Main Article Content

Abstract

On April 18, 2018, an earthquake hit Banjarnegara Regency, Central Java. The earthquake was measured M4.4 at a depth of 4 km and caused damages to buildings in several villages within Kalibening District. Predicting the future earthquake events is difficult. However, it is possible to estimate the potential damage caused by an earthquake event. FEMA has developed a methodology called HAZUS to estimate the potential loss and damage caused by earthquakes. This study compared the level of actual damage to buildings subjected to the 2018 Banjarnegara earthquake with the estimated damage to buildings obtained using HAZUS. The real damage is obtained from the field survey while the estimated damage is obtained from the HAZUS modeling. The object of this research is the unreinforced masonry low-rise buildings (URML) in Kasinoman Village, one of the villages that suffered the most subjected to the 2018 Banjarnegara Earthquake. The result of this study indicates the actual damage has a higher mean damage ratio (20,40 %) compared to the estimated damage (11.66%). HAZUS is developed according to the performance and experimental data of the buildings in the US therefore it might not be compatible with the building in Indonesia, especially surveyed buildings in Banjarnegara. The reason is the buildings in the US fulfilled the earthquake-resistant building provision meanwhile the surveyed buildings did not.

Keywords

earthquake building damages unreinforced-masonry HAZUS

Article Details

Author Biography

Jafar Jafar, Universitas Islam Indonesia

Jurusan Teknik Sipil
How to Cite
Jafar, J. (2021). PERBANDINGAN KERUSAKAN AKTUAL DAN PRAKIRAAN PADA BANGUNAN TEMBOK TANPA PERKUATAN AKIBAT GEMPA. Teknisia, 26(1), 40–51. https://doi.org/10.20885/teknisia.vol26.iss1.art5

References

  1. Aswandono, B. (2011). "Building Replacement Cost for Seismic Risk Assessment in Palbapang Village, Bantul Sub-District, Yogyakarta Building Replacement Cost For Seismic Risk Assessment in Palbapang, Indonesia". Universitas Gadjah Mada.
  2. Bawono, A. S. (2011). "Kajian Bangunan Di Indonesia Dengan Amerika (Studi Kasus Rumah Di Bantul)". Inersia, 7(1), 85–95.
  3. Bawono, A. S. (2016). "Studi Kerentanan Bangunan Akibat Gempa Studi Kasus Perumahan Di Bantul". Semesta Teknika, 19(1), 90–97.
  4. BMKG. (2018). "Press Release Gempabumi Banjarnegara, M 4.4, Rabu 18 April 2018, 13:28:38 WIB". https://cdn.bmkg.go.id/web/PRESS-RELEASE_Banjarnegara_-18-April-1-2018.pdf.
  5. Douglas, J. (2018). "Ground motion prediction equations 1964-2018". Departmen of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Stratchlyde.
  6. Erlangga, W. (2020). "Karakteristik Dan Parameter Subduksi Sumber Gempa Pulau Jawa". Teknisia, XXV(2), 30–40.
  7. FEMA. (2004). "Using HAZUS-MH for Risk Assessment". (Issue August).
  8. FEMA. (2005). "Improvement of Nonlinear Static Seismic Analysis Procedures. In FEMA 440, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington DC". (Vol. 440, Issue June).
  9. FEMA. (2020). "HAZUS. Earthquake Model, Technical Manual". Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington DC., October. https://www.fema.gov/
  10. Gulati, B. (2006). "Earthquake Risk Assessment of Buildings: Applicability of HAZUS in Dehradun, India".
  11. Hancilar, U., Sesetyan, K., & Cakti, E. (2020). "Comparative earthquake loss estimations for high-code buildings in Istanbul". Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 129 (May 2019), 105956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.105956
  12. Handika, M. S. D., & Madlazim (2020). No Title. Jurnal Inovasi Fisika Indonesia (IFI), 09(03), 1–6.
  13. IFRC. (2015). "Sendai Framework for DRR". March, 25. http://www.unisdr.org/we/inform/terminology
  14. Khalfan, M., Tait, M. J., & El-Dakhakhni, W. W. (2012). "Proposed Technique for Seismic Vulnerability Evaluation of Single Storey Unreinforced Masonry Residential Buildings in Developing Countries". 15th International Brick and Block Masonry Conference, 10.
  15. Li, J., & Weigel, T. A. (2006). "Damage States for Reinforced CMU Masonry Shear Walls". Advances in Engineering Structures, Mechanics & Construction (pp. 111–120). Springer.
  16. Neighbors, C. J., Cochran, E. S., Caras, Y., & Noriega, G. R. (2013). "Sensitivity Analysis of FEMA HAZUS Earthquake Model: Case Study from King County, Washington". Natural Hazards Review, 14(2), 134–146. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)nh.1527-6996.0000089
  17. Pratiwi, D. S., Teguh, M., & Pawirodikromo, W. (2019). "An Implementation of the HAZUS Method for Estimating Potential Damage of Residential Houses at Pacitan Sub-district, East Java, Indonesia due to Earthquake". MATEC Web of Conferences, 280, 01008. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201928001008
  18. Saputra, E., & Faizah, R. (2019). "Kajian Kerusakan Bangunan Sederhana Pasca Gempa Banjarnegara 18 April 2018". Agregat, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.30651/ag.v4i1.2816
  19. Spence, R. (2004). "Earthquake protection: the need for legislation to strengthen high-risk buildings". 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 2082.
  20. Tantala, M. W., Nordenson, G. J. P., Deodatis, G., & Jacob, K. (2008). "Earthquake loss estimation for the New York City Metropolitan Region". Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 28(10–11), 812–835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2007.10.012
  21. Widodo. (2012). "Seismologi Teknik dan Rekayasa Kegempaan". Pustaka Pelajar.