Main Article Content

Abstract

The research aims to see the realm of post-truth after the cancellation of Indonesia as the host of the U20 World Cup. Applying the participatory culture theory, this study used a qualitative approach. It founds that the phenomena of post-truth can be seen from the statement of Ganjar Pranowo, the Governor of Central Java Province, in refusing the participation of the Israeli National Team to play in Indonesia, which reaps the pros and cons on social media, and further grow fake news. After fact-checking has been carried out on some pros and cons, some news may be classified as fake news by irresponsible persons. It can be concluded that Indonesian society has already entered the post-truth era, characterized by many people believing in the issues merely based on their own interests and alignments. At this point, fact-checking efforts should be used as a basis for receiving any information.

Keywords

Post Truth fake news fact-checking the U20 World Cup

Article Details

Author Biographies

Widi Asmarani Agustina, Gunadarma University, Jakarta, Indonesia

Faculty of Communication Science

Edy Prihantoro, Gunadarma University, Jakarta, Indonesia

Faculty of Communication Science

Mujiyana, Gunadarma University, Jakarta, Indonesia

Faculty of Communication Science

How to Cite
Agustina, W. A., Prihantoro, E., Mujiyana, & Utami, S. R. (2023). Manifestations of Post-Truth after Cancellation of Indonesia as the U20 World Cup Host . Asian Journal of Media and Communication, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.20885/asjmc.vol7.iss1.art2

References

  1. Aminudin, A. (2022). Menghadapi Disinformasi Konten Berita Digital di Era Post Truth. Jurnal Psychomutiara. Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International, 283-292.
  2. Anggie Rizki Govaldi, H. (2021). Disinformasi Pada #JusticeForAudrey di Era Post Truth. Mediakom: Jurnal Komunikasi, 5.
  3. Arikunto. (2005). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Jakarta: Sagung Seto.
  4. Bachri, B. S. (2010). Meyakinkan Validitas Data Melalui Triangulasi Pada. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, Vol.10 No.1.
  5. Devie Rahmawati, G. L. (2020). Generasi Digital Natives Dalam Praktik Konsumsi Berita di Lingkungan Digital. Communications, 2, 74-98.
  6. Kurniawan. (2011). "Politisasi Agama di Tahun Politik : Politik Pasca-Kebenaran di Indonesia. Jurnal Sosiologi Agama, Vol. 12 No.1, 133-154.
  7. McQuail, D. (2011). Teori Komunikasi Massa. Jakarta: Salemba Humanika.
  8. Mofferz, M. W. (2020). Meretas Makna Post Truth: Analisis Kontekstual Hoaks, Emosi Sosial dan Populisme Agama. Jurnal Agama dan Masyarakat, Vol. 7 No 1.
  9. Mulawarman & Nurfitri, A. D. (2017). Perilaku Pengguna Media Sosial beserta Implikasinya Ditinjau dari Perspektif Psikologi Sosial Terapan”. Buletin Psikologi, 36-44.
  10. Nasrullah. (2014). Media Sosial Perspektif Komunikasi, Budaya dan Sosioteknologi. Bandung: Simbiosa Rekatama Media.
  11. Rianto, P. (2019). Literasi Digital Dan Etika Media Sosial Di Era Post-Truth. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi.
  12. Rianto, P. (2022). Literasi Digital Dan Etika Media Sosial Di Era Post-Truth.
  13. Rizaldi Parani, A. P. (2018). Mempertanyakan Kembali Bhinneka Tungggal Ika di Era Post Truth Melalui Media Sosial. Jurnal Lontar, 59-69.
  14. Roudhonah. (2007). Ilmu Komunikasi. Jakarta: Lembaga penelitian UIN Jakarta.
  15. Sugiyono. (2007). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  16. Suharyanto, C. E. (2019). Analisis Berita Hoaks Di Era Post-Truth: Sebuah Review (Analysis OF Hoax News On The Post Truth Era: An Review. Jurnal Masyarakat Telematika dan Informasi.
  17. Tenia. (2017). Tenia, H. 2017. Pengertian Media Sosial-Fungsi, Ciri, Jenis, Dampak Positif, dan Dampak Negatif.
  18. Wardani, P. K. (2018). Budaya Partisipasi (Participatory Culture) Di Kalangan Vlogger.