost of legal procedures, and a general lack of faith in the efficacy of the legal system. The study concludes that existing legal frameworks are insufficient to guarantee effective enforcement of child support, as there is no specialized legal policy tailored to the unique vulnerabilities faced by single mothers. This regulatory gap underscores the urgent need for legal reform that prioritizes the welfare of children and ensures compliance with parental responsibilities post-divorce.

Keywords

Divorce Child Support Children’s Rights

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Fairuza ‘Alima Fardindaputri, Fuat Hasanudin

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

How to Cite
Fardindaputri, F. ‘Alima, & Hasanudin, F. (2025). Legal Protection of Children’s Rights Post-Divorce: A Study of Single Mothers in Malang Regency. Prophetic Law Review, 7(1), 70–94. https://doi.org/10.20885/PLR.vol7.iss1.art4
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Afandy, Tri, and Yati Sharfina Desiandri. ‘Tinjauan Implementasi Kebijakan Perlindungan dan Pemenuhan Hak Anak’. Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum 4, no. 3 (October 2023): 145–55. https://doi.org/10.55357/is.v4i3.411.

  2. Aiko, Ondra. ‘Hak Anak Pasca Perceraian (Studi Kasus Di Nagari Pakan Rabaa Timur Kec. Koto Parik Gadang Diateh Kabupaten Solok Selatan)’. Jurnal Al-Ahkam 12, no. 1 (June 2021): 53–70. https://doi.org/10.15548/alahkam.v12i1.2915.

  3. Azani, Muhammad, and Cysillia Anggaraini Novalis. ‘Pelaksanaan Putusan Pengadilan Agama Mengenai Pemenuhan Hak Nafkah Anak Pasca Perceraian Di Pengadilan Agama Pekanbaru’. Jotika Research in Business Law 1, no. 2 (8 July 2022): 46–59. https://doi.org/10.56445/jrbl.v1i2.43.

  4. Aziz, Syukron Nur, and Mustofa Anwar. ‘Wives for Seekers in Islamic Law Perspective (Women Vegetable Traders in Metro City) Istri Pencari Nafkah Perspektif Hukum Islam’. JSHI: Jurnal Syariah Dan Hukum Islam 1, no. 1 (31 December 2022): 1–23.

  5. Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Jawa Timur. ‘Jumlah Talak Dan Cerai Menurut Kabupaten/Kota Di Provinsi Jawa Timur 2020–2022’. jatim.bps.go.id, 2023. https://jatim.bps.go.id/id/statistics-table/1/MzAyOSMx/jumlah-talak-dan-cerai-menurut-kabupaten-kota-di-provinsi-jawa-timur-2020-2022.html.

  6. Bariroh, Alfi, and Aulia Muthiah. ‘Eksekusi Terhadap Kewajiban Pemberian Nafkah Anak Pasca Perceraian Menurut Hukum Positif’. Jurnal Jantera Hukum Borneo 5, no. 2 (July 2022): 77–94.

  7. Bernardi, Laura, and Dimitri Mortelmans, eds. Shared Physical Custody: Interdisciplinary Insights in Child Custody Arrangements. Vol. 25. European Studies of Population. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68479-2.

  8. Cancian, Maria, Daniel R. Meyer, and Robert G. Wood. ‘Do Carrots Work Better than Sticks? Results from the National Child Support Noncustodial Parent Employment Demonstration’. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 41, no. 2 (March 2022): 552–78. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.22370.

  9. Darmawan, Feby Dwiki, and Dodik Setiawan Nur Heriyanto. ‘Invoking International Human Rights Law to Prevent Statelessness of International Refugee Children Born in Indonesia’. Prophetic Law Review 5, no. 1 (1 June 2023): 22–41. https://doi.org/10.20885/PLR.vol5.iss1.art2.

  10. Gushairi. ‘Pelaksanaan Pemenuhan Nafkah Anak Pasca Perceraian Di Provinsi Riau’. Hukum Islam 22, no. 1 (6 June 2022): 23. https://doi.org/10.24014/jhi.v22i1.17198.

  11. Hamid, Muhammad Hamizan Ab, Mohd Amzari Tumiran, Durriyyah Sharifah Hasan Adli, Mohd Yakub, Mohd Yakub @ Zulkifli Mohd Yusoff, Mohd Hapiz Mahaiyadin, Amir Muhriz Abdul Latiff, and Mohd Zaid Daud. ‘A Systematic Literature Review (SLR) Study on the Level of Eligibility of al-Ahliyyah for Muslim Individuals with Disabilities’. Al-Qanatir: International Journal of Islamic Studies 30, no. 2 (1 June 2023): 224–36.

  12. Harvin, and Liza Priandhini. ‘Pengaturan Hukum Pemberian Nafkah Anak Setelah Perceraian Orang Tua Dalam Undang-Undang Perkawinan’. Jurnal Kertha Semaya 9, no. 12 (2021): 2466–78. https://doi.org/10.24843/KS.2021.v09.i12.p17.

  13. Hashim, Nurhidayah Muhammad, Tim Lindsey, Zuliza Mohd Kusrin, and Aishah Mohd Nor. ‘Child Maintenance after Divorce: Review on the Practices in Malaysian Shariah Courts’. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal 9, no. 29 (22 June 2024): 63–67. https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v9i29.6024.

  14. Holid, Muhammad. ‘Implementasi Pemenuhan Hak Anak Pasca Perceraian Di Desa Kembang Tlogosari Bondowoso Ditinjau Dari Kompilasi Hukum Islam Dan Undang-Undang Perlindungan Anak Nomor 23 Tahun 2002’. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai 8, no. 1 (15 January 2024): 3055–63. https://doi.org/10.31004/jptam.v8i1.12841.

  15. Lamb, Michael E., Kathleen J. Sternberg, and Ross A. Thompson. ‘The Effects of Divorce and Custody Arrangements on Children’s Behavior, Development, and Adjustment’. Family and Conciliation Courts Review 35, no. 4 (1 October 1997): 393–404. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008873721682.

  16. Law No. 35 of 2014 on Child Protection (n.d.).

  17. Masyhari, Kholid, and Akhmad Nurasikin. ‘Implementasi Putusan Pengadilan Agama Tentang Nafkah Anak Dan Hadlanah’. Iqtisad: Reconstruction of Justice and Welfare for Indonesia 10, no. 1 (20 June 2023): 17–36. https://doi.org/10.31942/iq.v10i1.8508.

  18. Mawaddah, Lailatul and Zulfadli. ‘Jaminan Hak Nafkah Anak Pasca Perceraian Perspektif Fikih Syafi’iyah Dan Maqaşid Al-Syari’ah’. Al-Madaris Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Studi Keislaman 4, no. 1 (8 November 2023): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.47887/amd.v4i1.109.

  19. Ramadhani, Nabilla Suci, Salsabila Lubis, Afifa Tohira, and Usiono. ‘Hak Asasi Manusia Terhadap Anak’. IJEDR: Indonesian Journal of Education and Development Research 2, no. 1 (1 January 2024): 109–14. https://doi.org/10.57235/ijedr.v2i1.1567.

  20. Ramlah. ‘Tanggungjawab Orang Tua Terhadap Hak Hadhanah Dan Nafkah Anak Pasca Perceraian: Perspektif Hukum Islam Dan Putusan Pengadilan Agama’. Harakat An-Nisa: Jurnal Studi Gender Dan Anak 6, no. 1 (3 December 2021): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.30631/harakatan-nisa.2021.61.1-12.

  21. Salsabila, Miyah, and Ashwab Mahasin. ‘Dampak Perceraian Bagi Anak Dalam Mencapai SDGs Di Indonesia’. Pro Justicia: Jurnal Hukum Dan Sosial 3, no. 1 (June 2023): 1–10.

  22. Saputera, Abdurrahman Adi and Masniyati. ‘Analisis Terhadap Kelalaian Pemenuhan Nafkah Anak Pasca Putusan Pengadilan Agama Gorontalo’. Tamaddun: Journal of Islamic Studies 2, no. 1 (June 2023): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.55657/tajis.v2i1.117.

  23. Sari, Amitri Dinar. ‘Pengabaian Nafkah Anak Pascaperceraian Orang Tua Sebagai Penelantaran Anak’. JISIP: (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Pendidikan) 6, no. 3 (5 July 2022): 9925–32. https://doi.org/10.36312/jisip.v6i3.3299.

  24. Sari, Intan Puspita, and Hariyo Sulistiyantoro. ‘Implementasi Pemberian Nafkah Anak Pasca Perceraian Di Pengadilan Agama Surabaya Studi Putusan Nomor 2669/Pdt.G/2023 P.A Sby’. Civilia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan 2, no. 6 (26 November 2023): 275–88. https://doi.org/10.572349/civilia.v2i6.1435.

  25. Sepma, Armevya, and Yenni Erwita. ‘Pemberian Hak Nafkah Anak Pasca Perceraian Di Pengadilan Agama Jambi’. Zaaken: Journal of Civil and Business Law 1, no. 2 (1 October 2020): 344–58. https://doi.org/10.22437/zaaken.v1i2.9434.

  26. Services Australia. ‘Recovering Child and Spousal Support Payments’. www.servicesaustralia.gov.au, 31 January 2025. https://www.servicesaustralia.gov.au/recovering-child-and-spousal-support-payments?context=21911.

  27. Siregar, Wahidah Zein Br. ‘Causes and Impacts of Domestic Violence Against Women: Cases in Indonesia’. Jurnal Sosiologi Dialektika 19, no. 1 (11 June 2024): 77–88. https://doi.org/10.20473/jsd.v19i1.2024.77-88.

  28. Sukmawati, Berlia, and Nency Dela Oktora. ‘Dampak Perceraian Orang Tua Bagi Psikologis Anak’. Setara: Jurnal Studi Gender Dan Anak 3, no. 2 (17 December 2021): 24. https://doi.org/10.32332/jsga.v3i2.3801.

  29. Supreme Court Circular (SEMA) Number 3 of 2018 (n.d.).

  30. Supreme Court Circular (SEMA) Number 7 of 2012 (n.d.).

  31. Suri, Gusni Dian, Afdal Afdal, Mutia Afnida, Azmatul Khairiah Sari, Rezki Hariko, Miftahul Fikri, Rima Pratiwi Fadli, and Azahra Hardi Cusinia. ‘Bagaimana Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga Berefek Pada Kondisi Psikologis Anak?: Analisis Pendahuluan Intervensi Pendidikan’. Jurnal Educatio: Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia 9, no. 2 (30 December 2023): 1072–78. https://doi.org/10.29210/1202323434.

  32. Suzanna, Ella, Shabrina Hanifa, Sri Kesuma Wardhani Siahaan, Sheilvia Azura, Kartika Setiya, Raihanul Jannah, and Ade Ira Rahayu Berutu. ‘Kekerasan Pada Anak Dalam Keluarga’. Journal of Psychology 1, no. 1 (29 August 2024): 33–40. https://doi.org/10.70248/jp.v1i1.1220.

  33. the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI) of 1991 (n.d.).

  34. Wasiati, Cunduk, Bagus Anwar Hidayatullah, and Imma Indra Dewi Windajani. ‘Kewajiban Ayah Terkait Nafkah Anak Setelah Terjadinya Perceraian Di Pengadilan Agama: Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia’. Juris Humanity: Jurnal Riset Dan Kajian Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia 2, no. 2 (27 December 2023): 11–21. https://doi.org/10.37631/jrkhm.v2i2.25.

  35. Yana, Lutfi, and Ali Trigiyatno. ‘Pemenuhan Hak Nafkah Anak Pasca Perceraian’. Alhukkam: Journal of Islamic Fanily Law 2, no. 2 (2022): 113–22.