Article Sidebar

MODERNIZING ISLAMIC JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION
Submitted
February 10, 2025
Accepted
February 27, 2025
Published
March 5, 2025
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 81 Download : 44

Main Article Content

Abstract

Purpose – This study analyzes the implementation of electronic trial administration in Religious Courts using the responsive law theory approach. It examines its policies from the perspective of siyāsah idāriyyah to assess their alignment with the principles of effective and just judicial governance.


Methods – The study employed library research using a descriptive-analytical approach. It focuses on the bureaucracy of Religious Courts in Indonesia, particularly the implementation of electronic courts within the Religious Court System of the Supreme Court of Indonesia. Data were collected through a literature review from primary sources, namely the Supreme Court Regulations (PERMA) No. 1 of 2019 and No. 7 of 2022, and secondary sources, such as books, journals, and related regulations. The analysis used a qualitative descriptive method with an inductive approach to draw conclusions based on the interrelationships among the data.


Findings – This study finds that digitalizing religious court administration through e-courts is a strategic step toward building an adaptive and responsive legal system. In addition to improving efficiency, digitalization reflects the principles of responsive law and expands access to justice, especially for underprivileged groups. However, the digital divide and data protection must be addressed. From the perspective of siyāsah idāriyyah, it is essential to maintain the relevance of the judiciary to modern needs, without disregarding Islamic law. With fair policies and proper management, e-courts can strengthen a contemporary, inclusive religious court system that aligns with Islamic and national law.


Research contribution/limitations – This research contributes to the study of Islamic law and the judiciary by highlighting the role of e-court digitalization. Theoretically, it expands the understanding of responsive law in the context of siyāsah idāriyyah. These findings can serve as a policy foundation to enhance the inclusivity and effectiveness of e-court in providing access to justice.


Originality/value – This research examines the digitalization of religious courts from the perspective of responsive law and siyāsah idāriyyah, which has rarely been the primary focus of previous studies.

Keywords

Electronic Trial Responsive Law Islamic Law Judicial System

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Mohammad Ilhamuna

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
How to Cite
Ilhamuna, M. (2025). MODERNIZING ISLAMIC JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION IN THE CONTEMPORARY ERA: AN ANALYSIS OF RESPONSIVE LAW AND SIYĀSAH IDĀRIYYAH. Al-Mawarid Jurnal Syariah Dan Hukum (JSYH), 7(1), 113–134. https://doi.org/10.20885/mawarid.vol7.iss1.art7
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Aditya, P. S., Wardani, K. D. K. A., & Gorda, A. A. N. E. S. (2025). Peningkatan Akses E-court Pengadilan Negeri Mataram melalui Edukasi Terpadu. ABDI MOESTOPO: Jurnal Pengabdian Pada Masyarakat, 8(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.32509/abdimoestopo.v8i1.3241
  2. Adiwijana, M. R. (2020). Pelaksanaan Persidangan Secara Elektronik dalam Perspektif Hukum Acara Perdata [Thesis, Universitas Airlangga]. http://www.lib.unair.ac.id
  3. Ahmad Sukardja. (2014). Hukum Tata Negara & Hukum Administrasi Negara dalam Perspektif Fikih Siyasah. Sinar Grafika.
  4. Ali, Z. Z. (2021). The Urgency of Patriotism in Maintaining the Unity in the Republic of Indonesia in the Perspective of Maslahah. El-Mashlahah, 11(2), 116–126. https://doi.org/10.23971/elma.v11i2.2958
  5. Asis, N. H. (2023). Analisis Siyasah Idariyah Terhadap Pelayanan Administrasi di Kependudukan dan Pencatatan Sipil Kabupaten Pinrang [Thesis, IAIN Parepare]. https://repository.iainpare.ac.id/id/eprint/5023/
  6. at-Thamawi, M. S. (1965). Ilm al-Idarah al-Amah.
  7. Bhatt, H., Bahuguna, R., Swami, S., Singh, R., Gehlot, A., Akram, S. V., Gupta, L. R., Thakur, A. K., Priyadarshi, N., & Twala, B. (2024). Integrating industry 4.0 technologies for the administration of courts and justice dispensation—A systematic review. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1076. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03587-0
  8. Cannon, M. W. (1982). INNOVATION IN THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE, 1969‐1981: AN OVERVIEW. Policy Studies Journal, 10(4), 668–679. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.1982.tb00646.x
  9. Casanovas, P., De Koker, L., & Hashmi, M. (2022). Law, Socio-Legal Governance, the Internet of Things, and Industry 4.0: A Middle-Out/Inside-Out Approach. J, 5(1), 64–91. https://doi.org/10.3390/j5010005
  10. Chen, G. (2024). Made in China: Chinese Re-Conceptualization of the Ideal of Judicial Independence (1906–1937). China Law and Society Review, 9(2), 71–108. https://doi.org/10.1163/25427466-20240003
  11. Cooperrider, L. K. (1961). The Rule of Law and the Judicial Process. Michigan Law Review, 59(4), 501. https://doi.org/10.2307/1286232
  12. Cui, Y. (2020). AI—A Historical Opportunity for Judicial Modernization. In Y. Cui, Artificial Intelligence and Judicial Modernization (pp. 3–20). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9880-4_1
  13. DIH Komisi Yudisial. (2024). Komisi Yudisial. Jdih.Komisiyudisial.Go.Id. https://jdih.komisiyudisial.go.id/frontend/detail/4/269
  14. Dylag, M., & Smith, H. (2023). From cryptocurrencies to cryptocourts: Blockchain and the financialization of dispute resolution platforms. Information, Communication & Society, 26(2), 372–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.1942958
  15. Edward, R. (2013). Responsive law and the judicial process: Implications for the judicial function. Routledge.
  16. Ermakova, E. P., & Frolova, E. E. (2022). Using Artificial Intelligence in Dispute Resolution. In A. O. Inshakova & E. E. Frolova (Eds.), Smart Technologies for the Digitisation of Industry: Entrepreneurial Environment (Vol. 254, pp. 131–142). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4621-8_11
  17. Etikantoro, S. N. (2021). Implementasi Electronic Court (E-Court) dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Perdata dalam Pemenuhan Asas Peradilan Sederhana Cepat dan Biaya Ringan Pada Pengadilan Negeri di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta [Tesis, Universitas Gadjah Mada]. https://etd.repository.ugm.ac.id/penelitian/detail/199267
  18. Fatwah, S., & Umar, K. (2020). Penerapan Sistem E-Court Di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Makassar Perspektif Siyasah Syar’iyyah. Siyasatuna: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Siyasah Syar’iyyah, 1(3), Article 3.
  19. Gandhi, L. M. author. (1995). Harmonisasi Hukum menuju Hukum Responsif. Universitas Indonesia Library; UI-Press. https://lib.ui.ac.id
  20. Hastuti, L. T. (2007). Studi tentang wacana Hukum Responsif dalam Politik Hukum Nasional di Era Reformasi [Thesis, Sebelas Maret University]. https://digilib.uns.ac.id/dokumen/7187/Studi-tentang-wacana-Hukum-Responsif-dalam-politik-Hukum-Nasional-di-Era-Reformasi
  21. Hsieh, D., Chen, L., & Sun, T. (2021). Legal Judgment Prediction Based on Machine Learning: Predicting the Discretionary Damages of Mental Suffering in Fatal Car Accident Cases. Applied Sciences, 11(21), 10361. https://doi.org/10.3390/app112110361
  22. Iqbal, M., Susanto, S., & Sutoro, M. (2019). EFEKTIFITAS SISTEM ADMINISTRASI E-COURT DALAM UPAYA MENDUKUNG PROSES ADMINISTRASI CEPAT, SEDERHANA DAN BIAYA RINGAN DI PENGADILAN. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 8(2), 302. https://doi.org/10.30652/jih.v8i2.7286
  23. Jayanthi, R., & Dinaseviani, A. (2022). Kesenjangan Digital dan Solusi yang Diterapkan di Indonesia Selama Pandemi COVID-19. JURNAL IPTEKKOM Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan & Teknologi Informasi, 24(2), 187–200. https://doi.org/10.17933/iptekkom.24.2.2022.187-200
  24. Kant, I. (2018). Kritik Atas Akal Budi Praktis. Pustaka Pelajar.
  25. Khasanah, D. D. (2021). Analisis Yuridis Kekuatan Hukum Sertipikat Tanah Elektronik Dalam Pembuktian Hukum Acara Perdata. Widya Bhumi, 1(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.31292/wb.v1i1.5
  26. Kovač, P. (2011). Modernizing Administrative Procedural Law in Slovenia as a Driving Force of Efficient and Good Administration. NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 4(2), 39–66. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10110-011-0004-6
  27. Mahdalena, M. (2021). Efektivitas Hukum PERMA No. 1 Tahun 2019 tentang Administrasi Perkara dan Persidangan di Pengadilan Secara Elektronik dalam Perkara Perceraian (Studi di Pengadilan Agama Gunung Sugih Kab. Lampung Tengah) [Thesis, UIN Raden Intan Lampung]. https://repository.radenintan.ac.id/15838/
  28. Mahkamah Agung. (n.d.). E Court Mahkamah Agung RI [Electronics Justice System]. Ecourt.Mahkamahagung.Go.Id. Retrieved March 4, 2024, from https://ecourt.mahkamahagung.go.id/
  29. Mahkamah Agung. (2020). Annual Report of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia 2020. Mahkamah Agung. https://www.mahkamahagung.go.id/laptah/laptah2020/index.html#p=13
  30. Mahkamah Agung. (2023). Keputusan Direktur Jenderal Badan Peradilan Umum Nomor 29/DJU/SK/HM.02.3/1/2023 tentang Standarisasi Sarana dan Prasarana Persidangan Secara Elektronik pada Lingkungan Peradilan Umum. Badilum.Mahkamahagung.Go.Id. https://badilum.mahkamahagung.go.id/publik/peraturan/kebijakan-dirjen-badilum/3891-keputusan-direktur-jenderal-badan-peradilan-umum-nomor-29-dju-sk-hm-02-3-1-2023-tentang-standarisasi-sarana-dan-prasarana-persidangan-secara-elektronik-pada-lingkungan-peradilan-umum.html
  31. Marzuki, P. M. (2005). Penelitian Hukum. Kencana.
  32. Maulana, A. D., Mailiena, C., Rizqi, N. K., & Wahid, S. H. (2023). OPTIMALISASI SISTEM E-COURT DI PENGADILAN AGAMA MADIUN: STRATEGI DAN TANTANGAN. AICOMS: Annual Interdisciplinary Conference on Muslim Societies, 3(1), Article 1.
  33. Medellu, K. R. (2022). Pelaksanaan E-Court (Administrasi Perkara dan Persidangan di Pengadilan secara Elektronik) dalam Perkara Perdata [Thesis, Universitas Hasanuddin]. https://repository.unhas.ac.id/id/eprint/16159/
  34. Mulia, M., Zulfatmi, Z., Khalil, Z. F., Kurniawan, C. S., & Rizki, D. (2024). Conflict And Consensus in Fiqh Siyasah: The Practice of Islamic Law Across Various Cultures. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 12(3), 1263. https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v12i3.1363
  35. Nasri, A. T., Renggong, R., & Hasan, Y. A. (2023). EFEKTIVITAS PENERAPAN E-COURT: STUDI PADA PENGADILAN AGAMA SIDENRENG RAPPANG. Indonesian Journal of Legality of Law, 5(2), 265–272. https://doi.org/10.35965/ijlf.v5i2.2661
  36. Nir, E., & Musial, J. (2022). Zooming In: Courtrooms and Defendants' Rights during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Social & Legal Studies, 31(5), 725–745. https://doi.org/10.1177/09646639221076099
  37. Nonet, P., & Selznick, P. (2001). Law and Society in Transition: Toward Responsive Law. Transaction Publishers. https://www.routledge.com/Law-and-Society-in-Transition-Toward-Responsive-Law/Nonet-Selznick-Kagan/p/book/9780765806420?srsltid=AfmBOoqFItcxszUudO-KFHFBN0atDZTe35cNfUoquNySzgA_AXK4r_LV
  38. Nonet, P., & Selznick, P. (2009). Law and Society in Transition: Toward Responsive Law. Transaction Publishers.
  39. Nugroho, R. (2011). Public policy: Dinamika kebijakan-analisis kebijakan-manajemen kebijakan. Elex Media Komputindo. https://lib.ui.ac.id/detail.jsp?id=20292114
  40. Nurfuat, M. A. (2023). Penerapan E- Court dalam Pelaksanaan Sidang Online di Pengadilan Agama Pati Jawa Tengah [Thesis, Universitas Islam Indonesia]. https://dspace.uii.ac.id/handle/123456789/46368
  41. Onghokham. (1983). Rakyat dan Negara. LP3ES.
  42. Osborne, D., & Plastrik, P. (2018). Banishing Bureaucracy: The Five Strategies for Reiventing Government. Penerbit PPM.
  43. Paudel, K. P. (2024). The role of information and communication technology in modernizing the courts: A case of Nepali judiciary. International Journal of Law and Management, 66(1), 61–73. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-01-2023-0006
  44. Pengadilan Agama Tebing Tinggi. (n.d.). Pengertian E-Court. Www.Pa-Tebingtinggi.Go.Id. Retrieved March 4, 2024, from https://www.pa-tebingtinggi.go.id/index .php/kepaniteraan/e-court/pengertian-e-court
  45. Pengadilan Negeri Sawahlunto. (2022). Sosialisasi Perma Nomor 7 Tahun 2022 Tentang Administrasi Perkara Dan Persidangan Di Pengadilan Secara Elektronik. Pn-Sawahlunto.Go.Id. https://pn-sawahlunto.go.id/berita-pn/sosialisasi-perma-nomor-7-tahun-2022-tentang-administrasi-perkara-dan-persidangan-di-pengadilan-secara-elektronik/
  46. Prabowo, I. (2022, October 20). Paradigma Peraturan Mahkamah Agung: Modern Legal Positivism Theory, Teori Hukum Progresif Dan Urgensi Kodifikasinya. Pa-Namlea.Go.Id. https://pa-namlea.go.id/news/arsip-artikel/762-paradigma-peraturan-mahkamah-agung-modern-legal-positivism-theory-teori-hukum-progresif-dan-urgensi-kodifikasinya-oleh-imam-prabowo-s-h-19-10
  47. Purwanto, E. A., & Sulistyastuti, D. R. (2012). Implementasi Kebijakan Publik: Konsep dan Aplikasinya di Indonesia. Gava Media.
  48. Putz, B., Menges, F., & Pernul, G. (2019). A Secure and Auditable Logging Infrastructure Based on A Permissioned Blockchain. Computers & Security, 87, 101602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2019.101602
  49. Raaijmakers, S. (2019). Artificial Intelligence for Law Enforcement: Challenges and Opportunities. IEEE Security & Privacy, 17(5), 74–77. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSEC.2019.2925649
  50. Rahardjo, S. (2008). Membedah Hukum Progrsif. Kompas.
  51. Rahmawati, E. S., Zuhriah, E., Zaman, J. Q., Al Mafaz, F., & Samudin, S. A. (2024). USING CASE BROKER INSTEAD OF MEDIATOR IN TRIBUNAL PROCESS: CASE STUDY IN MARRIAGE LAW. PETITA: JURNAL KAJIAN ILMU HUKUM DAN SYARIAH, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.22373/petita.v9i2.320
  52. Rajamaki, J., & Knuuttila, J. (2013). Law Enforcement Authorities' Legal Digital Evidence Gathering: Legal, Integrity and Chain-of-Custody Requirement. 2013 European Intelligence and Security Informatics Conference, 198–203. https://doi.org/10.1109/EISIC.2013.44
  53. Rehatta, J. B. (2015, April 28). Penerapan Hukum Responsif di Indonesia [Blog Post]. Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura. https://fh.unpatti.ac.id/penerapan-hukum-responsif-di-indonesia/
  54. Rois, C., Irfan, A., Toyyib, M., & Ali, M. M. (2024). Recontextualization of Fiqh Al-Siyāsah from the Perspective of Fiqh Al-Ḥaḍarah in Realizing World Peace. Journal of Islamic Thought and Civilization, 14(1), 335–351. https://doi.org/10.32350/jitc.141.20
  55. Saleh, I. N. S., Badilla, N. W. Y., Apriyanto, A., & Depari, D. P. (2024). Buku Referensi Sistem Peradilan di Indonesia: Proses, Hak, dan Keadilan. PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia.
  56. Saputri, F. I., & Rizal, M. C. (2022). Studi Pemikiran Ketatanegaraan Imam al-Mawardi. Verfassung: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara, 1(1), 17–34. https://doi.org/10.30762/vjhtn.v1i1.157
  57. Sengupta, S., & Dave, V. (2022). Predicting applicable law sections from judicial case reports using legislative text analysis with machine learning. Journal of Computational Social Science, 5(1), 503–516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42001-021-00135-7
  58. Sulaiman, S., & Nasir, M. (2023). Hukum Responsif: Hukum sebagai Institusi Sosial Melayani Kebutuhan Sosial dalam Masa Transisi. Ius Civile: Refleksi Penegakan Hukum Dan Keadilan, 7(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.35308/jic.v7i1.7570
  59. Tajudeen, A. L., & Lawal, M. A. (2023). Application of Maqasid al-Shariah-Based Public Policy Framework in SDGs Policies: Poverty Eradication (SDG 1) as a Case Study. In M. Hamdan, M. Anshari, N. Ahmad, & E. Ali (Eds.), Advances in Public Policy and Administration (pp. 78–95). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-8903-1.ch005
  60. Ulum, B., & Arifullah, M. (2024). Contextualizing Fiqh al-Siyāsah in Indonesia: A Proposed Typology of Islamic Populism. AHKAM : Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, 24(2). https://doi.org/10.15408/ajis.v24i2.37747
  61. Wahab, S. A. (2016). Analisis Kebijakan: Dari Formulasi ke Penyusunan Model-Model Implementasi Kebijakan Publik. : Bumi Aksara.
  62. Warasi, N. G., Larosa, Y. M., Mendrofa, Y., & Waruwu, M. H. (2024). Analisis Pemanfaatan Teknologi e-Court dalam Meningkatkan Efisiensi dan Aksesibilitas di Pengadilan Negeri Gunungsitoli. Management Perspective: Jurnal Penelitian Manajemen, 1(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.62138/js7cpa25
  63. Widianingrum, A. R. (2024). ANALISIS IMPLEMENTASI KEBIJAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP PENANGANAN KEJAHATAN SIBER DI ERA DIGITAL. JOURNAL IURIS SCIENTIA, 2(2), 90–102. https://doi.org/10.62263/jis.v2i2.40
  64. Winarno, B. (2012). Kebijakan publik Teori proses dan studi kasus. CAPS.
  65. Zahrah, M. A. (1988). Ushul Fiqh. Dar al-Fikr al-‘Araby.
  66. Zuhdi, M. (1997). Masail Fiqhiyyah. PT Toko Gunung Agung.
No Related Submission Found