Article Sidebar

Jurnal Teknisia
Submitted
6 November 2015
Accepted
6 November 2015
Published
6 May 2015
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 513 Download : 606

Main Article Content

Abstract

TransJogja is a public bus system that serves Yogyakarta city and its vicinity using mid-sized air conditioned buses. The system, that was introduced in February 2008, currently runs daily from 05.30 to 21.30 on it 4 trunk routes. Recently, a plan of opening some feeder routes has been considered to expand its service coverage so as to include potential trip generator regions, including areas along Yogyakarta – Kaliurang road. The purpose of this study was twofold, i.e. to investigate prospective passengers’ willingness to pay (WTP) TransJogja service planned to run Yogyakarta – Kaliurang route and to study which factors that likely determine the formation of passengers’ WTP. Stated preference technique was used to collect prospective passengers’ opinion on the price that they would pay provided certain service characteristics. In a view that one’s WTP may also be influenced by his/her own socioeconomic background in addition to the service features offered, respondents’ socioeconomic information such as age, gender, income level, etc. were also collected and used to study their influence to the stated price to pay. Based on 655 observations, a majority of 26,1% respondents stated 3.000 rupiahs as the price they would pay for Yogyakarta-Kaliurang TransJogja services, while another 23,97% stated 2.000 rupiahs. These prices correspond to various combinations of service features, including varied seating capacity, inclusion or exclusion of air conditioning system (AC), bus stops, varied peak and off-peak headway, varied service hours, and application of special rates for students. Further study using multiple linear regression method indicated that respondents’ socioeconomic features that include one’s gender, age, place of stay (along Kaliurang Rd or otherwise), and monthly transportation-related expenditure had a greater share in determining his/her WTP, rather than service features that include seating capacity, AC, and student’s special rate. Therefore, it was recommended that the concerned office should take consumers’ socioeconomic factors into consideration in their future decision on passenger tariff should the Yogyakarta-Kaliurang route of TransJogja services is to open.

Article Details

License

Under the following term:

  • Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.

  • ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.

  • No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
How to Cite
Hidayat, A. M., & Kushari, B. (2015). KEMAUAN MEMBAYAR (WILLINGNESS TO PAY) CALON PENUMPANG TERHADAP RENCANA PELAYANAN TRANSJOGJA RUTE YOGYAKARTA-KALIURANG. Teknisia, 20(1), 67–77. Retrieved from https://journal.uii.ac.id/teknisia/article/view/3626
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Banister, D., (2002), Transport Planning: Transport, Develompent, and Sustainability, Spon Press, London
  2. Barter, P.A., dan Raad, T., (2000), Taking Steps: a Community Guide to People-Centred, Equitable and Sustainable Urban Transport, Sustainable Transport Network for Asia and The Pacific, Kuala Lumpur
  3. Ben–Akiva, A., dan Lerman, S.R., (1985), Discrete Choice Analysis, MIT Press, Cambridge Massachusets
  4. Cracknell, J.A., (2000), Experience in Urban Traffic Management and Demand Management in Developing Countries, Department for International Development (DfID), UK.
  5. Greene, D.L., dan Wegener, M., (1997), “Sustainable Transportâ€. Journal of Transport Geography 5: 177 – 190
  6. Ibrahim, M.F., (2003), “Viewpoint: Improvements and Integration of a Public Transport System the Case of Singaporeâ€. Cities 20 (3): 205 – 216.
  7. Kushari, B., (2004), A Comparative Study of Transportation Demand Management Policies in Some Southeast Asian Cities: Past Experiences, Social Feasibility, and Future Prospects, M.Eng Thesis (unpublished), Chualongkorn University, Bangkok
  8. Litman, T.A., (2003), Sustainable Transport: A Sourcebook for Policy Makers in Developing Cities, Module 2b: Mobility Management, Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ)
  9. Louviere, J.J., Hensher, D.A., dan Swait, J.D., (2000), Stated Choice Methods, Analysis and Applications, Cambridge University Press.
  10. O’Sullivan, A., (2003), Urban Economics, Int’l Ed. McGraw-Hill, Boston
  11. Prayitno, E., (2008), Analisa Kemauan Penumpang Pesawat Udara untuk Menggunakan Bus TransJogja, Tesis (tidak dipublikasikan), Magister Sistem dan Teknik Transportasi, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta
  12. Tanaboriboon, Y., 1992, “An Overview and Future Direction of Transport Demand Management in Asian Metropolisesâ€, Regional Develompent Dialogue 13 (3): 46 – 73.
  13. Wicaksono, Y.I., Riyanto, B., Kusumastuti, D.R., (2006), “Analisa Kemampuan Membayar Tarif Angkutan Kota (Studi Kasus Pengguna Jasa Angkutan Kota pada Empat Kecamatan di Kota Semarangâ€, Jurnal PILAR Vol 15 No 1.