Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to examine the utilization of High-Density Polyethylene (HDPE) plastic waste as a partial substitute for fine aggregate in the manufacture of Cellular Lightweight Concrete (CLC) lightweight bricks. The method used is a laboratory experiment with variations in the addition of HDPE of 0%, 5%, 10%, and 15% to the CLC mixture. Each variation was tested to determine the compressive strength, dry unit weight, and water absorption capacity after curing for 28 days. The results showed that the addition of HDPE affected the mechanical characteristics of lightweight bricks. The compressive strength decreased with increasing HDPE percentage, where the highest value was recorded at the 0% HDPE variation of 1.16 MPa and the lowest at the 15% variation of 0.92 MPa, below the SNI 8640-2018 standard. The highest dry unit weight was achieved at a composition of 5% HDPE of 3.32 kg/m³, indicating optimal density. However, the addition of HDPE also increased water absorption, with the highest average of 25.08% at the 15% variation. Thus, the use of HDPE waste as a substitute material shows environmentally friendly potential, but needs to be optimized so as not to reduce the structural quality of CLC lightweight bricks.

Keywords

Keywords: HDPE plastic waste CLC lightweight brick Compressive strength Dry unit weight Water absorption.

Article Details

How to Cite
Mg, T. (2025). HDPE plastic waste as a fine aggregate substitute in the production of CLC lightweight bricks: an experimental study. Teknisia, 30(1), 54–59. https://doi.org/10.20885/teknisia.vol30.iss1.art6

References

  1. Al-Hadithi, A. I., Almawla, S. A., & Mohammed, M. K. (2023). Fresh, mechanical and impact properties of self-compacting lightweight concrete containing waste PET fibers. Innovative Infrastructure Solutions, 8(10), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-023-01223-5
  2. Amalia, F., & Putri, M. K. (2021). Analisis Pengelolaan Sampah Anorganik Di Sukawinatan Kota Palembang. Jurnal Swarnabhumi, 6(2), 134–142. Link PDF
  3. Amran, Y. H. M., Farzadnia, N., & Ali, A. A. A. (2015). Properties and applications of foamed concrete: a review. Construction and Building Materials, 101, 990–1005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.10.112
  4. Belmokaddem, M., Mahi, A., Senhadji, Y., & Pekmezci, B. Y. (2020). Mechanical and physical properties and morphology of concrete containing plastic waste as aggregate. Construction and Building Materials, 257, 119559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119559
  5. Bhosale, A., Zade, N. P., Sarkar, P., & Davis, R. (2020). Mechanical and physical properties of cellular lightweight concrete block masonry. Construction and Building Materials, 248, 118621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118621
  6. Evita, Pasongli, H., Salam, R., & Marthinu, E. (2023). Analisis Hubungan antara Pengetahuan dan Sikap Peduli. Growth Dan Manajemen Lingkungan, 13(1), 31–43.
  7. Jones, M. R., & McCarthy, A. (2005). Behaviour and assessment of foamed concrete for construction applications. Cement and Concrete Composites, 27(9–10), 845–853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2005.03.017
  8. Kearsley, E. P., & Wainwright, P. J. (2001). Porosity and permeability of foamed concrete. Cement and Concrete Research, 31(5), 805–812. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(01)00490-2
  9. Kumar, P., Singh, R., & Sharma, A. (2021). Classification and performance evaluation of lightweight, normal weight, and heavyweight concrete: A review. Construction and Building Materials, 273, 121815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121815
  10. Limami, H., Manssouri, I., Cherkaoui, K., Saadaoui, M., & Khaldoun, A. (2020). Thermal performance of unfired lightweight clay bricks with HDPE & PET waste plastics additives. Journal of Building Engineering, 30(November 2019), 101251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101251
  11. Lv, X. Sen, Cao, W. X., Yio, M., Ji, W. Y., Lu, J. X., She, W., & Poon, C. S. (2024). High-performance lightweight foam concrete enabled by compositing ultra-stable hydrophobic aqueous foam. Cement and Concrete Composites. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2024.105675
  12. Manaf, I. A., Marsi, N., Genesan, V., Yusrianto, E., Shariff, H. H., Adnan, S. H., Awang, M., Ali, R., & Jamir, M. R. M. (2021). Compressive strength, sound absorption coefficient (SAC) and water absorption analysis of HDPE plastic waste reinforced polystyrene and Portland cement for lightweight concrete (LWC). Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2051(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2051/1/012043
  13. Mustapure, N. (2016). A Study on Cellular Lightweight Concrete Blocks. International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology, 188–191.
  14. Muthusubramanian, B., Neelamegam, P., Ramar, V., & Suresh, V. (2023). Assessing the embodied carbon and energy required for manufacturing sustainable concrete blocks using plastic pollution as a fiber. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(49), 107533–107548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-29933-4
  15. Narayanan, N., & Ramamurthy, K. (2000). Structure and properties of aerated concrete: a review. Cement and Concrete Composites, 22(5), 321–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0958-9465(00)00016-0
  16. Putra, F. C., Tamrin, A., & Rahmawati, K. (2023). Pengaruh Penggantian Sebagian Agregat Halus dengan Limbah Plastik Terhadap Berat Jenis, Kuat Tekan dan Nilai Ekonomis pada Bata Ringan. Indonesian Journal Of Civil Engineering Education, 9(2), 74. https://doi.org/10.20961/ijcee.v9i2.83608
  17. Putrilan, M., Harahap, S., & Nursyamsi, N. (2024). The Evaluation of the Use PET and HDPE Plastic Waste. 03(01), 49–57.
  18. Raheem, A., Azam, A., Arooj, A., Razzaq, A., Sohail, M. I., & Zulfiqar, B. (2022). Recycling and utilization of high-density polyethylene (HDPE) waste: A comprehensive review. Journal of Environmental Management, 301, 113821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113821
  19. Tian, H., Gao, J., Hao, J., Lu, L., Zhu, C., & Qiu, P. (2013). Atmospheric pollution problems and control proposals associated with solid waste management in China: a review. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 252, 142-154.