Article Sidebar

Submitted
February 7, 2023
Accepted
March 26, 2023
Published
March 28, 2023
Download
Full text PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 433 Download : 538

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Purpose – This article discusses the increasingly rapid development of the sharia e-commerce in Indonesia, focusing on FinTech peer to peer lending sharia.
Methodology – This article uses qualitative methods and literature research (library research), with descriptive analysis techniques related to sharia FinTech lending in Indonesia, as well as a statutory approach, which is classified based on hierarchy and sources of law by comprehensive review.
Findings – The theme of this article is that Islamic FinTech lending seeks to understand better how vital economic innovation is needed by society because FinTech lending is a new platform for fast and practical financial transaction services. However, although the Financial Services Authority (Otoritas Jasa Keuangan, OJK) has made FinTech lending regulations, no specific rules explicitly mention sharia FinTech lending. So there is still a possibility that some elements are different from Islamic sharia. So, of course, special regulations regarding sharia FinTech lending are urgently needed so that they follow Islamic laws.
Implications – This article is useful, apart from adding to the repertoire, it can also be a means for studying financial service platforms in Indonesian society and can be used as reference material for further research in the same field.
Originality – This article contributes to various financial service platforms to continue to improve and innovate in sharia-based financial activities, as well as provide an understanding to the wider community regarding the ease of accessing these sharia financial services

Keywords

FinTech peer to peer lending sharia

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Yunika Sari

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
How to Cite
Sari, Y. (2023). Sharia e-commerce in Indonesia: Sharia peer to peer lending. Review of Islamic Social Finance and Entrepreneurship, 2(1), 90–102. https://doi.org/10.20885/RISFE.vol2.iss1.art7
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Asosiasi FinTech Pendanaan Bersama Indonesia. (n.d.). Profil AFPI. Asosiasi FinTech Pendanaan Bersama Indonesia (AFPI). https://afpi.or.id/about
  2. Alshater, M. M., Saba, I., Supriani, I., & Rabbani, M. R. (2022). FinTech in Islamic finance literature: a review. Heliyon, 8(9), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10385
  3. Antoni, T. (2020). Kekosongan norma penentuan bunga pinjaman financial technology peer to peer lending. Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Bonum Commune, 3(1), 90–103. https://doi.org/10.30996/jhbbc..v3i1.3077
  4. Baihaqi, J. (2018). Financial technology peer to peer lending berbasis syariah di Indonesia. Tawazun: Journal of Sharia Economic Law, 1(2), 116–132. https://doi.org/10.21043/tawazun.v1i2.4979
  5. Basuki, F. H., & Husein, H. (2018). Analisis SWOT financial technology pada dunia perbankan di Kota Ambon (Survei pada bank di kota Ambon). Jurnal Manajemen dan Bisnisan Bisnis, 2(1), 60–74. https://doi.org/10.30598/manisvol2issue1page60-74
  6. Cai, S., Lin, X., Xu, D., & Fu, X. (2016). Judging pnline peer to peer lending behavior: a comparison of first time and repeated borrowing requests. Information and Management, 53(7), 857–867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2016.07.006
  7. Chrismastianto, I. A. W. (2017). Analisis SWOT implementasi teknologi finansial terhadap kualitas layanan perbankan di Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis, 20(1), 133–144. https://doi.org/10.24914/jeb.v20i1.641
  8. Darmalaksana, W. (2020). Metode penelitian kualitatif studi pustaka dan studi lapangan. Pre-Print Digital Library UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, 1–6. http://digilib.uinsgd.ac.id/eprint/32855
  9. Destiya, J. (2019). Peluang dan tantangan financial technology (FINTECH) bagi perbankan syariah di Indonesia (Studi kasus PT. Bank Syariah Mandiri) [Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta]. http://repository.umj.ac.id/id/eprint/4545
  10. Eltin, G. Q. (2019). Pengaruh kepercayaan, persepsi kegunaan dan persepsi kemudahan terhadap niat berperilaku dalam mengadopsi financial technology [Universitas Lampung]. http://digilib.unila.ac.id/eprint/54913
  11. Febrianti, S. R. I. D. (2018). Financial technology dalam sistem ekonomi Islam [IAIN Palangkaraya]. http://digilib.iain-palangkaraya.ac.id/id/eprint/1702
  12. Firdaus, F., Febiola, A., & Faiqoh, S. (2017). Ketegasan regulasi laporan ketaatan syariah dalam optimalisasi financial technology lembaga keuangan syariah. Perisai: Islamic Banking and Finance Journal, 1(3), 227–272. https://doi.org/10.21070/perisai.v1i3.1173
  13. Gonzalez, L. (2023). Financial literacy in for-profit vs pro-social peer-to-peer lending. Managerial Finance, 49 (2), 315-337. https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-07-2021-0329
  14. Ghofur, A. (2014). Politik hukum legislasi undang-undang perbankan syariah di Indonesia. Raisal Media Group.
  15. Habibunnajar, R., & Rahmatullah, I. (2020). Problematika regulasi pinjam meminjam secara online berbasis syariah di Indonesia. Jurnal Legal Reasoning, 2(2), 120–134. https://doi.org/10.35814/jlr.v2i2.2225
  16. Hadad, M. D. (2017). Financial technology (FinTech) di Indonesia: Kuliah umum tentang FinTech-IBS. http://www.ibs.ac.id/img/doc/MDH%20-%20FinTech%20IBS%20June%202017.pdf
  17. Hassan, M. K., Aliyu, S., Huda, M., & Rashid, M. (2019). A survey on Islamic finance and accounting standards. Borsa Istanbul Review, 19(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2019.07.006
  18. Hiyanti, H., Nugroho, L., Sukmadilaga, C., & Fitrijanti, T. (2020). Peluang dan tantangan FinTech (financial technology) syariah di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Islam, 5(3), 326–333. https://doi.org/10.29040/jiei.v5i3.578
  19. Ibrahim, J. (2006). Teori dan metodologi penelitian hukum. Banyumedia Publishing. https://lib.ui.ac.id/detail.jsp?id=20326032
  20. Kartika, R., Darna, N., & Setiawan, I. (2019). Analisis peer to peer lending di Indonesia. Akuntabilitas: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Ekonomi, 12(2), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.35457//akuntabilitas.v12i2.902
  21. Kennedy, P. S. J. (2017). Forum keuangan dan bisnis Indonesia, when FinTech meets accounting: opportunity and risk, tantangan terhadap ancaman disruptif dari financial technology dan peran pemerintah dalam menyikapinya. Prosiding Forum Keuangan Dan Bisnis Indonesia (FKBI), 171–182. http://repository.uki.ac.id/id/eprint/1446
  22. Kiko, S., & Firmansyah, A. (2017). Kajian perlindugan konsumen sektor keuangan: perlindungan konsumen pada FinTech. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. https://lms.ojk.go.id/OJK/FrontendLibrary/DetailCatalog/Detail/2/10282
  23. Lova, E. F. (2021). Financial technology peer to peer lending syariah: sebuah perbandingan dan analisis. Journal of Economic and Business Law Review, 1(2), 29–42. https://jurnal.unej.ac.id/index.php/JEBLR/article/view/27732
  24. Majelis Ulama Indonesia. (2016). Surat keputusan majelis ulama Indonesia tentang anggaran dasar-anggaran rumah tangga DSN-MUI. https://mui.or.id/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/8.-PO-AD-dan-ART-DSN-MUI-final-konsinyir_114-147.pdf
  25. Majelis Ulama Indonesia. (2018). Fatwa tentang layanan pembiayaan berbasis teknologi informasi berdasarkan prinsip syariah. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1qCu2X6MTIFnYqK22eMx7uFL53AXBT9Vo/view
  26. Marzuki, P. M. (2013). Penelitian hukum. Kencana Prenada Media Group.
  27. Miles, & Huberman. (1992). Analisis data kualitatif. Universitas Indonesia Press.
  28. Misissaifi, M., & Sriyana, J. (2021). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi minat menggunakan FinTech syariah. Iqtisahaduna: Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Kita, 10(1), 109–124. https://doi.org/10.46367/iqtishaduna.v10i1.276
  29. Moleong, L. J. (2011). Metode penelitian kualitatif. Remaja Rosdakarya.
  30. Mufalihah, M. (2021). Pengawasan otoritas jasa keuangan terhadap layanan pinjaman online berbadan koperasi yang belum berizin di otoritas jasa keuangan: perspektif undang-undang nomor 21 tahun 2011 tentang otoritas jasa keuangan dan hukum Islam [Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang]. http://etheses.uin-malang.ac.id/30995/1/17220158.pdf
  31. Muhammad, R., & Nissa, I. K. (2020). Analisis resiko pembiayaan dan resolusi syariah pada peer to peer financing. Equilibrium: Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah, 8(1), 63–88. https://doi.org/10.21043/equilibrium.v8i1.6558
  32. Muzdalifa, I., Rahma, I. A., Novalia, B. G., & Rafsanjani, H. (2018). Peran FinTech dalam meningkatkan keuangan inklusif pada UMKM di Indonesia (Pendekatan keuangan syarian). Jurnal Masharif Al-Syariah: Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Perbankan Syariah, 3(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.30651/jms.v3i1.1618
  33. Nabela. (2020). Sistem pengawasan otoritas jasa keuangan terhadap layanan peer to peer lending FinTech syariah persfektif hukum Islam [Institut Agama Islam Negeri Palangka Raya]. http://digilib.iain-palangkaraya.ac.id/id/eprint/2858
  34. Nafiah, R., & Faih, A. (2019). Analisis transaksi financial technology (FinTech) syariah dalam perspektif maqashid syariah. Iqtishadia: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Perbankan Syariah, 6(2), 167–175. https://doi.org/10.19105/iqtishadia.v6i2.2479
  35. Nidzar, M. A. (2017). Financial technology (FinTech): It’s concept and implementation in Indonesia. Warta Fiskal. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/98486/1/MPRA_paper_98486.pdf
  36. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (n.d.). Peraturan OJK. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. https://www.ojk.go.id/regulasi/otoritas-jasa-keuangan/peraturan-ojk/
  37. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2016). FinTech lending. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. https://www.ojk.go.id
  38. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2018a). Direktori FinTech per Juni 2018. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. https://www.ojk.go.id/Id/kanal/iknb/data-dan-statistik/direktori/FinTech/default.aspx
  39. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2018b). FinTech lending Indonesia. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. https://www.ojk.go.id
  40. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2020). Data Mei 2020 perkembangan FinTech lending (pendanaan gotong royong online). Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. https://www.ojk.go.id/Id/kanal/iknb/data-dan-statistik/FinTech/documents/statistikflmei2020v3.Pdf
  41. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2021a). FinTech corner. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. https://www.ojk.go.id
  42. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2021b). Penyelenggaraan FinTech lending terdaftar dan berizin di OJK per 17 November 2021. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. https://www.ojk.go.id
  43. Patilima, H. (2013). Metode penelitian kualitatif. Alfabeta. https://ecampus-fip.umj.ac.id/pustaka_umj/main/search?isbn=978979.8433.559
  44. Perwataatmadja, K., & Antonio, M. S. (1992). Apa dan bagaimana bank Islam. Dana Bhakti Wakaf.
  45. Prestama, F. B., Iqbal, M., & Riyadi, S. (2019). Potensi finansial teknologi syariah dalam menjangkau pembiayaan non-bank. Al-Masraf : Jurnal Lembaga Keuangan dan Perbankan, 4(2), 147–158. https://doi.org/10.15548/al-masraf.v4i2.217
  46. Rabbani, M. R., Ali, M. A. M., Rahiman, H. U., Atif, M., Zulfikar, Z., & Naseem, Y. (2021). The response of Islamic financial service to the Covid-19 pandemic: The open social innovation of the financial system. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology Market, and Complexity, 7(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7010085
  47. Rabbani, M. R., Bashar, A., Nawaz, N., Karim, S., Ali, M. A. M., Rahiman, H. U., & Alam, M. S. (2021). Exploring the role of Islamic FinTech in combating the aftershocks of Covid-19: The open social innovation of the Islamic financial system. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology Market, and Complexity, 7(2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7020136
  48. Rahadiyan, I., & Sari, A. R. (2019). Peluang dan tantangan implementasi FinTech peer-to-peer lending sebagai salah satu upaya peningkatan kesejahteraan masyarakat Indonesia. Jurnal Defendonesia, 4(1), 18–28. https://doi.org/10.54755/defendonesia.v4i1.79
  49. Rasidi, Y. S., Budi, C. S., & Hatmoko, P. A. (2021). FinTech syariah alternatif pendanaan UMKM pada masa pandemi covid-19 di Indonesia. Finansha-Journal of Sharia Financial Management, 2(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.15575/fjsfm.v2i1.12462
  50. Rizal, M., Maulina, E., & Kostini, N. (2018). FinTech as one of the financing solutions for SMES. Adbispreneur: Jurnal Pemikiran dan Penelitian Administrasi Bisnis dan Kewirausahaan, 3(2), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.24198/adbispreneur.v3i2.17836
  51. Rusydiana, A. S. (2018). Developing Islamic financial technology in Indonesia. Hasanuddin Economics and Business Review, 2(2), 143–152. https://doi.org/10.26487/hebr.v2i2.1550
  52. Suhendar, H., & Diniyanto, A. (2020). Pengawasan dan regulasi terhadap financial technology (FinTech) lending syariah. El-Iqtishady: Jurnal Institut Agama Islam Negeri Pekalongan, 2(2), 127–147. https://doi.org/10.24252/el-iqthisadi.v2i2.16213
  53. Sumartini, R. S., Arifin, J., & Gatri Sagala, S. (2021). Status dan kedudukan hukum lembaga financial technology (FinTech) syariah dalam menyelenggarakan jasa keuangan kepada masyarakat. Jurnal Yustitia, 7(2), 196–208. https://doi.org/10.31943/yustitia.v7i2.143
  54. Suryono, R. R., Budi, I., & Purwandari, B. (2019). Detection of FinTech P2P lending issues in Indonesia. Heliyon, 7(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06782
  55. Tampubolon, H. R. (2019). Seluk beluk peer to peer lending sebagai wujud baru keuangan di Indonesia. Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum, 3(2), 188–198. https://doi.org/10.23920/jbmh.v3n2.15
  56. Teichmann, F.M.J., Boticiu, S.R. & Sergi, B.S. (2023). Compliance concerns in sustainable finance: an analysis of peer-to-peer (P2P) lending platforms and sustainability, Journal of Financial Crime. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-11-2022-0281
  57. Wicaksono, S. R. (2018). Studi kasus sistem informasi manajemen. CV. Seribu Bintang.
  58. Widyaningsih, N. (2018). Analisis mitigasi resiko financial technology peer to peer lending dalam penyaluran kredit terhadap UMKM di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa FEB Universitas Brawijaya, 6(2), 1–14. https://jimfeb.ub.ac.id/index.php/jimfeb/article/view/4930
  59. Wiyono, T. (2020). Mekanisme dan layanan peer to peer lending syariah perspektif ekonomi Islam (studi analisis pada 13 FinTech syariah yang terdaftar di otoritas jasa keuangan per 19 Februari 2020) [Institut Agama Islam Negeri Ponorogo]. http://etheses.iainponorogo.ac.id/9840/
  60. Yarli, D. (2018). Analisis akad tijarah pada transaksi FinTech syariah dengan pendekatan maqshasid. Yudisia: Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum dan Hukum Islam, 9(2), 245–256. https://doi.org/10.21043/yudisia.v9i2.4766
  61. Yum, H., Lee, B., & Chae, M. (2012). Wisdom of crowds to my own judgment in microfinance through online peer to peer lending platforms. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 11(5), 469–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2012.05.003