Main Article Content

Abstract

This study analyzes the discourse construction of the local Lampung media, Lampung Geh, in reporting the development of the cable car in Bandar Lampung during the period of February-June 2025. The study uses Teun A. van Dijk's critical discourse analysis model. This research examines four news articles focusing on text structure (macro, superstructure, micro), social cognition, and social context. The results show that the media consistently constructs the government as a visionary actor and foreign investors as saviors, while positioning the public passively. The study also reveals the dominant ideologies at work in the text: developmentalism, which naturalizes physical development as the sole indicator of progress while ignoring social and environmental factors, and technocratism, which depoliticizes development into technical-administrative issues, excluding public participation. Both of these ideologies work simultaneously to legitimize foreign capital involvement and to close off space for criticism of contract transparency, structural dependency risks, and locally based development alternatives. The media functions more as an instrument of political development legitimacy than as a critical public space. This research contributes to the study of development communication and promotes critical literacy among the public regarding local media discourse.

Keywords

critical discourse analysis developmentalism technocratism local media political legitimation

Article Details

How to Cite
Prayoga, D. ., Khairullah, & Nasution, N. A. . (2025). Pembangunanisme dan teknokratisme: Konstruksi wacana media lokal terhadap pembangunan infrastruktur di Bandar Lampung. Jurnal Mahasiswa Komunikasi Cantrik, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.20885/cantrik.vol5.iss2.art8

References

  1. Alfi Arifin, K., & Basuki, U. (2018). MEDIA DAN NYIA: (Analisis Wacana Kritis Pembangunan Bandara Baru New Yogyakarta International Airport dalam Pemberitaan Media Lokal di Yogyakarta). Jurnal Komunikasi, 13(1), 67–80. https://doi.org/10.20885/komunikasi.vol13.iss1.art5
  2. Eriyanto. (2021). Analisis Wacana: Pengantar Analisis Teks Media (Edisi Revisi). Yogyakarta : LKis.
  3. Fairclough, N. (2018). CDA as dialectical reasoning. In J. Flowerdew & J. E. Richardson (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of critical discourse studies (pp. 13-25). Routledge.
  4. Hall, S. (1982). The rediscovery of ideology: Return of the repressed in media studies. Culture, Society and the Media, pp. 56-90(In M. Gurevitch, T. Bennett, J. Curran, J. Woollacott (Eds.)).
  5. Hameleers, M. (2021). Prospect or threat? A comparative, experimental study of the effects of populist communication on political participation. Political Communication, 38(5), 534–557. https://doi.org/. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2020.1810735
  6. Hart, C., & Cap, P. (2020). Critical discourse analysis. In B. Dancygier (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of cognitive linguistics. Cambridge University Press., pp. 259-37. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316339732.024
  7. Haryatmoko. (2019). Critical discourse analysis: Landasan teori, metodologi dan penerapan. RajaGrafindo Persada.
  8. Krzyżanowski, M. (2020). Discursive shifts and the normalisation of racism: Imaginaries of immigration, moral panics and the discourse of contemporary right-wing populism. Social Semiotics, 30(4), 504–527. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2020.1766199
  9. Lears, T. . (1985). The concept of cultural hegemony: Problems and possibilities. American Historical Review, 90(3), 567.
  10. Lim, M. (2021). Roots, routes and routers: Communications and media of contemporary social movements. Journalism & Communication Monographs, 23(2), 92–136. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/15226379211008585
  11. Machin, D., & Mayr, A. (2021). Multimodality and critical discourse analysis. Linguistics Vanguard, 7(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2020-0133
  12. Nielsen, R. K. (2015). Local journalism: The decline of newspapers and the rise of digital media. I.B. Tauris., Ed.
  13. Nugroho, Y. (2020). Media and power in Indonesia: The post-authoritarian era. South East Asia Research, 28(1), 24–41. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0967828X.2019.1691939
  14. Oktavia, A. R., & Nasution, N. A. (2023). Understanding Islamic symbols in Ramadhan special advertisements: A discourse analysis. Komunike: Jurnal Komunikasi Dan Informatika, 15(2), 155–171. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20414/jurkom.v15i2.8864
  15. Richardson, J. E. (2019). British Muslims in the broadsheet press: A critical discourse analysis. Palgrave Macmillan.
  16. Sinta Yuliana. (2025). Pemkot Akan Bangun Flyover Lagi dan Kereta Gantung di Bandar Lampung. Lampung Geh. https://kumparan.com/lampunggeh/pemkot-akan-bangun-flyover-lagi-dan-kereta-gantung-di-bandar-lampung-24W7T7YM6h7
  17. Van Dijk, T. A. (2018). Discourse and knowledge: A sociocognitive approach. Cambridge University Press.
  18. Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (Eds. . (2023). Methods of critical discourse studies. SAGE Publications.