Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to explore how communication practices, particularly the mention of husbands' names and titles, shape women's identities within military wives' organizations in Indonesia. Within this organizational structure, women's personal identities are often reduced to secondary identities related to their husbands' positions. Using Sara Mills' critical discourse analysis, this study examines the roles of subject and object, as well as the representation of women in organizational discourse. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with soldiers' wives across ranks and through observations of symbolic interactions on social media. The results show that the practice of mentioning husbands' names and titles functions as a form of symbolic violence that fragments women's authentic identities. This phenomenon creates a condition in which women become "integrated wives," with their personal agency absorbed by the institution's image. In the digital era, this construction is further reinforced through the disciplining of women's bodies and behaviors on social media to maintain the authority of their husbands' positions. This study concludes that military wives' organizations remain spaces that maintain bureaucratic patriarchy, which positions women as mirrors of male power.

Keywords

Critical discourse analysis, gender communication, identity construction military wives organization Sara Mills

Article Details

How to Cite
Kusumo, Y. W. ., Sari, E. A. ., & Chotijah, S. (2026). Patriarki birokratik: Identitas perempuan dalam praktik penyebutan nama dan jabatan suami di organisasi militer. Jurnal Mahasiswa Komunikasi Cantrik, 6(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.20885/cantrik.vol6.iss1.art1

References

  1. Andhika, A. M. N., Muharudin, E., Sukirno, S., & Suroso, E. (2025). Kajian wacana kritis Teun A. Van Dijk pada akun Instagram@ komikfaktap periode 2024. Ruang Kata. https://jurnal.umnu.ac.id/index.php/jrk/article/view/1989
  2. Andi, A., & Sukri, A. (2022). Strategi komunikasi politik Partai Demokrasi Indonesia Perjuangan pada pemilu legislatif 2019 di Pekanbaru. Journal of Political Communication and Media Juni, 1(1). https://journal.rc-communication.com/index.php/JPCM/article/view/21
  3. Athallah, R. E., Khairunnisa, A., & Safitri, D. (2025). Tagar sebagai praktik perlawanan digital warga: Strategi diskursif dalam# TolakRUUTNI di media sosial. In Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik. https://doi.org/10.15575/jispo.v15i1.46463
  4. Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power (J. B. Thompson (ed.)). Polity Press.
  5. Dilley, W. C. (2009). Globalization and cultural identity in the films of Ang Lee. In Style (Vol. 43, Issue 1).
  6. Elisabeth, R., & Adim, A. K. (2022). Representasi humor seksis pada program Tonight Show di NET . TV. E-Proceeding of Management, 9(2). https://repositori.telkomuniversity.ac.id/home/catalog/id/178261/slug/representasi-humor-seksis-pada-program-tonight-show-di-net-tv.html
  7. Fatmawati, N. I. (2020). Pierre Bourdieu dan konsep dasar kekerasan simbolik. MADANI: Jurnal Politik Dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan. https://doi.org/10.52166/madani.v12i1.3280
  8. Hasanah, R. U. (2018). Perempuan melawan isu perempuan (Studi analisis wacana Sara Mills film Pertaruhan At Stake 2008). In Repository.Uinjkt.Ac.Id. https://doi.org/1113051000024
  9. Hipdizah, S. A., Purwanto, S. I. P. S., & ... (2025). Buku ajar doktrin militer. books.google.com.
  10. Hyunanda, V. F., Palacios Ramírez, J., López-Martínez, G., & Meseguer-Sánchez, V. (2021). State ibuism and women’s empowerment in Indonesia: Governmentality and political subjectification of Chinese Benteng women. Sustainability, 13(6), 3559. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063559
  11. Ilvani F. V. W. (2019). Studi semiotika representasu identitas selebgram perempuan bercadar dalam media sosial Instagram. Interaksi Online, 7(3). https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/interaksi-online/article/view/24145
  12. Ives, G., & Rana, R. (2018). Language and power. books.google.com.
  13. Jakimow, T. (2018). Beyond “state ibuism”: Empowerment effects in state‐led development in Indonesia. Development and Change. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12374
  14. Jon, I. (2020). Reframing postmodern planning with feminist social theory: Toward “anti-essentialist norms.” Planning Theory, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095219851214
  15. Keohane, N. O. (2020). Women, power & leadership. Daedalus, 149(1). https://doi.org/10.1162/DAED_a_01785
  16. Kim, K., & Angouri, J. (2023). “It’s hard for them to even understand what we are saying”(.) Language and power in the multinational workplace. Critical Perspectives on International Business. https://doi.org/10.1108/cpoib-06-2020-0084
  17. Lewis, W. W. (2020). The mediated construction of reality: by Nick Couldry and Andreas Hepp, Cambridge, Polity Press. Taylor &Francis. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794713.2020.1730071
  18. Marzuki, M., Kamila, N. P., & Berutu, L. A. K. (2025). Aktor dan media dalam komunikasi politik. Sosial Simbiosis: Jurnal Integrasi Ilmu Sosial dan Politik. https://journal.lpkd.or.id/index.php/Sosial/article/view/2123
  19. Mills, S. (2003). Gender and politeness. In Gender and Politeness. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615238
  20. Mills, S. (2008). Languange and sexism. Cambridge University Press
  21. Nadjamuddin, R. S. (2025). Analisis konten media sosial pada akun calon presiden pemilu 2024 dalam meningkatkan personal branding. dspace.uii.ac.id. https://dspace.uii.ac.id/handle/123456789/56466
  22. Nugroho, G. W., & Ahmar, N. (2022). Whistleblowing system, gaya kepemimpinan, digitalisasi, budaya organisasi dan fungsi audit internal terhadap perencanaan strategis. In Behavioral Accounting Journal. scholar.archive.org. https://scholar.archive.org/work/nv7yokvuvbev5kwyuxkmtl3iue/access/wayback/http://baj.upnjatim.ac.id/index.php/baj/article/download/162/87
  23. Octavianti, A., Purwanto, E., Hidayati, A., Sari, H. J., & Rachman, Z. (2025). Teori feminis dalam dekonstruksi representasi perempuan di media sosial. In CONVERSE Journal Communication Science. https://doi.org/10.47134/converse.v2i1.4395
  24. Oktapiyani, D., & Hamdani, A. (2025). Model analisis wacana kritis Sara Mills dalam menganalisis representasi gender di media sosial: Studi kasus pada narasi feminisme dalam konten digital 2024. Jurnal Membaca Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia. https://jurnal.untirta.ac.id/index.php/jurnalmembaca/article/view/30297
  25. Pratama, R. A., & Syahri, A. S. (2024). Pemanfaatan Instagram sebagai media promosi buku Amazing Iqra Balita pada akun@ Iqrabalita. official. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi Dan Sosial Politik. http://jurnal.ittc.web.id/index.php/jiksp/article/view/1644
  26. Prihantini, A. F., Nurhidayah, S., & Efendi, T. A. (2024). Konstruksi dan representasi citra perempuan dalam media visual periklanan Indonesia: Upaya pencegahan kekerasan seksual terhadap perempuan. Jurnal Basataka. https://jurnal.pbsi.uniba-bpn.ac.id/index.php/BASATAKA/article/view/489
  27. Purnama, D., Wahdayanti, S., & Awaru, A. O. T. (2025). Media sosial dan citra perempuan lokal: Analisis representasi gender dalam promosi wisata Bira. Didaktik: Jurnal Ilmiah PGSD STKIP Subang. http://journal.stkipsubang.ac.id/index.php/didaktik/article/view/9658
  28. Purnamasari, M. (2024). The gender ideology of state ibuism and women’s roles in care practices at the Rawa Panjang Waste Bank, Bojonggede, Bogor. Masyarakat: Jurnal Sosiologi. https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/mjs/vol29/iss2/2/
  29. Rachmawati, S. A., Retnaningdyah, P., & Setiawan, S. (2022). Critical discourse analysis of language and power in EFL classroom interaction. Journal of English Teaching. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1355709
  30. Sahri, S. N., & Maella, N. A. S. (2025). Representasi feminisme digital di media sosial: analisis konten edukasi gender pada akun Instagram@ kawanpuan. id. In Medium. journal.uir.ac.id. https://journal.uir.ac.id/index.php/Medium/article/download/25492/8909
  31. Saputri, M. I. M., & Pinem, M. L. (2022). The glorification of beauty on social media: a case study of the exploitation of female students on the Instagram account @ugm.cantik. Journal of Social Development Studies, 3(1), 70–85. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22146/jsds.4446
  32. Sugiyono. (2018). Metode peneiltian kuantitatif, kualitatif kombinasi dan R&D. Alfabeta.
  33. Sugiyono, & Lestari, P. (2021). Metode penelitian komunikasi (Kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan cara mudah menulis artikel pada jurnal internasional). In Bandung: Alfabeta.
  34. Suryakusuma, J. I. (2011). State ibuism: The social construction of womanhood in the Indonesian new order. Komunitas Bambu.
  35. Svensson, G. (2019). Book review: The mediated construction of reality. journals.sagepub.com. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443717737614
  36. Tanjung, R. T., Lubis, M. R., & Hasibuan, S. (2025). Kritik feminis terhadap representasi gender dalam media. Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Pranata Sosial. https://jurnal.staialhidayahbogor.ac.id/index.php/am/article/view/8011
  37. Turner, M., & Lin, A. M. Y. (2024). Translanguaging: Process and power in education. Linguistics and Education. Elsevier. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0898589824000731
  38. Yusanto, F., Hidayat, D. R., Irawan, R. E., & Piliang, Y. A. (2020). Critical discourse analysis of marginalization of local wisdom content in television documentary program. Proceedings of the 2nd Jogjakarta Communication Conference (JCC 2020). https://www.atlantis-press.com/proceedings/jcc-20/125943449
  39. Zembylas, M. (2020). Emotional capital and education: Theoretical insights from Bourdieu. Bourdieu and Education. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429445163-4
  40. Zulaikha, S., & Firmonasari, A. (2023). Wacana stigmatisasi perempuan berpendidikan tinggi yang terefleksikan melalui media sosial YouTube. MIMESIS, 4(2), 191–201. https://doi.org/10.12928/mms.v4i2.8623