Article Sidebar

FATWĀ IN CONTEMPORARY ISLAMIC JUDICIARY
Submitted
June 23, 2025
Accepted
August 30, 2025
Published
September 5, 2025
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 128 Download : 80

Main Article Content

Abstract

Purpose – This study focuses on the extent to which the application of MUI ( Council of Indonesian Ulama) fatwā in the Indonesian Religious Court, particularly in the context of Islamic family law. This issue has led to discursive debates between Indonesian ʿUlamāʾ and some scholars.  Some argue that fatwā is not binding because it is not a legal source and there is no fatwā in the hierarchy of Indonesia’s legal system. However, MUI fatwās have been used as a legal basis for decisions related to Islamic family law in the Indonesian Religious Court.


Method - This research uses sociological jurisprudence as a method for inquiry. This method is based on normative legal research. However, it does not discuss the legal system or regulation; nevertheless, it observes the reactions and interactions that occur in society when the regulation is enforced. 


Findings – This study concluded that although MUI fatwā is not binding in the Indonesian Legal system, the judges of the Indonesian Religious Court have considered the MUI fatwā as a legal basis in rendering decisions relating to Islamic family law. In other words, the fatwās issued by the Majelis Ulama, which have been used as a legal basis by judges in the Religious Courts for several cases related to Islamic family law in Indonesia, will shift. The issues mentioned deal with the legal status of children out of wedlock, child adoption, interfaith marriage, and Ahmadiyah followers.


Research contribution – This study reveals the role of MUI fatwas as a non-formal source of legal legitimacy that, while not legally binding, continues to influence judicial practices in Indonesian Religious Courts concerning Islamic family law.


Originality/value – The value of this research rests in its ability to demonstrate the dynamic interaction between religious authority and the positive legal system, thereby opening a broader discourse on the integration of fatwas into national legal practice.

Keywords

Fatwā The Council of Indonesian Ulama (MUI) Legal Reasoning Indonesian Religious Court

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Abdullah Jarir, Nina Chairina, Masduki, Abdul Rahim Hakimi

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
How to Cite
Abdullah Jarir, Nina Chairina, Masduki, & Abdul Rahim Hakimi. (2025). FATWĀ IN CONTEMPORARY ISLAMIC JUDICIARY: THE ACCOMMODATION OF MUI FATWĀ AMONG JUDGES OF INDONESIAN RELIGIOUS COURT. Al-Mawarid Jurnal Syariah Dan Hukum (JSYH), 7(2), 373–396. https://doi.org/10.20885/mawarid.vol7.iss2.art9
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. A. Husain. (2008). Aḥkām Walad al-Zinā fī al-Fiqh al-Islāmi>. Najjah al-Waṭaniyyah University.
  2. Abi> I>sya Muhammad Ibn I>sya> Ibn Thawrah at-Tirmi>dzi. (2016). Sunan at-Tirmi>dzi. Cairo: Da>r at-Ta’si>l.
  3. Abi Abd Allah MuhamAbi> I>sya Muhammad Ibn I>sya> Ibn Thawrah at-Tirmi>dzimad Ibn Ismail Ibn Ibrahim ibn Al-Mugirah al-Bukhari. (n.d.). Sunan at-Tirmi>dzi>. Cairo: Da>r at-Ta’si>l.
  4. Abu> Da>wu>d. (2013). Sunan Abu> Da>wu>d. Da>r al-Fikr, Juz 2 no. 227.
  5. Aditya, R. I., & Waddington, L. B. (2021). The Legal Protection Against Child Marriage in Indonesia. BESTUUR, 9(2), 126. https://doi.org/10.20961/bestuur.v9i2.55144
  6. Ahmad ibn Hanbal. (n.d.). Musnad Ahmad ibn Hanbal. Cairo: Muassasah ar-Risa>lah, Da>r al H}adi>s}, al-Qa>hirah 1969, juz 28 no. 16990.
  7. Aldjufri. (n.d.). Hak Waris Anak di Luar Nikah menurut Hukum Islam. Journal of Lex et Societatis, Vol. IV, No. 1, (2016), 101, Vol. IV, No. 1, (2016), 101(2016), 101.
  8. AL-Imam Abu al-Husayn Muslim al Hajjaj al-Qusyairian-Naysaburi. (2013). Sah}i>h} Muslim. Bairut-Libanon: (Da>r al-Fikr,.
  9. Alnizar, F. (2025). The Language of Exclusion: Ideology and Power in the Fatwa of the Majelis Ulama Indonesia on Ahmadiyah. Journal of Islamic Law, 6(1), 67–88. https://doi.org/10.24260/jil.v6i1.3338
  10. Alnizar, F., Manshur, F. M., & Ma’ruf, A. (2022). Following the Global Rejection: The Motives of Majelis Ulama Indonesia’s Fatwas on Ahmadiyah. Studia Islamika, 29(3), 519–546. https://doi.org/10.36712/sdi.v29i3.15349
  11. Amiur Nuruddin & Azhari Akmal Tarigan. (2006). Hukum Perdata Islam di Indonesia: Studi KritisPerkembangan Hukum Islam dariFiqih, UU No 1 Tahun 1974 sampai KHI. Jakarta: PT Kencana Prenada Media Group.
  12. Andriansyah, Y. (2023). Analysis of Fatwas by the National Sharia Board-Indonesian Council of Ulama on the Stock Market. Millah: Journal of Religious Studies, 22(2), 525–552. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.20885/millah.vol22.iss2.art9
  13. Bahruddin Muhammad. (2013, Desember). Akibat Hukum Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 46/PUU/VII/2010 terhadap Pembagian Hak Waris Anak Luar Perkawinan. Badan Peradilan Agama Mahlamah Agung. Retrieved from https://badilag.mahkamahagung.go.id/artikel/18859-akibat-hukum-putusan-
  14. Decision of Tanjungpinang Religious Court No. 0025/Pdt.P/2015/PA.TPI.
  15. Ibrahim, B., Arifin, M., & Abd Rashid, S. Z. (2015). The role of fatwa and mufti in contemporary muslim society. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 23(SpecialIssue11), 315–326. Scopus. Retrieved from Scopus.
  16. Imam al-Hafidh Abu Isa Muhammad bin Isa Bin Thawrah Bin Musa Bin Bin Ad-dahhak as-Sulami at-TirmiziSunan at-Tirmizi. (n.d.). Sunan at-Tirmizi. (Bairut-Libanon: Dar al-Fikr, 2013, Juz 3 no. 2113.
  17. Jamaa, L. (2018). Fatwas of the Indonesian council of ulama and its contributions to the development of contemporary Islamic law in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Islam and Muslim Societies, 8(1), 29–56. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.18326/ijims.v8i1.29-56
  18. Johar, A. F. (n.d.). Kekuatan Hukum Fatwa Majelis Ulama Indonesia (Mui) Dari Perspektif Peraturan Perundang-Undangan di Indonesia | Oleh: Al Fitri Johar, S.Ag., S.H., M.H.I. (11/1)—Direktorat Jenderal Badan Peradilan Agama. Retrieved June 8, 2022, from https://badilag.mahkamahagung.go.id/artikel/publikasi/artikel/kekuatan-hukum-fatwa-majelis-ulama-indonesia-mui-dari-perspektif-peraturan-perundang-undangan-di-indonesia-oleh-al-fitri-johar-s-ag-s-h-m-h-i-11-1
  19. Khairuldin, W. M. K. F. W., Embong, A. H., Anas, W. N. I. W. N., Mohd, H., & Ismail, D. (2018). The application of technology in the dissemination of fatwas: A study on religious institutions in Malaysia. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 9(7), 1590–1596. Scopus. Retrieved from Scopus.
  20. Khoiruddin Nasution. (2008). Fatwa> Majelis Ulama Indonesia tentang Aliran Ahmadiyah. Millah: Journal of Religious Studies, VII(2008), 6.
  21. Lina Nur Anisa. (2020). Kedudukan Fatwa Majelis Ulama Indonesia Terhadap Hukum Positif Indonesia. Jurnal Investama, Vol. 4(No.1).
  22. M. ibn al-Ḥasan al-Kalwadhānī Abū al-Khaṭṭāb. (1995). Al-Tahdhīb fī ‘Ilm al-Farā’id wa al-Waṣāyā. T.Tp: Maktabah al-Abyakan.
  23. Marriage Law No. 1/1974 Article 43/1.
  24. Muh{ammad Ibn Isma>’i>l al-Bukha>ri. (2013). S}ah}i>h} al-Bukha>ri>,. Bairu>t: Da>r al-Fikr.
  25. Mustofa, K. N., Fakhria, S., Quintana, M. K., Tauziri, Y., & Nainin, D. M. (2024). Religious Authority and Family Law Reform in Indonesia: The Response and Influence of the Indonesian Ulema Council on Interfaith Marriage. JURIS (Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah), 23(2), 383–393. https://doi.org/10.31958/juris.v23i2.11849
  26. Rusli, R., Hasyim, M. S., & Nurdin, N. (2020). A NEW ISLAMIC KNOWLEDGE PRODUCTION AND FATWA RULINGS: How Indonesia’s Young Muslim Scholars Interact with Online Sources. JOURNAL OF INDONESIAN ISLAM, 14(2), 499. https://doi.org/10.15642/jiis.2020.14.2.499-518
  27. Sirry, M. (2013). Fatwas and their controversy: The case of the Council of Indonesian Ulama (MUI). Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 44(1), 100–117. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022463412000641
  28. Suhartono, S. (2018). Eksistensi Fatwa Majelis Ulama Indonesia dalam Perspektif Negara Hukum Pancasila. AL-IHKAM: Jurnal Hukum & Pranata Sosial, 12(2), 448–465. https://doi.org/10.19105/al-lhkam.v12i2.1255
  29. The decision of Kediri Religious Court No. 005/Pdt.P/2016/PA.Kdr.
  30. The Kompilasi Hukum Islam Article 99/1-2.
  31. The MUI Fatwa> No 5/MUNAS VII/MUI/9/2005 on Interfaith inheritance.
  32. The MUI Fatwa> No. 11/MUNAS VII/MUI/15/2005 on Ahmadiyyah.
  33. The MUI Fatwa> No.11 of 2012 on Legal Status of Children Born out of Wedlock,.
  34. The MUI Fatwa No. U-335/MUI/VI.1982 on Children Adoption.
  35. Wahbah Az-Zuhaylī. (1985). Al-Fiqh Al-’Islāmī wa ‘Adillatuh (Vol. 8). Dār al-Fikr.
  36. Zayyadi, A., Ridwan, Hidayat, A., Ubaidillah, & Masuwd, M. A. (2023). Understanding of Legal Reform on Sociology of Islamic Law: Its Relevance to Islamic Family Law in Indonesia. Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam, 249–262. https://doi.org/10.24090/mnh.v17i2.7584
No Related Submission Found