Article Sidebar

Submitted
January 15, 2026
Accepted
March 3, 2026
Published
March 8, 2026
Download
Statistic
Read Counter : 26

Main Article Content

Abstract

Purpose - This study examines the practical application of theories of ijtihad in the fatwas of the Indonesian Ulema Council (MUI), focusing on the issues of unregistered marriages and child marriage, as well as their impact on the diversity of legal arguments and the consistency of fatwa outcomes. Additionally, this study evaluates the extent to which the maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah approach is operationalized in addressing contemporary social problems.


Methods - This study is a literature review employing a normative-doctrinal approach. The primary data included MUI Fatwa No. 10 of 2008 on unregistered marriages and the 2009 Ijtima’ Ulama Decision on child marriage. Analysis was conducted using content analysis and critical interpretation of the fatwa text, supported by classical fiqh literature, contemporary usūl al-fiqh, and the maqāṣid al-sharī’ah framework.


Findings - This study found that the MUI applies a hybrid approach that combines taqlīd toward classical fiqh and collective ijtihād based on considerations of the public interest. Although the MUI acknowledges the negative social impacts of unregistered and underage marriages, its fatwas continue to sanction these practices based on the opinions of classical Islamic scholars, resulting in key concepts such as harm, maturity, and the public interest not being defined with sufficient clarity. Consequently, the application of maqāṣid al-sharī’ah in fatwas tends to be normative-formalistic and insufficiently responsive to the complexities of contemporary reality.


Contributions/limitations of the study - This study contributes to the discussion of Islamic legal reform by critically evaluating the methodology of MUI fatwas. The study’s limitation is its reliance on secondary data without empirical field research.


Originality/value - This study offers an original analysis of the application of ijtihād and maqāṣid al-sharī’ah theories and underscores the urgency of a more dynamic and contextual approach to Islamic law.

Keywords

Hybrid Ijtihād Theory of Ijtihad MUI Fatwas Unregistered Marriages Child Marriage

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Mukhlisah Amin, Dwi Widyanti Putri

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
How to Cite
Amin, M., & Dwi Widyanti Putri. (2026). HYBRID IJTIHĀD AND THE DILEMMA OF PUBLIC INTEREST: THE DYNAMICS OF APPLYING IJTIHĀD THEORY IN MUI FATWAS ON UNREGISTERED MARRIAGES AND CHILD MARRIAGES. Al-Mawarid Jurnal Syariah Dan Hukum (JSYH), 8(1). https://doi.org/10.20885/mawarid.vol8.iss1.art8
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Ali, A. Y. (2021). The Holy Qur’an: Translation and Commentary. Accessed from
  2. https://quranyusufali.com/
  3. Ali, K. (2011). Imam Shafi’i: Scholar and Saint. London: Oneworld Academic.
  4. Alodokter. (2023). Hamil Usia Muda, Kenali Berbagai Risikonya [Pregnant at a Young Age, Know the Various Risks]. Retrieved from https://www.alodokter.com/ha mil-muda-akibat-hubungan- intim-dini
  5. Alwani, Taha Jabir.(2001). Maqasid Al- Shari’ah. Beirut: IIIT and Dar al-Hadi.
  6. Arief, A., Kurniati, & Misbahuddin. (2022). Acceptance of Ashab al-Shafii on The Changes of Qaul Qadim and Qaul Jadid of Imam Shafii. Jurnal Hunafa Studia Islamika, 19(2), 175-191. doi: https://doi.org/10.24239/js i.Vol19.Iss2.683
  7. Arsal, T. (2012). Nikah Siri dalam Tinjauan Demografi [Nikah Siri in Demographic Overview]. Sodality, 6(2), 160-169. Retrieved from https://www.neliti.com/public ations/181025/nikah-siri-in- demographic-overview
  8. Auda, J. (2008). Maqasid al-Shariah as Philosophy of Islamic Law: A Systems Approach. London: The International Institute of Islamic Thought.
  9. Belhaj, A. (2022). Beyond the Global Mufti: Religious Authority as Political Action. Religions, 13(2), 100. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel130 20100
  10. Billah, M. (2023). The Maslahah of State Policy in Responding to Unregistered Marriage: Inclusion of Unregistered Marriage on The Family Card. Ulul Albab: Jurnal Studi dan Penelitian Hukum Islam, 6(2), 136-151. https://doi.org/10.30659/jua.v 6i1.36754
  11. Dāwud, A. (1994). Sunan Abī Dāwud. Beirut: Maktabah al- Miṣriyyah.
  12. Duderija, A. (2014). Islamic Law Reform and Maqāṣid al-Shari’a in the Thought of Mohammad Hashim Kamali. In A. Duderija (Ed.), Maqāṣid al- Shari’a and Contemporary Reformist Muslim Thought (pp. 13-37). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  13. Faisal, A.(2020). Reproduction of Unregistered Polygamous: Unregistered Marriage Services and Marriage Simplication. Al-Ulum, 20(2), 542-560. https://doi.org/10.30603/au.v2 0i2.3459
  14. Frenki, D., Eficandra, & Hirawan, Y. (2022). Analysis Study Of The 2009 MUI Fatwa About The Law Of Early Marriage. International Journal of Education, Vocational and Social Science, 1(1).
  15. Gulam, H. (2016). Comparing the Legal Rules (Ahkam-i Shariah) in the Maliki and Shafi’i Schools with the Hanafi School of Thought. Jurnal Ilmiah Islam Futura, 16(1), 1-8.
  16. Hadi, A. (2004). Islam and State in Sumatera: A Study of Seventeenth Century Aceh. Leiden: Brill.
  17. Hallaq, W. B. (2009). Shari’a: Theory, Practice, Transformations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  18. Harimurti, Y. W., et al. (2020). The Role of Majelis Ulama Indonesia and Its Fatwas within The Indonesian Governance System. In T. Suryanto (Ed.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Environment and Technology of Law, Business and Education on Post Covid 19 (pp. 18-22). Bandar Lampung: Icetlawbe.
  19. Haris, A. and Nurfaika. (2024). Pernikahan Anak Usia Dini di Media Sosial: MUI Dalam Sorotan Publik (Studi Kasus Kabupaten Wajo). Realism: Law Review, 2(3).290-310.
  20. Hasyim, S. (2011). The Council of Indonesian Ulama (Majelis Ulama Indonesia, MUI) and Religious Freedom. Irasec’s Discussion Paper. Retrieved from www.irasec.com
  21. Hasyim, S. (2015). Majelis Ulama Indonesia and pluralism in Indonesia. Philosophy and Social Criticism, 41(4-5), 487-495. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/01 91453714566547
  22. Hasyim, S. (2019). Fatwas and Democracy: Majelis Ulama Indonesia (MUI, Indonesian Ulema Council) and Rising Conservatism in Indonesian Islam. Trans-Regional and - National Studies of Southeast Asia, 8(2), 21-35. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/trn.2019.13
  23. Hosen, N. (2004). Behind the Scenes: Fatwas of Majelis Ulama Indonesia (1975-1998). Oxford Journal of Islamic Studies, 15(2), 147-179. Retrieved from [suspicious link removed]
  24. Kamali, M. H. (1996). Methodological Issues in Islamic Jurisprudence. Arab Law Quarterly, 11(1), 3-33. Retrieved from https://heinonline.org/HOL/Pa ge?handle=hein.journals/arabl q11&id=3
  25. Kamali, M. H. (2003). Principles of Islamic Jurisprudence. Cambridge: The Islamic Texts Society.
  26. Kamali, M. H. (2008). Shari’ah Law: An Introduction. London: Oneworld Publications.
  27. Kathir, U. I. (2000). al-Miṣbāḥ al-Munīr fī Tahdhīb Tafsīr Ibn Kathīr (S.S. al-Mubarakpuri & A. M. Mujahid, Eds.; Vol. 7). Riyadh: Darussalam.
  28. Kementerian Koordinator Bidang Pembangunan Manusia dan Kebudayaan. (2021). MUI Perlu Tetapkan Fatwa Untuk Cegah Perkawinan Anak [MUI Needs to Issue Fatwa to Prevent Child Marriage]. Retrieved from https://www.kemenkopmk.go. id/mui-perlu-tetapkan-fatwa- untuk- cegah- perkawinan- anak
  29. Kidman, R. (2017). Child marriage and intimate partner violence: a comparative study of 34 countries. International Journal of Epidemiology, 46(2), 662-675. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/ dyw225
  30. Komisi Perlindungan Anak Indonesia. (2013). Perkawinan Tidak Dicatatkan: Dampaknya bagi Anak [Unregistered Marriages: Impact on Children]. Retrieved from https://www.kpai.go.id/publik asi/tinjauan/perkawinan-tidak- dicatatkan-dampaknya-bagi- anak
  31. Kurniawan, A., Sumanto, D., Ramadhona,A., & Hendri, K.(2025). Judicial Disparities In Legal Interpretation: The Application Of Progressive Law In Marriage Dispensation Rulings. Al-Mawarid: JSYH. 7(2).
  32. Liputan6. (2013, April 17). VIDEO: MUI: Nikah Siri untuk Hubungan Seks Dianggap Zina [VIDEO: MUI: Secret Marriage for Sex is Considered Adultery]. Retrieved from https://www.liputan6.com/ne ws/read/563733/video-mui- nikah-siri-untuk-hubungan- seks-dianggap-zina
  33. Niam, M.A. (2008). Sadd al-Dzari’ah dan aplikasinya dalam Fatwa Majelis Ulama Indonesia. Unpublished Ph.D Dissertation, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah.
  34. Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. (2020). Pedoman Mengadili Permohonan Dispensasi Kawin [Guidelines for Adjudicating Marriage Dispensation Applications]. Jakarta: Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia.
  35. Majelis Ulama Indonesia. (2005). Fatwa Majelis Ulama Indonesia Nomor: 4/MUNAS VII/MUI/8/2005 Tentang Perkawinan Beda Agama [Fatwa of the Indonesian Ulama Council Number: 4/MUNAS VII/MUI/8/2005 Concerning Interfaith Marriage]. Retrieved from https://mui.or.id/baca/fatwa/pe rkawinan-beda-agama
  36. Majelis Ulama Indonesia. (2008). Nikah Siri Bisa Dihukumi Haram, Ini Penjelasan dan Argumentasinya. Retrieved from https://mirror.mui.or.id/tanya- jawab keislaman/muamalah/40468/n ikah- s i r i - bisa- dihukumi- haram-ini-penjelasan-dan- argumentasinya/
  37. Majelis Ulama Indonesia. (2009). Keputusan Ijtima’ Ulama Komisi Fatwa Se-Indonesia III [Decision of The 3rd Indonesian Fatwa Commission of Ulama]. Retrieved from https://fatwamui.com/storage/ 553/KEPUTUSAN-KOMISI- B- PERNIKAHAN- USIA-DINI.pdf
  38. Majelis Ulama Indonesia (2011). Himpunan Fatwa MUI sejak 1975. Jakarta: Erlangga
  39. Matthew B. M., A. Michael H., and Johnny S. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook, ed. Helen Salmon, 3rd ed. London: Sage Publication
  40. M. Atho, M. (1983). Fatwa-Fatwa Majelis Ulama Indonesia: Sebuah Studi tentang Pemikiran Hukum Islam Indonesia 1975- 1988. Jakarta: INIS
  41. Mubarok, N. (2017). Sejarah Hukum Pencatatan Perkawinan di Indonesia [History of Marriage Registration Law in Indonesia]. Justicia Islamica, 14(1), 71-86. doi: http://doi.org/10.21154/jus ticia.v14i1.1220
  42. Musthafa, H. (2012). “Dibahas Kembali Pedoman Penentapan Fatwa MUI,” in Mimbar Ulama. Suara Majelis Ulama Indonesia, Special Edition Ijtima’ Ulama. pp.
  43. Mutaqin, Z. Z., & Sopyan, Y. (2024). Forced Marriage and Sex Trafficking under the Guise of Nikah Siri in Indonesia. Studia Islamika: Indonesian Journal for Islamic Studies, 31(2), 221-249. doi: https://doi.org/10.36712/s di.v31i2.39198
  44. Nafis, M. Cholil. (2012). Otoritas Fatwa terhadap Bank Syariah. In Nahar Nahrawi et al. (eds). Fatwa Majelis Ulama Indonesia (MUI) dalam Perspektif Hukum dan Perundang-perundangaan Jakarta: Puslitbang Lektur dan Khazanah Keagamaan. Badan Litbang dan Diklat Kementerian Agama RI.
No Related Submission Found