Article Sidebar

Submitted
28 July 2020
Accepted
16 May 2021
Published
31 May 2021
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 522 Download : 486

Main Article Content

Abstract

Many aspects must be considered in the building's design so that the construction is sturdy and can be used according to its function. An important aspect that is often overlooked is the aspect of fire safety. This study aims to evaluate environmental conditions and safety facilities in buildings against fire hazards. The buildings reviewed are the Postgraduate Building, E6, E7, and F3 of the Muhammadiyah University of Yogyakarta. The research method used in this research is a qualitative approach, and the primary data is obtained by direct observation in the field and interviews with the person in charge of the building. This study indicates that the environmental conditions of the postgraduate building, E6, E7, and F3, are not in good condition because each building gets a condition value of 51.67%; 50.56%; 52.22%; and 50%. The rescue facilities in the postgraduate building, E6, and E7 are good; although there are some shortcomings, the value of the condition of each building is 85.98%, 87.41%, and 87.41%. The rescue facility in the F3 building is quite good, with a condition value of 65.81%.

Keywords

environment condition safety facilities fire protection fire building

Article Details

How to Cite
Saleh, F., Amalia, S. R., Prayuda, H., Tiyani, L., & Al Zakina, B. L. (2021). EVALUASI KONDISI LINGKUNGAN DAN SARANA PENYELAMATAN PADA GEDUNG PERKULIAHAN TERHADAP BAHAYA KEBAKARAN. Teknisia, 26(1), 31–39. https://doi.org/10.20885/teknisia.vol26.iss1.art4
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Adiwidjaja, R. (2012). “Studi Tingkat Keandalan Sistem Proteksi Kebakaran pada Bangunan Apartemen (Studi Kasus Apartemen di Surabaya)”. Journal of Architecture and Built Environment. 39 (1), 15-22.
  2. Arrazy, S., Sunarsih, E., dan Rahmiwati, A. (2014). “Penerapan Sistem Manajemen Keselamatan Kebakaran di Rumah Sakit Dr. Sobirin Kabupaten Musi Rawas Tahun 2013”. Jurnal Ilmu Kesehatan Masyarakat. 5, 103-111.
  3. Badan Litbang PU. [2005]. “Pemeriksaan Keselamatan Kebakaran Bangunan Gedung”. Jakarta.
  4. Hesna, Y., Hidayat B., dan Suwanda, S. (2009). “Evaluasi Penerapan Sistem Keselamatan Kebakaran pada Bangunan Gedung Rumah Sakit Dr. M. Djamil Padang”. Jurnal Rekayasa Sipil. 5(2), 65-76.
  5. Hidayat, D. A., Suroto., Kurniawan, B. (2017). “Evaluasi Keandalan Sistem Proteksi Kebakaran Ditinjau dari Sarana Penyelamatan dan Sistem Proteksi Pasif Kebakaran di Gedung Lawang Sewu Semarang”. Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat. 5 (5), 134-146.
  6. Kurniawan, P. A., Sugiyarto., dan Laksito, B. (2014). “Evaluasi Penerapan Sistem Proteksi Kebakaran pada Bangunan Rumah Sakit (Studi Kasus RS. Ortopedi Prof. Dr. R Soeharso Surakarta)”. E-Jurnal Matriks Teknik Sipil. 824-832.
  7. Ornam, Kurniati. (2011).” Kajian Tentang Penerapan Sistem Keselamatan Jiwa Terhadap Bahaya Kebakaran pada Perancangan Pusat Perbelanjaan Mal Mandonga Kendari”. Unity Jurnal Arsitektur. 1(2), 87-95.
  8. Peraturan Menteri Pekerjaan Umum. (2008). “Persyaratan Teknis Sistem Proteksi Kebakaran pada Bangunan Gedung dan Lingkungan”. Jakarta.
  9. Sukawi., Hardiman, G., DA, N. A., dan P, Z. A. (2016). “Evaluasi Sistem Proteksi Kebakaran pada Bangunan Rumah Susun (Studi Kasus: Rusunawa UNDIP)”. Undip E-Journal System Portal. 16 (1), 35-42.
  10. Sumardjito. (2011). “Kajian Terhadap Kelayakan Sarana Emergency Exit pada Bangunan Pusat Perbelanjaan di Yogyakarta”. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi dan Kejuruan. 20 (1), 89-116.
  11. Wicaksono, R. R., dan Ernawati, M. [2013]. “Evaluasi Sarana Evakuasi Kebakaran di Industri Karung Sidoarjo”. The Indonesian Journal of Republic Health. 10 (1), 44-55.
  12. Widowati, E., Koesyanto, H., Wahyuningsih, A. S., dan Sugiharto. (2017). “Analisis Keselamatan Gedung Baru F5 Universitas Negeri Semarang Sebagai Upaya Tanggap Keadaan Darurat”. Unnes Journal of Public Health. 6 (2), 101-106.

Most read articles by the same author(s)