Main Article Content

Abstract

Student Activity Centres (SACs) are vital for holistic student development, providing platforms for social interaction, intellectual exchange, and recreation. In the hot-dry climate of Nigeria, the architectural design of these centres must respond to bioclimatic challenges while meeting evolving user expectations. This study, therefore, investigates the architectural factors that enhance user satisfaction within SACs in this specific climatic context, guided by two research questions: What are the key architectural factors influencing satisfaction, and what preferences do users assign to them? A mixed-methods approach was employed, utilizing structured questionnaires, visual surveys, and focus group interviews across two case studies at Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria. Data from 194 respondents were analysed using descriptive statistics, mean scores (M), and the Relative Importance Index (RII). The results delineate six critical factor categories: Spatial Organization, Service Quality, Maintenance Mechanism, Morphological Configuration, Social Factors, and Physical Environment. A significant finding was a pronounced sense of exclusion among female users (59.8% felt activities did not favour their gender, vs. 16.7% among males). User preferences strongly favoured the incorporation of outdoor social spaces and modern amenities like movie theatres and advanced gaming facilities. The study concludes that in Nigeria’s hot-dry climate, a user-centric and climatically-responsive design approach, which prioritizes the identified factors, integrates passive cooling strategies, and addresses gender inequity, is paramount for enhancing satisfaction and ensuring the relevance and sustainability of SACs.

Keywords

Bioclimatic Design Hot-Dry Climate POE Student Activity Centre User Satisfaction

Article Details

How to Cite
Moral, B., & Duru Jr., M. (2026). Students’ Preferences and Satisfaction in Activity Centres for Nigeria’s Hot-Dry Climate. Journal of Architectural Research and Design Studies, 10(2), 215–224. https://doi.org/10.20885/jars.vol10.iss2.art3

References

  1. Abbas, M. Y., & Ghazali, R. (2011). Social and physical environment: The major determinant towards the creation of a healing environment. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 30, 2291-2298.
  2. Ajay, S., & Micah, B. (2014). Sampling techniques & determination of sample size in applied statistics research: An overview. International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, 2(11), 1-22.
  3. Akadiri, P. O. (2016). Evaluating the performance of bioclimatic design building in Nigeria. Civil and Environmental Research, 8(5), 60-66.
  4. Akinluyi, M. L. (2012). Post occupancy evaluation of on-campus students' hall of residences: A case study of Obafemi Awolowo Hall of Residence, Ile-Ife. Greener Journal of Science, Engineering and Technological Research, 3(1), 1-10.
  5. Azar, E., O'Brien, W., Carlucci, S., Hong, T., Sonta, A., Kim, J., ... & Wagner, A. (2020). The role of occupants in buildings' energy performance gap: Myth or reality? Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 129, 109897.
  6. Bera, M., Das, S., Dutta, S., Nag, P. K., & Roy Choudhury, M. (2024). Progress and challenges of bioclimatic design strategies for enhancing building environmental performance: a systematic review. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment.
  7. Conefrey, T. (2018). Supporting first-generation students' adjustment to college with high-impact practices. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 22(1), 143-163.
  8. Chaiyapong, Y. (2012). Estimation of proportion of a finite population. Thailand Statistician, 10(1), 129-140.
  9. Datnow, A., Park, V., Peurach, D. J., & Spillane, J. P. (2022). Transforming Education for Holistic Student Development: Learning from Education System (Re) Building around the World. Report. Center for Universal Education at The Brookings Institution.
  10. Dunfu, B. B. (2015). Evaluation of architectural determinants of users' satisfaction in university residence halls [Unpublished master's thesis]. Ahmadu Bello University.
  11. Evans, B. C., Coon, D. W., & Ume, E. (2011). Use of theoretical frameworks as a pragmatic guide for mixed methods studies: A methodological necessity?. Journal of mixed methods research, 5(4), 276-292.
  12. Givoni, B. (1992). Comfort, climate analysis and building design guidelines. Energy and Buildings, 18(1), 11–23.
  13. Gong, A., & Söderberg, B. (2024). Residential satisfaction in student housing: an empirical study in Stockholm, Sweden. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 39(2), 537-555.
  14. Hassanain, M. A., Sanni-Anibire, M. O., & Mahmoud, A. S. (2024). An assessment of users’ satisfaction with a smart building on university campus through post-occupancy evaluation. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 22(4), 1119-1135.
  15. Hussain, I. S., Shahid, B., & Jahuri, S. (2012). Students perception on the service quality of Malaysian universities hostel accommodation. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(15), 213-222.
  16. Israel, G. D. (2013). Determining sample size (PEOD6). University of Florida Cooperative Extension Service. Joachim, A. O., & Olachi, N. U. (2010). An assessment of the management of the students' hostels of tertiary institutions in Owerri, Imo state. Tropical Built Environment Journal, 1(1), 11-20.
  17. Kantiok, E. (2017). The use of architectural components in minimizing maintenance for Kaduna State University Students' Centre, Kafanchan [Unpublished master's thesis]. Ahmadu Bello University.
  18. Kumar, M., & Khan, S. (2024). Post-occupancy assessment of student housing facilities in an educational campus: case study of Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology Nagpur, India. Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, 18(2), 268-293.
  19. Maina, J. J. (2017). Informal space-use in formal learning environments: Case study of architecture department at Ahmadu Bello University. In S. Laryea & E. Ibem (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th West Africa Built Environment Research (WABER) Conference (pp. 930-944).
  20. Martincigh, L., Bianchi, F., Di Guida, M., & Perrucci, G. (2016). The occupants' perspective as catalyst for less energy intensive buildings. Energy and Buildings, 115, 94-101.
  21. Martins, O. O. I., Olufunke, O. A., & Adedoyin, A. O. (2012). Users' satisfaction with residential facilities in Nigerian private universities: A case study of Covenant University. Transitional Journal of Science and Technology, 2(11), 89-112.
  22. Mbubi, S. M. (2023). A comparative study on the design of communal spaces in on-campus and off-campus private accommodation (Doctoral dissertation, Makerere University).
  23. Najib, N. U. M., Yusof, N. A., & Osman, Z. (2011). Measuring satisfaction with student housing facilities. *American Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 4(1), 52-60.
  24. NASIRDEEN, M. Y., ADEDAYO, F., & Onwuk, B. N. (2018). ASSESSMENT OF STUDENTS SATISFACTION WITH PROVISION OF RECREATIONAL SPACES IN FACULTY BUILDINGS IN PUBLIC UNIVERSITIES IN NORTH CENTRAL NIGERIA. J Environ Spectr, 2(1), 60-73.
  25. Nimako, S. G. (2013). An empirical evaluation of student accommodation quality in higher education. European Journal of Business and Social Sciences, 1(12), 164-177.
  26. Olgyay, V. (2015). Design with climate: Bioclimatic approach to architectural regionalism. Princeton University Press.
  27. Redmond, Ú. (2020). “Creating capital”: The impact of sustained engagement with extracurricular activities on access students’ experience of University (Doctoral dissertation, Dublin City University).
  28. Roizen, R., & Davis, G. (2013). Architectural determinants of student's satisfaction in college residence halls. [Source extracted from thesis; assume this is a conference paper or report].
  29. Simeon, O. O., & Alibaba, H. Z. (2017). Bioclimatic approach for low operational energy in educational buildings in Nigeria. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, 8(12), 1670-1673.
  30. Toroxel, J. L., & Silva, S. M. (2024). A review of passive solar heating and cooling technologies based on bioclimatic and vernacular architecture. Energies, 17(5), 1006.
  31. Usman, A. (2011). [Direct citation from thesis; source likely a dissertation or institutional report].
  32. Waziri, B. S., & Vanduhe, B. A. (2013). Performance evaluation of public housing facilities in Nigeria: A case study of federal capital territory (F.C.T) Abuja. International Journal of Sustainable Construction Engineering & Technology, 4(2), 67-79.
  33. Xie, X., Qin, S., Gou, Z., & Yi, M. (2020). Can green building promote pro-environmental behaviours? The psychological model and design strategy. Sustainability, 12(18), 7714.
  34. Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
  35. Yusuf, S., & Ibrahim, M. A. (2024). Educational services in Nigerian universities: Prospect, challenges and way forward. Fuoye Journal of Educational Management, 1(1).
  36. Zhao, J., Abdul Aziz, F., Deng, Y., Ujang, N., & Xiao, Y. (2024). A review of comprehensive post-occupancy evaluation feedback on occupant-centric thermal comfort and building energy efficiency. Buildings, 14(9), 2892.