Article Sidebar

Submitted
August 4, 2024
Accepted
December 7, 2024
Published
December 23, 2024
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 163 Download : 49

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study explores the coverage of environmental issues in South African broadcast media, focusing on patterns, frames, and source representation, applying agenda-setting and framing theories. Employing a content analysis methodology, 360 prime-time news segments from three major broadcasters – SABC, eNCA, and Newzroom Afrika – were analyzed between July 2023 and June 2024. The findings revealed that climate change dominates coverage, accounting for 32% of environmental reporting, followed by natural disasters (21%) and water issues (17%). Economic and policy frames were the most prevalent, highlighting financial impacts and regulatory measures, while health perspectives were underutilized. Government sources were cited most frequently (44%), with limited representation of scientists, NGOs, and local communities, which comprised only 10% of sources. Coverage exhibited a mixed tone, balancing optimism about solutions with urgency about challenges. Despite a focus on global narratives, local environmental issues and grassroots perspectives were underrepresented, indicating a disconnect between media reporting and the lived experiences of South Africans. The study underscored the need for more inclusive and diverse coverage, advocating for the integration of scientific insights and community voices. These findings offered practical implications for media practitioners, policymakers, and environmental communicators, emphasizing the importance of balanced reporting to foster public engagement and informed policy discourse. This research provided a foundation for future studies on environmental journalism, especially in the context of developing countries, and highlighted the potential for media to act as a catalyst for environmental awareness and action.

Keywords

Environmental journalism broadcast media content analysis South Africa framing theory

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Zanele Mokoena, Lindiwe Nkosi

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
How to Cite
Mokoena, Z., & Nkosi, L. (2024). Environmental Issues in South African Broadcast Media: A Content Analysis of Coverage, Framing, and Source Representation. Asian Journal of Media and Communication, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.20885/asjmc.vol8.iss2.art1
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Anderson, A. (2015). Media, Environment and the Network Society. Palgrave Macmillan.
  2. Bornman, E. (2016). Environmental reporting in South African print media: The case of The Star and the Mail & Guardian. Journalism, 17(8), 1066-1083. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884915585962
  3. Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Sage Publications.
  4. Boykoff, M. T. (2011). Who Speaks for the Climate? Making Sense of Media Reporting on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press.
  5. Boykoff, M. T., & Boykoff, J. M. (2007). Climate change and journalistic norms: A case-study of US mass-media coverage. Geoforum, 38(6), 1190-1204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2007.01.008
  6. Boykoff, M. T., & Boykoff, J. M. (2004). Balance as bias: global warming and the US prestige press. Global Environmental Change, 14(2), 125-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2003.10.001
  7. Boykoff, M. T., Goodman, M. K., & Curtis, I. (2010). Cultural politics of climate change: Interactions in the spaces of everyday (media) life. In M. T. Boykoff (Ed.), The Politics of Climate Change (pp. 136-154). Routledge.
  8. Carvalho, A. (2007). Ideological cultures and media discourses on scientific knowledge: re-reading news on climate change. Public Understanding of Science, 16(2), 223-243. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662506066775
  9. Cousins, B., Cousins, T., & Hornby, D. (2010). Socio-economic dimensions of conservation in the Maputaland-Pondoland-Albany global biodiversity hotspot. South African Journal of Science, 106(11/12), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajs.v106i11/12.354
  10. Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51-58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
  11. Ferdous, S., & Khatun, M. (2020). News coverage on environmental issues: A Study on print media of Bangladesh. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science (IOSR-JHSS), 25(4), 53–59. https://doi.org/10.9790/0837-2504085359
  12. Gauntlett, D., Rossouw, G., & Naidoo, P. (2020). Renewable energy in South Africa: Opportunities for developing sustainable livelihoods. Energy Policy, 144, 111632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111632
  13. Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Harvard University Press.
  14. Haluza-DeLay, R., & Davidson, D. J. (2021). Climate change and television news in South Africa: a comparative analysis of media representation. Environmental Communication, 15(6), 792-806. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2021.1921573
  15. Hansen, A. (2010). Environment, media and communication. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203864362
  16. Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
  17. Maharaj, B., & Rampersad, R. (2018). Radio coverage of environmental issues in South Africa. Environmental Communication, 12(4), 485-499. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2017.1412995
  18. McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176-187. https://doi.org/10.1086/267990
  19. Musvoto, C., Nortje, K., & De Lange, W. (2016). Environmental sustainability reporting in South Africa. South African Journal of Science, 112(5/6), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2016/20150457
  20. Nisbet, M. C. (2009). Communicating climate change: Why frames matter for public engagement. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 51(2), 12-23. https://doi.org/10.3200/ENVT.51.2.12-23
  21. Neuendorf, K. A. (2017). The content analysis guidebook (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
  22. Olausson, U., & Berglez, P. (2014). Media and the climate change conundrum: Re-visiting the role of journalism in the public sphere. Environmental Communication, 8(2), 142-160. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2014.886084
  23. Painter, J. (2014). Climate Change in the Media: Reporting Risk and Uncertainty. I.B. Tauris.
  24. Retief, F., Bond, A., & Pope, J. (2019). Sustainable development goals and the environmental impact assessment community. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 37(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/146155
  25. Shehata, A., & Hopmann, D. N. (2012). Framing climate change: A longitudinal analysis of news media coverage in Sweden. Environmental Communication, 6(2), 183-200. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2012.665604
  26. Tandwa, L. (2017). Framing environmental issues in South African newspapers: A critical analysis. South African Journal of Science, 113(3-4), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2017/a0231