Article Sidebar

Submitted
July 15, 2022
Accepted
October 5, 2023
Published
October 30, 2023
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 317 Download : 204

Main Article Content

Abstract

This research is motivated by two primary factors. First, the emergence of alternative news media can be considered as a counterbalance to the professional news media with their various biases. The second pertains to the protracted legislative process of the Sexual Violence Bill (RUU TPKS) before its eventual enactment. The objective of this study is to see examine these two media categories frame the protracted struggle in the legislative process of the TPKS Bill, given that framing reflects the media's perspective, which subsequently influence the audience's understanding of the issue. The subjects of this research are news related to the TPKS Bill as presented by both professional and alternative media in Indonesia. This research employs a qualitative approach in conjunction with the framing method developed by Robert Entman. This study’s findings reveal diametrical contrast in the frames adopted by professional and alternative media in reporting the TPKS Bill. Professional media constructs a frame that characterizes the protracted discussion of the TPKS Bill in the DPR as a technical-procedural problem. In contrast, alternative media framed it as a result of the DPR’s failure or lack of commitment to protect victims of sexual violence.

Keywords

alternative media frame professional media sexual violence bill

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Nanang Krisdinanto, Merlina Maria Barbara Apul, Theresia Intan Hartiana

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
How to Cite
Krisdinanto, N. ., Apul, M. M. B. ., & Hartiana, T. I. . (2023). Media Dualism in Indonesia’s Coverage of the Sexual Violence Bill. Jurnal Komunikasi, 18(1), 34–51. https://doi.org/10.20885/komunikasi.vol18.iss1.art3
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Ahmad, N. (2017). The decline of conventional news media and challenges of immersing in new technology. https://www.gla.ac.uk/media/media_529633_en.pdf
  2. Al-Rawi, A. (2019). Viral News on Social Media. Digital Journalism, 7(1), 63–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1387062
  3. Anastasiou, A. (2017). Investigating News Selection: An Integrated Model for Cross-national Comparisons. Sur Le Journalisme, 6(2), 82–95.
  4. Aulia, M. (2022). Tuai Pro dan Kontra, Ini Perjalanan Pembahasan RUU TPKS Enam Tahun Terakhir. Beritasatu.Com. https://www.beritasatu.com/nasional/879101/tuai-pro-dan-kontra-ini-perjalanan-pembahasan-ruu-tpks-enam-tahun-terakhir
  5. Balkan Şahin, S., & Bodur Ün, M. (2022). Counter-hegemonic struggle and the framing practices of the anti-nuclear platform in Turkey (2002–2018). Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 40(1), 31–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/23996544211000342
  6. Baresch, B., Hsu, S.-H., & Reese, S. D. (2012). The power of framing: new challenges for researching the structure of meaning in news. In S. Allan (Ed.), The Routledge Companion to News and Journalism (Revised ed., pp. 637–647). Taylor & Francis Ltd.
  7. Bebić, D., & Volarević, M. (2016). Viral journalism: The rise of a new form. Medijska Istrazivanja, 22(2), 107–126. https://doi.org/10.22572/mi.22.2.6
  8. Bullock, C. F. (2007). Framing Domestic Violence Fatalities: Coverage by Utah Newspapers. Women’s Studies in Communication , 30(1), 34–63. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07491409.2007.10162504
  9. Carlson, M. (2009). Dueling, Dancing, or Dominating? Journalists and Their Sources. Sociology Compass, 3(4), 526–542. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2009.00219.x
  10. Chang, J., Gitlin, T., & Schudson, M. (2020). Reflecting on Forty Years of Sociology, Media Studies, and Journalism: An Interview with Todd Gitlin and Michael Schudson. Sociologica, 14(2), 249–263. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1971-8853/11515
  11. Detik.com. (2021a). Ketua Panja Target RUU TPKS Disahkan Jadi UU di Masa Sidang Tahun Depan. Detik.Com. https://news.detik.com/berita/d-5846749/ketua-panja-target-ruu-tpks-disahkan-jadi-uu-di-masa-sidang-tahun-depan
  12. Detik.com. (2021b, November). Puan Sorot Kasus Tewasnya Sarah Cianjur, Harap RUU TPKS Segera Disahkan. Detik.Com. https://news.detik.com/berita/d-5825714/puan-sorot-kasus-tewasnya-sarah-cianjur-harap-ruu-tpks-segera-disahkan
  13. Doğu, B. (2015). Comparing Online Alternative and Mainstream Media in Turkey: Coverage of the TEKEL Workers Protest Against Privatization. International Journal of Communication, 9(1), 630–651.
  14. Entman, R. M. (1993a). Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58.
  15. Entman, R. M. (1993b). Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
  16. Fahruddin, H. A. (2021). MODERNISASI MEDIA MASSA NAHDLATUL ULAMA: STUDI KASUS NU ONLINE TAHUN 2003-2018. Karmawibangga: Historical Studies Journal, 3(2), 41–52. htpps://journal.upy.ac.id/index.php/karmawibangga
  17. Fuchs, C. (2010). Alternative Media as Critical Media. European J of Social Theory, 13(2), 173–192.
  18. Gracia. (2022). Evaluasi RUU TPKS, Masih Tak Berpihak pada Penyandang Disabilitas. Magdalene.Co. https://www.magdalene.co/story/evaluasi-ruu-tpks-masih-tak-berpihak-pada-penyandang-disabilitas
  19. Groshek, J., & Han, Y. (2011). Negotiated Hegemony and Reconstructed Boundaries in Alternative Media Coverage of Globalization. International Journal of Communication, 5(0), 1523 – 1544. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/viewFile/1073/626
  20. Harcup, T. (2011). Alternative journalism as active citizenship. Journalism: Theory, Practice & Criticism, 12(1), 15 – 31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884910385191
  21. Heizmann, H., & Olsson, M. R. (2015). Power matters: the importance of Foucault’s power/knowledge as a conceptual lens in KM research and practice. Journal of Knowledge Management, 19(4), 756–769. https://doi.org/ttps://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-12-2014-0511
  22. Holt, K. (2020). Populism and Alternative Media. In B. Krämer & C. Holtz-Bacha (Eds.), Perspectives on Populism and the Media (1st ed., pp. 201–213). Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.
  23. Holt, K., Figenschou, T. U., & Frischlich, L. (2019). Key Dimensions of Alternative News Media. Digital Journalism, 7(7), 1–10.
  24. Howard, P. N., & Hussain, M. M. (2013). Democracy’s fourth wave? Digital media and the Arab Spring. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199936953.001.0001
  25. Kleemans, M., Schaap, G., & Hermans, L. (2015). Citizen sources in the news: Above and beyond the vox pop? Journalism, 18(4), 464–481. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884915620206
  26. Kompas.com. (2021). Tegaskan Urgensi RUU TPKS, Ketua DPP Nasdem: Mau Sampai Kapan Kekerasan Seksual Berulang? Kompas.Com. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2021/12/06/10050721/tegaskan-urgensi-ruu-tpks-ketua-dpp-nasdem-mau-sampai-kapan-kekerasan
  27. Konde.co. (2021). Dear DPR, Lihatlah Kasus Kekerasan Seksual di Unsri dan Mojokerto: Kapan RUU TPKS Disahkan? Konde.Co. https://www.konde.co/2021/12/dear-dpr-lihatlah-kasus-kekerasan-seksual-di-unsri-dan-mojokerto-kapan-ruu-tpks-disahkan.html/
  28. Konde Institute. (2020). Melihat Konsistensi Media Menulis Pemberitaan RUU PKS Dan Isu Kekerasan Seksual. Konde.Co. https://www.konde.co/2020/12/melihat-konsistensi-media-dalam-menulis-pemberitaan-ruu-pks-dan-isu-kekerasan-seksual.html/
  29. Krasmann, S. (2017). Imagining Foucault. On the Digital Subject and “Visual Citizenship.” Foucault Studies, 23. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.22439/fs.v0i0.5339
  30. Küng, L. (2015). Innovators In Digital News (T. G. Ash, I. Hargreaves, D. Levy, G. Linnebank, J. Lloyd, R. K. Nielsen, J. Painter, R. Picard, J. Seaton, & K. Voltmer (eds.)). I.B.Tauris & Co. Ltd in association with the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
  31. Lau, R. W. (2012). Re-theorizing news’ construction of reality: A realist-discourse-theoretic approach. Journalism, 13(7), 886–902. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884911432660
  32. Leung, D. K. K., & Lee, F. L. F. (2014). Cultivating an active online counterpublic: Examining usage and political impact of Internet alternative media. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 19(3), 340 – 359. https://doi.org/doi:10.1177/1940161214530787
  33. Lindell, J. (2015). Bourdieusian media studies: returning social theory to old and new media. Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory, 16(3), 362–377. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1600910X.2015.1040427
  34. Lopez, M. (2016). Elite Framing of Inequality in the Press: Brazil and Uruguay Compared. Brazilian Political Science Review, 10(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-38212016000100002
  35. Lune, H. & Berg, B. L. (2017). Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences (9th Edition). In Pearson Education Limited. Pearson.
  36. Mansbridge, J., & Macedo, S. (2019). Populism and Democratic Theory. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 15(0), 59–77. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-101518- 042843
  37. Martalena, & Yoetadi, G. (2019). Kekerasaan Seksual di Mata Konde (Analisis Framing Kekerasaan Seksual terhadap Perempuan pada Rubrik Perspektif Konde Edisi November dan Desember 2018). Koneksi, 3(1), 7–14. https://doi.org/10.24912/kn.v3i1.6137
  38. Mast, J., & Temmerman, M. (2021). What’s (The) News? Reassessing “News Values” as a Concept and Methodology in the Digital Age. Journalism Studies, 22(6), 689 – 701. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2021.1917445
  39. Müller, P., & Schulz, A. (2021). Alternative media for a populist audience? Exploring political and media use predictors of exposure to Breitbart, Sputnik, and Co. Information, Communication & Society, 24(2), 277–293. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1646778
  40. Nišić, V., & Plavšić, D. (2017). The role of media in the construction of social reality. Sociological Discourse, 4(7), 73–81. https://doi.org/10.7251/socen1407073n
  41. Noetzel, S., Mussalem Gentile, M. F., Lowery, G., Zemanova, S., Lecheler, S., & Peter, C. (2022a). Social campaigns to social change? Sexual violence framing in U.S. news before and after #metoo. Journalism, 146488492110563. https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849211056386
  42. Noetzel, S., Mussalem Gentile, M. F., Lowery, G., Zemanova, S., Lecheler, S., & Peter, C. (2022b). Social campaigns to social change? Sexual violence framing in U.S. news before and after #metoo. Journalism, 0(0), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849211056386
  43. Nu.or.id. (2021a). Anita Wahid Pertanyakan Kealpaan RUU TPKS di Sidang Paripurna. Nu.or.Id. https://www.nu.or.id/nasional/anita-wahid-pertanyakan-kealpaan-ruu-tpks-di-sidang-paripurna-ZntSL
  44. Nu.or.id. (2021b). RUU TPKS Gagal Berulang, Majelis KUPI Kecewa. Nu.or.Id. https://www.nu.or.id/nasional/ruu-tpks-gagal-berulang-majelis-kupi-kecewa-0n4SQ
  45. Nu.or.id. (2021c, November). Anggia Emarini Tegaskan Fatayat NU Komitmen Dukung RUU TPKS Disahkan. Nu.or.Id. https://www.nu.or.id/nasional/anggia-emarini-tegaskan-fatayat-nu-komitmen-dukung-ruu-tpks-disahkan-26FIq
  46. Nu.or.id. (2021d, November). Pengesahan RUU TPKS Tertunda, Aktivis Perempuan Beberkan Data Kekerasan Seksual. Nu.or.Id. https://www.nu.or.id/nasional/pengesahan-ruu-tpks-tertunda-aktivis-perempuan-beberkan-data-kekerasan-seksual-D0Zrm
  47. Portschy, J. rgen. (2020). Times of power, knowledge and critique in the work of Foucault. Time & Society, 29(2), 392 – 419. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X20911786
  48. Reiter, F., & Matthes, J. (2021). Correctives of the Mainstream Media? A Panel Study on Mainstream Media Use, Alternative Digital Media Use, and the Erosion of Political Interest as Well as Political Knowledge. Digital Journalism, 10(3), 1–21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1974916
  49. Rizky, P. A., & Mar’iyah, C. (2021). Advokasi Kebijakan RUU PKS: Analisis Pemberitaan Media Perempuan Magdalene.co dan Konde.co. TheJournalish: Social and Government, 2(2), 36–46.
  50. Sergiu, B. (2010). M. FOUCAULT’S VIEW ON POWER RELATIONS. Cogito: Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 2(0), 55–61.
  51. Shimal, K. kadhim, & Hanif, M. (2020). Power and Knowledge as Route to Social and Political Control as depicted in the novels Nineteen Eighty-Four and Animal Farm. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 12(8), 175–191.
  52. Simons, G., & Strovsky. (2019). The interaction of journalism and public relations in Russia: A self-perception. Global Media and Communication, 15(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/.org/10.1177/1742766518818855
  53. Splendore, S. (2017). The dominance of institutional sources and the establishment of non-elite ones: The case of Italian online local journalism. Journalism, 21(7), 990–1006. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884917722896
  54. Stringer, P. (2020). Viral Media: Audience Engagement and Editorial Autonomy at BuzzFeed and Vice. Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture, 15(1), 7–18.
  55. Sudibyo, A. (2013). Media Politik dan Pertarungan Wacana. LKiS.
  56. Thakker, J., & Durrant, R. (2006). News coverage of sexual offending in New Zealand. In Article in New Zealand Journal of Psychology. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/39707115
  57. Trappel, J., & Tomaz, T. (2021). Democratic performance of news media Dimensions and indicators for comparative studies. In J. Trappel & T. Tomaz (Eds.), THE MEDIA FOR DEMOCRACY MONITOR 2021 HOW LEADING NEWS MEDIA SURVIVE DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION (1st ed., pp. 11–58). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.48335/9789188855404
  58. Utami, E. (2021). Ada yang Gagal Paham Tujuan RUU TPKS dan Coba Menggeser Maknanya. Konde.Co. https://www.konde.co/2021/11/ada-yang-gagal-paham-tujuan-ruu-tpks-dan-coba-menggeser-maknanya.html/
  59. Wang, X., Fang, G., & Li, H. (2019). Gender‑based violence and hegemonic masculinity in China: an analysis based on the quantitative research. In China Population and Development Studies. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s42379-019-00030-9
  60. Weatherred, J. L. (2015). Child sexual abuse and the media: A literature review. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 24(1), 16–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/10538712.2015.976302
  61. Weatherred, J. L. (2017). Framing Child Sexual Abuse: A Longitudinal Content Analysis of Newspaper and Television Coverage, 2002–2012. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 26(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/10538712.2016.1257528
  62. Wijayanto. (2019). Bourdieu and Media Theory: Explaining Media‟s Changes and Continuities in The Post Authoritarian Countries. Politik Indonesia: Indonesian Political Science Review, 4(2), 274–300. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15294/ipsr.v4i2.19513