Article Sidebar

Submitted
August 2, 2025
Accepted
September 29, 2025
Published
October 2, 2025
Download
Full text PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 246 Download : 209

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Purpose – This study examines how social media influencers shape students’ willingness to engage in sadaqah (voluntary charity) at the International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM), using the theory of planned behavior (TPB) as the guiding framework.
Methodology – A mixed-methods design was employed, combining a survey of 150 students with semi-structured interviews with three influencers active in charitable campaigns. A descriptive analysis of TPB constructs (attitude, subjective norm, perceived behavioral control, and behavioral intention) was conducted alongside thematic analysis of the interview data.
Findings – Students reported high exposure to influencer-promoted campaigns, particularly on Instagram and TikTok. Attitudes toward sadaqah were positive, and subjective norms were influential, as many felt encouraged to donate when their peers participated. However, financial constraints and trust-related concerns limit donations and underscore perceived behavioral control as a barrier. Influencers have highlighted the importance of emotional storytelling, transparency, and alignment with Islamic values in motivating contributions.
Implications – Campaigns should pair credible, value-congruent influencers with platforms that have clear Shariah governance, transparent fund allocation, and visible verification to build trust; lower behavioral frictions through micro and recurring donation options, simple payment flows, and salient security cues; and leverage subjective norms by embedding peer-sharing prompts and social proof. Universities and NGOs can co-create cause-fit content with emotional storytelling and real-time impact updates to convert intentions into actual donations.
Originality – This study is among the first to explore influencer-led sadaqah campaigns in Malaysia by integrating TPB with insights from Islamic social finance and digital philanthropy.

Keywords

Social media influencers Sadaqah Islamic social finance Youth giving Theory of planned behavior

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Muhammad Irwan Ariffin, Muhammad Ghazi Zufar Nasaruddin, Ahsan Yusuf Maulana, Abdulbarry Sultan Ameer

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
How to Cite
Ariffin, M. I., Nasaruddin, M. G. Z. ., Maulana, A. Y., & Ameer, A. S. . (2025). Social media influencers and sadaqah contribution among university students: Case of International Islamic University Malaysia. Review of Islamic Social Finance and Entrepreneurship, 4(2), 124–140. https://doi.org/10.20885/RISFE.vol4.iss2.art3
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
  2. Al-Wugayan, A. A. (2023). Celebrity appeal effectiveness in donating to the cause: Popular culture vs. religious celebrities. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 20(2), 369–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12208-022-00344-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12208-022-00344-4
  3. Assaidi, S., Nahar, A., & Suhartono. (2025). Exploring social media role in zakat, infaq, and sedekah administration. International Journal of Zakat, 9(Special), 11–21. https://doi.org/10.37706/ijaz.v9iSpecial.519
  4. Balaban, D. C., Szambolics, J., & Chirică, M. (2022). Parasocial relations and social media influencers’ persuasive power: Exploring the moderating role of product involvement. Acta Psychologica, 230, 103731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103731 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103731
  5. Barasch, A., & Berger, J. (2014). Broadcasting and narrowcasting: How audience size affects what people share. Journal of Marketing Research, 51(3), 286–299. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.13.0238 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.13.0238
  6. Bargoni, A., Giachino, C., Battisti, E., & Iaia, L. (2022). The effects of influencer endorsement services on crowdfunding campaigns. Journal of Services Marketing, 37(1), 40–52. https://doi.org/10.1108/jsm-12-2021-0444 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-12-2021-0444
  7. Belanche, D., Casaló, L. V., Flavián, M., & Ibáñez-Sánchez, S. (2021). Understanding influencer marketing: The role of congruence between influencers, products and consumers. Journal of Business Research, 132, 186–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.03.067 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.03.067
  8. Bergkvist, L., & Rossiter, J. R. (2007). The predictive validity of multiple-item versus single-item measures of the same constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 44(2), 175–184. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.44.2.175 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.44.2.175
  9. Bernama. (2024, November 24). MAIWP’s zakat collection surges 11 per cent to RM1 bln in 2023.2 Bernama. https://bernama.com/en/news.php?id=2367114
  10. Bernama. (2025, April 23). LZS hits record RM1.22 bln collection in 2024. Bernama. https://bernama.com/en/news.php?id=2415915
  11. Bilgin, Y., & Kethüda, Ö. (2022). Charity social media marketing and its influence on charity brand image, brand trust, and donation intention. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 33(5), 1091–1102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-021-00426-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-021-00426-7
  12. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  13. Busari, S. A., Sitiris, M., & Adebiyi, J. A. (2023). Ṣadaqah (charity) attitudes of Muslims during Covid-19 pandemic lockdown: An interpretative phenomenology. International Journal of Fiqh and Usul Al-Fiqh Studies, 7(1), 78–87. https://doi.org/10.31436/ijfus.v7i1.288 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31436/ijfus.v7i1.288
  14. Buyong, A. (2024). Online donations and the theory of planned behaviour. Labuan E-Journal of Muamalat and Society, 18(1), 111–130. https://jurcon.ums.edu.my/ojums/index.php/LJMS/article/view/5127
  15. Casaló, L. V., Flavián, C., & Guinalíu, M. (2010). Determinants of the intention to participate in firm-hosted online travel communities and effects on consumer behavioral intentions. Tourism Management, 31(6), 898–911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2010.04.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2010.04.007
  16. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155
  17. DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  18. Diamantopoulos, A., Sarstedt, M., Fuchs, C., Wilczynski, P., & Kaiser, S. (2012). Guidelines for choosing between multi‐item and single‐item scales for construct measurement: A predictive validity perspective. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(3), 434–449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-011-0300-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-011-0300-3
  19. Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2015). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
  20. Farook, S. Z. (2007). On corporate social responsibility of Islamic financial institutions. Islamic Economic Studies, 15(1), 31–46.
  21. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
  22. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2018). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning EMEA.
  23. Hamdani, L., Sunarsih, S., Yusfiarto, R., Rizal, A., & Khoirunnisa, A. N. (2024). Social media, trust and intention to pay zakat through institution: Lessons from Indonesian experience. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 15(9), 2399–2418. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-01-2023-0016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-01-2023-0016
  24. Hossain, M. E., Mahadi, N. F. B., Haron, R., Nor, R. M., & Yousuf, M. A. (2025). Islamic social finance for sustainable economic growth in Bangladesh. Journal of Islamic Finance, 14(1), 85–97. https://journals.iium.edu.my/iiibf-journal/index.php/jif/article/view/897
  25. Huang, Z., Wang, Z., & Qu, W. (2021). Influence of cost and self-control on individual donation behavior: The promoting effect of self-affirmation. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 14, 1339–1358. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S325651 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S325651
  26. Jalees, T., Khan, S., Zaman, S. I., & Miao, M. (2024). The effect of religiosity, materialism and self-esteem on compulsive and impulsive buying behavior. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 15(11), 2697–2731. https://doi.org/10.1108/jima-03-2022-0078 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-03-2022-0078
  27. Kailani, N., & Slama, M. (2019). Accelerating Islamic charities in Indonesia: Zakat, sedekah and the immediacy of social media. South East Asia Research, 28(1), 70–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/0967828x.2019.1691939 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0967828X.2019.1691939
  28. Kamaruddin, M. I. H., Muhamed, N. A., Mat Radzi, R., Wan Mohamad Nazarie, W. N. F., & Kamarubahrin, A. F. (2023). Financial management practices in Islamic donation-based crowdfunding (DCF) platforms in Malaysia. Future Business Journal, 9, 32. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-023-00210-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-023-00210-7
  29. Kasri, R. A., & Ramli, U. H. (2019). Why do Indonesian Muslims donate through mosques?: A theory of planned behaviour approach. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 12(5), 663–679. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-11-2018-0399 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-11-2018-0399
  30. Kemp, S. (2025). Digital 2025: Malaysia. https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2025-malaysia DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9798229003339.002
  31. Kim, M., & Kim, J. (2024). From empathetic hearts to digital hands: A study of compassion and donation behavior in social media advertising. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 79, 103855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.103855 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.103855
  32. Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.
  33. Knowles, S. R., Hyde, M. K., & White, K. M. (2012). Predictors of young people’s charitable intentions to donate money: An extended theory of planned behavior perspective.3 Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(9), 2096–2110. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00932.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00932.x
  34. Kristofferson, K., White, K., & Peloza, J. (2014). The nature of slacktivism: How the social observability of an initial act of token support affects subsequent prosocial action. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(6), 1149–1166. https://doi.org/10.1086/674137 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/674137
  35. Lynn-Sze, J. C., & Fathi, N. N. (2023). The roles of social media influencers on online fundraising in Indonesia. Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business, 38(2), 105–118. https://doi.org/10.22146/jieb.v38i2.6010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jieb.v38i2.6010
  36. Mahardiyanto, A., & Sutikno, B. (2022). Online marketing strategies of Sedekah Rombongan. AZKA International Journal of Zakat & Social Finance, 3(2), 61–76. https://doi.org/10.51377/azjaf.vol3no2.114 DOI: https://doi.org/10.51377/azjaf.vol3no2.114
  37. Mansur, M., Addiarrahman, Ismail, D., Al Ibrahim, A. R., & Putra, M. D. (2025). Islamic philanthropy in the digital age: A study on zakat and sadaqah campaigns via social media. Asian Journal of Media and Culture, 1(1), 74–92. https://doi.org/10.63919/ajmc.v1i1.20 DOI: https://doi.org/10.63919/ajmc.v1i1.20
  38. Mekler, E. D., Brühlmann, F., Opwis, K., & Tuch, A. N. (2017). Towards understanding the effects of individual gamification elements on intrinsic motivation and performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 525–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.08.048 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.08.048
  39. Mohd Anim, N. A. H., Suffarruddin, M. A., Mohd Najib, N., & Sabarudin, N. A. (2023). Ensuring the sustainability of sadaqah based crowdfunding platforms: The role of gamification and user experience. The Journal of Muamalat and Islamic Finance Research, 20(1), 35–48. https://doi.org/10.33102/jmifr.475 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33102/jmifr.475
  40. Ngama Yasifah, N. A. N., & Makhrus. (2024). The role of digital technology to enhance Zakat, Infaq, Sadaqah and Humanitarian Fund (ZISKA) fundraising. Jurnal Al-Hakim Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Studi Syariah Hukum Dan Filantropi, 6(1), 99–108. https://doi.org/10.22515/jurnalalhakim.v6i1.8587 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22515/jurnalalhakim.v6i1.8587
  41. Osman, A. F., Mohammed, M. O., & Fadzil, A. (2016). Factor influencing cash waqf giving behavior: A revised theory of planned behavior. Journal of Global Business and Social Entrepreneurship, 1(2), 12–25.
  42. Petrescu, M. (2013). Marketing research using single-item indicators in structural equation model. Journal of Marketing Analytics, 1(2), 99–117. https://doi.org/10.1057/jma.2013.7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jma.2013.7
  43. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 123–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60214-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60214-2
  44. Piliyanti, I., Latief, H., & Anwar, S. (2022). Technologizing Islamic philanthropy: Lessons from the Covid-19 pandemic. Journal of Muslim Philanthropy and Civil Society, 6(2), 120–141. https://scholarworks.iu.edu/iupjournals/index.php/muslimphilanthropy/article/view/4911