Article Sidebar

JUDICIAL DISPARITIES IN LEGAL INTERPRETATION
Submitted
December 14, 2024
Accepted
August 25, 2025
Published
August 31, 2025
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 295 Download : 131

Main Article Content

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to analyze the disparity in judicial interpretations and the application of legal progressivism in marriage dispensation decisions at the Muara Bulian Religious Court. This study seeks to explore how judges construct legal reasoning when faced with applications for underage marriage dispensation and whether their decisions reflect consistency or divergence in applying child protection principles.


Methods - This study employs a socio-legal approach with qualitative methods. Data were obtained from case decisions, field observations, and interviews with judges at the Muara Bulian Religious Court. The data were analyzed thematically to identify patterns of judicial interpretation and the extent of progressivism in the rulings’ content.


Findings - The results reveal a disparity in judges’ interpretations, particularly regarding the use of progressive legal reasoning. Some judges strictly adhere to statutory provisions, while others accommodate sociocultural considerations and parental requests, resulting in inconsistent outcomes. Although progressive legal theory provides opportunities for child protection, in practice, dispensations are often granted, thereby reinforcing early marriage practices instead of preventing them.


Contribution/Limitation of Research: This study contributes to the discourse on judicial discretion and progressive legal thought in the context of family law adjudication. However, it is limited to the Muara Bulian Religious Court; thus, its findings cannot be generalized to all religious courts in Indonesia.


Originality/Value - This study highlights the tension between statutory child protection norms and judicial discretion in marriage dispensation cases. It offers a critical socio-legal perspective on how progressivism is interpreted and practiced at the local courts.

Keywords

Judicial Interpretation Legal Progressivism Marriage Dispensation Religious Court

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Ardian Kurniawan, Dedi Sumanto, Ana Ramadhona, Hendri. K

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
How to Cite
Kurniawan, A., Dedi Sumanto, Ana Ramadhona, & Hendri. K. (2025). JUDICIAL DISPARITIES IN LEGAL INTERPRETATION: THE APPLICATION OF PROGRESSIVE LAW IN MARRIAGE DISPENSATION RULINGS. Al-Mawarid Jurnal Syariah Dan Hukum (JSYH), 7(2), 203–222. https://doi.org/10.20885/mawarid.vol7.iss2.art1
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Afif Khalid. (2014). Penafsiran Hukum, Hakim, Sistem Peradilan di Indonesia. Penafsiran Hukum, 6(11).
  2. Al Arif, M. Y. (2019). Penegakan Hukum dalam Perspektif Hukum Progresif. Undang: Jurnal Hukum, 2(1), 169–192. https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.2.1.169-192
  3. Al Hasan, F. A., & Yusup, D. K. (2021). DISPENSASI KAWIN DALAM SISTEM HUKUM INDONESIA: Menjamin Kepentingan Terbaik Anak melalui Putusan Hakim. Al-Ahwal: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.14421/ahwal.2021.14107
  4. Alexy, R. (2021). Gustav Radbruch’s Concept of Law. Law’s Ideal Dimension, 26(1946), 107–118. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198796831.003.0008
  5. Anggreni, D., Notobroto, H. B., & Soedirham, O. (2023). Determinants factors of early marriage in developing countries: a literature review. Journal of Public Health in Africa, 14(S2). https://doi.org/10.4081/jphia.2023.2543
  6. Aulia, M. Z. (2018). Hukum Progresif dari Satjipto Rahardjo. Undang: Jurnal Hukum, 1(1), 159–185. https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.1.1.159-185
  7. Bappenas. (2020). Strategi Nasional Pencegahan Perkawinan Anak. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(9), xi–78.
  8. Budiono, A., & Izziyana, wafda vivid. (2014). Theistic Legal Realism ( Suatu Pilihan Radikal bagi Pengembangan Hukum ). Jurnal Theistic Legal Realism, VI.
  9. Bukido, R., Haris, C., Rosyadi, M. A. R., & Suleman, Z. (2023). Reception of Marriage Age Limit in Marriage Law in Indonesia. Samarah, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v7i1.15245
  10. Bukido, R., Harun, N., Alwi, M., & Kamaru, F. F. (2023). Muslim Society’s Response to the New Rule of Marriage Age. Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v8i1.5521
  11. Chroust, A.-H. (1944). The Philosophy of Law of Gustav Radbruch. The Philosophical Review, 53(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.2307/2181218
  12. Chusnida, N. L., & Anggriawan, T. P. (2022). Dispensation of Marriage in The Perspective of Children’s Rights: Best Interest of The Children. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 22(3). https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2022.v22.295-310
  13. Dakhoir, A., & Sa’adah, S. L. (2023). Meta-Juridical Analysis on the Legal Arguments beyond Changes in Indonesian’s Marriage Age Rule. Al-Ihkam: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pranata Sosial, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.19105/al-lhkam.v18i1.7162
  14. Fadhli, A., & Warman, A. B. (2021). ‘Alasan Khawatir’ Pada Penetapan Hukum Dispensasi Kawin Di Pengadilan Agama Batusangkar ‘Reasons for Concern’ on Marriage Dispensation Decisions in Batusangkar Religious Court. Al-Ahwal, 14(2).
  15. Gani, B. A., Eriyanti, N., & Ramadhani, P. (2021). Pedoman Hakim Dalam Mengadili Permohonan Perkara Dispensasi Kawin Menurut PERMA No. 5 Tahun 2019 (Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Syar’iyah Banda Aceh Nomor Perkara 5/Pdt.P/2021/Ms.Bna). El-Hadhanah : Indonesian Journal Of Family Law And Islamic Law, 1(2).
  16. Islamiyati, I. (2018). Kritik Filsafat Hukum Positivisme Sebagai Upaya Mewujudkan Hukum Yang Berkeadilan. Law, Development and Justice Review, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.14710/ldjr.v1i1.3574
  17. Isman, I. (2020). LEGAL REASONING COMPARATIVE MODEL OF ASY SYATIBI AND GUSTAV RADBRUCH. Nurani: Jurnal Kajian Syari’ah Dan Masyarakat, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.19109/nurani.v20i1.6089
  18. Karima, A., Rahma, N. L., Kasdi, A., & Nubahai, L. (2023). Kepentingan Terbaik Anak Pemohon Dispensasi Pernikahan Dalam Penafsiran Hukum Oleh Hakim. Al-Syakhsiyyah: Journal of Law & Family Studies, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.21154/syakhsiyyah.v5i2.7082
  19. Karlsson, G. V. (2014). The legal philosophy of Ronald Dworkin 1977. February, 1–63. https://scholarworks.umass.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3668&context=theses
  20. Kurniawan, M. B., & Refiasari, D. (2022). Penafsiran Makna “Alasan Sangat Mendesak” Dalam Penolakan Permohonan Dispensasi Kawin. Jurnal Yudisial, 15(1), 83. https://doi.org/10.29123/jy.v15i1.508
  21. Maimunah, M., Helim, A., Aina, N., & Adawiyah, R. (2021). Juridical and Sociological Considerations of Judges in Granting Marriage Dispensation after Enactment Law No. 16 Of 2019. Jurnal Ilmiah Al-Syir’ah, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.30984/jis.v19i2.1460
  22. Marilang, M. (2017). Menimbang Paradigma Keadilan Hukum Progresif. Jurnal Konstitusi, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1424
  23. Mursyid, S., & Yusuf, N. (2022). Changes in Marriage Age Limits and Marriage Dispensations: A Study of Causes and Impacts on the Religious Courts in North Sulawesi. Samarah, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v6i2.12439
  24. Muzayyanah Dini Fajriyah, I., Marhamah, S., & Anggriani, S. (2023). The Pitfall of Child Marriage Dispensation: A Study of Court Judgments in East Java. The Indonesian Journal of Socio-Legal Studies, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.54828/ijsls.2023v2n2.5
  25. Nasution, K., & Nasution, S. (2021). Implementation of Indonesian Islamic Family Law To Guarantee Children’S Rights. Al-Jami’ah, 59(2), 347–374. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajis.2021.592.347-374
  26. Nawawi, M. A., Sulastri, Edi, R. N., & Setiawan, A. (2022). Harmonization of Islam and human rights: judges’ legal arguments in rejecting child marriage dispensation in Sukadana, Indonesia. Ijtihad: Jurnal Wacana Hukum Islam Dan Kemanusiaan, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.18326/ijtihad.v22i1.117-133
  27. Norhasanah, N. (2019). DISPENSASI KAWIN DI BAWAH UMUR (ANALISIS PUTUSAN MK NO.74?PUU-XII/2014 UJI MATERIIL PASAL 7 AYAT 2 UU PERKAWINAN). El-Mashlahah, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.23971/el-mas.v8i1.1092
  28. Purnomo, A., & Rohmatulloh, D. M. (2022). LEGAL SYSTEM THEORY PERSPECTIVE ON CHILD MARRIAGE IN INDONESIA AFTER AMENDMENT TO THE MARRIAGE LAW. ULUL ALBAB Jurnal Studi Islam, 23(2). https://doi.org/10.18860/ua.v23i2.17426
  29. Putri, Kania Dewi Andhika & Arifin, R. (2018). Tinjauan Teoritis Keadilan Dan Kepastian Dalam Hukum Di Indonesia. Mimbar Yustitia, 2(2).
  30. Putri, D., & Santika, V. (2022). Proceedings of the International Conference on Sustainable Innovation on Humanities, Education, and Social Sciences (ICOSI-HESS 2022). In Proceedings of the International Conference on Sustainable Innovation on Humanities, Education, and Social Sciences (ICOSI-HESS 2022). Atlantis Press SARL. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-494069-65-7
  31. Radbruch, G. (2020). Law’s image of the human. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 40(4), 667–681. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqaa026
  32. Rahardjo, S. (2009). Hukum Progresif. Yogyakarta Genta Press.
  33. Rahmawati, M., & Nuraeni, H. A. (2021). Peran Dispensasi Kawin dalam Peningkatan Angka Pernikahan Dini di Wilayah Kotamadya Jakarta Barat. Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v6i1.1578
  34. Riwanto, A. (2018). Mewujudkan Hukum Berkeadilan Secara Progresif Perspektif Pancasila. Al-Ahkam Jurnal Ilmu Syari’ah Dan Hukum, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.22515/alahkam.v2i2.1068
  35. Rizki, D., Oktalita, F., & Sodiqin, A. (2022). Maqasid Sharia Perspective in Changes the Marriage Age Limits for Women According to Law Number 16 of 2019. Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v7i2.4016
  36. Rohmawati, R., & Rofiq, A. (2021). Legal reasonings of religious court judges in deciding the origin of children: a study on the protection of biological children’s civil rights. Ijtihad : Jurnal Wacana Hukum Islam Dan Kemanusiaan, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.18326/ijtihad.v21i1.1-20
  37. Rosih oci, V. P. R. (2023). Analisis Dikabulkannya Dispensasi Perkawinan Pada Anak Di Bawah Umur Ditinjau Perma Nomor 5 Tahun 2019 Tentang Dispensasi Perkawinan (Studi Kasus Putusan Hakim Di Pengadilan Agama Tasikmalaya). Bandung Conference Series: Islamic Family Law. https://doi.org/10.29313/bcsifl.vi.7749
  38. Sarip, Fitriana, D., Syarifudin, A., Romdoni, A., & Multahibun. (2022). Legal Dialectics: Age Limits for Marriage and Political Rights in Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Novelty, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.26555/novelty.v13i1.a19018
  39. Schoolmedia News. (2023). Indonesia Peringkat Empat Kasus Kawin Anak di Dunia, 25,52 Juta Anak Menikah Usia Dini. https://news.schoolmedia.id/lipsus/Indonesia-Peringkat-Empat-Kasus-Kawin-Anak-di-Dunia-2552-Juta-Anak-Menikah-Usia-Dini-3898
  40. Suadi, A., & Candra, M. (2022). PREVENTION OF CHILD MARRIAGE IN INDONESIA BASED ON SYSTEM INTERCONNECTION. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 57(6). https://doi.org/10.35741/issn.0258-2724.57.6.79
  41. Sumaya, P. S. (2018). Relevansi Penerapan Teori Hukum Dalam Penegakan Hukum Guna Mewujudkan Nilai Keadilan Sosial. Jurnal Hukum Responsif FH UNPAB, 6(6).
  42. Supraptiningsih, U. (2021). Pro and cons contestation on the increase of marriage age in Indonesia. Samarah, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v5i1.9136
  43. Susanti, R. D. I. (2015). Penafsiran Hukum Yang Komprehensif Berbasis Lingkar Hermeneutika (Cet. 1). IPHILS (Indonesian Philosophical Studies).
  44. Tekile, A. K., Woya, A. A., & Basha, G. W. (2020). Determinants of early marriage among female children in Amhara region, Ethiopia. African Health Sciences, 20(3), 1190–1195. https://doi.org/10.4314/ahs.v20i3.22
  45. Tribunjambi.com. (2023). Pernikahan Dibawah Umur Meningkat di Kabupaten Batang Hari. https://jambi.tribunnews.com/2023/11/06/pernikahan-dibawah-umur-meningkat-di-kabupaten-batanghari#google_Vignette
  46. UNICEF. (2020). SDGs and Child Marriage: Unless We End Child Marriage, We Won’t Achieve 8 of the 17 Sustainable Development Goals. In The Global Partnership to End Child Marriage (Issue July).
  47. Wahhaj, Z. (2018). An economic model of early marriage. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 152, 147–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2018.06.001
  48. Wahid, A. (2022). Keadilan Restoratif: Upaya Menemukan Keadilan Substantif? Jurnal Ius Constituendum, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.26623/jic.v7i2.5793
  49. Wahyudi, T. H., & Prastiwi, J. H. (2022). Seksualitas dan Negara: Permasalahan Dispensasi Perkawinan Anak di Indonesia. Aspirasi: Jurnal Masalah-Masalah Sosial, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.46807/aspirasi.v13i2.2988
  50. Wibowo, H. R., Ratnaningsih, M., Goodwin, N. J., Ulum, D. F., & Minnick, E. (2021). One household, two worlds: Differences of perception towards child marriage among adolescent children and adults in Indonesia. The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific, 8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanwpc.2021.100103
  51. Yuni, L. A. (2021). Analysis of The Emergency Reasons in The Application of Marriage Dispensation at The Tenggarong Religious Court. Samarah, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v5i2.9135
  52. Yusuf. (2020). Dynamics of Marriage Age Limits in Indonesia. Journal of Islamic Law, 1(2).
No Related Submission Found