Article Sidebar

Submitted
January 2, 2026
Accepted
February 27, 2026
Published
March 5, 2026
Download
Statistic
Read Counter : 37

Main Article Content

Abstract

Purpose – This study aims to analyze the normative paradox in the flexibility of marriage dispensations, which expands the subjectivity of judicial decisions due to the absence of substantive indicators of “urgent reasons” and parameters of the best interests of the child. In addition, this study examines the shift in the function of dispensations from the ultimum remedium to a response to social pressure. This study also evaluates its impact on the consistency of decisions and the effectiveness of the minimum age norm as an instrument of child protection.


Methods – This study used a qualitative method with a normative legal approach. The research data consist of primary and secondary legal materials selected purposively based on their relevance and authority, with a focus on legal norms and judicial considerations related to marriage dispensation.


Findings – This study confirms the existence of a normative paradox in the flexibility of marriage dispensation in Indonesia, where the mechanism, originally designed as a limited correction to the minimum age limit, has instead expanded the scope for subjectivity in judicial practice due to the absence of indicators regarding compelling reasons and operational parameters in the best interests of the child. This has resulted in inconsistent decisions and weakened child protection. Furthermore, the functional shift of dispensation from ultimum remedium to a response to social pressure has blurred the boundaries and has the potential to shift the law from an instrument of protection to a means of legitimizing child marriage practices.


Research contribution/limitations – This study offers a conceptual framework for reorienting the practice of marriage dispensation towards child protection and substantive justice. However, this study does not fully accommodate the empirical perspectives of those directly affected by the disaster.


Originality/value – The novelty of this study is that it positions marriage dispensation as a structural issue in family law, emphasizing the need for more accountable regulatory standards and judicial guidelines for the protection of children and justice.

Keywords

Marriage Dispensation Child Protection Family Law Regulatory Flexibility Court Decisions

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Latifatus Zahra Az Zubaidi, Ahmad Fauzi, Ahbib Wildan Sholihi

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
How to Cite
Latifatus Zahra Az Zubaidi, Ahmad Fauzi, & Ahbib Wildan Sholihi. (2026). BETWEEN JUDICIAL DISCRETION AND THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE CHILD: THE DILEMMA OF CHILD PROTECTION IN MARRIAGE DISPENSATION IN INDONESIA. Al-Mawarid Jurnal Syariah Dan Hukum (JSYH), 8(1). https://doi.org/10.20885/mawarid.vol8.iss1.art4
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Adisti, S. A. S. (2025). Analisis Hukum Islam terhadap Pernikahan Dini Dampak dan Implikasinya dalam Perspektif Sosial dan Keagamaan. Journal of Family and Sharia, 1(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.64845/jfs.v1i1.22
  2. Afiyah, I., Macsudov, V. G., Mahmudulhassan, M., and Muthoifin, M. (2024). Impact Analysis of Marital Dispensation: Economic Implications and Family Welfare in Social and Legal Context. Solo International Collaboration and Publication of Social Sciences and Humanities, 2(01), 25–36.
  3. Akmal, Ahmad, A. & Joharsah. (2025). Peran Hakim sebagai Pelindung Nilai Kemanusiaan dalam Sengketa Perdata: Studi Naratif atas Putusan Inovatif. Al-Zayn : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum, 3(3), 1682–1688. https://doi.org/10.61104/alz.v3i3.1527
  4. Al Hasan, F. A., and Yusup, D. K. (2021). Dispensasi Kawin Dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia: Menjamin Kepentingan Terbaik Anak melalui Putusan Hakim. Al-Ahwal: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam, 14(1), 86–98. https://doi.org/10.14421/ahwal.2021.14107
  5. Anwar, W. A., Sururie, R. W., Fautanu, I., Wahyu, A. R. M., and Yaekaji, A. (2024). A Perkawinan Dini di Era Modern: Analisis Relevansi, Tantangan Penetapan dan Implementasi Batas Minimal Usia Nikah. DIKTUM, 45–69.
  6. Ardiansyah, B. R., Thareq, S. I., and Yulianto, A. P. (2025). Melampaui Hukum Reformasi: Legitimasi Budaya Dalam Mempertahankan Pernikahan Dini Di Kalimantan Tengah. 14(2). Mimbar : Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Dan Politik, 14(2), 299-314. https://doi.org/10.32663/6dre6x11
  7. Baihaqi, B., Tutik, T. T., Musadad, A., Khazin, A. M., and Simun, M. G. B. (2024). Legal Non-Compliance and Kiai Hegemony: The Practice of Unregistered Marriages among the Madurese Muslim Community of Kubu Raya. Journal of Islamic Law, 5(2), 242–268. https://doi.org/10.24260/jil.v5i2.2819
  8. Basalamah, A. B. R., and Widodo, S. (2024). Implementasi Permohonan Dispensasi Nikah Bagi Anak Dibawah Umur (Studi Kasus Di Pengadilan Agama Purwokerto). Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research, 4(6).
  9. BPS, and Bapennas. (2020). Prevention of Child Marriage Acceleration that cannot wait. BPS-Bapennas. https://www.unicef.org/indonesia/sites/unicef.org.indonesia/files/2020-06/Prevention-of-Child-Marriage-Report-2020.pdf
  10. Braithwaite, V. (2021). Institutional oppression that silences child protection reform. International Journal on Child Maltreatment: Research, Policy and Practice, 4(1), 49–72.
  11. Bunting, A. (2005). Stages of Development: Marriage of Girls and Teens as an International Human Rights Issue. Social & Legal Studies, 14(1), 17–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663905049524
  12. Darmawati, D. and Wildana Arsyad. (2024). Pengembangan Putusan Hakim terhadap Dispensasi Pernikahan di Pengadilan Agama Belopa (Tinjauan Maqāṣid Syarī’ah). BUSTANUL FUQAHA: Jurnal Bidang Hukum Islam, 5(3), 514–543. https://doi.org/10.36701/bustanul.v5i3.1791
  13. Dwiyanti, S., Durahman, D., Gumilar, M. R. F., Yusuf, L. N., Fadillah, F. R., Yusmar, F. F., Hidayatulloh, A. W., Safaat, G., Nugraha, D., and Cahyadi, C. (2025). Hubungan Dispensasi Nikah Dan Kehamilan Di Luar Nikah Setelah Revisi Batas Usia Kawin Dalam Undang-Undang No. 16 Tahun 2019. Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum, 3(4), 4587–4595.
  14. Efevbera, Y. (2020). Defining and deconstructing girl child marriage and applications to global public health.
  15. Faiz, M. F., Ali, Z. Z., and Taufiq, M. (2023). Underage Widows and Widowers before the Law: Problem, Contestation and Legal Certainty in Marriage Dispensation. JURIS (Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah), 22(2), 223. https://doi.org/10.31958/juris.v22i2.9097
  16. Fauzi, M. Y. (2022). Pergeseran Paradigma Pembatasan Usia Perkawinan Dan Penerapannya Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Dispensasi Kawin. El-Izdiwaj: Indonesian Journal of Civil and Islamic Family Law, 3(1), 33–49.
  17. Fernando, E. (2020). Criminal Law Policy on the Protection of the Marriage of the Underage Children. Indonesian Journal of Law and Society, 1(1), 75. https://doi.org/10.19184/ijls.v1i1.16758
  18. Firdaus, M. I., and Andaryuni, L. (2025). Kajian Normatif Terhadap Penerapan Prinsip Best Interest of The Child Dalam Putusan Dispensasi Kawin. Jurnal Tana Mana, 6(3), 34–42.
  19. Foster, N. (2020). Respecting the dignity of religious organisations: When is it appropriate for courts to decide religious doctrine? University of Western Australia Law Review, 47(1), 175–219.
  20. Hernawan, H., and Widigdo, M. S. A. (2023). Peran Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Penetapan Dispensasi Nikah Perspektif Children’s Best Interest: Studi Kasus Pengadilan Agama Wonosari. Al Qalam: Jurnal Ilmiah Keagamaan Dan Kemasyarakatan, 17(5), 3491. https://doi.org/10.35931/aq.v17i5.2652
  21. Hidayat, H., Wantu, F. M., and Ahmad, A. (2024). Determination of Marriage Dispensation at Gorontalo Religious Court in Accordance with the Child Protection Law No. 35 of 2014. Estudiante Law Journal, 6(3), 663–680. https://doi.org/10.33756/eslaj.v6i3.29567
  22. Husna, A., Rahmatillah, M., and Imran, H. (2022). Marriage Dispensation and Family Resilience: A Case Study of the Bener Meriah Shariah Court, Aceh Province. Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, 22(2), 433–454. https://doi.org/10.15408/ajis.v22i2.28827
  23. Ilham, M. (2022). Penetapan Perkara Dispensasi Nikah Di Pengadilan Agama Perspektif Sosiologis (Studi Kasus Di Pengadilan Agama Cilacap Tahun 2019-2021). (Tesis). Universitas Islam Indonesia.
  24. Ilma, M. (2020). Regulasi Dispensasi dalam Penguatan Aturan Batas Usia Kawin bagi Anak Pasca Lahirnya UU No. 16 Tahun 2019. Al-Manhaj: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pranata Sosial Islam, 2(2), 133–166. https://doi.org/10.37680/almanhaj.v2i2.478
  25. Ilyas, M. (2025). Analisis Empiris terhadap Putusan Pengadilan Agama tentang Dispensasi Perkawinan Anak dalam Perspektif Pluralisme Hukum dan Maqāṣid al-Syarī’ah: Empirical Analysis of Religious Court Decisions on Marriage Dispensations for Minors from the Perspective of Legal Pluralism and Maqāṣid al-Syarī’ah. Bustanul Fuqaha: Jurnal Bidang Hukum Islam, 6(3), 743–765.
  26. Insani, N., Beddu, S., Rahman, R., Arpin, A., and Samuri, M. A. A. (2024). Judicial Considerations in Child Marriage Dispensations: An Empirical Study of the Gorontalo Religious Court. Jurnal Ilmiah Al-Syir’ah, 22(1), 41. https://doi.org/10.30984/jis.v22i1.2066
  27. Kurniawan, A., Sumanto, D., and Ramadhona, A. (2025). Judicial Disparities In Legal Interpretation: The Application Of Progressive Law In Marriage Dispensation Rulings. Al-Mawarid Jurnal Syariah Dan Hukum (JSYH), 7(2).
  28. Ludfi, L. (2024). Dispensasi Nikah dan Paradoks Kawin Anak di Madura: Studi Tentang Dampak Regulasi Terhadap Praktik Perkawinan Anak. Jurnal Mediasas: Media Ilmu Syari’ah Dan Ahwal Al-Syakhsiyyah, 7(2), 738–768. https://doi.org/10.58824/mediasas.v7i2.270
  29. Makruf, S., Mufti, RA., Yusup, DK., & Astarudin, T. (2025). Pelaksanaan Peraturan Pemberian Izin Dispensasi Kawin Menurut Hukum Perdata dan Hukum Islam. JIMU:Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisipliner, 3(03), 1938–1952. https://doi.org/10.70294/jimu.v3i03.973
  30. Mursyid, S., and Yusuf, N. (2022). Changes in Marriage Age Limits and Marriage Dispensations: A Study of Causes and Impacts on the Religious Courts in North Sulawesi. Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam, 6(2), 975. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v6i2.12439
  31. Nabilah, W., Putri, D., and Rizal, D. (2024). Jasser Auda’s System Approach in The Rules of Marriage Dispensation in Indonesia (Review of Maqashid Syariah). The Indonesian Journal of Islamic Law and Civil Law, 5(2), 265–281.
  32. Nasyadira, A., and Saputra, A. (2025). Relevansi Dispensasi Kawin Terhadap Tingkat Perceraian di Pengadilan Agama Semarang. 08. Al-Maqashidi Journal Hukum Islam Nusantara, 8(2), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.32665/almaqashidi.v8i2.5040
  33. Nurlaelawati, E. (2010). Modernization, Tradition and Identity: The Kompilasi Hukum Islam and Legal Practice in the Indonesian Religious Courts. Amsterdam University Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt46msj2
  34. Oktavianti, I., Ismail Jalili, and Sirajuddin M. (2023). Penerimaan Dispensasi Kawin di Pengadilan Agama Kepahiang Kelas II Perspektif Maqashid Syariah. Journal of Sharia and Legal Science, 1(3), 167–178. https://doi.org/10.61994/jsls.v1i3.191
  35. Onditi, F. (2022). Gender Inequalities in Africa’s Mining Policies. Springer.
  36. Ottakkam Thodukayil, F. S., Palaniswamy, U., and Kunjumon, A. (2025). The Causes of Divorce and Its Effects on Women: A Systematic Review. Marriage & Family Review, 1–36.
  37. Owens, B. R., and Merriman, B. (2021). “Habit and creativity in judges’ definition and framing of legal questions”. Theory and Society, 50(5), 741–767. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-021-09437-1
  38. Patoni, A., Bukhori, I., and Hannan, A. (2025). Analisis Pemberian Dispensasi Nikah di Pengadilan Agama Krasaan Perspektif Hukum Positif. Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 6(6).
  39. Perserikatan Bangsa-Bangsa. (1989, November 20). Konvensi Hak-Hak Anak.
  40. Pratiwi, A. (2025). Child Marriage and Marriage Law Reform in Indonesia: Unresolved Intersectional Issues. Girlhood Studies, 18(3), 64–80. https://doi.org/10.3167/ghs.2025.180307
  41. Purwanti, A., and Natalis, A. (2025). Law as Text, Culture as Context: The Semiotics of Marriage Dispensation and Judicial Considerations in Indonesia. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law-Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique, 1–32.
  42. Purwanto, M. R., And Fajriyah, N. I. (2024). An Analysis Of Judicial Determinations In Marriage Dispensation Cases From The Perspective Of Maqāṣid Al-Sharī‘Ah And The Child Protection Law. At-Thullab : Jurnal Mahasiswa Studi Islam, 6(2). Https://Doi.Org/10.20885/Tullab.Vol6.Iss2.Art14
  43. Putri, B. D. C. W., and Marwa, M. H. M. (2025). Dispensasi Kawin di Pengadilan Agama Soasio: Antara Regulasi dan Kemaslahatan bagi Anak. Media of Law and Sharia, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.18196/mls.v6i2.334
  44. Rahmah, S. A., and Achdiani, Y. (2025). Pernikahan Usia Muda sebagai Faktor Risiko dalam Ketahanan Ekonomi Keluarga. Equalita: Jurnal Studi Gender Dan Anak, 7(1), 56–63.
  45. Riza, F., and Sibarani, F. A. (2021). Prinsip The Best Interest of The Child dalam Proses Peradilan Anak (Vol. 1). umsu press.
  46. Rizal Arif Fitria, Ahmadi Hasan, and Masyithah Umar. (2023). Dispensasi Kawin dan Pemenuhan Hak Anak: Studi Pengaruh terhadap Hak-hak Anak dalam Konteks Hukum dan Sosial. Indonesian Journal of Islamic Jurisprudence, Economic and Legal Theory, 1(4), 749–767. https://doi.org/10.62976/ijijel.v1i4.201
  47. Rohmadi, Ali, Z. Z., Apriani, F., Octavianne, H., and Permata, C. (2024). Judges’ Considerations in Granting Marriage Dispensation Licenses in Indonesia: Islamic Family Law Perspective. El-Usrah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga, 7(1), 326–345. http://dx.doi.org/10.22373/ujhk.v7i1.22597
  48. Rohman, T., Mahsus, M., Abduh, M., and Arnone, G. (2023). Preventing Violations of Religious and Social Norms: Judicial Interpretation of “Urgent Reasons” in Marriage Dispensation at the Wonosari Religious Court, Indonesia. JIL: Journal of Islamic Law, 4(2), 218–236. https://doi.org/10.24260/jil.v4i2.1535
  49. Sanusi, M., Zainuddin, C., and Aprita, S. (2024). Implementasi Dispensasi Kawin Sebelum dan Sesudah Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2019 Tentang Perkawinan. Nnovative: Journal Of Social Science Research, 4 (3) , 9838-9857. https://j-innovative.org/index.php/Innovative
  50. Sari, L. Y., Umami, D. A., and Darmawansyah, D. (2020). Dampak Pernikahan Dini Pada Kesehatan Reproduksi Dan Mental Perempuan (Studi Kasus Di Kecamatan Ilir Talo Kabupaten Seluma Provinsi Bengkulu). Jurnal Bidang Ilmu Kesehatan, 10(1), 54–65. https://doi.org/10.52643/jbik.v10i1.735
  51. Sekarrini, L., Prasetyo, S., and Kusumayati, A. (2025). Child marriage dispensation from a reproductive health perspective: Why do judges grant or reject applications? International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health, 37(6), 411–420.
  52. Setiawan, B. (2024). Tantangan Hukum dan Perlindungan Hak Anak: Analisis Perkawinan Anak di Bawah Umur. As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga, 6(2), 1915–1924. https://doi.org/10.47467/as.v6i2.6793
  53. Shantya, D., Ramdani, R., and Khosim, A. (2025). Disparitas dispensasi kawin dan perlindungan anak: Analisis kritis terhadap Undang-Undang nomor 16 tahun 2019 dan Undang-Undang nomor 35 tahun 2014. As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga, 7(3), 365–383.
  54. Sirohi, T., and Mehra, P. (2025). An Evolutionary and Comparative Analysis of the Legal Landscape of Sexual Offenses Against Women in India. Sexual Health & Compulsivity, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/10720162.2025.2598472
  55. Silva, L. S. D. O. C. (2025). Women in Repudiation and Divorce Cases in the Christian Mission: Jesuit Translation Strategies and Normativities in Sixteenth- and Seventeenth-Century Japan. In K. Triplett, Y. Orii, and P. Jolliffe (Eds.), Japan in the Early Modern World (Vol. 5, pp. 183–209). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-70424-0_9
  56. Sriono, S., Mashdurohatun, A., Kusriyah, S., and Rofiq, A. (2023). Reconstruction of Marriage Dispensation Regulations in the Perspective of Human Rights Based on the Value of Justice. Scholars International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 6(04), 225–233. https://doi.org/10.36348/sijlcj.2023.v06i04.005
  57. Sumner, C., and Lindsey, T. (2011). Courting Reform: Indonesia’s Islamic Courts and Justice For The Poor. https://iacajournal.org/articles/66/files/submission/proof/66-1-148-1-10-20131023.pdf
  58. Susanti, R. (2024). Legal Analysis Of The Judge’s Consideration On The Matter “Marriage Dispensation From The Perspective Of Justice.” NEGREI: Academic Journal of Law and Governance, 4(1), 111–144. https://doi.org/10.29240/negrei.v4i1.11562
  59. Syaifullah, A. B., Zenrif, M. F., and Susamto, B. (2023). Legal Policy Addition of The Minimum Age Limit for Marriage in Law Number 16 of 2019 and Relevance With Efforts to Press the Application for Marriage Dispensation. Al-Fikru: Jurnal Ilmiah, 17(1), 48–63. https://doi.org/10.51672/alfikru.v17i1.170
  60. Tahir, C. M., Wulansari, R., And Reynaldo, T. (2025). Pemberian Dispensasi Perkawinan Terhadap Anak Dibawah Umur Dalam Prinsip Perlindungan Anak Dan Peraturan Mahkamah Agung. Kertha Semaya: Journal Ilmu Hukum, 13(1). Https://Doi.Org/10.24843/Ks.2025.V13.I11.P08
  61. Tobin, J. (Ed.). (2019). The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child: A Commentary (1st ed.). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198262657.001.0001
  62. UNICEF. (2018). Child Marriage: Latest Trends and Future Prospects [Dataset]. https://data.unicef.org/resources/child-marriage-latest-trends-and-future-prospects
  63. UNICEF Indonesia. (2016). Child Marriage in Indonesia: Progress on Pause. UNICEF Indonesia. https://www.unicef.org/indonesia/Unicef_Indonesia_Child_Marriage_Reserach_Brief_.pdf
  64. UNICEF, and UNFPA. (2021). Global Programme to End Child Marriage: Annual Report. Unfpa-Unicef. https://www.unicef.org/protection/unfpa-unicef-global-programme-end-child-marriage
  65. Vundamati, R. (2021). Right to marry and found family: A most challenged human right in post modern era. Indian Journal of International Law, 59(1), 229–255.
  66. Wismayanti, Y. F., O’Leary, P., Tilbury, C., and Tjoe, Y. (2021). The problematization of child sexual abuse in policy and law: The Indonesian example. Child Abuse & Neglect, 118, 105157.
  67. Yang, B. A. (2021). Inkonsistensi Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Implementasi Asas Kepentingan Terbaik Bagi Anak Yang Berkonflik Dengan Hukum. Journal Of Legality Of Law, 3(1), 20.
  68. Yogie Fahrisal, S., MM, M., and Haney Fuza Primadiane, S. (2025). Perkawinan Dibawah Umur: Perlindungan Anak dan Telaah Yuridis Dalam Praktek Peradilan. Penerbit CV Detak Pustaka.
  69. Yuni, L. A. (2021). Analysis of The Emergency Reasons in The Application of Marriage Dispensation at The Tenggarong Religious Court. Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam, 5(2), 976–1002.
  70. Zermatten, J. (2010). The Best Interests of the Child Principle: Literal Analysis and Function. The International Journal of Children’s Rights, 18(4), 483–499. https://doi.org/10.1163/157181810X537391
No Related Submission Found