Article Sidebar

Submitted
7 July 2023
Accepted
16 December 2023
Published
30 December 2023
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 190 Download : 437

Main Article Content

Abstract

The large number of students is directly proportional to the increase in private vehicles on campus, resulting in traffic congestion. Efforts should be made to encourage motorized vehicle users to switch to sustainable modes of transportation. This study aims to determine student dependence on motorized vehicles to go to campus and identify factors associated with using sustainable modes of transportation at the Universitas Islam Indonesia (UII). The data sample consisted of 614 respondents, collected through online simple random sampling. The collected data were then analyzed using the Chi-Square test. The survey data reveals a significant reliance on motorized vehicles to get to campus, with 67% of trips within a 2-kilometer radius made by motor vehicles. Based on the Chi-Square test results, factors such as motor vehicle ownership, driving license ownership, travel distance, and the primary mode of transportation are strongly associatedwith the willingness to walk or cycle. This condition indicates that practicality or habitual aspects have a stronger relationship with students' willingness to use sustainable transportation than demographic or socioeconomic factors. Thus, efforts are needed to increase the practicality of using sustainable transportation to optimize sustainable campus development.

Keywords

Walk Bicycle Motorized vehicle Campus trip

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Teknisia

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Under the following term:

  • Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.

  • ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.

  • No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
How to Cite
Prayitno, P. A., Kemal Fardianto, Faza Fawzan Bastarianto, Muhammad Kennyzyra Bintang, & Raihan Pasha Isheka. (2023). Analisis Potensi Penggunaan Moda Transportasi Tidak Bermotor Pada Mahasiswa di Kampus Terpadu Universitas Islam Indonesia. Teknisia, 28(2), 102–114. https://doi.org/10.20885/teknisia.vol28.iss2.art4
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Alhomaidat, F. and Eljufout, T. (2021) “Perception of cycling risks and needs associated with skill level, gender, and age,” Archives of Transport, 59(3), pp. 113–127. doi: 10.5604/01.3001.0015.2390.
  2. Ali Kemal, Ç. et al. (2015) “Factors influencing consumers’ light commercial vehicle purchase intention in a developing country,” Management and Marketing, 10(2), pp. 148–162. doi: 10.1515/mmcks-2015-0012.
  3. Arwini, N. P. D. (2020) “Dampak Pencemaran Udara Terhadap Kualitas Udara Di Provinsi Bali,” Jurnal Ilmiah Vastuwidya, 2(2), pp. 20–30. doi: 10.47532/jiv.v2i2.86.
  4. Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta (2023) Provinsi Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta Dalam Angka 2023. Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta.
  5. Carboni, A. et al. (2022) “Active mobility perception from an intersectional perspective: insights from two European cities,” Transportation Research Procedia, 60(2021), pp. 560–567. doi: 10.1016/j.trpro.2021.12.072.
  6. Dawodu, A. et al. (2022) “Campus sustainability research: indicators and dimensions to consider for the design and assessment of a sustainable campus,” Heliyon, 8(12), p. e11864. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11864.
  7. Esztergár-Kiss, D. et al. (2021) “Promoting sustainable mode choice for commuting supported by persuasive strategies,” Sustainable Cities and Society, 74. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103264.
  8. Ha, T. V., Asada, T. and Arimura, M. (2019) “Determination of the influence factors on household vehicle ownership patterns in Phnom Penh using statistical and machine learning methods,” Journal of Transport Geography, 78(May), pp. 70–86. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.05.015.
  9. Herdiansyah, H. et al. (2017) “Capacity Analysis of Parking Lot and Volume of Vehicle Toward Sustainable Parking Convenience,” IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 88(1). doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/88/1/012031.
  10. Hosford, K., Beairsto, J. and Winters, M. (2022) “Is the 15-minute city within reach? Evaluating walking and cycling accessibility to grocery stores in Vancouver,” Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 14(April), p. 100602. doi: 10.1016/j.trip.2022.100602.
  11. Irawan, M. Z. (2022) “Perceived disadvantages or motorized vehicle use habit? Investigating obstacles in bicycle use among adolescents in Yogyakarta, Indonesia,” Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 14(November 2021), p. 100595. doi: 10.1016/j.trip.2022.100595.
  12. Irawan, M. Z. and Sumi, T. (2011) “Promoting Active Transport in Students’ Travel Behavior: A Case from Yogyakarta (Indonesia),” Journal of Sustainable Development, 4(1), pp. 45–52. doi: 10.5539/jsd.v4n1p45.
  13. Kim, D., Park, Y. and Ko, J. (2019) “Factors underlying vehicle ownership reduction among carsharing users: A repeated cross-sectional analysis,” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 76(October), pp. 123–137. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2019.09.018.
  14. Kök, M. V., Kalinli, A. and İlkuçan, A. (2022) “Sustainable Transportation Managing in University Campuses: The Case of Middle East Technical University,” Journal of Sustainability Perspectives, 2, pp. 292–300. doi: 10.14710/jsp.2022.15525.
  15. Li, H. (2016) “Study on Green Transportation System of International Metropolises,” Procedia Engineering, 137, pp. 762–771. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.01.314.
  16. Li, R., Ji, S. and Wang, Y. (2019) “Research on Cycling Distance Based on Cyclist Perception,” IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 688(2). doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/688/2/022034.
  17. Marquet, O. and Miralles-Guasch, C. (2015) “The Walkable city and the importance of the proximity environments for Barcelona’s everyday mobility,” Cities, 42(PB), pp. 258–266. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2014.10.012.
  18. Meng, M., Koh, P. P. and Wong, Y. D. (2016) “Influence of socio-demography and operating streetscape on last-mile mode choice,” Journal of Public Transportation, 19(2), pp. 38–54. doi: 10.5038/2375-0901.19.2.3.
  19. Mohiuddin, H., Jamal, S. and Bhuiya, M. M. R. (2022) “To bike or not to bike: Exploring cycling for commuting and non-commuting in Bangladesh,” Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 14(April), p. 100614. doi: 10.1016/j.trip.2022.100614.
  20. Moore, D. S., Notz, W. I. and Fligner, M. N. (2018) The Basic Practice of Statistics. 8th ed. Edited by L. Lahr et al. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.
  21. Mpoi, G., Milioti, C. and Mitropoulos, L. (2023) “Factors and incentives that affect electric vehicle adoption in Greece,” International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology, (xxxx), pp. 1–16. doi: 10.1016/j.ijtst.2023.01.002.
  22. Pangkalan Data Pendidikan Tinggi (2022) Profil Perguruan Tinggi. Available at: https://pddikti.kemdikbud.go.id/data_pt/OTQyNzMzMDUtODM0Qi00ODZFLUE3OTYtNzhDRThDOEZBRjJE (Accessed: May 2, 2023).
  23. Pisoni, E., Christidis, P. and Navajas Cawood, E. (2022) “Active mobility versus motorized transport? User choices and benefits for the society,” Science of the Total Environment, 806, p. 150627. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150627.
  24. Rahul, T. M. and Verma, A. (2017) “The influence of stratification by motor-vehicle ownership on the impact of built environment factors in Indian cities,” Journal of Transport Geography, 58, pp. 40–51. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.11.008.
  25. Saeed, A. A. and Mahdi, W. A. (2021) “Alternatives to sustainable transportation system in campus of the University of Baghdad,” IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 779(1). doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/779/1/012028.
  26. Sarker, R. I., Mailer, M. and Sikder, S. K. (2020) “Walking to a public transport station: Empirical evidence on willingness and acceptance in Munich, Germany,” Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 9(1), pp. 38–53. doi: 10.1108/SASBE-07-2017-0031.
  27. Siiba, A. (2020) “Active travel to school : Understanding the Ghanaian context of the underlying driving factors and the implications for transport planning,” Journal of Transport & Health, 18(December 2019), p. 100869. doi: 10.1016/j.jth.2020.100869.
  28. Simanjuntak, N. R., Desriantomy and Silitonga, S. P. (2020) “Evaluasi Kapasitas Areal Parkir Kampus Universitas Palangka Raya Berdasarkan Kebutuhan Satuan Ruang Parkir (SRP),” Teknika, 3(2), pp. 136–148.
  29. Sitinjak, L. L. and Sitindaon, C. (2019) “Pemilihan Moda Transportasi Pematangsiantar menuju Bandara Silangit Dengan Metode Stated Preference,” Jurnal Rekayasa Konstruksi Mekanika Sipil (JRKMS), 2(1), pp. 43–57. doi: 10.54367/jrkms.v2i1.435.
  30. Sukor, N. S. A. and Hassan, S. A. (2017) “Analysis of Transportation Energy Consumption: En Route Towards Carbon Reduction for Sustainable Campus,” IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 226(1). doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/226/1/012055.
  31. Tjahjono, T., Kusuma, A. and Septiawan, A. (2020) “The Greater Jakarta Area Commuters Travelling Pattern,” Transportation Research Procedia, 47(2019), pp. 585–592. doi: 10.1016/j.trpro.2020.03.135.
  32. Tsunoda, K. et al. (2023) “Acceptable walking and cycling distances and functional disability and mortality in older Japanese adults: An 8-year follow-up study,” Health and Place, 79(December 2022), p. 102952. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2022.102952.
  33. Universitas Islam Indonesia (2021) Program Pendidikan. Available at: https://www.uii.ac.id/ studi/program/#toggle-id-2 (Accessed: April 15, 2023).
  34. Universitas Islam Indonesia (2022) “Rencana Strategis Universitas Islam Indonesia 2022-2026.” Yogyakarta, p. 44.
  35. Weng, M. et al. (2019) “The 15-minute walkable neighborhoods: Measurement, social inequalities and implications for building healthy communities in urban China,” Journal of Transport and Health, 13(129), pp. 259–273. doi: 10.1016/j.jth.2019.05.005.

Most read articles by the same author(s)