Main Article Content

Abstract

In 2008, the city of Yogyakarta adopted a buy the service scheme in the Trans Jogja public transport aiming to improve the quality of public transport and reduce congestion. Based on the study of GIZ-SUTIP in 2012, there were several problems in Trans Jogja, including inadequate bus stops and excessive staff numbers. The aim of our study were to evaluate and improve bus stops performance and analyze bus stop service quality according to passenger perceptions. This study is a descriptive study using purposive sampling technique, conducted on 12 Trans Jogja bus stops and 180 respondents. The data obtained were analyzed using MS Excel and SPSS 22 computer program. The results showed that bus stop performance was not good on headways, waiting times, and on-time performance. The clearance time of far-side bus stops was shorten than near-side and mid block bus stops. The near-side and far-side bus stops were accessed by passengers on foot. The service quality of the Trans Jogja shelter does not match the expectations of the passengers with a Gap Servqual value of -0.790. The service attribute was in quadrant C of the Cartesian Diagram, that requires corrective action from the Trans Jogja operator.

Keywords

Bus Stops performance Trans Jogja Servqual

Article Details

How to Cite
Adi, N. B., Priyanto, S., & Malkhamah, S. (2020). EVALUASI KINERJA HALTE BUS DENGAN METODE SERVQUAL (STUDI KASUS HALTE TRANS JOGJA TRAYEK 1A, 1B, 2A, DAN 2B). Teknisia, 25(1), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.20885/teknisia.vol25.iss1.art2

References

  1. Adi, M. N. B. (2016). “Evaluasi Kinerja Halte Trans Jogja Trayek 1A: Studi Kasus Halte Prambanan, Sudirman 1, dan Malioboro 1”. Tugas Akhir. Universitas Islam Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Tidak dipublikasikan.
  2. American Public Transportation Asso-ciation. (2010). “APTA Standart Development Program Recommended Practice”. APTA Bus Rapid Transit Working Group, Washington.
  3. Aritonang, A. H. (2015). ”Pengaruh Halte Trans Jogja terhadap Kecepatan Kendaraan Lain dan Kinerja Jalan (Studi Kasus: Halte Senopati 2, Jalan Senopati, Yogyakarta)”. Tugas Akhir. Universitas Gadjah Mada. Yogyakarta.
  4. GIZ-SUTIP. (2014). “Pedoman Peren-canaan Mobilitas Perkotaan di Indonesia”. Kementrian PPN/Bappenas, Jakarta.
  5. GIZ-SUTIP. (2015). “Langkah Jitu Pembenahan Angkutan Perkotaan”. Kementrian PPN/Bappenas, Jakarta.
  6. Institute for Transportation & Development Policy. (2016). “The BRT Standard”. Institute for Transportation & Development Policy.
  7. Jasfar, F. (2005). “Manajemen Jasa Pendekatan Terpadu”. Ghalia Indonesia. Bogor.
  8. Permenhub Republik Indonesia. (2012). “Standar Pelayanan Minimal Angkutan Massal Berbasis Jalan”. Menteri Perhubungan Republik Indonesia. Jakarta.
  9. Saragih, R. U. (2015). “Analysis Service Quality of Trans Jogja with Approach of Integration of Servqual and Kano’s Model into Quality Function Deployment (QFD)”. Tesis. Universitas Gadjah Mada. Yogyakarta.
  10. Supriyanto, M. S. (2018). ”Kajian Faktor Fisik dan Perlunya Penambahan Halte Bus Trans Jogja di Kota Yogyakarta dan Sekitarnya”. Tugas Akhir. Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta.
  11. Susilowati, N. R. (2016). “Keberagaman Pola Pergerakan Penumpang dalam Mengakses Halte Trans Jogja”. Tesis. Universitas Gadjah Mada. Yogyakarta.
  12. Syukri, R. (2014). “Evaluasi Kinerja Pelayanan Angkutan Umum Trans Jogja berdasarkan Persepsi Operator”. Tugas Akhir. Universitas Gadjah Mada. Yogyakarta.
  13. Transportation Research Board. (2002). “A Guidebook for Developing a Transit Performance-Measurement System”. Transit Cooperative Research Program. Washington D.C.
  14. Transportation Research Board. (2003). “2nd Edition the Transit Capacity and Quality Service Manual”. Transit Cooperative Research Program. Washington D.C.
  15. Transportation Research Board. (2013). “3rd Edition the Transit Capacity and Quality Service Manual”. Transit Cooperative Research Program. Washington D.C.
  16. Vuchan, V. R. (1981). “Urban Public Transport: System and Technology”. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.