Main Article Content

Abstract

This study analyzes presidential speeches that reflect state policies, the president's political direction, and tools for shaping public opinion regarding environmental issues. Using the corpus linguistic analysis method, this study examines 160 speeches by the President of the Republic of Indonesia, Joko Widodo, throughout 2019-2024 that use the keywords environment, climate change, climate crisis, and global warming. Using the rhetorical situation theory, this study finds that the president's speeches on the environment are driven by three main factors, namely new capital city development, economic growth efforts, and engagement in international forums. International audiences and economic actors also influence the themes of the speeches. Furthermore, the study finds that the president's speech rarely addresses environmental issues that are close and directly impact the public, does not highlight environmental justice issues, and resolves environmental problems. This study offers novelty in the analysis of the president's environmental speeches with corpus linguistic analysis, which is still rare.

Keywords

Presidential speech rhetorical situation corpus linguistic analysis environmental discourse

Article Details

How to Cite
Poerwaningtias, I. (2025). Prioritizing economic growth over environmental protection: A rhetorical situation of President Joko Widodo’s speeches. Jurnal Komunikasi, 19(2), 199–214. https://doi.org/10.20885/komunikasi.vol19.iss2.art2

References

  1. Ananda, P. (2024, June 18). Jakarta kembali jadi kota dengan kualitas udara terburuk nomor 1 di dunia. Media Indonesia. https://mediaindonesia.com/megapolitan/678896/jakarta-kembali-jadi-kota-dengan-kualitas-udara-terburuk-nomor-1-di-dunia
  2. Bailey, C. J. (2019). Assessing President Obama’s climate change record. Environmental Politics, 28(5), 847–865. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2018.1494967
  3. Baker, P. (2006). Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis. Continuum.
  4. Bitzer, L. F. (1968). The rhetorical situation. Philosophy & Rhetoric, 1(1), 1–14.
  5. Brezina, V. (2018). Statistics in Corpus Linguistics: A Practical Guide. Cambridge University Press.
  6. Cavari, A., Mate, A., & Sebők, M. (2024). Staying on the democratic script? A deep learning analysis of the speechmaking of U.S. presidents. Policy Studies Journal, 52(4), 709–729. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12534
  7. Chan, S. C., Katz, B. D., Schmidt, D., & Rehfeldt, R. A. (2021). “In” or “Out”? An Analysis of the use of augmentals in U.S. Presidential speeches on the Paris climate agreement. Behavior and Social Issues, 30(1), 692–711. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42822-021-00070-2
  8. Chávez, K. (2024). US Military intervention and presidential communication frames. The Journal of Politics, 86(4), 1495–1508. https://doi.org/10.1086/729968
  9. Ekawati, R. (2019). Power through linguistic modalities in Indonesian presidential speeches. Discourse and Interaction, 12(1), 5–28. https://doi.org/10.5817/DI2019-1-5
  10. Eshbaugh-Soha, M. (2010). The politics of presidential speeches. Congress & the Presidency, 37(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/07343460903390679
  11. Fadhillah, F. F. H., & Irwansyah, I. (2021). Analisis retorika pada pidato Presiden Jokowi “Bersatu Menghadapi Corona” sebagai himbauan melalui media youtube. Jurnal Lensa Mutiara Komunikasi, 5(2), 49–60. https://doi.org/10.51544/jlmk.v5i2.1672
  12. Global Carbon Project. (n.d.). Global Carbon Atlas. https://Globalcarbonatlas.Org/Emissions/Carbon-Emissions/.
  13. Haider, A. S., Ahmad, A., Yagi, S., & Hammo, B. H. (2023). The influence of audience on the topics discussed by King Abdullah II of Jordan: a corpus-assisted discourse study. Contemporary Levant, 8(2), 208–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/20581831.2023.2241005
  14. Hajrah, H., Alam, A. M., & Jufri. (2024). Analisis Wacana Kritis pada Pidato Presiden Tahun 2022: Model Norman Fairclough. Jurnal Onoma: Pendidikan, Bahasa Dan Sastra, 10(1), 169–181.
  15. Hamed, D. (2021). Keywords and collocations in US presidential discourse since 1993: A corpus-assisted analysis. Journal of Humanities and Applied Social Sciences, 3(2), 137–158. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHASS-01-2020-0019
  16. Humas Setkab. (2014, October 20). Pidato Presiden Joko Widodo pada Pelantikan Presiden dan Wakil Presiden Republik Indonesia, di Gedung MPR, Senayan, Jakarta, 20 Oktober 2014. https://Setkab.Go.Id/Pidato-Presiden-Joko-Widodo-Pada-Pelantikan-Presiden-Dan-Wakil-Presiden-Republik-Indonesia-Di-Gedung-Mpr-Senayan-Jakarta-20-Oktober-2014/.
  17. Kujanen, M., Koskimaa, V., & Raunio, T. (2024). President’s constitutional powers and public activism: a focused analysis of presidential
  18. speeches under Finland’s two presidencies. Comparative European Politics, 22(5), 594–615. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41295-023-00375-z
  19. Lewandowsky, S. (2021). Climate change disinformation and how to combat it. Annual Review of Public Health, 42(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-090419-102409
  20. Manihuruk, F. E., Alisya, J., Syahbana, E., & Purba, B. (2024). Kebijakan Pengelolaan sumber daya alam di Indonsia pada era pemerintahan Jokowi: Tinjauan ekonomi. Journal Of Economics and Regional Science, 4(1), 37–52. https://doi.org/10.52421/jurnal-
  21. esensi.v4i1.449
  22. McCright, A. M., Dunlap, R. E., & Marquart-Pyatt, S. T. (2016). Political ideology and views about climate change in the European Union. Environmental Politics, 25(2), 338–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2015.1090371
  23. McEnery, T., & Wilson, A. (1996). Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh University Press.
  24. Moshou, H., & Drinia, H. (2023). Climate change education and preparedness of future teachers—A Review: The case of Greece. Sustainability, 15(2), 1177. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15021177
  25. Mustaqim, A. H. (2022). Mengonstruksi masa depan Indonesia: Situasi retorikal tentang Ibu Kota Negara
  26. Nusantara. Jurnal Komunika Islamika: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi dan Kajian Islam, 9(1), 1–14.
  27. Nugroho, Y. (2020). Man of contradictions: Joko Widodo and the struggle to remake Indonesia. Contemporary Southeast Asia,
  28. (3), 437–439. https://doi.org/10.1355/CS42-3h
  29. Partelow, S., Winkler, K. J., & Thaler, G. M. (2020). Environmental non-governmental organizations and global environmental discourse.
  30. PloS One, 15(5), e0232945. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232945
  31. Primantoro, A. Y. (2023, April 7). Tiga permasalahan mendasar sampah yang tidak kunjung selesai. https://www.kompas.id/baca/humaniora/2023/04/06/tiga-permasalahan-mendasar-sampah-yang-tidak-kunjung-selesai.
  32. Rahmouni, K. (2023). Language, power and identity: discursive construction of post-revolution national identity in Tunisia. Critical Discourse Studies, 20(6), 683–699. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2022.2090398
  33. Rasyid, N. A. (2024, March 20). 10 negara dengan area hutan terluas, ada Indonesia! https://data.goodstats.id/statistic/10-negara-dengan-area-hutan-terluas-ada-indonesia-y38rm.
  34. Riana, F., & Paskalis, Y. (2021, June 15). Hujan protes dari pegiat lingkungan. https://www.tempo.co/ekonomi/mengapa-pegiat-lingkungan-memprotes-rencana-pembangunan-ibu-kota-negara-849535.
  35. Roderick, N. (2024). Exigence at the Dawn of Recommendation Media: Dramatizing Salience in Audio Memes. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 54(1), 74–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/02773945.2023.2251454
  36. Saiputra, R. P. (2022, September 23). 5 Kebijakan Presiden Jokowi di Bidang Iklim & Lingkungan Hidup. https://www.goodnewsfromindonesia.id/2022/09/23/5-kebijakan-presiden-jokowi-di-bidang-iklim-dan-lingkungan-hidup.
  37. Sakka, S. bin, Nurhadi, N., & Sari, E. S. (2023). Analisis Wacana Kritis Model Teun A. van Dijk pada Pidato Presiden di KTT Ke-42 ASEAN. CENDEKIA: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan, 3(2), 93–102. https://doi.org/10.51878/cendekia.v3i2.2237
  38. San Román, Á., & Molinero-Gerbeau, Y. (2023). Anthropocene, capitalocene or westernocene? on the ideological foundations of the current climate crisis. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 34(4), 39–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/10455752.2023.2189131
  39. Saputra, E., Saleh, M., & Maria, H. E. (2020). Gaya bahasa teks pidato presiden republik Indonesia Joko Widodo. Indonesia: Jurnal
  40. Pembelajaran Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 1(2), 68–74.
  41. Siahaan, A., Afriyanti, A. A., Nainggolan, E. M., Dewi, E. R., Siallagan, L., Rianti, & Capah, Y. S. (2023). Bahasa dan kekuasaan dalam wacana politik: Analisis wacana historis ruth wodak terhadap pidato Presiden Joko Widodo. ENGGANG: Jurnal Pendidikan, Bahasa, Sastra, Seni, Dan Budaya, 4(1), 557–569. https://doi.org/10.37304/enggang.v4i1.12105
  42. Silva-Muller, L., & Sposito, H. (2024). Which Amazon problem? Problem-constructions and transnationalism in Brazilian presidential discourse since 1985. Environmental Politics, 33(3), 398–421. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2023.2220639
  43. Thaker, J., & Leiserowitz, A. (2014). Shifting discourses of climate change in India. Climatic Change, 123(2), 107–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1059-6
  44. Turnbull, N. (2017). Political rhetoric and its relationship to context: a new theory of the rhetorical situation, the rhetorical and the political. Critical Discourse Studies, 14(2), 115–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2016.1268186
  45. United Nations. (n.d.). No Title. The 17 Goals. https://sdgs.un.org/goals
  46. World Population Review. (2024). Countries with Coral Reefs 2024. https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/countries-with-coral-reefs.