Article Sidebar

Submitted
August 12, 2022
Accepted
April 25, 2024
Published
August 15, 2024
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 298 Download : 134

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to describe the crisis communication messages delivered by Kawal COVID-19 via Instagram social media in the pre-crisis and early crisis stages to deal with the pandemic and infodemic in Indonesia. Qualitative content analysis was conducted on 190 posts by the Instagram account @kawalcovid19.id on March 1-May 24, 2020. The results of the study showed that the crisis and risk communication delivered were in the form of sensemaking messages (awareness/understanding), possible risks and potential crises that would occur, and education related to the COVID-19 virus. Efficacy messages (efficacy/success) were also presented. This study also found a combination of sensemaking and efficacy messages and linked them to the social and cultural context. Other messages related to identity and public relations strategies were used to build credibility and interactivity with the public.

Keywords

crisis communication infodemic message pandemic risk

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Fadhiilati Hasanah , Nia Ashton Destrity -

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
How to Cite
Hasanah , F. ., & Destrity, N. A. . (2024). From Awareness to Risk Prevention: Developing Messages for Crisis Communication During Pandemics and Infodemics. Jurnal Komunikasi, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.20885/komunikasi.vol19.iss1.art1
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Chatterjee, R., Bajwa, S., Dwivedi, D., Kanji, R., Ahammed, M., & Shaw, R. (2020). COVID-19 Risk Assessment Tool: Dual application of risk communication and risk governance. Progress in Disaster Science, 7, 100109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2020.100109
  2. Cinelli, M., Quattrociocchi, W., Galeazzi, A., Valensise, C. M., Brugnoli, E., Schmidt, A. L., Zola, P., Zollo, F., & Scala, A. (2020). The COVID-19 social media infodemic. Scientific Reports, 10(16598). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-73510-5
  3. Damayanti, A. (2020). Instagram sebagai Medium Komunikasi Risiko di Masa Pandemi COVID-19: Studi Netnografi terhadap Komunitas Online KawalCOVID19.id. Jurnal Komunikasi Pembangunan, 18(02), 176–193. https://doi.org/10.46937/18202032355
  4. Dewan Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi Nasional, W. (n.d.). Akses Digital Meningkat Selama Pademi. Retrieved May 27, 2022, from http://www.wantiknas.go.id/id/berita/akses-digital-meningkat-selama-pademi
  5. Hardjanti, R. (2020). Perubahan Digital karena Covid-19, Dua Pertiga Manusia di Dunia Kini Gunakan Ponsel. https://economy.okezone.com/read/2020/05/02/320/2208179/perubahan-digital-karena-covid-19-dua-pertiga-manusia-di-dunia-kini-gunakan-ponsel
  6. Herovic, E., Sellnow, T. L., & Sellnow, D. D. (2020). Challenges and opportunities for pre-crisis emergency risk communication: lessons learned from the earthquake community. Journal of Risk Research, 23(3), 349–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2019.1569097
  7. Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
  8. Ida, R. (Ed.). (2017). Budaya Populer Indonesia: Diskursus Global/Lokal dalam Budaya Populer Indonesia. Airlangga University Press.
  9. Jiang, S., & Beaudoin, C. E. (2016). Smoking Prevention in China: A Content Analysis of an Anti-Smoking Social Media Campaign. Journal of Health Communication, 21(7), 755–764. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2016.1157653
  10. Kementerian Komunikasi dan Informatika, K. K. dan I. (2020). Ancaman Infodemik Dapat Memperburuk Pandemi COVID-19. https://kominfo.go.id/content/detail/25895/ancaman-infodemik-dapat-memperburuk-pandemi-covid-19/0/virus_corona
  11. Makitan, G., & Novenanto, A. (2020). Infodemi dan Habitus Informasi. Jurnal Eutenika, 1. https://jurnal.eutenika.org/edisi/vol-1/infodemi-dan-habitus-informasi
  12. Mayring, P. (2014). Qualitative content analysis: theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution.
  13. Nasution, S., Sadono, D., & Wibowo, C. T. (2018). Penyuluhan Kesehatan untuk Pencegahan dan Risiko Penyakit DBD dalam Manga dan Infografis. Jurnal Penyuluhan, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.25015/penyuluhan.v14i1.17618
  14. Park, H., Reber, B. H., & Chon, M. G. (2016). Tweeting as health communication: Health organizations use of twitter for health promotion and public engagement. Journal of Health Communication, 21(2), 188–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2015.1058435
  15. Reynolds, B. (2007). Crisis and Emergency Risk Communication: Pandemic Influenza. https://doi.org/10.1177/153567600501000106
  16. Reynolds, B., & Seeger, M. W. (2005). Crisis and emergency risk communication as an integrative model. Journal of Health Communication, 10(1), 43–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730590904571
  17. Veil, S., Reynolds, B., Sellnow, T. L., & Seeger, M. W. (2008). CERC as a theoretical framework for research and practice. Health Promotion Practice, 9(4 Suppl), 26–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839908322113
  18. Vos, S. C., & Buckner, M. M. (2016). Social Media Messages in an Emerging Health Crisis: Tweeting Bird Flu. Journal of Health Communication, 21(3), 301–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2015.1064495
  19. Wang, Y., Hao, H., & Platt, L. S. (2021). Examining risk and crisis communications of government agencies and stakeholders during early-stages of COVID-19 on Twitter. Computers in Human Behavior, 114(June 2020), 106568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106568
  20. Winanti, P. S., & Wawan Mas’udi. (2020). Problem Infodemic dalam merespon Pandemi Covid-19. In Policy Brief (3). https://fisipol.ugm.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/sites/1056/2020/04/Policy-Brief-Problem-Infodemic-dalam-Merespon-Pandemi-COVID-19.pdf
  21. World Health Organization, W. (n.d.). Infodemic. Retrieved May 27, 2022, from https://www.who.int/health-topics/infodemic#tab=tab_1