Article Sidebar

Vol. 4, No. 1, September 2020
Submitted
January 11, 2023
Published
September 25, 2020
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 366 Download : 292

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study explains al-Ghazali’s argumentative criticism in Tahafut al-Falasifah. It aims to analyze the intentions of al-Ghazali’s argumentative refutation of other alleged rational thinkers considered by irfani epistemology as the cause of decline of Islam and to observe the method used by al-Ghazali in his argument. This study is a library research which is included in the qualitative research cluster. The result of study is that the intentions of al-Ghazali’s argumentative criticism are to discuss the twenty errors of Muslim philosophers, namely al-Farabi and Ibn Sina in matters of metaphysical philosophy. The method used by al-Ghazali is also the same as Aristotle’s criticism of Eudoxus, that is attacking Muslim philosophers in terms of the arguments they built, even labelling them as heretics and infidels/apostates. This method is known as argumentum ad hominem because it attacks Muslim philosophers when it comes to argumentation. It is built on the dialectical method of speech or in other terms known as jawab wa su’al which always recalls an imaginary trial.

Keywords

Tahafut al-Falasifa al-Ghazali argumentative criticism

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Ali Akhbar Abaib Mas Rabbani Lubis, Fathur Rozi

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Lubis, A. A. A. M. R. ., & Rozi, F. . (2020). RETHINKING THE BOOK OF TAHAFUT AL-FALASIFAH: Examining Al-Ghazali’s Argumentative Criticism Against the Thinking of Philosophers. Indonesian Journal of Interdisciplinary Islamic Studies (IJIIS), 4(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.20885/ijiis.vol4.iss1.art1
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Aini, Qurrotul. “Dissencting the Tahafut Al-Falasifah as the Critism of Ghazali Against the Muslim’s Philosopy.” Farabi 13, no. 1 (2016): 1–29.
  2. Al-Ghazali. Tahafut Al-Falasifa. Edited by Tahkik Sulaiman Dunya. Kairo: Dar al-Ma’arif, 1962.
  3. Al-Ghazali, Abu Hamid Muhammad bin Muhammad. Ihya’ Ulum Ad-Din. 1st ed. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr, 1995.
  4. Al-Ghazali, Imam. Kerancuan Filsafat (Tahafut Al-Falasifah). Edited by Translated by Achmad Maimun. Yogyakarta: Forum, 2015.
  5. Al-Jisr, Nadim. Qishshat Al-Iman. Beirut: Dar al-Andalus, 1963.
  6. Amien, M. Miska. “Kerangka Epistemologi Al-Ghazali.” Jurnal Filsafat 1, no. 1 (1993): 11–19.
  7. Atabik, Ahmad. “Telaah Pemikiran Al-Ghazali Tentang Filsafat.” Fikrah 2, no. 1 (2014): 19–40.
  8. Dougherty, M. V. “Ghazali and Metaphorical Predication in the Third Discussion of the Tahafut Al-Falasifa.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 82, no. 3 (2008): 391–409.
  9. Ess, Josef van. “Skepticism in Islamic Religious Thought.” In Kleine Scriften by Josef van Ess, edited by Hinrich Biesterfeldt, Volume 1. Leiden, Boston: Brill, 2018.
  10. ———. “The Logical Structure of Islamic Theology.” In Kleine Scriften by Josef van Ess, edited by Hinrich Biesterfeldt, 1st ed. Leiden, Boston: Brill, 2018.
  11. Giacaman, George, and Raja Bahlul. “Ghazali on Miracles and Necessary Connection.” Medival Philosophy and Theology 9, no. 1 (2000): 39–50.
  12. Halevi, Leor. “The Theologian’s Doubts: Natural Philosophy and the Skeptikal Games of Ghazali.” Journal of the History of Ideas 63, no. 1 (2002): 19–39.
  13. Hasan, Ali. “Al-Ghazali and Ibn Rushd (Averroes) on Creation and Divine Attributes.” In Models of God and Alternative Ultimate Realities, edited by Jeanine Diller and Asa Kasher. New York, London: Springer, 2013.
  14. Hesova, Ms. Zora. “Scheler and Ghazali: Explorations of the Finalty of Knowledge Between East and West.” Journal of Islamic and Civilization 1, no. 2 (2011): 89–102.
  15. Marmura, Michael E. “Ghazali and Demontrative Science.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 2, no. 2 (1965): 183–204.
  16. Marriola, Sulkowska. “‘argumentum Ad Hominem’ and New Methods of Philosophical Polemics.” In Rasionality Today: Challenges, Problems, Changes, edited by A. Kiepas and A. Noras. Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwerstetu Slaskiego, 2003.
  17. Mubarak, Zaky. Al-Akhlaq ’ind Al-Ghazali. Mesir: Dar al-Katib al-Araby al-Thaba’at al-Nasyr, 1968.
  18. Muhammad, Jamaluddin. “Pergulatan Intelektual Imam Ghazali Saturday.” BuntetPesantren.org, 2008.
  19. Muliati. “Al-Ghazali Dan Kritiknya Terhadap Filosof.” Jurnal Aqidah 2, no. 2 (2016): 77–86.
  20. Nasr, Seyyed Hossein. “The Qur’an and Hadith as Source and Inspiration of Islamic Philosophy.” In History of Islamic Philosophy, edited by Seyyed Hosein Nasr and Oliver Leaman. London, New York: Routledge, 2008.
  21. Nur, Muhammad. “Islam Dan Logika Menurut Pemikiran Abu Hamid Al-Ghazali.” Jurnal Al-Ulum 11, no. 1 (2011): 47–62.
  22. Poedjawijatna, I. R. Tahu Dan Pengetahuan. Jakarta: Bina Aksara, 1983.
  23. Qardhawi, Yusuf. Al-Ghazali Antara Pro Dan Kontra. Edited by Translated by Abrori and Hasan. Surabaya: Pustaka Progresif, 1996.
  24. Sabirin. “Kritik Nalar Al-Ghazali Dalam Sengkarut Filsafat Islam.” El-Ihkam 8, no. 1 (2015): 89–110.
  25. Tamer, George. “Revelation, Sciences and Symbolism Al-Ghazali’s Jawahir Al-Qur’an.” In Islam and Rasionality: The Impact of Al-Ghazali: Paper Collected on His 900th, edited by Georges Tamer. Leiden, Boston: Brill, 2015.
  26. Zar, Sirajuddin. Filsafat Islam, Filosof Dan Filsafatnya. Jakarta: PT. Raja Graindo Persada, 2004.