Article Sidebar

ISLAMIC FAMILY MEDIATION IN SOUTHEAST ASIA
Submitted
July 23, 2025
Accepted
August 27, 2025
Published
August 31, 2025
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 257 Download : 56

Main Article Content

Abstract

Purpose – This study examines the legal framework and institutional practices of family dispute mediation in Indonesia and Malaysia within the context of Islamic family law. This study aims to evaluate how legal pluralism, religious values, and cultural norms shape the implementation and effectiveness of mediation mechanisms in both countries by comparing the effectiveness of the regulation and implementation of family mediation in Indonesia and Malaysia, highlighting Indonesia's reliance on mediation and Malaysia's reliance on the Majlis Sulh.


Methods – This study employs a qualitative legal methodology with doctrinal, comparative, and empirical approaches. The regulations compared include PERMA No. 1 of 2016 and related regulations in Indonesia, as well as the Islamic Family Law Act 1984 (Act 303) and Kaedah-Kaedah Sulh in Malaysia. The analysis examines the legal framework, institutions, and implementation of family mediation, supported by institutional data from the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia (2022) and the Malaysian Sharia Judicial Department (2020).


Findings – The findings reveal significant contrasts: while Indonesia relies heavily on court-annexed mediation led by judges, Malaysia has institutionalized Sulh through the Syariah Court's Majlis Sulh, featuring trained officers and standardized procedures. In Indonesia, mandatory mediation often lacks adequate screening for domestic violence, which raises ethical concerns. Conversely, Malaysia's structured system demonstrates greater procedural integrity and role clarity. Cultural and psychosocial dimensions further influence the outcomes. Community-based models in Indonesia emphasize negotiated resolutions, whereas Malaysia prioritizes religious legitimacy and professionalization. The role of psychosocial professionals and child-inclusive practices emerged as vital elements for increasing effectiveness. Legal culture, public trust, and the institutional environment also determine how mediation is perceived and practiced, with Malaysia benefiting from clearer legal demarcation.


Research contribution/limitations – This study contributes to the growing body of literature on Islamic legal pluralism and non-adversarial justice by identifying the institutional, cultural, and ethical factors that enhance or constrain mediation in Muslim-majority contexts.

Keywords

Family Mediation Islamic Family Law Legal Pluralism Non-Adversarial Justice Sulh

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Rahma Khofifah Khoirun Umah, Nur Fadhilah, M. Darin Arif Mu'allifin

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
How to Cite
Rahma Khofifah Khoirun Umah, Nur Fadhilah, & M. Darin Arif Mu’allifin. (2025). ISLAMIC FAMILY MEDIATION IN SOUTHEAST ASIA: AN ANALYSIS OF CULTURAL LEGITIMACY, LEGAL STRUCTURE, AND CONTEMPORARY DYNAMICS IN INDONESIA AND MALAYSIA. Al-Mawarid Jurnal Syariah Dan Hukum (JSYH), 7(2), 281–300. https://doi.org/10.20885/mawarid.vol7.iss2.art5
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Abraham, Shanti. 2023. “Introduction to Mediation in Malaysia.” Revista Brasileira de Alternative Dispute Resolution 5(9). doi:10.52028/rbadr.v5i9.ART06.
  2. Adnan, Wan Azimin Wan, Ahmad Hidayat Buang, and Zubaidi Sulaiman. 2022. “Pemerkasaan Pelaksanaan Sulh Dalam Kes-Kes Hartanah Melalui Pemakaian Arahan Amalan Di Mahkamah Syariah Di Malaysia (Enhancement on the Application of Sulh in Real Property Cases through Practice Directions in Malaysian Shariah Courts).” UUM Journal of Legal Studies 13(2):345–71.
  3. Alibašić, Haris. 2024. “Exploring the Influence of Islamic Governance and Religious Regimes on Sustainability and Resilience Planning: A Study of Public Administration in Muslim-Majority Countries.” Public Policy and Administration 39(4):556–87. doi:10.1177/09520767231223282.
  4. Aly Wahb, Yousef. 2023. “Competing Authorities: Islamic Family Law and Quasi-Judicial Proceedings in North America.” American Journal of Islam and Society 39(3–4):87–111. doi:10.35632/ajis.v39i3-4.2993.
  5. Bashir, Haroon. 2023. “Islam and the Emancipatory Ethic: Islamic Law, Liberation Theology and Prison Abolition.” Religions 14(9):1083. doi:10.3390/rel14091083.
  6. Dami, Zummy Anselmus, Ali Imron, Burhanuddin Burhanuddin, and Achmad Supriyanto. 2022. “Servant Leadership and Job Satisfaction: The Mediating Role of Trust and Leader-Member Exchange.” Frontiers in Education 7:1036668. doi:10.3389/feduc.2022.1036668.
  7. Drnovšek, Katja, and Suzana Kraljić. 2025. “The Reform of Family Mediation in Slovenia.” Revista Brasileira de Alternative Dispute Resolution 7(13). doi:10.52028/rbadr.v7.i13.ART04.SLO.
  8. El Maknouzi, Mohammed El Hadi, Iyad Mohammad Jadalhaq, Imad Eldin Abdulhay, and Enas Mohammed Alqodsi. 2023. “Islamic Commercial Arbitration and Private International Law: Mapping Controversies and Exploring Pathways towards Greater Coordination.” Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 10(1):523. doi:10.1057/s41599-023-02031-z.
  9. Fadhilah, Nur, Muhammad Mufti Al Anam, and Nuril Farida Maratus. 2024. “Contestation and Negotiation on Interfaith Inheritance in Pancasila Village.” Justicia Islamica 21(2):377–400. doi:10.21154/justicia.v21i2.9577.
  10. Fleming, Mark D., Nadia Safaeinili, Margae Knox, Elizabeth Hernandez, Emily E. Esteban, Urmimala Sarkar, and Amanda L. Brewster. 2022. “Conceptualizing the Effective Mechanisms of a Social Needs Case Management Program Shown to Reduce Hospital Use: A Qualitative Study.” BMC Health Services Research 22(1):1585. doi:10.1186/s12913-022-08979-z.
  11. Gerungan, Alexandra, Claudio Shallaby Adre, Fahmi Shahab, and Raymond Lee. 2023. “Mediation Ecosystem in Indonesia.” Revista Brasileira de Alternative Dispute Resolution 5(9). doi:10.52028/rbadr.v5i9.ART04.
  12. Hakim, Ghada Osmat El, and Rania Mohamad Mansour. 2024. “Managing Marital Disputes in Lebanese Religious Courts from a Social Work Perspective: A Study on the Importance of Family Mediation Offices in Lebanese Druze Religious Courts as a Model.” Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology 8(6):6040–50. doi:10.55214/25768484.v8i6.3319.
  13. Hamzani, Achmad Irwan, Fajar Dian Aryani, Bambang Tri Bawono, Nur Khasanah, and Nur Rohim Yunus. 2025. “Non-Procedural Dispute Resolution: Study of the Restorative Justice Approach Tradition in Indonesian Society.” International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 69(4):373–87. doi:10.1177/0306624X231165425.
  14. Hamzani, Achmad Irwan, Tiyas Vika Widyastuti, Nur Khasanah, and Mohd Hazmi Mohd Rusli. 2024. “Implementation Approach in Legal Research.” International Journal of Advances in Applied Sciences 13(2):380. doi:10.11591/ijaas.v13.i2.pp380-388.
  15. Haq, Hilman Syahrial, Achmadi Achmadi, SInung Mufti Hangabei, and Arief Budiono Budiono. 2022. “Community Mediation-Based Legal Culture in Resolving Social Conflicts of Communities Affected by the COVID-19 Pandemic in West Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia.” Studia Iuridica Lublinensia 31(2):11–32. doi:10.17951/sil.2022.31.2.11-32.
  16. Hariyanto, Erie, Moh. Efendi, and Sulistiyawati Sulistiyawati. 2021. “Dilema Hakim Pengadilan Agama Dalam Menyelesaikan Perkara Hukum Keluarga Melalui Mediasi.” Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi 4(1):115–24. doi:10.24090/volksgeist.v4i1.4333.
  17. Hartanto, Dadang, Agussani Agussani, and Juhriyansyah Dalle. 2021. “Antecedents of Public Trust in Government During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Indonesia: Mediation of Perceived Religious Values.” Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies 8(4):321–41. doi:10.29333/ejecs/975.
  18. Hasan, Kamrul. 2021. “Researching Masculinity and Men’s Sexual Health in Bangladesh: Methodological Reflections.” Qualitative Sociology Review 17(4):44–57. doi:10.18778/1733-8077.17.4.03.
  19. Hefner, Robert W. 2021. “Islam and Institutional Religious Freedom in Indonesia.” Religions 12(6):415. doi:10.3390/rel12060415.
  20. Huda, Miftahul, Agus Purnomo, Abdul Mun’im, Lutfi Hadi Aminuddin, and Lukman Santoso. 2024. “Tradition, Wisdom and Negotiating Marriage and Inheritance Disputes on Javanese Muslim.” Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam 9(1):25. doi:10.29240/jhi.v9i1.9887.
  21. Islamiyati, Dewi Hendrawati, Aisyah Ayu Musyafah, Asma Hakimah, and Ruzian Markom. 2022. “Religious Practices of Land Endowment: Examining Reform and Dispute Resolution Alternatives of Land Waqf in Indonesia and Malaysia.” International Journal of Public Policy and Administration Research 9(3):71–78. doi:10.18488/74.v9i3.3204.
  22. Jamaluddin, Siti Zaharah, Mohammad Abu Taher, Department of Law, American International University-Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh, Hua Siong Wong, and Faculty of Law, Multimedia University, Melaka, Malaysia. 2023. “Application of Mediation in Resolving Elderly Family Issues in Malaysia: Lessons from Canada and Australia.” Kajian Malaysia 41(1):62–84. doi:10.21315/km2023.41.1.4.
  23. Jamil, Ghazala. 2021. “A Secular Need: Islamic Law and State Governance in Contemporary India: Jeffrey A. Redding, Seattle, University of Washington Press, 2020, 240 Pp., ISBN 978-0-295-74708-8.” Contemporary South Asia 29(2):302–3. doi:10.1080/09584935.2021.1917078.
  24. Jones, Balawyn, and Amira Aftab. 2024. “Inside Indonesia’s Religious Courts: An Argument for Domestic and Family Violence Screening and Exemption from Compulsory Mediation.” Oxford Journal of Law and Religion 12(2):217–31. doi:10.1093/ojlr/rwad015.
  25. Kalajdzic, Jasminka, Axel Halfmeier, Bernard Murphy, Ianika Tzankova, and Manuel A. Gómez. 2024. “The (Un)Intended Consequences of Legal Transplants: A Comparative Study of Standing in Collective Litigation in Five Jurisdictions.” Journal of Tort Law 17(2):149–202. doi:10.1515/jtl-2025-0003.
  26. Kasri, Rahmatina Awaliah, and Syafira Rizma Chaerunnisa. 2022. “The Role of Knowledge, Trust, and Religiosity in Explaining the Online Cash Waqf amongst Muslim Millennials.” Journal of Islamic Marketing 13(6):1334–50. doi:10.1108/JIMA-04-2020-0101.
  27. Laksono, Agung Dwi, and Ratna Dwi Wulandari. 2021. “Regional Disparities of Facility-Based Childbirth in Indonesia.” Trends in Sciences 18(21):387. doi:10.48048/tis.2021.387.
  28. Latifiani, Dian. 2021. “Human Attitude and Technology: Analyzing a Legal Culture on Electronic Court System in Indonesia (Case of Religious Court).” Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies 6(1):157–84. doi:10.15294/jils.v6i1.44450.
  29. López, Verónica, Karen Cárdenas, and Luis González. 2021. “The Effect of School Psychologists and Social Workers on School Achievement and Failure: A National Multilevel Study in Chile.” Frontiers in Psychology 12:639089. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.639089.
  30. Maryam, Rini, and Sulistyowati Irianto. 2024. “Exploring Efficacy.” Lentera Hukum 10(3):331. doi:10.19184/ejlh.v10i3.43726.
  31. Md Said, Muhamad Helmi, Muhammad Amrullah Drs Nasrul, Nora Abdul Hak, and Wan Noraini Mohd Salim. 2021. “Muslim Estate Administration: The Locus of Malaysian Syariah Court in Malaysia.” International Journal of Islamic Thought 19(1):73–78. doi:10.24035/ijit.19.2021.197.
  32. Moore‐Grant, Tracy Ann, Stephanie Robins, Neena Saxena, and Suchika Siotia. 2025. “The Impact of Cultural Competence in Family Law: An Overview of Buddhism, Islam, Hinduism, and Judaism.” Family Court Review 63(1):86–104. doi:10.1111/fcre.12847.
  33. Muradin, Arshad. 2022. “Religious Authority and Family Dispute Resolution among Moroccan Muslims in the Netherlands.” Journal of Muslims in Europe 11(1):52–66. doi:10.1163/22117954-bja10047.
  34. Mustapha, Ahmad S. 2024. “Al-Fatani’s Perspectives on Islamic Family Law: Insights From Hidayah Al-Muta’allim Wa’Umdah Al-Muta’alim.” Journal of Islamic Thought and Civilization 14(1):247–65. doi:10.32350/jitc.141.15.
  35. Novita, Dwi, Mohamad Sar’an, Asep Ahmad Ridwansah, Suharyono Suharyono, and Hamdan Ardiansyah. 2025. “Family Conflict Disclosure on Social Media in Islamic Law: Islah as a Reconciliation Mechanism.” Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam 10(1):443–58. doi:10.29240/jhi.v10i1.12658.
  36. Nyathi, Mkhululi. 2023. “Re-Asserting the Doctrinal Legal Research Methodology in the South African Academy: Navigating the Maze.” South African Law Journal 140(2):365–86. doi:10.47348/SALJ/v140/i2a5.
  37. Ojo, Samuel Olugbenga. 2023. “Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR): A Suitable Broad Based Dispute Resolution Model in Nigeria; Challenges and Prospects.” International Journal of Conflict Management 4(1):50–62. doi:10.47941/ijcm.1253.
  38. Owolabi, Kudirat Magaji W. 2023. “Understanding the Place of Islamic Arbitration within the Nigerian Law.” Jurnal Hukum Novelty 14(1):69. doi:10.26555/novelty.v14i1.a25926.
  39. Rahmat, Nur Ezan, Muhamad Ikhwan Mohd Zain, Hartini Saripan, Daleleer Kaur Randawar, and Muhammad Fikri Othman. 2022. “Mediation as an Alternative Mechanism to Resolve Family Disputes in Malaysia: A Comparative Analysis with Australia and New Zealand.” Intellectual Discourse 30(2). doi:10.31436/id.v30i2.1818.
  40. Razak, Askari, Mohamad Hidayat Muhtar, Suzanne Andrea Bloks, and Geofani Milthree Saragih. 2023. “Balancing Civil and Political Rights: Constitutional Court Powers in Indonesia and Austria.” Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies 8(2). doi:10.15294/jils.v8i2.70717.
  41. Rosalina, Maria, and Az Zahra Zulfikar. 2024. “The Implementation of the Republic of Indonesian Supreme Court Regulation Number 3 of 2022 Concerning Electronic Mediation in Court: A Case Study.” Qubahan Academic Journal 4(1):310–20. doi:10.48161/qaj.v4n1a206.
  42. See, Hooi Y., Mohd S. Mohamed, Siti N. M. Nor, and Wah Y. Low. 2021. “Challenges in the Ethical Review of Clinical and Biomedical Research in Malaysia: A Mixed Methods Study.” Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 16(5):487–500. doi:10.1177/15562646211033191.
  43. Sellitto Ferrari, Andrés D. 2022. “In Pursuit of the Right Path: The Promise of Islamic Leadership in the Post-Singapore Convention World of International Commercial Mediation.” University of Pittsburgh Law Review 83(2). doi:10.5195/lawreview.2021.862.
  44. Sin, Kit Yeng, Choon Ling Sim, Yi Jin Lim, Damien Lee, and Joanne Shaza Janang. 2021. “The Mediating Effect of Business Ethics in the Relationship between Total Quality Management and Sustainable Performance: Perspective from 4- and 5-Stars Hotels.” International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management 34(2):176. doi:10.1504/IJPQM.2021.118429.
  45. Topkara, Ufuk. 2025. “On Responsibility: Islamic Ethical Thought Engages with Jewish Ethical Thought.” Religions 16(3):274. doi:10.3390/rel16030274.
  46. Votruba, Ashley M., Jared S. Noetzel, and Abigail L. Herzfeld. 2023. “Pathways to Preferences for Collaborative Conflict Resolution: Disputants’ Process Goals Drive Preferences.” Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 29(3):364–82. doi:10.1037/law0000377.
  47. Wan Adnan, Wan Azimin, and Ahmad Hidayat Buang. 2021. “Pelaksanaan Sulh Dalam Kes Tuntutan Harta Sepencarian Melibatkan Hartanah Di Mahkamah Syariah Malaysia: Satu Analisis: Application Of Sulh In Jointly Acquired Property Cases Involving Real Estate Property In Malaysian Shariah Courts: An Analysis.” Malaysian Journal of Syariah and Law 9(1):137–52. doi:10.33102/mjsl.vol9no1.270.
  48. Wardiono, Kelik, Khudzaifah Dimyati, Wardah Yuspin, Tasyha Panji Nugraha, Arief Budiono, and Saepul Rochman. 2024. “Epistemology Of Legal Studies: Research Method Characteristics of Theoretical Law Bearers in Indonesia.” Journal of Ecohumanism 3(3):814–54. doi:10.62754/joe.v3i3.3374.
  49. Winter, Helen M. E., Felix Klapprott, Muhamad Naanaa, A. Marco Turk, and Sebastian F. Winter. 2022. “Psychosocial Peer Mediation as Sustainable Method for Conflict Prevention and Management among Refugee Communities in Germany.” Conflict Resolution Quarterly 39(3):195–210. doi:10.1002/crq.21322.
  50. Zatari, Fadi, and Omar Fili. 2024. “Justice and the Just Ruler in the Islamic Mirror of Princes.” American Journal of Islam and Society 41(3–4):34–55. doi:10.35632/ajis.v41i3-4.3291.
  51. Zulnaidi, Hutkemri, Nofouz Mafarja, Suzieleez Syrene Abdul Rahim, and Umi Kalsum Mohd Salleh. 2024. “Ethical Mediation: The Influence of Mathematics Teachers Cooperation on Readiness for the Industrial Revolution Era in Indonesia and Malaysia.” Acta Psychologica 243:104151. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104151.
  52. Bintania, A. (2019). Implementasi Mediasi dalam Perkara Perceraian di Pengadilan Agama. Jurnal Al-Risalah, 19(2), 195–210
  53. Musyahadah, A. (2020). Mediasi sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Perceraian di Pengadilan Agama. Jurnal Hukum dan Keadilan, 4(2), 70–85.
  54. Rahman, F. (2020). Sulh in Shariah Court of Malaysia: A Restorative Approach. Jurnal Syariah, 28(3)
No Related Submission Found