Article Sidebar

Submitted
April 20, 2024
Accepted
October 28, 2024
Published
October 31, 2024
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 63 Download : 23

Main Article Content

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to find and explain the existence of pantun as a means of environmental communication in the Uluan community of South Sumatra. The study used a qualitative method. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, observations, and searches for relevant documents. The results of this study indicate that environmental communication in pantun can be divided into two categories. The first category explicitly refers to environmental issues, and the second category is not explicitly related to environmental issues, but its implicit meaning refers to environmental issues. This study also found that pantun as a form of environmental communication in the Uluan community of South Sumatra is dynamic and continues to reproduce. Because pantun is rooted and sourced from the environmental conditions of the community itself, this study recommends that pantun can be a medium for environmental campaigns.

Keywords

pantun environmental communication Uluan community

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Yenrizal Yenrizal, Ahmad Muhaimin, Muhammad Sirozi

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
How to Cite
Yenrizal, Y., Muhaimin, A., & Sirozi, M. (2024). Pantun Sebagai Bentuk Komunikasi Lingkungan Masyarakat Uluan di Sumatera Selatan. Jurnal Komunikasi, 19(1), 163–180. https://doi.org/10.20885/komunikasi.vol19.iss1.art10
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Akmal. (2015). Kebudayaan Melayu Riau (Pantun, Syair, Gurindam). Risalah, 26(4), 159–165.
  2. Al-Fin, M., & Jalaluddin, N. H. (2022). Fenomena Alam dalam Pantun Melayu. Melayu: Jurnal Antarabangsa Dunia Melayu, 15(2), 161–176. https://doi.org/10.37052/jm.15(2)no1
  3. Astuti, D. P. J. (2024). Semiotika Pantun Minang pada Masyarakat Minangkabau Kota Bengkulu. Disastra: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 2(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.29300/disastra.v2i1.3122
  4. Bartosh, D. K., Kotova, E. O., Kytina, V. V., & Kharlamova, M. V. (2023). Malay Folk Genre Pantun: Traditions and Modernity. RUDN Journal of Studies in Literature and Journalism, 28(1), 61–78. https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-9220-2023-28-1-61-78
  5. Blumer, H. (1986). Symbolic Interactionism Perspective and Method. University of California Press.
  6. Carey, J. W. (1989). Communication as culture. In Routledge (Revised). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139059497.008
  7. Denzin, N. K. (Ed. . (2009). Study in Interactionism Symbolic. In N. K. (Ed. . Denzin (Ed.), Emerald Books (33rd ed.). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  8. Ducarme, F., & Couvet, D. (2020). What does ‘nature’ mean? Palgrave Communications, 6(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-0390-y
  9. Flor, A. G. (2004). Environmental Communication : Principles , Approaches and Strategies of Communication Applied to Environmental Management. UP Open University. https://doi.org/10.1080/15330150590934480
  10. Fuchs, C. (2020). Communication and Capitalism A Critical Theory (1st ed.). University of Wesminster Press.
  11. Hidayatunnur, H., Suwandi, S., & Waluyo, H. J. (2022). Malay Pantun as an Intangible Cultural Heritage and Its Role in Community Life. ICHSS, 08, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.8-12-2021.2322578
  12. Irwansyah, Syafrudin, & Mulyati. (2021). Hilangnya Identitas Budaya pada Perilaku Remaja Kabupaten Dompu (Studi Kasus : Dusun Ria Desa Riwo Kabupaten Dompu). Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 5, 10214–10221.
  13. Iskandar, J., & Iskandar, B. S. (2018). Etnoekologi, Biodiversitas Padi dan Modernisasi Budidaya Padi: Studi Kasus Pada Masyarakat Baduy dan Kampung Naga. Jurnal Biodjati, 3(1), 47. https://doi.org/10.15575/biodjati.v3i1.2344
  14. Ismail, M. A. (2004). Marga di Bumi Sriwijaya. Universitas Tridinanti Press.
  15. Khalil, M. bin K., & Ahmad, M. R. W. (2023). Perlambangan Unsur Alam dalam Pantun Melayu Terpilih dari Sudut Pandangan Ekoritikan. Jurnal Melayu, Desember, 46–59.
  16. Leo Fandi, Agustina, N. (2012). Struktur Dan Fungsi Pantun Minangkabau Dalam Masyarakat Pasa Lamo, Pulau Punjung, Dharmasraya. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 1(1), 278–286.
  17. Naess, A. (2001). Ecology, community, and lifestyle (D. Rothenberg (ed.); 7 th Editi). Cambridge University Press.
  18. Puspita, A., Syamsidar, R., & Sum, T. (2022). Local Plant Treasures and Functions of Pantun Batobo. ELS Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 5(4), 673–676. https://doi.org/10.34050/elsjish.v5i4.24597
  19. Rahman, A. S. M. M., Haque, M. F., Arafat, M. L., Bhattacharya, R., & Akter, H. (2022). Exploring Nature in the Selected Poems of Derek Walcott and Kaiser Haq: An Ecocritical Approach. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation (IJLLT), 3(11), 55–67. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijllt
  20. Rambo, A. T. (1983). Conceptual Approaches to Human Ecology Conceptual Approaches to Human Ecology (Issue 14). East-West Center.
  21. S Wagmore, R., & G. Kallimani, D. M. (2023). Eco-Philosophical Perspectives in the Select Poems of Gary Snyder: A critical Exposition. International Journal of English Literature and Social Sciences, 8(6), 176–181. https://doi.org/10.22161/ijels.86.27
  22. Santun, D. I. M., Murni, & Supriyanto. (2010). Iliran dan Uluan. In Eja Publisher. Eja Publisher.
  23. Spradley, J. P. (2007). Metode Etnografi. Tiara Wacana.
  24. Sudarmanto, B. A. (2020). Revitalisasi Sastra Lisan dan Pemertahanan Bahasa Daerah: Studi Kasus Sastra Lisan Rejung dan Guritan di Sumatra Selatan. JSSH (Jurnal Sains Sosial Dan Humaniora), 4(2), 111. https://doi.org/10.30595/jssh.v4i2.8593
  25. Susanti, A., & Darmansyah, A. (2022). Analisis Makna dan Nilai Moral dalam Pantun Tradisi Sekujang : Sesuaikah Menjadi Materi Pembelajaran Siswa Sekolah Dasar ? Eduprof : Islamic Education Journal, 4(2), 80–104.
  26. Venus, A. (2015). Cara Pandang Komunikasi Orang Melayu.
  27. Wilian, S., & Husaini, B. N. (2019). Pergeseran Pemakaian Tingkat Tutur (Basa Alus) Bahasa Sasak Di Lombok. Linguistik Indonesia, 36(2), 161–185. https://doi.org/10.26499/li.v36i2.82
  28. Xiang, W. N. (2016). Ecophronesis: The ecological practical wisdom for and from ecological practice. Landscape and Urban Planning, 155, 53–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.07.005
  29. Yenrizal, Muhaimin, A., & Sirozi, M. (2022). Aktualisasi Pesan Lingkungan Hidup pada Pantun Masyarakat Uluan Sumatra Selatan. UIN Raden Fatah Press.
  30. Yenrizal, Rahmat, A., Iskandar, J., & Bajari, A. (2022). Manusia Memandang Alam dalam Perspektif Etnoekologi Komunikasi. In Etnoekologi Komunikasi, Orang Semende Memandang Alam (Issue October). Penerbit Deepublish.
  31. Yusari, N. I. (2021). Eksistensi Pantun Sebagai Dampak Ekologis Dan Bentuk Tradisi Ekspresif Masyarakat Melayu: Tinjauan Antropolinguistik. Jurnal Sasindo UNPAM, 9(2), 17–34.