Article Sidebar

Submitted
January 1, 2024
Accepted
August 9, 2024
Published
August 16, 2024
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 529 Download : 494

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to understand and analyze public reception of disinformation in Yogyakarta using Stuart Hall's encoding-decoding theory. The study used a qualitative method. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with two types of informants, namely santri and abangan. This study found that audience reception of COVID-19 pandemic disinformation varied, some were in a dominant hegemonic, negotiating, or oppositional position. The findings of this study confirm the thesis of reception studies which state that every message spread in the media is received polysemically. However, in contrast to the assumptions of reception studies, the position of audience reception at each reading position which is fixed and comes from the same audience is not true. On the contrary, this study found that audience acceptance can change, sometimes in a dominant hegemonic code, sometimes in a negotiating position, and even an oppositional code. Changes in acceptance positions are highly dependent on the issues contained in the COVID-19 pandemic disinformation message.

Keywords

Covid 19 Pandemic Disinformation Reception Study santri-abangan

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Murti Kusuma Wirasti, Sugeng Bayu Wahyono

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
How to Cite
Wirasti, M. K., & Wahyono, S. B. (2024). Studi Resepsi Khalayak terhadap Disinformasi Pandemi Covid-19 pada Media Sosial di Yogyakarta. Jurnal Komunikasi, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.20885/komunikasi.vol19.iss1.art2
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Allcott, H., & Gentzkow, M. (2017). Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(2), 211–236. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.31.2.211
  2. Ang, I. (1986). Ien Ang - Watching Dallas_ Soap Opera and the Melodramatic Imagination-Routledge Kegan & Paul (1986).
  3. Bafadhal, Madri, O., Anang, & Santoso, D. (2020). Memetakan Pesan Hoaks Berita COVID-19 di Indonesia Lintas Kategori, Sumber, dan Jenis Disinformasi Mapping Hoax Messages of COVID-19 in Indonesia Accros Categories, Sources, and Types of Disinformation. Jurnal Magister Ilmu Komunikasi, 6(2), 235–249. http://journal.ubm.ac.id/
  4. Barker, C., & Jane, E. A. (2016). Barker, C. and E. A. Jane - Cultural Studies_ Theory and Practice-SAGE Publications (2016) (5th ed.). Sage Publications Ltd.
  5. Capurro, R. (2017) Homo Digitalis. http://www.springer.com/series/15203
  6. Davies, A. (2013). Native Speakers and Native Users: Loss and Gain. In A. Davies (Ed.), Native Speakers and Native Users: Loss and Gain. Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/0797AE8190EDC77151D53FBCC669F472
  7. Dwiputra, K. O. (2021). Analisis resepsi khalayak terhadap pemberitaan Covid-19 di klikdokter.com. Jurnal Komunikasi Profesional, 5(1), 26–37. http://ejournal.unitomo.ac.id/index.php/jkp
  8. Fetzer, J. H. (2004). Disinformation: The Use of False Information. Minds and Machines, 14(2), 231–240. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MIND.0000021683.28604.5b
  9. Fuchs, C. (2018). Authoritarian capitalism, authoritarian movements and authoritarian communication. Media, Culture and Society, 40(5), 779–791. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443718772147
  10. Geertz, C. (1976). The Religion of Java. THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO PRESS.
  11. Hall, S. (1997). Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices (1st ed.). Sage Publications & Open University.
  12. Hardiman, F. B. (2018). Manusia Dalam Prahara Revolusi Digital. Diskursus, 17(2), 177–192. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.36383/diskursus.v17i2.252
  13. Haryatmoko. (2019). Post-truth dan (Anti) Pluralisme (A. Suwignyo, Ed.). Kompas Media Nusantara.
  14. Chumairoh, H. (2020). Ancaman Berita Bohong di Tengah. VOX Populi, 3(2017), 22–30.
  15. Juditha, C. (2018). Interaksi Komunikasi Hoax di Media Sosial serta Antisipasinya Hoax. Jurnal Pekommas, 3(1), 31–44.
  16. Wahyono, S. B., Wirasti, M. K., & Ratmono, B. M. (2020). Audience Reception of Hoax Information on Social Media in the Post-Truth Era. Jurnal Komunikasi Indonesia, 110–124. https://doi.org/10.7454/JKI.V9I2.12773
  17. Katz, E., Bouchard, N.-N., & Nathalie-Nicole Elihu Katz, B. (1990). The Export of Meaning, Cross-Cultural Readings of Dallas (Vol. 14). https://www.persee.fr/doc/comin_1189-3788_1993_num_14_1_1633Fichierpdfgénéréle17/05/2018
  18. Keller, F., Schoch, D., Stier, S., & Yang, J. (2019). Political Astroturfing on Twitter: How to Coordinate a Disinformation Campaign. Political Communication, 37, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2019.1661888
  19. Lash, S. (2002). Critique of information (S. Lash, Ed.). SAGE Publications, Ltd. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446217283
  20. Levtzion, N. (1979). Conversion to Islam (N. Levtzion, Ed.; 1st ed.). Holmes dan Meir.
  21. Llronte & Cuenca. (2017). UNO_27_ENG_alta.
  22. Magnis-Suseno, F. (1984). Etika Jawa: Sebuah Analisa Falsafi tentang Kebijaksanaan Hidup Jawa. Gramedia.
  23. McAnany, E. G., & la Pastina, A. C. (1994). Telenovela Audiences: A Review and Methodological Critique of Latin America Research. Communication Research, 21(6), 828–849. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365094021006009
  24. McComiskey, & Bruce. (2017). Post-Truth Rhetoric and Composition.
  25. Morley, D. (1980). The Nationwide Audience: Structure and Decoding. London : British Film Institute.
  26. Picard, M., & Madinier, R. (2011). The Politics of Religion in Indonesia Syncretism, Orthodoxy, and Religious Contention in Java and Bali (M. Picard & R. Madinier, Eds.; 1st ed.). Routledge.
  27. Priastuty, WP., Pawito, & Rahmanto, AN. (2020). Hoaks tentang Vaksin Covid-19 di Tengah Media Sosial Hoax about Covid-19 Vaccine amid Social Media. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Unimus, 391–399. www.covid19.go.id
  28. Ricklefs, M. C. (2013). Islamization and its Opponents in Java: A Political, Social, Cultural and Religious History, c. 1930 to Present. NUS Press.
  29. Ritzer, G. (2012). Teori Sosiologi dari Sosiologi Klasik sampai Perkembangan Terakhir Postmodern. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
  30. Safitri, D. A., & Rajagukguk, S. (2022). Analisis Resepsi Khalayak Pada Aplikasi Peduli Lindungi Di Masa Pandemi COVID 19. Jurnal Netnografi Komunikasi, 1(1), 40–49. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.59408/netnografi.v1i1.6
  31. Secor, M., & Walsh, L. (2004). A Rhetorical Perspective on the Sokal Hoax: Genre, Style, and Context. Written Communication, 21(1), 69–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088303261037
  32. Soelistyo, L. (2015). Resepsi Orang Tionghoa Terhadap Tayangan Ketionghoaan di Lima Stasiun Televisi Swasta. Yogyakarta: Universitas Gadjah Mada.
  33. Wahyono, S. B., Wirasti, M. K., & Ratmono, B. M. (2020). Audience Reception of Hoax Information on Social Media in the Post-Truth Era. Jurnal Komunikasi Indonesia, 110–124. https://doi.org/10.7454/JKI.V9I2.12773
  34. Wardle, C. (2019). Understanding Information Disorder.
  35. Yustitia, S., & Ashrianto, P. D. (2020). An Analysis on COVID-19 Disinformation Triangle in Indonesia. Komunikator, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.18196/jkm.122040