Article Sidebar

Submitted
July 17, 2022
Accepted
October 27, 2022
Published
December 9, 2022
Download
Full text PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 370 Download : 364

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Purpose – This study aims to identify and map the research most relevant to developing digital technology research trends published by leading journals on digital management in zakat institutions.
Methodology – The analysis focused on describing the characteristics and trends of keywords, authors, citations, and journals. The data analyzed were 25 journal publications for the last four years starting from 2019-2022, accessed online by Dimensions on June 09 2022. The methods used were descriptive statistics and bibliometric analysis with Biblioshiny, an R-based application, to generate bibliometric maps.
Findings – The study found that Indonesia's covid pandemic and zakat management blockchain is the most common words in this topic.
Implications – This paper focuses on the development of the Islamic world in building and contributing to the digital ecosystem in zakat institutions.
Originality – This research is expected to help carry out a comprehensive study of the center, identify research gaps, and help researchers determine research development by exploring findings that can still be developed related to digital management in zakat institutions are still limited

Keywords

Digital technology, digital management, zakat institutions, blockchain and biblioshiny R

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Silma Lafifa Sunarya, Sabiq Al Qital

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
How to Cite
Sunarya, S. L., & Al Qital, S. (2022). Digital management on zakat institutions: Mapping using Biblioshiny R. Review of Islamic Social Finance and Entrepreneurship, 1(2), 97–108. https://doi.org/10.20885/RISFE.vol1.iss2.art2
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Ahlgren, P., Jarneving, B., & Rousseau, R. (2003). Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient. Journal of The American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(6), 550–560. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10242
  2. An, K., & Seo, H. (2018). Donate system development using blockchain technology. Journal of Korea Institute of Information and Communication Engineering, 812–817. https://doi.org/10.6109/jkiice.2018.22.4.812
  3. Asfarina, M., Ascarya, & Beik, I. S. (2019). Classical and contemporary fiqh approaches to re-estimating the zakat potential in Indonesia. Journal of Islamic Monetary Economics and Finance, 5(2), 387–418. https://doi.org/10.21098/jimf.v5i2.1068
  4. Beik, I. S., Swandaru, R., & Priyesta Rizkiningsih. (2021). Utilization of digital teknology for zakat development. Islamic FinTech, 231–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45827-0_13
  5. Beik, I. S., Zaenal, M. H., & Saoqi, A. A. Y. (2021). The optimization of blockchain for greater transparency in zakat management. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45827-0_16
  6. Boyack, K., Klavans, R., & Borner, K. (2005). Mapping the backbone of science. Scientrometrics, 64(3), 351–374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-005-0255-6
  7. Choudhury, M. A., & Harahap, S. S. (2008). Interrelationship between zakat, Islamic bank and the economy: A theoretical exploration. Managerial Finance, 34(9), 610–617. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/03074350810890967
  8. CRAN. (n.d.). The Comprehensive R Archive Network. https://cran.r-project.org
  9. Cuccurullo, C., Aria, M., & Sarto, F. (2016). Foundations and trends in performance management. a twenty-five years bibliometrics analysis in business and public administration domains. Scientrometrics, 108(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1948-8
  10. Djaghballou, C.-E., Djaghballou, M., Larbani, M., & Mohamad, A. (2017). Efficiency and productivity performance of zakat funds in Algeria. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 11(3), 474–494. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-07-2017-0185
  11. Gumiri, E. R., & Alghifari, A. (2020). Manajemen aset produktif untuk memberdayakan mustahik: analisis pendistribusian zakat berdasarkan fatwa MUI nomor 14, tahun 2011. Management of Zakat and Waqf Journal (MAZAWA), 1(2), 162–183. https://doi.org/10.15642/mzw.2020.1.2.162-183
  12. Hafidhuddin, D. (2019). Peran strategis organisasi zakat dalam menguatkan zakat di dunia. Al-Infaq: Jurnal Ekonomi Islam, 2(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.32507/ajei.v2i1.361
  13. Hamdani, L. (2020). Zakat blockchain: A descriptive qualitative approach. EkBis: Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 4(2), 492–502. https://doi.org/10.14421/EkBis.2020.4.2.1270
  14. Hudaefi, F. A., Caraka, R. E., & Wahid, H. (2021). Zakat administration in times of Covid-19 pandemic in Indonesia: A knowledge discovery via text mining. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 15(2), 271–286. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-05-2020-0250
  15. Isnaini, J. L., & Utami, H. W. (2021). Analisis maslahah dan akuntanbilitas sebagai prinsip aset waqf kontemporer. Management of Zakat and Waqf Journal (MAZAWA), 1(2), 127–144. https://doi.org/10.15642/mzw.2020.1.2.127-144
  16. Kassim, S., & Hawariyuni, W. (2021). Proposing blockchain technology based zakat management model to enhance muzakki's s trust in zakat agencies : A conceptual study. Journal of Accounting Research, Organization and Economics, 4(2), 153–163. https://doi.org/10.24815/jaroe.v4i2.20467
  17. Lubis, M., & Azizah, A. H. (2018). Towards achieving the efficiency in zakat management system: interaction design for optimization in Indonesia. International Conference on User Science and Engineering (289–301). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1628-9_26
  18. Munir, M., & Zidna, R. R. (2021). Penerapan akuntansi zakat sebagai respon administrasi digital di era modern: studi pada badan amil zakat nasional (BAZNAS) provinsi Jawa Timur. Management of Zakat and Waqf Journal (MAZAWA), 2(2), 118–135. https://doi.org/10.15642/mzw.2021.2.2.118-135
  19. Nasri, R., Aeni, N., & Haque, M. . (2019). Determination of professionalism and transparency and its implications for the financial performance of zakat institutions. Journal of Islamic Monetary Economics and Finance, 5(4), 785– 806. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21098/jimf.v5i4.1158
  20. Nikmatuniayah, N., Marliyati, M., & Mardiana, L, (2017). Effects of accounting information quality, accountability, and transparency on zakat acceptance. MIMBAR: Jurnal Sosial Dan Pembangunan, 33(1), 62. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29313/mimbar.v33i1.2029
  21. Nur, M., Salikin, M., & Yahya, N. (2021). Blockchain-based zakat collection to overcome the trust issues of zakat payers. International Journal on Perceptive and Cognitive Computing (IJPCC), 7(1), 53–58. https://journals.iium.edu.my/kict/index.php/IJPCC/article/view/217
  22. Owoyemi, M. . (2020). Zakat management: The crisis of confidence in zakat agencies and the legality of giving zakat directly to the poor. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 11(2), 498–510. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-07-2017- 0097
  23. Perbawa, A., & Abdullah, H. (2018). Determinant factors of awareness for paying zakat on BAZNAS, Indonesia. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2799446
  24. Sugiyono, M. P. P. (2007). Pendekatan Kuantitatif. Kualitatif, dan R&D, Bandung: Alfabeta.
  25. Sulaeman, S., Majid, R., & Widiastuti, T. (2021). The impact of zakat on socio-economic welfare before Covid-19 pandemic in Indonesia : A quantitative study. International Journal of Zakat, 6(2), 75–90. https://doi.org/10.37706/ijaz.v6i2.301
  26. Wahid, H., Kader, R. ., & Ahmad, S. (2012). Localization of zakat distribution, religiosity, quality of life, and attitude change (Perceptions of Zakat Recipients in Malaysia). https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/268876123.pdf
  27. Yaakob, M. F. M., Nawi, A., Raja Rizal Iskandar, & Akhmad Habibi. (2022). The acceptance of cryptocurrency for zakat transactions: Experts view on its issues readiness. environment behaviour proceedings journal, 7(20), 1–8. doi: https://doi.org/10.21834/ebpj.v7i20.3419
  28. Yusoff, B., & Densumite, S. (2012). Zakat distribution and growth in the federal territory of Malaysia. Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, 4(8), 449–456. https://doi.org/10.22610/jebs.v4i8.346
  29. Zulfikri, Z., Adam, A., Kassim, S., & Hassan, A. (2022). Trust enhancement in zakat institutions using blockchain technology: A qualitative approach. European Journal of Islamic Finance, 2421. https://doi.org/10.13135/2421-2172/6312