Article Sidebar

Submitted
January 11, 2023
Accepted
October 5, 2023
Published
October 24, 2023
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 228 Download : 231

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to compare the perspective of legal sources of divorce in Indonesia and the United Kingdom by using a  number of legal sources and other written literacy as the reading sources and reference (Public Research). This study used a qualitative-descriptive method by comparing divorce laws; analyzed the factors causing similarities and differences in the form of the rules in terms of divorce in Indonesia and the United Kingdom, and identified similarities and differences in how the two countries regulate the divorce issues. The researcher concerned with the biography and history of the two countries in the development of divorce law and found that social background, religion, political ideology, and history are the factors that have greatly affected the laws issued and implemented in country. This research will be a source of comparison and reflection for divorce law in Indonesia and the UK to become more progressive and developing. Alos, this research will be useful for further research on divorce law in Indonesia or the United Kingdom.  


Keywords: Divorce Law, Indonesia, United Kingdom, Comparative.


 Abstrak


Studi ini adalah studi yang membandingkan perspektif sumber hukum perceraian di Indonesia dan Inggris. Dengan menggunakan sumber hukum dan literasi tertulis lainnya sebagai sumber bacaan dan acuan (Penelitian Pustaka). Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif-deskriptif, dengan membandingkan undang-undang perceraian serta menganalisa faktor-faktor yang menyebabkan persamaan dan perbedaan bentuk aturan-aturan mengenai perceraian di Indonesia dan United Kingdom, lalu menemukan persamaan dan perbedaan bagaimana kedua negara mengatur mengenai masalah perceraian. Dengan memperhatikan biografi dan sejarah kedua negara dalam perkembangan hukum perceraian. Penulis menemukan bahwa faktor latar belakang sosial, agama, ideologi politik, dan historis sangat mempengaruhi undang-undang yang disahkan dan diterapkan di suatu negara. Penelitian ini akan menjadi sumber perbandingan dan refleksi bagi hukum perceraian di Indonesia dan Inggris untuk menjadi lebih progresif dan berkembang, selain itu penelitian ini akan berguna bagi penelitian lanjutan mengenai hukum perceraian di Indonesia ataupun United Kingdom.

Keywords

Hukum Perceraian Indonesia Inggris Raya Perbandingan Hukum

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Fakhriyah Tri Astuti, Setiyawan Setiyawan bin Gunardi, Erni Erni Dewi Riyanti

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
How to Cite
Tri Astuti, F., Setiyawan bin Gunardi, S., & Erni Dewi Riyanti, E. (2023). SOSIO-CULTURAL ANALYSIS OF DIVORCE LEGISLATION A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN INDONESIA AND UNITED KINGDOM. Al-Mawarid Jurnal Syariah Dan Hukum (JSYH), 5(2), 135–158. https://doi.org/10.20885/mawarid.vol5.iss2.art2
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. A3: Components of GDP. (2020). House of Commons.
  2. Absiroh, U. (2017). Understanding of History 350 Years Indonesia Colonized By Dutch. Jurnal Online Mahasiswa (JOM) Fakultas Keguruan Dan Ilmu Pendidikan (FKIP) Universitas Riau, 1, 1–15. https://www.neliti.com/publications/205480/sejarah-pemahaman-350-tahun-indonesia-dijajah-belanda
  3. Ahmad Alfin Rafadi. (2023). Analysis of Modern Women's Iddah and Ihdad from the Fuqoha Perspective. 1st International Conference on Education, Society and Humanity, Vol 01 No. 1. https://eournal.unuja.ac.id/index.php/icesh
  4. Ahmad Rajafi. (2017). Sejarah Pembentukan dan Pembaruan Hukum Keluarga Islam di Nusantara. JURNAL AQLAM, 2(1), 1–20.
  5. Ahmad Rajafi. (2017). The Renewal Movement of Islamic Family Law in Indonesia (Politics of Islamic Law from Old Order until Reformation). 1st Biennial Conference on Sharia and Social Studies Faculty Sharia Iman Bonjol Islamic University.
  6. Nugraheni, A. S. C., Sutiono., Harahap, B., Tejomurti, K. (2019). The Development of Child Custody Regulation in Indonesian Divorce Law. International Journal of Business, Economics, and Law, 18(5).
  7. Ayu, I., Kristanty, P., Hukum, F., Udayana, U., Nyoman, D., Asmara, R., Hukum, F., & Udayana, U. (2020). Akibat Hukum Serta Penyelsaian terhadap Harta Bersama Berdasarkan Hukum Perkawinan. 9(1), 112–120.
  8. Benuf, K., & Azhar, M. (2020). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum sebagai Instrumen Mengurai Permasalahan Hukum Kontemporer. Gema Keadilan, 7 Edisi 1(April), 20–33. https://doi.org/10.14710/gk.7.1.20-33
  9. Biga, N. H. H. (2017). History of Renewal of Islamic Family Law in Indonesia. Al-Mizan, 13(2), 185–203.
  10. Bill becomes an Act of Parliament. (2022). https://www.parliament.uk/about/how/laws/passage - bill/lords/lrds-royal-assent
  11. British Social Attitudes: Record Number of British with No Religion. (2017). Natcen Uk. https://natcen.ac.uk/news-media/press-releases/2017/september/british-social-attitudes-record-number-of- brits-with-no-religion/
  12. Crime, Justice and the Law. (2022). https://www.gov.uk/browse/justice/courts-sentencing-tribunals
  13. Department for Business Innovation & Skills. (2011). Principles for Economic Regulation (Issue April).
  14. Dian Erika Nugraheny. (2021, March 13). Menag Sebut Mayoritas Muslim Indonesia Setuju dengan Pancasila. Kompas. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2021/03/13/11584391/menag-sebut-mayoritas-muslim-indonesia-setuju-dengan-pancasila
  15. Divorce : Who gets “ custody ”? (2020).
  16. Divorces in England and Wales: 2019. (2020).
  17. Ellis, T. P. (n.d.). Welsh Tribal Law and Custom in the Middle Ages. The American Historical Review, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.2307/1838124
  18. Encyclopedia Britannica. (n.d.). Retrieved March 24, 2021, from https://www.britannica.com/topic/divorce
  19. General Election. (n.d.). United Kingdom Parliament. https://www.parliament.uk/about/how/elections-and-voting/general/
  20. Global Economy Watch – Projection. (n.d.). https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/research- insights/economy/global-economy-watch/projections.html
  21. H.M. Government. (2020). Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Bill [HL]. June. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/bills/cbill/58-01/0125/20125.pdf
  22. Hawkins, N. (2010). Privatization Revisited. Adam Smith Institute. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.1994.tb00604.x
  23. Hikmatullah, H. (2018). Selayang Pandang Sejarah Penyusunan Kompilasi Hukum Islam di Indonesia. Ajudikasi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum. https://doi.org/10.30656/ajudikasi.v1i2.496
  24. How are laws made? (2022). https://www.parliament.uk/about/how/laws/
  25. Impelemtasi Ketentuan Anak Luar Kawin dalam Undang-Undang Perkawinan Pasca Putusan MK. (2012). In Hukum Online. https://www.hukumonline.com/talks/baca/arsip/lt4f79272c66780/implementasi-ketentuan-anak- luar-kawin- dalam-uu-perkawinan-pasca-putusan-mk.
  26. Juwita, P. (2009). Penelitian Komparatif.
  27. Key Statistics and Quick Statistics for local authorities in the United Kingdom. (2013). Office for National Statistic.
  28. Kha, H. (2017). The Reform of English Divorce Law : 1857 – 1937. 1857–1937.
  29. Khiyaroh. (2020). Alasan Dan Tujuan Lahirnya Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 Tentang Perkawinan. Al-Qadha, 7(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.32505/qadha.v7i1.1817
  30. Koss, S., & Wilson, H. (1977). The Governance of Britain. Political Science Quarterly, 92(3), 555. https://doi.org/10.2307/2148525
  31. Kundhi, P. (2022). Government announces ‘No Fault’ Divorce to become law on 6 April 2022.
  32. Lathif, N. (2017). Teori Hukum Sebagai Sarana /Alat Untuk Memperbaharui Atau Merekayasa Masyarakat. Pakuan Law Review, 3, 73–94.
  33. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia. (2019). In Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia (Issue 186, p. 8). https://jdihn.go.id/files/4/2019uu016.pdf
  34. Louth, L. N., Webb, & David, P. (2019). Conservative Party. Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Conservative-Party-political-party-United-Kingdom.
  35. Mansur, S. (2017). Homoseksual dalam Perspektif Agama-Agama di Indonesia. Aqlania, 08(01), 21–60.
  36. Maulia, S. T. (2019). Pemahaman Konsep Nilai-Nilai Pancasila Sebagai Ideologi Bangsa. SEMINAR NASIONAL : Aktualisasi Nilai-Nilai Pancasila Di Era Reformasi, 46–55.
  37. Morrill, J. S., P. (2020). United Kingdom. Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/place/United-Kingdom
  38. Muhammad, N. (2013). Epistemologi Pengembangan Hukum Islam. Al-Mizan, 9(1), 77–86.
  39. Muhammad Reza Pahlevi, Syariffudin Yusuf, A. (2020). Sejarah Undang-Undang Perkawinan Atas Pendapat Hingga Pertentangan dari Masyarakat dan Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Tahun 1973-1974. Journal of Indonesian History, 9(2), 167–177.
  40. Nelwan, O. (2019). Akibat Hukum Perceraian Suami-Isteri Ditinjau dari Sudut Pandang Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974. Lex Privatum, VII, 103–110. http://scioteca.caf.com/bitstream/handle/123456789/1091/RED2017-Eng-8ene.pdf?sequence=12&isAllowed=y%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2008.06.005%0Ahttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/305320484_Sistem_Pembetungan_Terpusat_Strategi_Melestari
  41. Parliament’s Authority. (2022). https://www.parliament.uk/about/how/role/sovereignty/
  42. Parliament and Crown. (n.d.).
  43. Pongoliu, H. (2017). Family of Sakinah, Mawaddah, Warahmah in the Concept of Islamic Marriage. Al Mizan, 13(1).
  44. Qamar, N. (2010). Perbandingan Sistem Hukum dan Peradilan. https://www.umi.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Buku-Perbandingan-Sistem-Hukum-dan-Peradilan-2010.pdf
  45. Reid, D. (2019). New York stretches lead over London as the world’s top financial center, surveys shows accessed on Saturday, January 20. CNBC. https://www.cnbc.com/2019/09/19/new-york-beats-london-again-as-the-worlds-top-financial- center.html
  46. Rita Uli Hutapea. (2019). Mantan Menlu Boris Johnson Terpilih Jadi Perdana Menteri Baru Inggris. Detik.Com. https://news.detik.com/internasional/d-4636454/mantan-menlu-boris-johnson-terpilih-jadi-perdana-menteri-baru- inggris
  47. Rodliyah, N. (2014). Akibat Hukum Perceraian Berdasarkan Undang-undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 Tentang Perkawinan. Keadilan Progresif, 5(1), h. 127.
  48. State of the Parties. (2022). Unietd Kingdom Prliament. https://members.parliament.uk/parties/Commons
  49. Stewart, J., Dziobon, R., Manches, P., & Llp, C. (2021). Family law in the UK England and Wales: overview (pp. 1–47). Thomson Reuters.
  50. Supriatna, O. N., & Pascasarjana, S. (n.d.). Nana Supriatna Budaya Lokal-Kurikulum IPS-Perspektif Global Kajian Budaya Lokal Pada Kurikulum Ips dalam Perspektif Global Makalah disajikan dalam Seminar Pendidikan Pips 2007 Sekolah Pasca Sarjana Upi. Retrieved June 14, 2019, from http://file.upi.edu/Direktori/FPIPS/JUR._PEND._SEJARAH/196110141986011-NANA_SUPRIATNA/NANA-MAKALAH-KUR-IPS-_GLOBAL-PASCA-21-07.pdf
  51. Susetyo, H. (2021). Latar Belakang Pembentukan Kompilasi Hukum Islam.
  52. Thane, P. (2019). The Origins of the British Welfare State. The Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 50(3), 427–433. https://doi.org/10.1162/jinh_a_01448
  53. The GDP of London. (n.d.). https://ec.europa.eu/growth/tools-databases_en
  54. The Two-House System. (2022). https://www.parliament.uk/about/how/role/system/
  55. The Two-Party System. (2020). Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/topic/two-party-system.
  56. The World’s 500 Largest Companies Generated $27.6 Trillion in Revenues and $1.5 Trillion in Profits in 2015. (2016). Fortune. https://fortune.com/global500/2016/.
  57. Thompson, G., Hawkins, O., Dar, A., & Taylor, M. (2012). Grey Britain: The ageing of the UK population. Olympic Britain: Social and Economic Change since the 1908 and 1948 London Games, p19-23.
  58. United Kingdom: New Report Finds Only One in 10 Attend Church. (n.d.).
  59. United Kingdom Country Profile. (2020). In QQFS. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-18023389
  60. Ward, M. (2021). Statistics on UK-EU trade.
  61. Wardah, M. (2018). Hadhanah Akibat Perceraian Dalam Hukum Keluarga di indonesia dan Maroko.
  62. Webb, & P. David. (2020). Labour Party. Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Labour-Party-political-party.
  63. Wisyawati, A. (2020). Perceraian dan Akibatnya Menurut Undang-undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 Tentang Perkawinan. Jurnal Hukum Dan Dinamika Masyarakat, 18(1). http://mpoc.org.my/malaysian-palm-oil-industry/
  64. Zyen. (2022). Global Finance Center Index (GFCI 27 Rank). Long Finance. https://www.longfinance.net/programmes/financial-centre-futures/global-financial-centres-index/gfci-27- explore-data/gfci-27-rank/.
No Related Submission Found