Article Sidebar

Submitted
August 16, 2022
Accepted
November 13, 2022
Published
January 16, 2023
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 1522 Download : 1792

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to reveal the meaning of noken, and how the socialization and internalization of the noken philosophy in Jayapura society in the dynamics of development communication. The research method uses field studies. Data was collected through in-depth interviews. The results of the study show that the meaning of the Jayapura people for noken is not only as a work of civilization in the form of an art object in the form of a knitted bag, but also contains a philosophy regarding Papuan socio-cultural values. On the other hand, even though noken contains a philosophical meaning full of Papuan values, the people of Jayapura and Papua in general do not know the philosophical meaning of noken. This research suggests the need for communication activities aimed at socializing and internalizing the noken philosophy to the people of Jayapura. Socialization should be carried out using a positivistic paradigm communication model, while at the internalization level using a constructivist paradigm.

Keywords

communication development meaning noken philosophy

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Lefaan, A. (2023). Pemaknaan, Sosialisasi, dan Internalisasi Filsafat Noken dalam Komunikasi Pembangunan Masyarakat Kota Jayapura. Jurnal Komunikasi, 17(2), 137–154. https://doi.org/10.20885/komunikasi.vol17.iss2.art1
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Agustine, Oly Viana. 2019. “Implementasi Noken sebagai Hukum Tidak Tertulis dalam Sistem Hukum Nasional.” Jurnal Rechts Vinding. Volume 8, Nomor 1. Halaman 69-84.
  2. Baran, Stanley J., dan Dennis K. Davis. 2000. Communication Theory: Foundations, Ferment, and Future. Wadsworth Thomson Learning.
  3. Boekorsjom, Aleandro Kevin. 2019. “Strategi Indonesia dalam memperkenalkan Noken ke Dunia Internasional”. Skripsi. Program Studi Hubungan Internasional, FISIP Universitas Kristen Jakarta.
  4. Burgess, Robert G. 2018. Field Research: Sourcebook and Field Manual. New York and London: Routledge.
  5. Carey, J.W. 1988. Communication as Culture. Boston: Unwin Hyman.
  6. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105-117). London: Sage.
  7. Heidbuchel, Ester. 2007. The West Papua Conflict in Indonesia: Actor, issues and Approachs, Wettenberg: Johanes Herman J & J Verlag.
  8. Januar, Arie. 2017. “Fungsi, Makna, dan Eksistensi Noken sebagai Simbol Identitas Orang Papua.” Jurnal Patrawidya, Volume 18. 1 (2017), hal. 57-70.
  9. Koerber, Amy dan Lonie McMichael, ‘Qualitative Sampling Methods: A Primer for Technical Communicators’, Journal of Business and Technical Communication 2008; 22-454.
  10. Kossay, Methodius. 2014. Pemilu Sistem Noken dalam Demokrasi Indonesia (Studi kasus di Kabupaten Jayawijaya Provinsi Papua).” E-Journal. Program Studi Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta.
  11. Lasswell, H. 1948. “The Structure and function of communication in society’, in L. Bryson. (ed.), The Communication of Ideas, pp. 32-51. New York: Harper.
  12. Lefaan, Ave, 2019. Praktik Politik Representasi dalam Dinamika Demokrasi Politik Lokal di Papua. Yogyakarta: Kalam Semesta.
  13. Mahaldar, Orance., and Kinkini Bhadra. 2015. ICT: A Magis Wand for Social Change in Rural India. Dalam Handbook of Research on Cultural and Economic Impacts of the Information Society. Hal. 25.
  14. McQuail, Denis. 2005. Communication Theory. Fifth Edition. London: SAGE Publications.
  15. Miller, Khaterine. Communication Theories: Perspectives, Processes, and Cotexts. Second Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill International.
  16. Neuman, W. Lawrence. 2002. Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Vol. 30. Boston: Pearson.
  17. Owalabi, Toyosi O.S. and Nurudeen, Nahjmah A. 2020. Indegenous Language Media and Communication for Health Purposes in the Digital Age. Dalam Emerging Trends in Indegenous Language Media, Communication, Gender, and Health. Hal. 21-33.
  18. Shannon, C., and Weaver, W. (eds.) 1949. The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
  19. Suwae, Habel. 2013. Konstruksi Identitas Kepapuan dalam Era Demokrasi. Disertasi. Program Studi Kajian Budaya dan Media. Sekolah Pascasarjana UGM.
  20. Szecsy, Esie M. 2011. Building Knowledge without Borders: Using ICT to Develop a Binational Education Research Community. Dalam Hanbook of Research on Transformative Online Education and Liberation: Model fot Social Equality. Pages: 19. Doi: 10.4018/978-1-60960-046-4.
  21. Wanma, O Afredo. Reinardus L Cabuy. Hans F.Z. Peday. Matheus Beljai. 2013. “Ethnobotanical aspect of Noken: Case study in the High Mountain Indigenous Community of Papua Islamd, Indonesia.” India Journal of Tradisional Knowledge. Volume 12. Hal. 202-208.
  22. Widjojo, Muridan, S. (ed.). 2009. Papua Road Map: Negotiating the Past, improving the Present and Securing the Future. Jakarta: LIPI, Yayasan Tifa, Yayasan Obor