Main Article Content

Abstract

Exhibition design plays a critical role in mediating historical narratives within heritage architectural settings, where curatorial decisions must negotiate conservation constraints, institutional mandates, and visitor engagement. This study addresses the fundamentally different institutional and narrative statuses of Museum Gedung Sate and Museum Konferensi Asia Afrika in Bandung. Museum Gedung Sate operates within an active governmental building and emphasizes digital and immersive forms of interpretation, whereas Museum Konferensi Asia Afrika functions as a commemorative institution grounded in a specific historical event and sustained thematic narrative continuity. Using a qualitative comparative approach based on observation, interviews, and document analysis, the study examines how narrative structure, spatial configuration, and interpretive strategies are shaped by these contrasting institutional contexts. The findings indicate that exhibition performance is strongly influenced by curatorial continuity, levels of technological integration, and the rigidity of heritage conservation frameworks. Museum Gedung Sate demonstrates flexibility and experimentation in digital storytelling but encounters challenges in maintaining narrative coherence, while Museum Konferensi Asia Afrika sustains strong thematic clarity with limited interpretive adaptability. This study contributes an analytical benchmarking framework for exhibition design within heritage architecture, highlighting how institutional positioning fundamentally conditions narrative strategies and offering insights for developing more coherent, context-sensitive, and visitor-centered museum exhibitions.

Keywords

Comparative Study Exhibition Design Heritage Museum Narrative Strategy

Article Details

How to Cite
Carlos S, F., Putra, I. D. A. D. ., & Hapsoro, A. N. A. . (2026). Exhibition Design Strategies within Heritage Architectural Settings: A Comparative Study of Museum Gedung Sate and Museum Konferensi Asia Afrika. Journal of Architectural Research and Design Studies, 10(2), 235–248. https://doi.org/10.20885/jars.vol10.iss2.art5

References

  1. Arbi, Y., Yulianto, K., Tjahjopurnomo, R., Kosim, M. R. A., & Sukasno. (2019). Konsep penyajian museum. In R. Tjahjopurnomo (Ed.), Direktorat Pemuseuman, Kementerian Pariwisata dan Ekonomi Kreatif.
  2. Anom, R. I. P., Primasita, L., Ramdhani, A., & others. (2024). Augmented reality di Museum Gedung Sate Bandung: Aksiologi teknologi di sektor pariwisata. Jurnal Ilmiah Pariwisata, 29(1), 28–37. https://doi.org/10.30647/jip.v29i1.1761
  3. Ayu. (2023, November 13). Museum Gedung Sate, the iconic contemporary educational tourism destination in Bandung. DetikJabar. Retrieved November 11, 2025, from https://www.detik.com/jabar/wisata/d-7032420/museumgedung-sate-ikonnya-wisata-edukasi-masa-kini-di-bandung/
  4. Bappeda Jawa Barat. (2018, January 25). 3,600 people visit Museum Gedung Sate. Retrieved November 13, 2025, from https://bappeda.jabarprov.go.id/3-600-orang-kunjungi-museum-gedung-sate/
  5. Creswell, J. W. (2018). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed., C. Pearson, Ed.). SAGE Publications.
  6. Fanya, F. S., Septanti, D., & Novianto, D. (2025). Kajian transformasi ruang bersejarah melalui konsep adaptive reuse di De Tjolomadoe Surakarta. NALARS: Jurnal Arsitektur, 24(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.32332/nalars.v24i1.11713
  7. Hermawan, H., Sumartias, S., & Agustin, H. (2022). Motivation and Communication of Asian-African Museum Volunteers. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, 8(21), 620-628. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7302410
  8. ICOM. (2022). Definition museum. International Council of Museums.
  9. Ibrahim, Y. A., Wawolangi, R. D., Natsir, M. R., & Perdana, A. (2018). Modul penata pameran koleksi museum. Direktorat Pelestarian Cagar Budaya, Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
  10. Kemedikbud. (2018). Modul pelatihan teknis pemugaran cagar budaya untuk juru pelestari cagar budaya. Pusdiklat Pegawai Kemendikbud.
  11. Król, K., Bazarnik, Ł., & Jakubiec, P. (2025). Preserving digital cultural heritage from oblivion: Processes, hardware, and software. Illustrated with selected museum cases. Scientific Papers of Wroclaw University. https://homeproject.pl/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/228-Krol-Bazarnik-Jakubiec-Andrzejewski.pdf
  12. Kumar, R. (2014). Research methodology: A step-by-step guide for beginners (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  13. Kusbiantoro, K., Gunawan, I. V., Oktavia, T., & Yuwono, A. A. (2022). Study of preferential display method of a cultural museum in Bandung, Indonesia. ARTEKS: Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur, 7(3), 399–408. https://doi.org/10.30822/arteks.v7i3.1878
  14. Locker, P. (2011). Exhibition design. AVA Publishing; Thames & Hudson.
  15. Loureiro, S. M. C. (2021). The use of augmented reality to expand the experience of museum visitors. In Augmented reality in tourism, museums and heritage (pp. 141–151). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70198-7_8
  16. MacLeod, S. (2018). Museums and the interpretation of visual culture. Routledge.
  17. Mason, M., & Vavoula, G. (2021). Digital cultural heritage design practice: A conceptual framework. The Design Journal, 24(3), 405–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2021.1889738
  18. Meng, W. S., & Dolah, J. (2024). Interaction design and analysis of exhibition narrative models in cultural heritage museums. Journal of Software & System Applied Practice, 13(3), 148–159. https://doi.org/10.18576/jsap/130311
  19. Nazhar, R. D., & Rosid, Y. S. (2020). Penyajian ruang pameran sejarah berteknologi augmented reality pada Museum Gedung Sate Bandung. Waca Cipta Ruang, 6(1), 13–18. https://doi.org/10.34010/wcr.v6i1.4193
  20. Parry, R. (2010). Museums in a digital age. In P. S. J. Knell (Ed.), University of Leicester (1st ed., Vol. 3, Issue 1). Routledge.
  21. Permana, A. Y., Permana, A. F. S., & Wijaya, K. (2021). Model of virtual tourism as an alternative of the concept of architecture tourism post Covid-19 in Bandung City, Indonesia. In S. A. R. Khan (Ed.), Tourism. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.94015
  22. Pertiwi, S. N. I., & Yudana, G. (2018). Penerapan pendekatan museum inklusif pada Museum Gedung Sate, Kota Bandung. Cakra Wisata, 19(1), 1–8. https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/cakra-wisata/article/view/34118
  23. Ramadhan, A. J., Erwina, W., & Rohman, A. S. (2025). Penerapan Smart Museum sebagai strategi pengembangan layanan Museum Gedung Sate Bandung. Jurnal Pustaka Budaya, 12(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.31849/pb.v12i1.21860
  24. Ryanty Derwentyana Nazhar. (2023). Augmented Reality at Gedung Sate Museum: Bring the past to the present. Proceeding of International Conference on Business, Economics, Social Sciences, and Humanities, 4, 599–605. https://doi.org/10.34010/icobest.v2i.325
  25. Schweibenz, W. (2019). The “virtual museum”: New perspectives for museums to present objects and information using the internet as a knowledge base and communication system. Museum International, 71(1–2), 6–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/muse.12176
  26. Utama, R. A. (2024). Relasi kerja sama pemerintah dan komunitas publik dalam pengelolaan Museum Konferensi Asia Afrika di Kota Bandung. Moderat: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 10(1), 150–163. https://ojs.unigal.ac.id/index.php/moderat