Article Sidebar

Vol. 5, No. 2, March 2022
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 116 Download : 77

Main Article Content

Abstract

Economic activity in the information technology era does not only occur in the real world but also in cyberspace. There are so many things that can be done in cyberspace that can bring economic benefits, for example ownership of a youtube channel, web hosting, google adsense, crypto and so on. This fact raises the problem of joint property in the family. Can the acquisition of property through the economic activity of husband and wife in cyberspace during the marriage period be included as joint property that must be divided when the marriage breaks up? This problem needs to be studied sociologically and normatively. This sociological study is intended to find an explanation of how the process of creating economic institutions in cyberspace uses Michael Heim's theory of the characteristics of cyberspace and Peter L. Berger's dialectical theory of society formation. Normatively, the problem of joint property in the cyber era is analyzed using Islamic legal norms, positive law, and customary law. The data is taken from searching documents on the internet and other documents such as journals and books that discuss human activities in the cyber era. These data were then analyzed using the sociological and normative perspectives above. Sociologically, the character of the cyber world in the form of simulation, interaction, artificiality, immersion, telepresence, and networked communications makes people choose economic activities using the internet, because of the convenience it provides. This activity occurs through a dialectical process of externalization, objectivation and internalization that makes the cyber world economic order sustainable. Normatively, the assets produced by a husband and/or wife through their economic activities in the cyber world during a marriage can be included in the category of joint property which must be divided in two when the marriage breaks up.

Keywords

joint property cyber era sociological-normative analysis

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

References

  1. Coltrane, Scott L. and Randall Collins. Sociology of Marriage and the Family: Gender, Love, and Property, 5th edition (Belmont, CA: Cengage Learning, 2000), 30.
  2. Djuniarti, Evi. "Joint property Law Reviewed from the Perspective of Marriage Law and Civil Code," Journal of Legal Research De Jure 17, no. 4 (December 15, 2017): 445, https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2017.V17.445-461.
  3. Firdawaty, Linda. "Philosophy of Sharing Joint Property," ASAS 8, no. 1 (2016): 88, https://doi.org/10.24042/asas.v8i1.1227.
  4. Hadikusuma, Hilman. Introduction to Indonesian Customary Law Revision Edition. Bandung: CV. Mandar Maju, 2014.
  5. Al-Jaziri, Abdurraman. Al-Fiqh alā Madzāhib Al-Arba'ah Mujallad 3. Cairo: Daar Ibn Jauzi.
  6. Judiasih, Sonny Dewi. Marital Property: A Study of Equal Rights and Position of Husbands and Wives on Property Ownership in Marriage. PT. Refika Aditama, 2015.
  7. Kurniawan, Muhamad Beni. "Division of Joint Property Reviewed From the Amount of Husband and Wife Contribution in Marriage," Judicial Journal 11, no. 1 (April 26, 2018): 41, https://doi.org/10.29123/jy.v11i1.224.
  8. Maspeke, Arifah S. and Akhmad Khisni. "The Position of Joint property in Marriage According to Indonesian Positive Fiqh and Law And Religious Court Decision Practice," Khaira Ummah Law Journal 12, no. 2 (June 15, 2017): 173.
  9. Muttaqin, Husnul. "Urgency of Reform of Cyberspace Era Fikih, in the Journal of Islamic Law Kopertais Region IV Surabaya, Vol. 1 No. 1 March 2009.
  10. Nuzula, Nikmatun. "Division of Joint property Due to Divorce in Kediri Religious Court," Mahakim: Journal of Islamic Family Law 1, no. 1 (January 4, 2017): 27, https://doi.org/10.30762/mh.v1i1.1009.
  11. Piliang, Yasraf Amir. "A Mayan Universe: Fantasy Imperialism and the Death of Reality, in mark Slouka's introduction, Lost Space, The Humanist View of a Troubling Cyberspace Culture, is buffeted. Zulfahmi Andri. Bandung: Mizan, 1999.
  12. Prasetyo, Hoedi and Wahyudi Sutopo. "Industry 4.0: Study the Classification of Aspects and Direction of Research Development," Undip J@ti: Journal of Industrial Engineering 13, no. 1 (March 31, 2018): 17–18, https://doi.org/10.14710/jati.13.1.17-26.
  13. Sābiq, Sayyid. Fiqhu al Sunnah, volume 3. Beirut: Al-asriyah, tt..
  14. Sugiawati, Besse. 'Conception of The Joint property of the Perspective of Islamic Law, The Code of Civil Law and Customary Law', in the journal Perspective, Vol. 19, No. 3, September 2014, 205.
  15. BIP Team, Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage, Bhuana Popular Science, 2017.
  16. Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage.
  17. VIVA, "5 Most Expensive Domains in the World, Some Cost Trillions - VIVA," Viva.Co.Id, August 14, 2018, https://www.viva.co.id/digital/teknopedia/1064805-5-domain-termahal-di-dunia-ada-yang-harganya-triliunan.
  18. Widiana, Revelation. Review of Islamic Fiqh Against Religious Court Decisions in Joint Property Cases, Jakarta: Directorate of Development of islamic Religious Justice Agency, 2004.
  19. Wignjodipoero, Soerojo. Introduction and Principles of Customary Law. Jakarta: PT. Gunung Agung Store, 1995.
  20. Wijayanti, Winda. "Wife's Position in The Division of Joint Property Due to Marriage Break-Up Due to Divorce Related to Bank Secrecy," Journal of the Constitution 10, no. 4 (May 20, 2016): 709, https://doi.org/10.31078/jk%x.
  21. Zubaidi, Zaiyad. "The Problem of Sharing Joint property in Samalanga-Bireuen," JURNAL AL-IJTIMAIYYAH 5, no. 2 (Oktober 9, 2019): 55, https://doi.org/10.22373/al-ijtimaiyyah.v5i2.4779.
  22. Al-Zuhaily, Wahbah. Fiqh Islam wa Adillatuhu, volume 5. Jakarta: Gema Insani, 2011.