Article Sidebar

Submitted
October 14, 2024
Accepted
December 17, 2024
Published
December 23, 2024
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 88 Download : 43

Main Article Content

Abstract

In the digital era, algorithms have assumed a mediation role historically associated with journalism, limiting and prioritizing information in a personalized manner for each user. This curation contributes to the formation of information bubbles that reinforce selection effects and potentially feed preexisting beliefs. Although it is not a consensual view, several authors believe this phenomenon increases polarization, posing significant challenges to democratic discourse and societal cohesion. This paper reflects on information bubbles in the context of Bruno Latour’s and Edgar Morin’s perspectives on the nature-culture dichotomy. Together, these perspectives help us understand the algorithmic personalization of information as a hybrid (arising from the interaction between humans and non-humans) and complex phenomenon (multidimensional, engaging various parts of knowledge), where the central role of non-human actors and the continuous interaction between the whole and the parts are evident. It is concluded that addressing the information bubbles conundrum will require: (1) abandoning simplification and reductionism, while accepting contradiction and controversies, (2) mapping and analyzing the interactions between actors, (3) conducting inter- and transdisciplinary research, and (4) developing hybrid solutions.

Keywords

information bubbles nature-culture hybrids complexity Latour Morin

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Sara Monteiro Machado

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
How to Cite
Machado, S. M. . (2024). Hybrid Times Call for Hybrid Measures: Reflecting on the Information Bubbles Phenomenon in Light of the Nature-culture Debate. Asian Journal of Media and Communication, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.20885/asjmc.vol8.iss2.art2
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Bennett, W. Lance, and Shanto Iyengar. 2008. “A New Era of Minimal Effects? The Changing Foundations of Political Communication.” Journal of Communication, 58(4): 707-731. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00410.x
  2. Bruns, Axel. 2019. Are Filter Bubbles Real? Cambridge: Polity Press.
  3. Coleman, Stephen. 2017. Can The Internet Strengthen Democracy? Cambridge: Polity Press.
  4. Couldry, N. 2019. Media: Why It Matters. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  5. Festinger, Leon. 1957. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Standford: Stanford University Press.
  6. Fletcher, Richard, and Rasmus Kleis Nielsen. 2017. “Are News Audiences Increasingly Fragmented? A Cross-National Comparative Analysis of Cross-Platform News Audience Fragmentation and Duplication.” Journal of Communication, 67(4): 476-498. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12315
  7. Geschke, Daniel, Jan Lorenz, and Peter Holtz. 2019. “The Triple-Filter Bubble: Using Agent-based Modelling to Test a Meta-Theoretical Framework for the Emergence of Filter Bubbles and Echo Chambers.” British Journal of Social Psychology, 58(1): 129-149. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12286
  8. Jamieson, Kahtleen Hall, and Joseph N Cappella. 2008. Echo Chamber. New York: Oxford University Press.
  9. Latour, Bruno. 1993. We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  10. Latour, Bruno. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
  11. Lazarsfeld, Paul F, Bernard Berelson, and Hazel Gaudet. 1948. The People’s Choice. New: Columbia University Press.
  12. Lee, Sangwon, and Michael Xenos. 2022. “Incidental News Exposure via Social Media and Political Participation: Evidence of Reciprocal Effects.” New Media & Society, 24(1): 178-201. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820962121
  13. Machado, Sara Monteiro. 2021. “Democracia em Risco? Explorando a Contribuição do Ciberjornalismo para o Fenómeno do Filtro-bolha” (“Democracy at Risk? Exploring the Contribution of Digital Journalism to the Filter Bubble Phenomenon”). Observatorio (OBS*), 15(2): 83-99. https://doi.org/10.15847/obsOBS15220211730
  14. McPherson, Miller, Lynn Smith-Lovin, and James M. Cook. 2001. “Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks.” Annual Review of Sociology, 27: 415-438. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415
  15. Möller, Judith, Damian Trilling, Natali Helberger, and Bram van Es. 2018. “Do not Blame it on the Algorithm: an Empirical Assessment of Multiple Recommender Systems and their Impact on Content Diversity.” Information, Communication & Society, 21(7): 959-977. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1444076
  16. Morin, Edgar. 1999. SevenCcomplex Lessons in Education for the Future. Paris: UNESCO.
  17. Morin, Edgar. 2005a. Ciência com Consciência (Science with Conscience). Rio de Janeiro: Bertrand Brasil.
  18. Morin, Edgar. 2005b. Introdução ao Pensamento Complexo (Introduction to Complex Thinking). Porto Alegre: Editora Sulina.
  19. Morin, Edgar. 2019. "Edgar Morin: In Praise of Complex Thought." CNRS News,
  20. July 1. https://news.cnrs.fr/articles/edgar-morin-in-praise-of-complex-thought
  21. Negroponte, Nicholas. 1995. Being Digital. New York: Vintage Books.
  22. Nichols, Tom. 2018. A Morte da Competência: Os Perigos da Campanha contra o Conhecimento Estabelecido (The Death of Expertise: The Campaign Against Established Knowledge and Why It Matters). Lisboa: Quetzal Editores.
  23. Pariser, Eli. 2011. The Filter Bubble: What the Internet is Hiding From You. New York: Penguin Press.
  24. Pombo, Olga. 2006. “Interdisciplinaridade e Integração dos Saberes” (Interdisciplinarity and Integration of Knowledge). Liinc em Revista, 1(1): 3-15. https://doi.org/10.18617/liinc.v1i1.186
  25. Sætra, Henrik Skaug. 2019. '”The Tyranny of Perceived Opinion: Freedom and Information in the Era of Big Data.” Technology in Society, 59: 101155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.101155
  26. Seargeant, Philip, and Caroline Tagg. 2019. “Social Media and the Future of Open Debate: A User-oriented Approach to Facebook’s Filter Bubble Conundrum.” Discourse, Context & Media, 27: 41-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2018.03.005
  27. Sears, David O, and Jonathan L Freedman. 1967. “Selective Exposure to Information: A Critical Review.” The Public Opinion Quarterly, 31(2): 194-213. https://doi.org/10.1086/267513
  28. Shah, Dhavan V., Douglas M. McLeod, Hernando Rojas, Jaeho Cho, Michael W. Wagner, and Lewis A. Friedland. 2017. “Revising the Communication Mediation Model for a New Political Communication Ecology.” Human Communication Research, 43(4): 491-504. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12115
  29. Sunstein, Cass Robert. 2001. Republic.com. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  30. Sunstein, Cass Robert. 2006. Infotopia: How Many Minds Produce Knowledge. New York: Oxford University Press.
  31. Sunstein, Cass Robert. 2020. #Republic: Divided Democracy in the Age of Social Media. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  32. Tabrizi, Shayan A., and Azadeh Shakery. 2019. “Perspective-based Search: A New Paradigm for Bursting the Information Bubble.” FACETS, 4(1): 350-388. https://doi.org/10.1139/facets-2019-0002
  33. Thorson, Kjerstin, Kelley Cotter, Mel Medeiros, and Chankyung Pak. 2019. “Algorithmic Inference, Political Interest, and Exposure to News and Politics on Facebook.” Information, Communication & Society, 24(2): 183-200. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1642934
  34. Valkenburg, Patti M., Jochen Peter, and Joseph B. Walther. 2016. “Media Effects: Theory and Research.” Annual Review of Psychology, 67(1): 315-38. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033608
  35. Winner, Langdon. 2020. The Whale and the Reactor: A Search for Limits in an Age of High Technology. Chicago: University of Chicaco Press.
  36. Zhang, Xing, Yongtao Cai, Mengqiao Zhao, and Yan Zhou. 2023. “Generation Mechanism of ‘Information Cocoons’ of Network Users: An Evolutionary Game Approach.” Systems, 11(8): 414. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems11080414