Article Sidebar

Submitted
29 April 2021
Accepted
31 May 2021
Published
31 May 2021
Download
PDF Untitled (Bahasa Indonesia) Untitled (Bahasa Indonesia) Untitled (Bahasa Indonesia) Untitled (Bahasa Indonesia)
Statistic
Read Counter : 625 Download : 1439

Main Article Content

Abstract

Research on Shear Wave Velocity (vs) and Sediment Thickness (h) in Klaten Regency, Central Java from field microtremor data aims to determine the thickness of sediment or soft sediment as one of the factors of high and low earthquake vulnerability. Microtremor data was collected using a three-component TDS 303 seismometer, covering 111 measuring points in the Klaten Regency area. In this study, the sediment thickness was calculated using the equation shear wave velocity (vs) divided by four times the dominant frequency (fg). The dominant frequency (fg) value is obtained from the HVSR curve while the shear wave velocity value (vs) used in this study is the inversion value of the HVSR curve which is modeled based on borlog data at the Wedi Church, equated for all measurement points. On the map of the shear wave velocity distribution at each microtremor measuring point has a vs value, this value is used to calculate the thickness of the sediment at each point. So that the distribution of the thickness value of the sediment at each point is obtained, then a thickness map is made covering the study area. The results showed that in general the research area has a Vs value in the results of the HVSR curve inversion ranging from 130 m/s to 570.83 m/s, Vs average 275.68 m/s. The areas with vs are relatively high in the southern part of Gantiwarno, Wedi, and Bayat subdistricts that are directly adjacent to the hills of Gunung Kidul. Areas with relatively low value vs are in the area of Prambanan Subdistrict, Northern Wedi Subdistrict, Trucuk Subdistrict, Jogonalan Subdistrict, South Klaten District, Central Klaten District, and Kalikotes Subdistrict. For sediment thickness (h) ranges from 5,105 m to 113,648 m. Areas with relatively high sediment thickness are located in parts of Wedi Subdistrict with a thickness of up to 110 m.  Areas with medium thickness (around 60 to 90 m) are in the area of Gantiwarno sub-district, Prambanan district, and the southern part of the Jogonalan sub-district. In the area of Bayat District it has a low thickness (about 5 to 30 m) located in the proves and mountains of the Paseban area and the tomb of Sunan Pandanaran. This shows that areas with high sediment thickness, namely in Wedi District, will also have a high level of earthquake vulnerability.

Keywords

shear wave velocity sediment thickness HVSR curve inversion microtremor

Article Details

License

Under the following term:

  • Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.

  • ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.

  • No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Author Biography

Anggit Mas Arifudin, Universitas Islam Indonesia

Program Studi Teknik Sipil
How to Cite
Arifudin, A. M. (2021). KECEPATAN GELOMBANG GESER (VS) DAN KETEBALAN SEDIMEN (H) DI KABUPATEN KLATEN DARI DATA MIKROTREMOR. Teknisia, 26(1), 52–60. https://doi.org/10.20885/teknisia.vol26.iss1.art6
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Bardet, & Tobita. (2001). “A computer program for nonlinear earthquake site response analysis of layered soil deposits”. California: Department of Civil Engineering, University Of Southern California.
  2. BMKG (2016). “Data Gempabumi dirasakan di DIY dan sekitarnya”. Yogyakarta.
  3. Daryono. (2011). “Indeks Kerentanan Seismik Berdasarkan Mikrotremor pada setiap satuan bentuk Lahan di Zona Graben Bantul Daerah Istimewa Yogkarta”. Yogyakarta: Disertasi, Universitas Gadjah Mada.
  4. Daryono, & T. R. (2007). “Data Mikrotremor dan Pemanfaatannya Untuk Pengkajian Bahaya Gempa Bumi”. Badan Meteorologu Klimatologi dan Geofisika.
  5. Gurler, Nakamura, Saita, & Sato. (t.thn.). “Local Site Effect of Mexico City Based on Microtremor Measurement”. System and Data Research Co., Ltd, Tokyo 186-0003, Japan.
  6. Irjan dan Bukhori, A. (2010). “Pemetaan Wilayah Rawan Bencana berdasarkan Data Mikroseismik Menggunakan TDS (Time Digital Seismograf) Type 303 Study Kasus : Kampus I UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang”. Jurnal Neutrino Vol.3 No.2.
  7. Ishihara, K. (1982). “Evaluation of Soil Properties for use in Earthquake response analysis”. Proceedings International Symo. On Num. Model in Geomechanics, (hal. 237-259).
  8. Ishihara, K. (1978). “Introduction to Dynamic Soil Mechanism. in Japanese”.
  9. Nakamura, Y. (1989). “A method for dynamic characteristic estimation of subsurface using microtremor on the ground surface”. Q.R of R.T.I 30-1 , 25-33.
  10. Nakamura, Y. (2007). “Development of vulnerability assesment for ground and structures using microtremor”. System and Data Research Co., Ltd.
  11. Nakamura, Y. (2008). “On The H/V Spectrum”. The 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, October 12-17, 2008. Beijing, China.
  12. SESAME. (2004). “Guidelines for the Implementation of the H/V Spectral Ratio Technique on Ambient Vibratio Measurement, Processing and Interpretation”. European Commission - Reseacrh General Directorate.
  13. Widodo. (2012). “Seismologi Teknik dan Rekayasa Kegempaan”. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.